non-US Citizens Research Articles

A cross sectional analysis of residents by race/ethnicity and specialty from 2020-2023

BackgroundMinorities are underrepresented in all areas of medical education relative to the United States general population, and minority physicians are more likely to practice in disadvantaged areas and in primary care settings. Many individual and structural factors contribute to this discrepancy. We aimed to demonstrate how resident race/ethnicity representation differs across the various resident specialties. MethodsWe used publically available data from the Association of American Medical College's Report on Residents data series and averaged the four academic years from 2019 to 2020 through 2022-2023. We then calculated the odds ratio (OR) of self-reported race/ethnicity (alone and in combination) in thirty-four specialties. ResultsAcross the four-year study period, there were, on average, 147026 unduplicated resident trainees. The average number of duplicated residents by self-identified ethnic category (alone and in combination) include: American Indian or Alaska Native (839, 0.6%), Asian (31627, 21.5%), Black or African American (7935, 5.4%), Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish Origin (10900, 7.4%), Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (296, 0.2%), White (76289, 51.9%), Other (4879, 3.3%), Unknown (522, 0.4%), and Non-US Citizens (23914, 16.3%). Across race/ethnicity, there are differences in ORs of representation in different specialties. Key findings include high representation in Public Health and Preventative Medicine by Black and African American (OR=3.7) and Native Hawaiian (OR=2.6) residents, and Family Medicine in Native Americans (OR=1.9), Native Hawaiian (OR=1.7), Black (OR=1.5), and Hispanic (OR=1.3) residents. Psychiatry also had high ORs of representation in minority residents. ConclusionThis study illustrates relative resident ethnic representation across training specialties. Minorities ethnicities were more likely to be represented in primary care and public health domains. This has implications for creating a physician workforce suitable to serve the United States Population.

An Immediate but Fleeting Interest in MPH Programs After the Onset of COVID-19: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.

The relationship between the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and interest in master of public health (MPH) programs is unknown. We examined trends in MPH application rates for 31 MPH concentrations and specifically for the MPH concentration in epidemiology and differences by race and ethnicity before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We constructed a quasi-experimental design to examine trends in MPH application rates from academic years 2015-2016 through 2022-2023 by using Centralized Application Service for Schools and Programs of Public Health data. We used an interrupted time-series analysis to test whether application rates surged after the pandemic's onset (academic years 2019-2020 through 2020-2021) and whether this increase persisted during the pandemic (academic years 2020-2021 through 2022-2023). We fit models for the overall sample, a combined racially and ethnically minoritized sample, each racial and ethnic group separately, and a non-US citizen sample. The pandemic's onset correlated with an immediate increase in application rates across most samples: overall (38%) and among American Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (91%), Asian (35%), Black (42%), Hispanic (60%), multiracial (30%), racially and ethnically minoritized (44%), and White (53%) samples. However, this trend was not sustained; application rate trends during the pandemic were significantly lower than prepandemic trends. Application rate trends for all MPH concentrations and the MPH in epidemiology concentration among non-US citizens were significantly higher during the pandemic than prepandemic. Our results highlight the need for innovative strategies to sustain MPH degree interest and a diverse applicant pool.

Outcomes among Hispanic Kidney Transplant Recipients Including Non-US Citizens

Outcomes among Hispanic Kidney Transplant Recipients Including Non-US Citizens

Abstract B154: Effect modification of United States residency and length of time in US on the relationship between allostatic load and cancer mortality risk in Hispanic/Latinx Americans: Insights from NHANES (1999-2019)

