Nonclinical Safety Research Articles

Non-clinical safety evaluation and risk assessment to human of aleglitazar, a dual PPAR α/γ agonist, and its major human metabolite

The non-clinical safety profile of aleglitazar, a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist, and its major human metabolite M6 was studied in a complete package consisting of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics characterization, safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, repeat dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity studies. These studies identified the following main targets similar to other PPAR agonists: red blood cell parameters, liver, heart, kidney, ovaries, testes, bone marrow, adipose tissue, and fluid accumulation. Additionally, and in the 12-month monkey study only, an increased incidence of generalized hair loss/thinning was observed in all groups including controls. In the rat carcinogenicity study there was no statistically significant increase in tumors. In the mouse carcinogenicity study, there was an increased incidence of angiomatous tumors and there were three males with gallbladder adenoma. No relevant compound-related effects were observed in safety pharmacology, genotoxicity, and a 28-day immunotoxicity rat study. Effects observed in reproductive toxicity studies were similar to those known for other PPARγ agonists. Separate studies with the human metabolite M6 did not reveal findings that would prevent human dosing. Overall, the results from the non-clinical safety studies conducted with aleglitazar and the human metabolite M6 were considered to support the clinical Phase 3 program.

Nonclinical Profile of BLZ-100, a Tumor-Targeting Fluorescent Imaging Agent.

BLZ-100 is a single intravenous use, fluorescent imaging agent that labels tumor tissue to enable more complete and precise surgical resection. It is composed of a chlorotoxin peptide covalently bound to the near-infrared fluorophore indocyanine green. BLZ-100 is in clinical development for intraoperative visualization of human tumors. The nonclinical safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BLZ-100 was evaluated in mice, rats, canines, and nonhuman primates (NHP). Single bolus intravenous administration of BLZ-100 was well tolerated, and no adverse changes were observed in cardiovascular safety pharmacology, PK, and toxicology studies in rats and NHP. The single-dose no-observed-adverse-effect-levels (NOAELs) were 7 mg (28 mg/kg) in rats and 60 mg (20 mg/kg) in NHP, corresponding to peak concentration values of 89 400 and 436 000 ng/mL and area-under-the-curve exposure values of 130 000 and 1 240 000 h·ng/mL, respectively. Based on a human imaging dose of 3 mg, dose safety margins are >100 for rat and monkey. BLZ-100 produced hypersensitivity reactions in canine imaging studies (lethargy, pruritus, swollen muzzle, etc). The severity of the reactions was not dose related. In a follow-up study in dogs, plasma histamine concentrations were increased 5 to 60 minutes after BLZ-100 injection; this coincided with signs of hypersensitivity, supporting the conclusion that the reactions were histamine based. Hypersensitivity reactions were not observed in other species or in BLZ-100 human clinical studies conducted to date. The combined imaging, safety pharmacology, PK, and toxicology studies contributed to an extensive initial nonclinical profile for BLZ-100, supporting first-in-human clinical trials.

From the Cover: The Minipig is a Suitable Non-Rodent Model in the Safety Assessment of Single Stranded Oligonucleotides.

Non-human primates (NHPs) are currently considered to be the non-rodent species of choice for the preclinical safety assessment of single-stranded oligonucleotide (SSO) drugs. We evaluated minipigs as a potential alternative to NHPs to test the safety of this class of compounds. Four different phosphorothioated locked nucleic acid-based SSOs (3 antisense and 1 anti-miR), all with known safety profiles, were administered to minipigs using similar study designs and read-outs as in earlier NHP studies with the same compounds. The studies included toxicokinetic investigations, in-life monitoring, clinical and anatomic pathology. In the minipig, we demonstrated target engagement by the SSOs where relevant, and a similar toxicokinetic behavior in plasma, kidney, and liver when compared with NHPs. Clinical tolerability was similar between minipig and NHPs. For the first time, we showed similar and dose-dependent effects on the coagulation and complement cascade after intravenous dosing similar to those observed in NHPs. Similar to NHPs, morphological changes were seen in proximal tubular epithelial cells of the kidney, Kupffer cells, hepatocytes, and lymph nodes. Minipigs appeared more sensitive to the high-dose kidney toxicity of most of the selected SSOs than NHPs. No new target organ or off-target toxicities were identified in the minipig. The minipig did not predict the clinical features of human injection site reactions better than the NHPs, but histopathological similarities were observed between minipigs and NHPs. We conclude that there is no impediment, as default, to the use of minipigs as the non-rodent species in SSO candidate non-clinical safety packages.

