Non-crop Habitats Research Articles

Landscape context affects patch habitat contributions to biodiversity in agroecosystems

AbstractEffective conservation schemes are needed to advance the dual objectives of biodiversity conservation and agronomic production in agricultural landscapes. Understanding how plant and arthropod taxa respond to both local habitat patch characteristics and landscape complexity is crucial for planning effective agri‐environment schemes. This study investigated the relative effects of local variables (plant and insect diversity ≤100 m from patch habitat center) and landscape variables (landscape composition and configuration metrics ≤5 km from patch habitat center) on the diversity of plants and arthropods within noncrop habitat patches (1) at different spatial extents ranging from 0.1 to 5 km, while (2) quantifying differential effects of local and landscape variables on particular components of diversity (i.e., species richness and abundance), and accounting for (3) particular components of landscape extent (0.1‐, 0.5‐, 1‐, 2‐, and 5‐km radii) and complexity (i.e., landscape composition and configuration). Landscape variables were significantly correlated with local plant and arthropod species richness and abundance at all spatial extents. Biodiversity responses to landscape variables were largely scale‐dependent, as pairwise comparisons were significantly different between all spatial extents except between 1‐ and 2‐km extents, and correlations were lowest at the 5‐km extent. Partial R2 values for predicting local biodiversity were highest when both local and landscape variables were included as predictors of species richness and abundance, increasing from 0.163 to 0.469 when landscape variables were included, underscoring the importance of considering both local and landscape effects on local diversity. Landscape configuration variables accounted for more variation in plant and arthropod species richness than composition variables. However, models performed best when composition and configuration were considered together rather than alone, suggesting that both components of landscape complexity should be considered for identifying and managing conservation areas in crop fields. Existing conservation schemes that incentivize farmers to create or conserve seminatural patch habitat within crop fields may be more effective when combined with landscape‐scale designs that enhance landscape complexity across the Northern Great Plains. Local conservation efforts should be coordinated with landscape‐level efforts to ultimately enhance biodiversity and desired ecosystem service outcomes across agricultural landscapes.

Quantifying farm sustainability through the lens of ecological theory.

The achievements of the Green Revolution in meeting the nutritional needs of a growing global population have been won at the expense of unintended consequences for the environment. Some of these negative impacts are now threatening the sustainability of food production through the loss of pollinators and natural enemies of crop pests, the evolution of pesticide resistance, declining soil health and vulnerability to climate change. In the search for farming systems that are sustainable both agronomically and environmentally, alternative approaches have been proposed variously called 'agroecological', 'conservation agriculture', 'regenerative' and 'sustainable intensification'. While the widespread recognition of the need for more sustainable farming is to be welcomed, this has created etymological confusion that has the potential to become a barrier to transformation. There is a need, therefore, for objective criteria to evaluate alternative farming systems and to quantify farm sustainability against multiple outcomes. To help meet this challenge, we reviewed the ecological theories that explain variance in regulating and supporting ecosystem services delivered by biological communities in farmland to identify guiding principles for management change. For each theory, we identified associated system metrics that could be used as proxies for agroecosystem function. We identified five principles derived from ecological theory: (i) provide key habitats for ecosystem service providers; (ii) increase crop and non-crop habitat diversity; (iii) increase edge density: (iv) increase nutrient-use efficiency; and (v) avoid extremes of disturbance. By making published knowledge the foundation of the choice of associated metrics, our aim was to establish a broad consensus for their use in sustainability assessment frameworks. Further analysis of their association with farm-scale data on biological communities and/or ecosystem service delivery would provide additional validation for their selection and support for the underpinning theories.