Abstract Allostatic load (AL) a measure of the cumulative physiological stress occurs when external stressors exceed an individual's ability to adapt, increasing the risk of chronic diseases, including cancer. In the United States (US), Hispanic/Latinx people face acculturation-related stressors like family separation, low socioeconomic status, language barriers, racism, and discrimination, which can elevate AL and cancer risk. This study aims to examine the moderating role of US citizenship status and length of time living in US on the relationship between high allostatic load and risk of cancer mortality among Hispanic/Latinx people. We performed a retrospective analysis using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2010 among 7,299 Hispanic/Latinx people linked with National Death Index with follow-up through December 31, 2019. We defined high AL as having more than three abnormal measures among the following nine biomarkers: body mass index, C-reactive protein, diastolic blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and serum creatinine (above the 75th percentile), or serum albumin (below the 25th percentile). We compared differences in participant characteristics using Rao-Scott Chi-Square tests for weighted survey data. We fit weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals of cancer death, stratified by US residence and length of time in US Among 7,299 Hispanic/Latinx people, 2,835 (33.4% weighted) had high AL, and 4,464 (66.6% weighted) had low AL. Hispanic/Latinx people with high AL were more likely to be male, aged 40-59, have a lower level of formal education (52.0% vs. 43.6%, p- value <0.001), and were more often surveyed during the 2007-2010 NHANES period (43.2% vs. 37.2%, p-value <0.001) compared to those with low AL. When considering US residency, participants with high AL were more likely to live in the US longer than 15 years (38.2% vs. 24.8%, p-value <0.001) and be US citizens (65.0% vs. 54.7%, p-value <0.001). Regarding health behaviors, participants with high AL were less likely to have been diagnosed with heart attack and less likely to have any history of smoking. We observed that among Hispanic/Latinx people, those with high AL have a 97% increased risk of dying from any cancer (HR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.24 - 1.34) when compared to those with low AL. When stratifying by US citizenship status, among Hispanic/Latinx US citizen population those with high AL have a 2.3-times higher risk of cancer death when compared to those with low AL (HR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.22 - 4.32). Among those who are Hispanic/Latinx non-US citizens, those with high AL have 48% increased risk of cancer death compared to those with low AL, though non-significant (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.64 - 3.43). Our preliminary findings highlight that Hispanic/Latinx people with US citizenship who experience high levels of chronic stress, as measured by AL, have an increased risk of cancer mortality. Citation Format: Jessica Amezcua, Mellisa Lopez-Pentecost, Jessica Y. Islam, Marlo Vernon, Kathleen L. O'Connor, Justin X. Moore. Effect modification of United States residency and length of time in US on the relationship between allostatic load and cancer mortality risk in Hispanic/Latinx Americans: Insights from NHANES (1999-2019) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B154.

International Travel for Organ Transplantation: Provider and Patient Perspectives.

Organ allocation in the United States to non-US citizen, non-US residents who travel for transplant (NC/NRTx) is controversial. Current policies may not be informed by stakeholder opinions, as limited data exist assessing the knowledge or opinions of providers or patients on this issue. A cross-sectional, hospital-based pilot survey was distributed to providers and patients from December 2019 to June 2020 at a single large urban transplant institute. Providers were members of the departments of surgery and medicine and included both transplant and nontransplant providers. Surveys included 10 questions on eligibility, prioritization, and limitations for deceased donor transplantation and 12 demographic questions. A total of 209 providers responded (61% women, median age 40) and 119 patients responded (62% women, median age 54). Awareness of eligibility for transplantation of US citizens, non-US citizens residing in the United States (NC/R), and NC/NRTx was high in both groups, though providers and patients lacked awareness of the eligibility of nonlegal NC/R (those who live in the United States who are not citizens and are not legal residents) to donate and receive organs. Overall, 79.3% of patients stated that NC/NRTx should be eligible for transplant in the United States compared with only 60.7% of providers (P = 0.001). Providers were more likely than patients to prioritize transplant to legal NC/NR over NC/NRTx (58.2% versus 35.1%, P < 000.1) and reported that families should be able to limit donations to NC/NRTx (34.9% versus 23.2%, P = 0.03). Surveyed patients and providers generally support transplant in non-US citizens; however, the strength of support varied considerably based on the legal status of the patient and the occupation of those surveyed. Larger studies are necessary to develop data-informed policy.

Disaster preparedness among Asian, Pacific Islander, and Desi American communities.

Disaster experiences and explorations of preparedness among Asian, Pacific Islander, and Desi Americans (APIDA) in the United States are often overlooked owing to their relatively smaller population share. APIDA are not homogenous, and their disaster experiences warrant further examination. This paper does so by investigating disaster preparedness using disaggregated information about APIDA. The study utilises nationally representative data from the 2017 American Housing Survey, analysing sociodemographic covariates. The disaster preparedness score among APIDA communities was approximately 4.81 on a zero to nine scale. APIDA renters and non-US citizens were less prepared than homeowners and US citizens. Among subgroups, Korean, Chinese, and Vietnamese respondents who were non-US citizens were less prepared than those who were US citizens. Marital status was significantly and positively associated with preparedness among Indians, Japanese, Vietnamese, and multiracial respondents. The findings underscore the importance of data disaggregation and tailored preparedness information and resources to address specific challenges APIDA communities face instead of a one-size-fits-all approach.