A Pre-Clinical Safety Evaluation of SBP (HBsAg-Binding Protein) Adjuvant for Hepatitis B Vaccine.

Although adjuvants are a common component of many vaccines, there are few adjuvants licensed for use in humans due to concerns about their toxic effects. There is a need to develop new and safe adjuvants, because some existing vaccines have low immunogenicity among certain patient groups. In this study, SBP, a hepatitis B surface antigen binding protein that was discovered through screening a human liver cDNA expression library, was introduced into hepatitis B vaccine. A good laboratory practice, non-clinical safety evaluation was performed to identify the side effects of both SBP and SBP-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine. The results indicate that SBP could enhance the HBsAg-specific immune response, thus increasing the protection provided by the hepatitis B vaccine. The safety data obtained here warrant further investigation of SBP as a vaccine adjuvant.

Pharmacological characterization of microminipig as a model to assess the drug-induced cardiovascular responses for non-clinical toxicity and/or safety pharmacology studies.

We tried to establish the halothane-anesthetized microminipigs as an alternative animal model for non-clinical toxicity and/or safety pharmacology studies. In order to characterize the halothane-anesthetized microminipigs, we firstly clarified the effects of halothane anesthesia on their cardiovascular system (n = 5). Then, we examined the cardiovascular effects of dl-sotalol in doses of 0.1, 0.3 and 1 mg/kg, i.v. on the halothane-anesthetized microminipigs (n = 6). Induction of the halothane anesthesia by itself prolonged the QT interval as well as QTcF, suggesting that the halothane anesthesia can reduce the cardiac repolarization reserve in microminipigs like in dogs. dl-Sotalol showed more potent negative chronotropic, dromotropic and hypotensive effects together with repolarization delay in microminipigs than in dogs, although each cardiovascular response to dl-sotalol was directionally similar between them, suggesting greater basal sympathetic tone and/or smaller volume of distribution of the drug in microminipigs than in dogs. Analyses of proarrhythmic surrogate markers indicate that Tpeak-Tend and short-term variability of QT interval may be more sensitive to detect the dl-sotalol-induced direct electrophysiological changes in microminipigs than in dogs, but its reverse will be true for J-Tpeakc. Thus, these results may help better understand the drug-induced cardiovascular responses in microminipigs.

Rx: Observe, Do not Treat When is it Appropriate not to Treat?

Development of a protocol for a nonclinical safety study to evaluate the safety profile of an investigational therapeutic, whether it is a toxicology or safety pharmacology study, must not be conducted in haste. The evaluation of this novel therapeutics relies on the integrated strategy developed by the scientific team, which may include the pharmaceutical company and the services of a contract research organization. All nonclinical study protocols involving the use of live animals require the inclusion of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and staff veterinarians during the review of the study protocol. The team, as a whole, must endure a frank, honest, and open discussion regarding study design and animal welfare issues. All available information regarding the test material should be shared with all parties in a manner and time that allows for constructive protocol and treatment strategy development. The intent of nonclinical safety assessments is driven by both administrative guidelines from drug regulatory agencies and statutory (legal) controls of federal laws. In working with test articles, particularly for small molecules, the probability of unexpected findings is relatively high. The research team must maintain the highest standards of animal care throughout this process which is complicated by the fact that when animal health and welfare issues occur they must be remedied fast, efficiently, and transparently. We review the pitfalls of safety assessment strategies and offer some industry standard resolutions that may help to make the road to market a little easier. The paper is written based on small molecule development, but many of the points would also apply to biopharmaceuticals as well.

Differences in Types and Incidence of Neoplasms in Wistar Han and Sprague-Dawley Rats.