Leveraging satellite observations to reveal ecological drivers of pest densities across landscapes

Landscape ecologists have long suggested that pest abundances increase in simplified, monoculture landscapes. However, tests of this theory often fail to predict pest population sizes in real-world agricultural fields. These failures may arise not only from variation in pest ecology, but also from the widespread use of categorical land-use maps that do not adequately characterize habitat-availability for pests. We used 1163 field-year observations of Lygus hesperus (Western Tarnished Plant Bug) densities in California cotton fields to determine whether integrating remotely-sensed metrics of vegetation productivity and phenology into pest models could improve pest abundance analysis and prediction. Because L. hesperus often overwinters in non-crop vegetation, we predicted that pest abundances would peak on farms surrounded by more non-crop vegetation, especially when the non-crop vegetation is initially productive but then dries down early in the year, causing the pest to disperse into cotton fields. We found that the effect of non-crop habitat on pest densities varied across latitudes, with a positive relationship in the north and a negative one in the south. Aligning with our hypotheses, models predicted that L. hesperus densities were 35 times higher on farms surrounded by high versus low productivity non-crop vegetation (EVI area 350 vs. 50) and 2.8 times higher when dormancy occurred earlier versus later in the year (May 15 vs. June 30). Despite these strong and significant effects, we found that integrating these remote-sensing variables into land-use models only marginally improved pest density predictions in cotton compared to models with categorical land cover metrics alone. Together, our work suggests that the remote sensing variables analyzed here can advance our understanding of pest ecology, but not yet substantively increase the accuracy of pest abundance predictions.

Distance functions of carabids in crop fields depend on functional traits, crop type and adjacent habitat: a synthesis.

Natural pest and weed regulation are essential for agricultural production, but the spatial distribution of natural enemies within crop fields and its drivers are mostly unknown. Using 28 datasets comprising 1204 study sites across eight Western and Central European countries, we performed a quantitative synthesis of carabid richness, activity densities and functional traits in relation to field edges (i.e. distance functions). We show that distance functions of carabids strongly depend on carabid functional traits, crop type and, to a lesser extent, adjacent non-crop habitats. Richness of both carnivores and granivores, and activity densities of small and granivorous species decreased towards field interiors, whereas the densities of large species increased. We found strong distance decays in maize and vegetables whereas richness and densities remained more stable in cereals, oilseed crops and legumes. We conclude that carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes are driven by the complex interplay of crop types, adjacent non-crop habitats and further landscape parameters with great potential for targeted agroecological management. In particular, our synthesis indicates that a higher edge-interior ratio can counter the distance decay of carabid richness per field and thus likely benefits natural pest and weed regulation, hence contributing to agricultural sustainability.

Cropland can support high bird diversity in heterogeneous rural tropical landscapes

Summary Land-use change for crop production is one of the key drivers of habitat loss and fragmentation and consequently biodiversity loss and change in tropical regions. This may impact biodiversity-regulated ecosystem services; birds are important to crop health regulating services (e.g. seed dispersal, pest control) and disservices (e.g. seed predation, grain herbivory). However, knowledge is limited on how birds use heterogeneous agricultural landscapes and the consequences for spatial distribution and flow of services and disservices. We studied crop and non-crop–habitat associations of birds in forest–agricultural landscapes of the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania. We focused on dietary preference as a key trait impacting bird responses to land-use change, services, and disservices to crops. We surveyed birds across four main habitat types using repeated point counts, recording a total of 148 species. We found that crop habitats supported higher species richness and larger communities of potentially beneficial species to crop health, whereby 34.5% of invertebrate-feeding species were recorded in cropland. We found that habitat heterogeneity within the landscape supports bird functional diversity and that each habitat type supported unique communities of species. Furthermore, the number of species unique to forest habitats increased with increasing forest canopy closure. Our findings suggest that management strategies for maintaining trees and shrubs, and enhancing tree cover within the crop production landscape, can be effective approaches for maintaining bird diversity and services. However, in-depth studies on trade-offs with disservices need further exploration to mitigate negative impacts of birds on crop yields.