Association of depression and self-reported health status by birthplace and citizenship status: Results from the 2010–2018 National Health Interview Survey

BackgroundSelf-reported health (SRH) is an important indicator of mental health outcomes. More information, however, is needed on whether this association varies by birthplace (defined as US-born or non-US-born) and citizenship status (i.e., non-US-born citizen, non-US citizen, and US-born citizen). MethodsWe examined the associations between SRH and depression among non-US-born US citizens, non-US citizens, and US-born citizens aged 18 years and older using weighted cross-sectional data from the 2010–2018 National Health Interview Survey (n = 139,884). Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between depression and SRH by citizenship status, adjusting for covariates. ResultsUS-born citizens reported the highest prevalence of depression (40.3 %), and non-US-born citizens reported the highest prevalence of poor/fair SRH (14.5 %). Individuals with fair/poor SRH had a significantly increased likelihood of depression relative to those with good/very good/excellent for non-US-born US citizens (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 2.42, 95 % Confidence Interval [95 % CI] = 2.04–2.88), non-US citizens (AOR = 2.80, 95 % CI = 2.31–3.40), and US-born citizens (AOR = 2.31, CI = 2.18–2.45).Limitations.The study is cross-sectional, reducing the strength of determining causal relationships. Also, there is a possible response bias due to the self-reported nature of the data. ConclusionsOur study indicates that fair/poor SRH is significantly associated with an increased likelihood of depression regardless of an individual citizenship status. Additionally, immigrants with fair/poor SRH had higher increased odds of depression. Therefore, mental healthcare interventions tailored for immigrants can reduce mental health problems and disparities among immigrants.

Effect of citizenship status on access to pediatric liver and kidney transplantation

Transplantation of non-US citizen residents remains controversial. We evaluate national trends in transplant activity among pediatric noncitizen residents (PNCR). Pediatric liver and kidney transplant data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Data on transplanted organs, region, waitlist additions, procedures, and citizenship status were analyzed from 2012-2022. Rates of PNCR transplantation activity were compared with population rates from the US Census Bureau. On average, 713 ± 47 pediatric liver and 1039 ± 51 kidney patients were added to the waitlist, with 544 ± 32 liver and 742 ± 33 kidney transplants performed annually. Of these, PNCR comprised 1.5% and 3.3% of liver and kidney waitlist additions and 1.5% and 2.9% of liver and kidney transplant procedures, respectively. There were no significant changes in waitlist or transplant activity nationwide over the study period. There was a significant geographic variation in the percentage of waitlist additions and transplants across the United Network for Organ Sharing regions among the PNCR for liver and kidney transplantation. This is the first study to evaluate national trends in transplantation activity among PNCRs. The significant regional variation in transplantation activity for PNCR may suggest multilevel structural and systemic barriers to transplant accessibility.

DO seniors and IMGs have lower match probabilities than MD seniors after adjusting for specialty choice and USMLE Step 1 score.

It is unknown if US residency applicants of different educational backgrounds (US allopathic [MD], Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine [DO], and international medical graduates [IMG]) but comparable academic performance have similar match success. Our objective was to compare match probabilities between applicant types after adjusting for specialty choice and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores. We performed a secondary analysis of published data in National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) reports from 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 for US MD seniors, DO seniors, and IMGs (US citizens and non-US citizens). We examined the 10 specialties with the most available spots in 2022. Average marginal effects from a multiple variable logistic regression model were utilized to estimate each non-MD senior applicant type's probability of matching into their preferred specialty compared to MD seniors adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year. Each non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching to their preferred specialty than MD seniors,-7.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI],-11.3 to-2.9) for DO seniors,-45.6 % (-50.6 to-40.5) for US IMGs, and-56.6 % (-61.5 to-51.6) for non-US IMGs. Similarly, each non-MD applicant type had a lower adjusted percent difference in matching than MD seniors across almost all Step 1 score ranges, except for DO seniors with Step 1 scores <200 (-2.0 % [-9.5 to 5.5]). After adjusting for specialty choice, Step 1 score, and match year, non-US MD applicants had lower probabilities of matching into their preferred specialties than their US MD colleagues.