A substantial quantity of data on Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Hannover Wistar rats strains have been published concerning their source, diet, and housing conditions, as well as the incidences of nonneoplastic lesions and neoplasms observed in different laboratories. Differences between the commonly used rat strains provided by different breeders (i.e., CD (SD) vs. Harlan Sprague-Dawley strain or Crl: WI(Han) vs. Wistar Hannover (Han)-derived strain, continued breeding by RCC Ltd., Switzerland, thereafter continued breeding by Harlan) may include, but are not limited to, body weight, incidence, and onset of major nonneoplastic lesions and neoplasms, and these can impact the development of a nonclinical safety program. Fisher 344 (F344) and SD rat strains generally have the highest tumor incidences, exceeding that in Wistar rats. Certain tumors are more commonly observed in one strain, and for some, the difference in incidence may be so significant that the tumor may even be considered characteristic for a specific strain (e.g., thymoma in Wistar and amphophilic renal adenoma in SD).

Safety and General Considerations for the Use of Antibodies in Infectious Diseases.

Monocolonal antibodies are valuable potential new tools for meeting unmet needs in treating infectious dieseases and to provide alternatives and supplements to antibiotics in these times of growing resistance. Especially when considering the ability to screen for antibodies reacting to very diverse target antigens and the ability to design and engineer them to work specifically to hit and overcome their strategies, like toxins and their hiding in specific cells to evade the immuneresponse and their special features enabling killing of the infectious agents and or the cells harbouring them. Antibodies are generally very safe and adverse effects of treatments with therapeutic antibodies are usually related to exaggeration of the intended pharmacology. In this chapter general safety considerations for the use of antibodies is reviewed and the general procedures for nonclinical testing to support their clinical development. Special considerations for anti-infective mAb treatments are provided including the special features that makes nonclinical safety programs for anti-infective mAbs much more simple and restricted. However at a cost since only limited information for clinical safety and modeling can be derived from such programs. Then strategies for optimally designing antibodies are discussed including the use of combination of antibodies. Finally ways to facilitate development of more than the currently only three approved mAb based treatments are discussed with a special focus on high costs and high price and how collaboration and new strategies for development in emerging markets can be a driver for this.

Safety Profile Based on Concordance of Nonclinical Toxicity and Clinical Adverse Drug Reactions for Blood Cancer Drugs Approved in Japan.

BackgroundIn drug development, animal toxicology data are very important for the evaluation of clinical safety. We quantitatively assessed the safety profiles of blood cancer drugs approved in Japan from category I (high) to V (low). We examined the ratios of drug exposure in animals at the no observed adverse effect level to those in humans at the expected therapeutic dose. In addition, qualitative analysis of the relationship between toxicological findings and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is one of the primary approaches for determining the risk–benefit profile of a pharmaceutical. This study thus aimed to evaluate the potential of nonclinical safety assessments for predicting ADRs in humans.MethodsWe examined toxicological findings at the lowest observed adverse effect level and ADRs in pivotal clinical studies. We calculated concordance rates as the ratio of the number of concordant ADRs to all ADRs.ResultsTwenty-seven drugs were eligible for analysis. Concordance rates ranged from 0 to 84.8%. No significant differences were observed in concordance rates between antibodies (median 14.3%) and small molecules (median 18.5%). There was a significant correlation between concordance rates and quantitative safety profiles (p = 0.047), suggesting that some drugs with low safety profiles (categories III, IV, or V) have high concordance rates.ConclusionThe results suggested that ADRs in clinical trials could be predicted based on toxicity data obtained in animal tests, especially for some drugs with a low quantitative safety profile.

Nonclinical Safety Testing of RNA Vaccines.

In this chapter, we first consider the overall goal of nonclinical safety testing during drug development and have a brief overview of its regulatory background. We then discuss some basic requirements of safety/toxicity testing before concentrating on the safety testing of RNA vaccines and developing a sample RNA vaccine safety testing program.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intrathecally administered Xen2174, a synthetic conopeptide with norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and analgesic properties.