Both class- and landscape-level patterns influence crop yield

Under global climate change, we can adjust landscape patterns to mitigate the effects of climate factors on crop yield. Field and landscape-scale research suggests that increased land cover diversity and non-crop habitats can improve crop yield, but little is known on the effects of patch area and shape of one type of land use (i.e., class-level) and spatial patterns (aggregation, fragmentation, and heterogeneity) of surrounding multiple land-use classes (i.e. landscape-level) on crop yield. We evaluated the relationship between 375 landscape metrics at both class- and landscape-levels, 120 climate variables, and the crop yields of maize, rice, and wheat in China from years 2000–2015 at national and sub-climatic zone scales. Our results suggest that both class- and landscape-level patterns were the main drivers, contributing averagely 12% of the variations in crop yields. Specifically at national scale, crop yield in cropland with forest cover (>27%) was increased by 169% than where without forest cover. Shape complexity in forest and cropland patches, aggregation degree, and spatial complexity of land cover types were more closely associated with crop yield (accounting for 2–73% of the variations in crop yield at sub-climatic zones) than landscape diversity (<2%), mainly owing to their mediating effects on the relationship between climate factors and crop yield. Not all non-crop habitats are beneficial to crop yield, and forest patches with a suitable area and shape complexity perform best. Our findings suggest that the regulation of both class- and landscape-level patterns may be an alternative way to improve crop yield, rather than only enhancing land-cover diversity or increasing the area of non-crop habitats.

Field edge flower plantings have variable effects on wild bee abundance, richness, nesting success, and crop pollination, independent of the surrounding landscape

To mitigate the effects of habitat loss on bee conservation and crop pollination, farmers are encouraged to plant flowers along the edges of crop fields. However, it is unclear where and to what degree these flower plantings are effective. Recent studies suggest that flower plantings may be less effective if they are established in landscapes with either very low or very high amounts of non-crop habitat. Moreover, while field edge flower plantings often increase the abundance and richness of bees in field edges, it is unclear whether this improves crop pollination or bee nesting success, which could increase bee populations over time. In this study we examined how field edge flower plantings and the landscape context in which they are established affect wild bee conservation and crop pollination. Across two years we established flower plantings of 0.1–0.5 ha along the edges of 17 of 34 commercial cucumber fields arranged across a gradient of landscape complexity. We then measured wild bee abundance, richness, and crop pollination in and around cucumber fields with and without plantings and assessed the nesting success of stem-nesting bees. We found that both field edge flowers and landscape-scale non-crop habitat had independent, positive effects on bee abundance, richness, nesting, or crop pollination in one of the two years of the study, and that the effects of field edge flowers on bees and crop pollination were not influenced by the surrounding landscape. We also found that managing field edges in a way that maintains naturally-occurring flowers may matter as much or more than flower plantings for short-term increases in bee abundance and richness. However, certain species of planted flowers might be associated with improved bee nesting success, an outcome important for both bee conservation and sustained crop pollination.

Effect of agricultural landscape pattern on the qualitative food web of epigaeic arthropods in low hilly areas of northern China

Under the macro background of global change and sustainable development, the sustainable and healthy development of agricultural landscapes is crucial for human well-being. Formulating targeted protection measures based on biodiversity conservation is currently a hot topic and challenge. Our study focused on Jianping County, a typical hilly area in northern China, to understand the impact of regional agricultural landscape patterns on qualitative food webs. We calculated food web parameters by constructing predator-pest qualitative food web matrices and compared the differences in food web structure characteristics under different agricultural landscape patterns. By using function regression method, we established landscape indices and food web parameter models. The results showed that the average number and community structure of predatory natural enemies and pests varied across different agricultural landscape patterns, but the common groups were similar. Maintaining a proportion of 30–40 % non-crop habitats is optimal for the stability of qualitative food webs. Different landscape elements have varying regulatory effects on the structure of qualitative food webs, and the food web parameter model can explain these effects more directly. Specifically, the Landscape Shape Index (LSI) is significantly positively correlated with Generality (G), while the Contagion Index (CONTAG) is significantly negatively correlated with vulnerability (V). We propose that in low hilly areas, where non-crop diversity is the primary source of heterogeneity, promoting measures for non-crop habitats through landscape planning will help maintain the richness of epigaeic arthropods and the stability of qualitative food webs. This research is of great significance in promoting ecological control and sustainable development of agroecosystems in low hilly areas.