Health insurance coverage and poverty status of postpartum women in the United States in 2019: an ACS-PUMS population-based cross-sectional study

BackgroundA quarter of United States (US) postpartum women still report unmet health care needs and health care unaffordability. We aimed to study associations between receipt of health insurance coverage and poverty status/receipt of government financial support and determine coverage gaps overall and by social factors among US postpartum women in poverty.MethodsThis study design is a cross-sectional study using secondary data. We included women who gave birth within the last 12 months from 2019 American Community Survey Public Use Microdata Sample. Poverty was defined as having an income-to-poverty ratio of less than 100%. We explored Medicaid/government medical assistance gaps among women in poverty. To examine the associations between Medicaid/government medical assistance (exposures) and poverty/government financial support (outcomes), we used age-, race-, and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models. We also evaluated the associations of state, race, citizenship status, or language other than English spoken at home (exposures) with receipt of Medicaid/government medical assistance (outcomes) among women in poverty through multivariable-adjusted logistic regression.ResultsIt was notable that 35.6% of US postpartum women in poverty did not have Medicaid/government medical assistance and only a small proportion received public assistance income (9.8%)/supplementary security income (3.1%). Women with Medicaid/government medical assistance, compared with those without the coverage, had statistically significantly higher odds of poverty [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.15, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.85–3.48], having public assistance income (aOR: 24.52 [95% CI: 17.31–34.73]), or having supplementary security income (aOR: 4.22 [95% CI: 2.81–6.36]). Also, among postpartum women in poverty, women in states that had not expanded Medicaid, those of Asian or other race, non-US citizens, and those speaking another language had statistically significantly higher odds of not receiving Medicaid/government medical assistance [aORs (95% CIs): 2.93 (2.55–3.37); 1.30 (1.04–1.63); 3.65 (3.05–4.38); and 2.08 (1.86–2.32), respectively].ConclusionsOur results showed that the receipt of Medicaid/government medical assistance is significantly associated with poverty and having government financial support. However, postpartum women in poverty still had Medicaid/government medical assistance gaps, especially those who lived in states that had not expanded Medicaid, those of Asian or other races, non-US citizens, and other language speakers.

Self-awareness of hepatitis C infection in the United States: A cross-sectional study based on the National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global health issue with an estimated prevalence of 2.4 to 3 million people in the US and 58 million worldwide. Previous reports from the US have shown that close to half of those with the infection are unaware of their status. Although the current therapy for HCV is very effective, the primary barrier has been the inability to diagnose a large fraction of those infected. We studied public awareness of HCV in the US using National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey data from 2013 to 2020. Our aim was to measure awareness of infection in individuals with HCV and identify possible barriers to diagnosis. In total, 206 individuals with HCV were included in the weighted analysis. The weighted awareness of infection was 60.1%, suggesting that over 0.8 million are unaware nationally. Awareness was significantly low in the Mexican American and Asian populations. Non-US citizens and non-US-born individuals also had poor awareness. The transaminases were more elevated in those unaware of the infection, suggesting their higher risk of liver fibrosis. Although the proportion of infected people aware of their illness has been rising, over 0.8 million are still unaware of their infection and their risk of liver damage. We believe policy measures focused on further intense screening and educational campaigns, particularly in high-risk groups, are vital in realizing the World Health Organization's goal of eliminating HCV as a global health threat.

Becoming doctors again in the United States: An intersectional approach to understanding women refugee physicians