Xen2174 is a synthetic 13-amino acid peptide that binds specifically to the norepinephrine transporter, which results in inhibition of norepinephrine uptake. It is being developed as a possible treatment for moderate to severe pain and is delivered intrathecally. The current study was performed to assess the pharmacodynamics (PD) and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pharmacokinetics (PK) of Xen2174 in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study in healthy subjects. The study was divided into three treatment arms. Each group consisted of eight subjects on active treatment and two or three subjects on placebo. The CSF was sampled for 32h using an intrathecal catheter. PD assessments were performed using a battery of nociceptive tasks (electrical pain, pressure pain and cold pressor tasks). Twenty-five subjects were administered Xen2174. CSF PK analysis showed a higher area under the CSF concentration-time curve of Xen2174 in the highest dose group than allowed by the predefined safety margin based on nonclinical data. The most common adverse event was post-lumbar puncture syndrome, with no difference in incidence between treatment groups. Although no statistically significant differences were observed in the PD assessments between the different dosages of Xen2174 and placebo, pain tolerability in the highest dose group was higher than in the placebo group [contrast least squares mean pressure pain tolerance threshold of Xen2174 2.5mg-placebo (95% confidence interval), 22.2% (-5.0%, 57.1%); P = 0.1131]. At the Xen2174 dose level of 2.5mg, CSF concentrations exceeded the prespecified exposure limit based on the nonclinical safety margin. No statistically significant effects on evoked pain tests were observed.

Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology-It's Not Just about the Numbers.

Preanalytical variables can have significant impacts on clinical pathology parameters evaluated during the conduct of a nonclinical safety or toxicity study. These preanalytical variables can be controlled by careful attention to factors such as animal dietary status (diet composition, fasted, and fed state), restraint and anesthesia, intercurrent procedures, timing of clinical pathology collections, and proficiency of animal technicians. The impact of preanalytical variables on test results can be significant enough to result in difficult interpretations and/or regulatory questions or can obfuscate the effects of a test article. Control of preanalytical variables starts with knowledge of what processes and procedures impact test results. Minimizing these effects improves the quality of results and maximizes the value of the study.

A Mixed Type 1 and Type 2 Kinase Inhibitor That Overrides FLT3 F691 and D835 Resistance Mutations

Introduction: Mutations in FLT3, a class III receptor tyrosine kinase predominantly expressed on hematopoietic progenitor cells, represent the most common genetic alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Approximately 25% of patients with AML harbor internal tandem duplications (ITD) within the juxtamembrane domain of FLT3. Quizartinib, the first selective FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) to show clinical activity, frequently achieves a composite complete remissions (CRc) rate of approximately 50% in relapsed and refractory FLT3-ITD+AML patients. However, patient samples obtained at the time of relapse with quizartinib revealed resistance-conferring FLT3 mutations at two kinase domain residues (F691L and D835V/Y/F). The crystal structure of the FLT3-quizartinib complex indicates that quizartinib binding relies on essential edge-to-face aromatic interactions with the gatekeeper F691 residue, and with F830 within the DFG motif in the activation loop (A-loop). This reliance makes quizartinib responses critically vulnerable to gatekeeper (F691) and A-loop (D835) substitutions. This has led to the identification of TKIs that have activity against quizartinib-resistant FLT3 mutants, including type 1 inhibitors (e.g. crenolanib, ASP2215) targeting specifically D835 mutants, and type 2 inhibitors (e.g. pexidartinib, ponatinib) active against F691L. Until now, no FLT3 inhibitor has demonstrated potent inhibition of both classes of resistance mutations.Methods: To identify FLT3 inhibitors with activity against both gatekeeper and A-loop mutants, we used a modular approach to systematically alter the constituents of quizartinib to optimize interactions with the mutant proteins guided by X-ray structures and modeling. The compounds were profiled through a panel of in vitro growth assays and in vivo studies using Ba/F3 cells engineered to express FLT3-ITD/F691L and FLT3-ITD/D835Y, and MOLM14 quizartinib-resistant clones (MOLM14/F691L and MOLM14/D835Y) that have acquired the same mutations after chronic exposure to quizartinib. When injected into the tail vein of nude mice, the engineered Ba/F3 cells home to the spleen and proliferate, causing marked splenomegaly, whereas MOLM14 parental cells and MOLM14 resistant clones significantly reduce the overall survival of mice. Ba/F3-induced splenomegaly is directly dependent on the activity of the expressed mutant FLT3 and inhibition of splenomegaly measures target engagement in vivo. Analysis of efficacy in the MOLM14 survival models was done by Kaplan-Meier estimates and the logrank statistic.Results: Structure-guided lead optimization generated a series of FLT3 inhibitors with a mixed type 1 and type 2 binding mode and equal potency against the two classes of resistant mutants. Further optimization to improve pharmaceutical properties and maximize in vivo efficacy led to development candidate PLX3623. PLX3623 potently inhibited the growth of two Ba/F3 cell lines expressing F691L and D835Y mutants, with IC50 values of 0.18 (±0.04) and 0.15 (±0.03) nM, respectively. PLX3623 had a comparable antiproliferative effect on the MOLM14 resistant clones, with IC50values of 0.52 (±0.14) and 0.26 (±0.08) nM for the F691L and D835Y clones, respectively. In vivo PLX3623 treatment resulted in dose-dependent reduction in Ba/F3-induced splenomegaly, achieving >90% inhibition at 3 mg/kg dose. PLX3623 at 3mg/kg increased the length of survival of MOLM14 parental cell recipients by 120%, compared to the 80% increase afforded by 3 mg/kg quizartinib. At 3mg/kg dose, PLX3623 extended the survival of mice that received the two MOLM14 resistant clones by 80%; quizartinib at the same dose provided no survival benefit.Conclusion: Clonal evolution and tumor heterogeneity present a major challenge to targeted therapy and personalized cancer medicine. While acquired mutations individually may be actionable targets, often multiple inhibitors are required to combat the clonal diversity in a refractory setting. PLX3623, a FLT3 inhibitor with a mixed type 1 and type 2 binding mode, is the first TKI that is active against mutations conferring resistance through independent structural mechanisms. The in vitro and in vivo potency and favorable nonclinical safety profile of PLX3623 support its clinical development as a potentially best-in-class therapy to overcome clinical resistance to first generation FLT3 inhibitors. DisclosuresLin:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Zhang:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Matusow:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Mumy:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Tsang:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Zhang:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Powers:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Spevak:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Severson:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Tsai:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Bollag:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment. Zhang:Plexxikon Inc.: Employment.