Inter-Row Management and Clay Content Influence Acari and Collembola Abundances in Vineyards

Viticulture is a perennial cropping system that provides large inter-row space as a non-crop habitat for a range of different taxa. Extensive vegetation management has been shown to increase biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in vineyards. Important soil ecosystem services are decomposition, nutrient cycling, and pest regulation provided by the mesofauna (e.g., Acari and Collembola). However, studies investigating the effects of inter-row management on soil mesofauna are scarce. We studied the effect of inter-row management intensity (complete vegetation cover, alternating vegetation cover, and bare ground) and local pedoclimatic conditions on Acari and Collembola in nine Austrian vineyards. Our results showed that the clay content of the soil was the most important factor and increased the abundances of both analyzed taxa. Complete and alternating vegetation cover increased their abundance in comparison to bare ground management. Higher soil respiration slightly contributed to higher abundances of those two taxa in both years. In conclusion, besides the positive effects of the clay content in the soil, complete and alternating vegetation cover are feasible management practices for increasing soil mesofauna in vineyards.

Ecologically-Informed Precision Conservation: A framework for increasing biodiversity in intensively managed agricultural landscapes with minimal sacrifice in crop production

Conservation actions are urgently needed to tackle biodiversity loss in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Production lands are usually heterogeneous and contain low-yield areas that can be set aside for biodiversity conservation without serious yield losses. Here, we introduce Ecologically-Informed Precision Conservation, a framework that integrates yield mapping and ecological theory to select the best areas to create new set-asides while ensuring high crop yields at the farm/landscape level. Long-term yield maps can be generated using globally available satellite data and basic information on field/farm crop yield from farmers. Ecological principles are then used to select the subset of areas with the highest potential for biodiversity conservation by prioritising those that increase connectivity, maximise habitat heterogeneity and decrease landscape grain size. The created non-crop habitats can be permanent and thus ensure biodiversity support over time. In addition, agricultural management efficiency can be enhanced by improving field shapes. The framework provides the basis for a practical, user-friendly tool that informs all interested stakeholders on how to rationalise existing agricultural landscapes using already-existing farming systems and available technologies. High cost-effectiveness from an economic and conservation perspective, along with the creation of heterogeneous non-crop habitats, make our framework a promising solution to re-design agricultural landscapes.

Ecological refugia enhance biodiversity and crop production in dryland grain production systems

Meeting global food demand while reducing biodiversity loss will require strategies that quantify and minimize conservation and production tradeoffs in agroecosystems. Ecological refugia (non-crop habitat patches) were identified in three dryland grain production systems in the Northern Great Plains and assessed for their capacity to enhance biodiversity, crop yield, and crop quality. A radial design of six 100–200 meter transects originating from the refugia and extending into crop fields was used to assess trends in plant and arthropod diversity with increasing distance from the refuge center. Plant species diversity significantly declined with distance from established refugia into crop fields in all years sampled and from a newly established refuge by the third year of data collection. Arthropod taxon diversity declined significantly with distance from refugia on two organic farms but not on a conventional farm. Fields with a refuge hosted a higher abundance of arthropods belonging to Coleoptera than fields without a refuge. Distance from refuge was the most important variable explaining grain yield and grain quality in a random forest model. Yield significantly declined with distance from refugia while grain nutritional quality, based on protein content, iron concentration, and polyphenol concentration, significantly increased with distance from refugia. Overall, ecological refugia enhanced farmland biodiversity and provided tradeoffs for marketable crop production. Moving forward, ecological refugia could serve as a multi-objective conservation practice to integrate food production and conservation goals in agroecosystems.

Living mulches reduce natural enemies when combined with frequent pesticide applications

Agricultural intensification with frequent pesticide applications often diminishes biological control services delivered by beneficial insects. However, re-integrating diverse and structurally complex non-crop habitat may mitigate negative effects by providing refugia to natural enemies, enabling rapid recolonization of pesticide-treated crops. This study examines the compatibility of chemical control with non-crop habitat management by manipulating pesticide treatments and living mulches between rows of zucchini crops in four replicated experiments across the Southeastern United States. The hypothesis was that living mulches and pesticide applications would each negatively impact pests and have interactive effects on predatory insects, with negative pesticide effects being attenuated in plots with untreated living mulches serving as refugia for predators between crop rows. Instead, combining living mulches with pesticide applications reduced natural enemy densities, relative to bare plots. Pesticide applications had no effect on spotted and striped cucumber beetle pests, while living mulches directly reduced them by 25%. Conversely, pesticide applications reduced squash bug pressure by 50%, while living mulches had no effect. Although crops were grown in plastic mulch to protect them from competition, living mulches reduced zucchini yields by 54% at sites where living mulches were less-managed. Alternatively, living mulches had more neutral effects on yields at sites where mulches were mowed monthly, suggesting that living mulches require management to minimize competition with crops. These results suggest that the grass-dominated living mulches tested in this study did little to harmonize chemical and biological control. While non-crop plant diversity has clear benefits for natural pest suppression in many systems, these benefits cannot be generalized across all plant and insect taxa. Future efforts to fine-tune management of non-crop habitat within fields will be strengthened by consideration of traits of key pests and their specific responses to both pesticide applications and plant diversity.