Although International Medical Graduates (IMGs) make up close to one quarter of practicing physicians in the US, formal and informal barriers to gaining a US medical license are high. Previous research has identified a number of such obstacles including linguistic and cultural impediments, subtle and overt prejudice, bias, and discrimination, as well as formal and informal hurdles in the admission process for residency positions. For purposes of US medical licensure qualifications and record-keeping, all IMGs are lumped together. However, IMGs are not homogeneous. Studies of the licensure process typically distinguish between US citizens who go to medical school outside the US (USIMGs) and non-US citizens who prepare to complete their medical training in a US residency (non-USIMGs) but this distinction conceals significant differences among non-USIMGs. This paper contributes to the growing body of literature that explores differences among the trajectories of would-be physicians who are non-US citizens by focusing on women physicians who are both non-USIMGs and forced to flee from their homelands (Refugee Physicians). It applies an intersectional lens to understand ways in which gender, forced migration, and medical licensure in the US are interrelated factors constraining the decisions of non-USIMGs. Drawing upon a larger qualitative study of 18 men and 10 women Refugee Physicians in the United States this paper focuses on the experiences of the 10 women and asks: how does gender matter in Refugee Physicians’ navigation of the medical licensure system and migration?

Noncitizen Justice: The Criminal Case Processing of Non-US Citizens in Texas and California

Noncitizen Justice: The Criminal Case Processing of Non-US Citizens in Texas and California

COVID-19: Academic, Financial, and Mental Health Challenges Faced by International Students in the United States Due to the Pandemic.

Background and objective Many international students often face challenges regarding their mental health, finances, and academics. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak may have presented unprecedented challenges to many foreign students in these aspects. Our study examined the academic, financial, and mental health challenges encountered byinternational students residing in the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It also examined the association betweenthe mental health of the respondents and the academic and financial challenges they encountered. Method The study involved international students enrolled at Texas A&M University, who identified themselves as non-US citizens or non-permanent residents. We conducted a cross-sectional study by using Qualtrics® to explore the three domains of the study. Questions included in previous studies were modified to assess the academic and financial status while the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) score was used to assess the mental health of the respondents. We presented descriptive statistics for all domains and used an ordered logistic regression to further analyze the effect of the other domains on the mental health of therespondents. Results Of the 281 respondents, the majority (79%) experienced challenges with online classes; 91% reported having negative emotions and some students (24%) lost funding due to the pandemic. The inability to pay bills resulted in a three-fold increase in the likelihood of reporting higher mental distress [adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 3.051, 95% CI: 1.665-5.591; p<0.001], and experiencing academic challenges led to a seven-fold increase in the likelihood of reporting higher mental distress (aOR: 7.236, 95% CI: 3.168-12.530; p<0.001). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic posed a major challenge to international students and its impact on the mental health of the participants was aggravated by concurrent academic and financial hardships.

Leadership and Impostor Syndrome in Surgery.

Impostor syndrome is an internalized sense of incompetence and not belonging. We examined associations between impostor syndrome and holding leadership positions in medicine. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to US physicians from June 2021 to December 2021 through medical schools and professional organizations. Differences were tested with the chi-square test and t -test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with holding leadership positions and experiencing impostor syndrome. A total of 2,183 attending and retired physicians were included in the analytic cohort; 1,471 (67.4%) were in leadership roles and 712 (32.6%) were not. After adjustment, male physicians were more likely than women to hold leadership positions (odds ratio 1.4; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.69; p < 0.001). Non-US citizens (permanent resident or visa holder) were less likely to hold leadership positions than US citizens (odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.55; p < 0.001). Having a leadership position was associated with lower odds of impostor syndrome (odds ratio 0.54; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.68; p < 0.001). Female surgeons were more likely to report impostor syndrome compared to male surgeons (90.0% vs 67.7%; p < 0.001), an association that persisted even when female surgeons held leadership roles. Similar trends were appreciated for female and male nonsurgeons. Impostor syndrome rates did not differ by race and ethnicity, including among those underrepresented in medicine, even after adjustment for gender and leadership role. Female physicians were more likely to experience impostor syndrome than men, regardless of specialty or leadership role. Although several identity-based gaps persist in leadership, impostor syndrome among racially minoritized groups may not be a significant contributor.

Jail Conditions And Mortality: Death Rates Associated With Turnover, Jail Size, And Population Characteristics.

In 2019, there were approximately ten million admissions to more than 3,000 US jails-facilities that had become increasingly deadly in the prior decades. Between 2000 and 2019, jail mortality rose by approximately 11percent. Although incarceration is widely viewed as a health hazard, relationships between jail conditions and jail deaths are understudied. Using data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and Reuters journalists, we assessed mortality rates and conditions in approximately 450 US jails in the period 2008-19. During those years, certain facility characteristics were related to mortality. For example, high turnover rates and high populations were associated with higher death rates. Greater proportions of non-Hispanic Black people in jail populations were associated with more deaths due to illness, and the presence of larger shares of non-US citizens was associated with lower overall mortality rates. Our findings suggest that heavy reliance on incarceration and the prevalence of broad health disparities escalate jail mortality.