321 - Non-clinical safety and antitumor efficacy of live attenuated Salmonella typhimurium-based oral T-cell vaccines VXM01m, VXM04m and VXM06m

321 - Non-clinical safety and antitumor efficacy of live attenuated Salmonella typhimurium-based oral T-cell vaccines VXM01m, VXM04m and VXM06m

Data Standardization, Pharmaceutical Drug Development, and the 3Rs.

Despite the efforts, cost, and extensive use of animals for nonclinical research, only a small number of studies have methodically compared findings from animal toxicology studies to those from human clinical trials. Impediments to understanding the translation of nonclinical safety have included the lack of easy access to data and the need for extensive data curation given the diverse terminologies, formats, and data platforms in use. SEND and SDTM study data standards, developed by CDISC and about to become mandated by FDA, can address this and other drug development issues by facilitating access to data in ways that are not currently feasible. A consistent data standard across clinical and nonclinical will discourage the development of data silos, which easily become obstacles to data sharing and maximizing the value of animal and human data. The confluence of rapid scientific advances, increasingly larger quantities of diverse data, technological advances in data mining, and the FDA's requirements for standardized study data create new opportunities for the advancement of drug development and for refinement in the way we use animals.

Investigative safety strategies to improve success in drug development

Understanding and reducing attrition rate remains a key challenge in drug development. Preclinical and clinical safety issues still represent about 40% of drug discontinuation, of which cardiac and liver toxicities are the leading reasons. Reducing attrition rate can be achieved by various means, starting with a comprehensive evaluation of the potential safety issues associated to the primary target followed by an evaluation of undesirable secondary targets. To address these risks, a risk mitigation plan should be built at very early development stages, using a panel of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo models. While most pharmaceutical companies have developed robust safety strategies to de-risk genotoxicity and cardiotoxicity issues, partly driven by regulatory requirements; safety issues affecting other organs or systems, such as the central nervous system, liver, kidney, or gastro-intestinal system are less commonly addressed during early drug development. This paper proposes some de-risking strategies that can be applied to these target organ systems, including the use of novel biomarkers that can be easily integrated in both preclinical and clinical studies. Experiments to understand the mechanisms’ underlying toxicity are also important. Two examples are provided to demonstrate how such mechanistic studies can impact drug development. Novel trends in investigative safety are reviewed, such as computational modeling, mitochondrial toxicity assessment, and imaging technologies. Ultimately, understanding the predictive value of non-clinical safety testing and its translatability to humans will enable to optimize assays in order to address the key objectives of the drug discovery process, i.e., hazard identification, risk assessment, and mitigation.