Salivary protein expression profiles of five species of Pentatomidae (Hemiptera)

Abstract Stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) development typically requires feeding on a diversity of plant species and various plant tissues. During feeding, stink bugs discharge salivary enzymes with roles in extraoral digestion and countering plant defense responses. Although previous research has described digestive salivary proteins from stink bugs, less is known of the salivary proteins involved in the suppression of plant defenses. We sequenced the transcriptomes of salivary glands dissected from five stink bug species collected from non-crop habitats in Washington: Halyomorpha halys (Stål), Nezara viridula L., Euschistus conspersus (Uhler), Thyanta pallidovirens (Stål), and Chlorochroa ligata (Say). We identified a total of 677 candidate secreted proteins from the salivary glands of the five species. Based on work from other insects, many of the proteins have potential functions in the suppression of plant defense signaling and deactivation of plant defense molecules. We also identified salivary proteins with potential roles in the extraoral digestion of plant tissues, protection from entomopathogens, and deposition of salivary sheaths. This report provides a curation of putative salivary effector genes for further functional analysis.

Passive monitoring of avian habitat on working lands.

Intensive agricultural landscapes are a challenge for wildlife managers, policy makers, and landowners hoping to increase the diversity of desired wildlife species, such as grassland birds, which require urgent conservation action. In intensive agricultural landscapes, like those of the midwestern USA, most land area is privately owned and operated and managed primarily for production. Conducting ecological research in intensive agricultural landscapes thus requires collaborative approaches aimed at farm owners and operators. Recent advances in acoustic data collection and high-resolution habitat mapping, including low-cost acoustic recorders and satellite remote sensing, may be well positioned to address this challenge by enabling expanded assessments and monitoring of wildlife populations and habitats across regions. This study examined fine grain habitat characteristics and their relationship with avian biodiversity in intensive agricultural landscapes at 44 agricultural sites across Iowa, USA. Passive acoustic monitoring and manual identification of bird species allowed for measurement of vocalizing bird richness. High resolution mapping of noncrop vegetation provided detailed information on small noncrop vegetation habitat complexes within row-crop agriculture. Measures of image texture provided characterizations of compositional heterogeneity within noncrop vegetation. General linear Poisson modeling demonstrated robust associations between noncrop vegetation and vocalizing bird richness, yet variation in grassland bird richness was not well predicted by noncrop vegetation. Noncrop vegetation texture demonstrated potential as a predictor of vocalizing bird richness, though not better than or when combined with noncrop vegetated area, indicating it may not be an independent measure of habitat quality. Passive acoustic monitoring resulted in useful data at 44 out of 60 originally selected sites, with some lost to failed recorders and/or collaboration issues. Challenges remain in detecting habitat characteristics that promote grassland birds in row crop landscapes. Working toward probabilistic research design across privately owned working landscapes and incorporating more detailed management practice information would improve the transferability of this approach to farmland management and policy.

Within-field crop diversity and landscape complexity decrease the abundance of fall armyworm larvae in maize cropping systems

The composition and spatial arrangement of multiple crop and non-crop habitats at a field and landscape levels have the potential to modify the abundance and structure of arthropod communities. In particular, semi-natural habitats can provide important life support functions to a range of natural enemies of agricultural pests. How such traits might affect generalist predators has poorly been considered in complex landscapes dominated by intercropping and trees within a mosaic of small-scale agricultural plots in Africa. The objective of the present study was to test the hypothesis that crop diversity and landscape complexity in maize cropping systems decrease the abundance of crop pests through natural regulation by generalist predators. For this purpose, we monitored the fall armyworm abundance and predation of sentinel larvae by predatory ants across a set of maize fields with contrasted within-field crop diversity and abundance of semi-natural vegetation including trees and shrubs in their surrounding landscape. A negative effect of crop diversity and landscape complexity on FAW abundance, and a species-specific effect on ant abundance, were observed. However, no significant effect of ant abundance or predation on FAW abundance was observed, suggesting that habitat complexity by itself or other natural enemy communities such as parasitoids could play a complementary role to explain FAW abundance in maize crops.