Organ Donation and Transplantation among Non-US Citizens: Opportunities to Improve Global Equity in Heart Transplantation

BackgroundNon-US citizens/non-US residents (NCNR) are a unique and growing population. Patterns of heart donation and heart transplantation (HT) within this subgroup have not been described fully. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of organs from NCNR donors and the characteristics and outcomes of NCNR HT recipients. MethodsAll adult donors whose hearts were recovered for HT and all primary adult HT recipients from 2013 to 2020 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing. Donors and recipients were categorized as citizens, residents, or NCNR. NCNR were further categorized by reason for travel to the United States. Outcomes included mortality, infection, and rejection at 1-year after transplantation. ResultsNCNR accounted for 0.4% (n = 77) of heart donors. Most NCNR donors identified as Hispanic (61%), were predominately recovered from the South and Southwest United States, and were less likely to express written documentation to be a donor compared with citizens and residents. NCNR accounted for 0.7% (n = 147) of all HT recipients. The majority identified as non-Hispanic White individuals (57.1%). Compared with citizens and residents, NCNR recipients seemed to be sicker, as evidenced by higher intra-aortic balloon pump use before HT and higher priority United Network for Organ Sharing status. Of NCNR recipients, 63% traveled to the United States for HT, predominately from Kuwait (29.9%) and Saudi Arabia (20%). At 1-year after transplant, there were no differences in mortality, infection, or rejection between the groups. ConclusionsA growing subgroup of NCNR travel from countries with low HT rates to the United States for HT. This finding highlights the need for strategies to improve equitable access to HT domestically and abroad.

Forced Organ Harvesting

Forced Organ Harvesting

Reported Visa Acceptance or Sponsorship for Non-US Citizen Applicants to US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

Non-US citizen international medical graduates (IMGs) make up a significant proportion of the physician workforce, especially in physician shortage areas and specialties. IMGs face barriers matriculating in US residency programs. Whether a program reports accepting J-1 visas and sponsoring H-1B visas influences their decision to apply, it remains unclear which institutional factors shape programs' likelihood to consider visa-seeking applicants. We investigated factors associated with programs reporting accepting J-1 visas or sponsoring H-1B visas for non-citizen applicants in internal medicine, the specialty most sought after by IMGs. We performed multivariable regression analyses using publicly available data to identify characteristics associated with reported visa acceptance (J-1 and or H-1B). Covariates included university affiliation, program size, program type (academic, university-affiliated community, or community), and Doximity reputation ranking. We identified 419 programs: 267 (63.7%) reported accepting J-1 visas. Among programs that accepted J-1 visas, 65.6% (n=175) accepted only J-1 visas while 34.5% (n=92) sponsored H-1B and accepted J-1 visas. Ranking in the third quartile (vs first quartile) was associated with lower odds of accepting J-1 (aOR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.87; P=.04) and sponsoring H-1B visas (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.76; P=.02). Community status (vs academic) was associated with lower odds of accepting J-1 visas (aOR 0.2; 95% CI 0.06-0.64; P=.007), as was county hospital affiliation vs non-county hospitals (aOR 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.42; P<.001). While prior evidence shows that most internal medicine programs that substantially enroll IMGs are low ranking, high-ranking internal medicine programs are paradoxically more likely to report that they consider and sponsor visa-seeking applicants.

Examining Pre- and Post-Pandemic Cross-Border Trips Using Crowdsourced Data at the Second-Busiest US-Mexico Border Community

The US-Mexico border witnesses frequent cross-border travels for educational, recreational, healthcare, and work purposes, with millions of passenger and commercial vehicles crossing the international border each year. In 2020, pandemic-related travel restrictions were applied to non-US citizens at the US-Mexico border and reshaped cross-border trips. Using crowdsourced data, we explored the mobility changes that the COVID-19 pandemic brought to the second-busiest border region between the United States and Mexico. Results showed that although some patterns remained similar, overall mobility decreased significantly.