Influence of Study Design Variables on Clinical Pathology Data.

A number of factors related to study design have the potential to impact clinical pathology test results during the conduct of nonclinical safety studies. A thorough understanding of these factors is paramount in drawing accurate conclusions from clinical pathology data generated during such studies, particularly when attempting to make the distinction between test article and nontest article-related effects. Study design and conduct variables with potential to impact clinical pathology data discussed in this overview include those related to species and test system, animal age, animal care and husbandry practices, fasting, acclimatization periods, effects of transportation and stressors, route of administration, effects of in-life and surgical procedures, influence of study length, timing of blood collections, impact of vehicle/formulation composition, and some general concepts related to drug class. The material presented here is a summary based on information presented at the 35th Annual Symposium of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (June 2016), during Symposium Session 2 titled "Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology-It's Not Just about the Numbers."

Application of a MABEL Approach for a T-Cell-Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody: CEA TCB.

CEA TCB is a novel T-cell-bispecific (TCB) antibody targeting the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expressed on tumor cells and the CD3 epsilon chain (CD3e) present on T cells, which is currently in Phase 1 clinical trials (NCT02324257) for the treatment of CEA-positive solid tumors. Because the human CEA (hCEA) binder of CEA TCB does not cross-react with cynomolgus monkey and CEA is absent in rodents, alternative nonclinical safety evaluation approaches were considered. These included the development of a cynomolgus monkey cross-reactive homologous (surrogate) antibody (cyCEA TCB) for its evaluation in cynomolgus monkey and the development of double-transgenic mice, expressing hCEA and human CD3e (hCEA/hCD3e Tg), as a potential alternative species for nonclinical safety studies. However, a battery of nonclinical in vitro/ex vivo experiments demonstrated that neither of the previous approaches provided a suitable and pharmacologically relevant model to assess the safety of CEA TCB. Therefore, an alternative approach, a minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), based on an in vitro tumor lysis assay was used to determine the starting dose for the first-in-human study. Using the most conservative approach to the MABEL assessment, a dose of 52 μg was selected as a safe starting dose for clinical study.

Nonclinical Safety Considerations for the Development of Pediatric-First Drugs: An Industry View.

This paper provides considerations on approaches to the development of medicines initially developed for pediatric use (ie, "pediatric-first" or "pediatric-only" drugs). The most common development approach for these types of medicines involves a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial with healthy adult volunteers to assess safety and tolerability. This approach generally requires nonclinical repeat-dose studies in adult animals; safety pharmacology and in vivo genetic toxicology studies in adult animals are also performed for small-molecule drugs. Additional studies in juvenile animals may be required prior to clinical trials in pediatric patients, on a case-by-case basis. In this paradigm, the starting dose for pediatric patients is primarily driven by modeling from the adult pharmacokinetic assessment and pharmacology data. A second development approach is where the FIH clinical trial is conducted in pediatric patients. This approach is generally supported by repeat-dose studies in juvenile animals, with the onset of dosing at ages that developmentally correlate to the age of the pediatric patients. Safety pharmacology and in vivo genetic toxicology studies are generally performed in adult animals for small-molecule drugs. To define a safe yet minimally efficacious starting dose for pediatric patients, various complementing approaches can be used, including human equivalent dose, minimal anticipated biological effect level, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Case examples for pediatric-first drug candidates show how both drug development approaches (ie, entry into human first in adults or directly in pediatric populations) are used in the pharmaceutical industry.

Regulatory strategy for the nonclinical safety assessment to support licensure application of GSK's Zoster candidate vaccine

Regulatory strategy for the nonclinical safety assessment to support licensure application of GSK's Zoster candidate vaccine