Effect of Distance from Wetland Borders on Hymenopteran Wasps and Spider Abundance in Maize-soybean Cropping System

The non-crop habitats within agroecosystems are important resources for ecological and biological insect pest management. Diversified cropping systems are known to influence pests populations, however, how neighboring habitats to the agricultural fields affect insect pest natural enemies population dynamics is not clear. This study focused on understanding the influence of wetland borders on Hymenoptera wasps and predatory spider prevalence in a maize-soybean intercrop system. The Hymenoptera wasps and spiders population estimates were carried out in twelve farmers’ fields stratified within 0-300 and 500-1100 meters from the wetland borders. Data were collected once a week starting one week from the emergence of maize and soybean plants until post-flower growth of the two crops. Results showed crop fields within 0-300 meters from the wetland borders had significantly higher numbers of wasps and spiders, while crop fields set up at 500-1100 meters from the wetland borders, the population of Hymenoptera wasps and spiders was significantly reduced. The findings of this study indicate that stable habitats such as wetland borders harbour higher numbers of natural enemies of crop pests and crop fields at close proximity benefit from quick migration of natural enemies from the pool in stable habitats. These findings can be used to design field architectures such as field margins or borders that can support insect pest natural enemies survival and migration into crop fields.

Local scale crop compositional heterogeneity suppresses the abundance of a major lepidopteran pest of cruciferous vegetables

Previous studies have recommended preserving semi-natural habitats as a strategy to promote natural enemies and reduce the abundance of agricultural pests. Such non-crop habitats, however, may increase pest abundance, causing spillover from non-crop to crop fields. A potentially more economical and attractive solution for farmers might arise if crop fields were themselves designed to aid in pest control. As part of such a strategy, we examined whether increasing crop compositional heterogeneity (i.e. the number of crop types and their evenness) and crop configurational heterogeneity (i.e. field margin length) could reduce the abundance of Pieris canidia, a major agricultural pest butterfly in several Asian countries. Adult females of P. canidia lay their eggs on cruciferous vegetables (Brassicaceae), and the emerging larvae consume the leaf tissue, causing crop damage. We surveyed adult P. canidia across 52 farmlands in south China when their abundance was at a peak in spring (April to May). Our results showed that the percentage of cruciferous crops (cabbage, oilseed rape, and pak choi) at the 100 m radius local scale was strongly positively associated with P. canidia abundance. However, crop compositional heterogeneity, also at the local scale, significantly reduced the abundance of P. canidia. Field margin type, categorized by the spatial coexistence of the most dominant cover types (sugarcane, corn, vegetables, including crucifers, and weedy vegetation), was also an important explanatory variable, with weedy patches, usually consisting of fallow cropfields adjacent to the field margins, having the highest pest abundance. These results suggest that to control pest attack by P. canidia on cruciferous vegetables, increasing crop compositional heterogeneity could be a more effective strategy than increasing configurational heterogeneity or the amount of non-crop habitat. However, research measuring crop damage by larval butterflies is necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

Assessing the role of invasive weeds in the impact of successional habitats on the bird assemblage in overgrowing agriculture

Agricultural habitats are assumed to be biodiversity refuges. However, some studies treat agricultural land management as a cause of the biodiversity decline, to which habitat loss and heterogeneity may contribute. Between the crops, the successional habitats appear – ruderal plant communities and bush areas. Their influence on farmland biodiversity is unknown. This research assessed the impact of spatial relationships between agricultural areas, semi-natural meadows and successional habitats on the bird species richness, Shannon diversity index, and Faith’s phylogenetic diversity index. An additional habitat variable was the presence of weeds, i.e., invasive Caucasian hogweeds Heracleum sp., treated as crops in the past. The birds and habitats research was on 74 sites set in pairs (invaded vs control) in south-eastern Poland. Results showed that birds assembling in agricultural and semi-natural areas were more diverse and contained protected farmland species, while birds appearing in overgrown habitats (i.e., successional and invaded) were clumped with their habitat requirements. In the presence of plant invaders, ruderal habitats negatively affected the bird phylogenetic diversity index. In invaded sites, bush areas had no positive effects on the Shannon diversity index and species richness of birds, in contrast with control sites. The presented research suggests the need to re-evaluate the importance of successional non-crop habitats considered positive in agricultural landscapes if those habitats develop in areas with plant invasion.

Continent-wide evidence that landscape context can mediate the effects of local habitats on in-field abundance of pests and natural enemies.

Landscape-scale factors known to influence in-field abundance of pest herbivores and their natural enemies, but little is known about effects that operate through the shorter-range influences exerted by habitats immediately adjacent to crop fields.This study first compared the abundance of brassica insect pests and their natural enemy arthropods in 24 spatially independent brassica vegetable fields across southern Australia. An 'edge effect' index was used to compare the abundance of each taxon in the field center with abundance in areas of the crop adjacent to differing habitats. Then, three landscape properties: landscape composition, edge density, and connectivity of diverse crop and non-crop habitats were analyzed at five scales up to 5km from these focal field centers to assess longer-range influences on arthropod abundances in field centers and on the edge effects.Edge effect of adjacent woody vegetation promoted ladybirds and reduced diamondback moth and whiteflies. Conversely, the presence of crops and pastures immediately adjacent to focal crop fields reduced whiteflies and aphids but with no effect on natural enemies.Effect of landscape composition and connectivity on arthropod abundance at field center found promotion of aphids (cabbage aphid and green peach aphid) by woodland in the landscape.Effect of landscape properties on the edge effects of adjacent habitats was contrasting; strengthened (landscape composition and edge density on edge effect of crops, pasture and woody vegetation in reducing diamondback moth and whiteflies) as well as weakened (edge density and landscape connectivity on edge effect of crops, pasture and woody vegetation in reducing diamondback moth on diamondback moth, whiteflies and aphids, and promoting ladybirds). Synthesis and applications: Findings of this geographically extensive study help define the level of pest risk associated with sites as well as suggest potential interventions such as establishment or restorations of woody vegetation adjacent to crop fields that could reduce risk.

Biological control of the stink bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) by two parasitoids and their interaction in non-crop habitats: a simulation model.

Non-cultivated areas are resting, overwintering, feeding, and/or reproducing habitats for insects, and also places from where crop areas are colonized; thus, they are essential for understanding the biological control programs in agroecosystems. We developed a simulation model for a non-cultivated area of Buenos Aires province (Argentina), and we analyzed the control of Nezara viridula achieved by the action of two parasitoids: the oophagous Trissolcus basalis and the tachinid Trichopoda giacomellii, which attack older nymphs and adults. The model is a discrete time, deterministic, phenomenological, spatially homogeneous with a 1-week time interval simulation model, based on the age-structure and/or stage-structure of N. viridula and its two parasitoids. The host-parasitoid interactions were combined with a degree-day model affecting development times of T. giacomellii pupae and T. basalis pre-imaginal stages. The simultaneous attack of both parasitoid species enables the persistence of the system at low host densities, mediated by the functional response of the parasitoids, identified as population regulation factors. However, if only one parasitoid exists (i.e., only T. basalis or only T. giacomellii) the interaction N. viridula-parasitoid persisted but at higher density of N. viridula. These results explain the successful biological control of N. viridula after the introduction of T. basalis in the 1980s, when T. giacomellii was the only parasitoid present, unable to control N. viridula. Our model shows an indirect competition when both parasitoids are present: the attack of one of them diminished the potential number of hosts available to the other parasitoid species. In the field this interaction is obscured by the hibernation period which acted as a reset mechanism affecting the density and age/stage structure of all three populations. Our model was supported by field observations, and never exhibited the extinction of any of the parasitoids from the interaction.