You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Basic Research III1 Apr 20101139 MICRORNAS DETECTION AS URINE MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA Hideki Enokida, Takeshi Chiyomaru, Kazumori Kawakami, Kazuya Kawahara, Masahiko Inahara, Satoko Kojima, Kenryu Nishiyama, Naohiko Seki, and Masayuki Nakagawa Hideki EnokidaHideki Enokida Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author , Takeshi ChiyomaruTakeshi Chiyomaru Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author , Kazumori KawakamiKazumori Kawakami Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author , Kazuya KawaharaKazuya Kawahara Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author , Masahiko InaharaMasahiko Inahara Chiba, Japan More articles by this author , Satoko KojimaSatoko Kojima Chiba, Japan More articles by this author , Kenryu NishiyamaKenryu Nishiyama Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author , Naohiko SekiNaohiko Seki Chiba, Japan More articles by this author , and Masayuki NakagawaMasayuki Nakagawa Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.638AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Currently, tumor marker for urothelial carcinoma (UC) depends on urine cytology because of its high sensitivity (around 95%) despite of its low sensitivity (around 30%). Bladder tumor antigen (BTA) and nuclear matrix protein (NMP)-22 are are not widely used because of their low specificity for distinguishing UC from non-malignant diseases. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs of about 22 nucleotides in length, that function as negative regulators of gene expression through antisense complimentarily to specific messenger RNAs. Recent studies suggest that aberrant microRNA expression contribute to the development of various human malignancies. Our previous miRNA screening of UC demonstrated that miR-96 and miR-183 were the top 2 up-regulated miRNAs among 667 miRNAs examined. We hypothesize that these microRNAs are detectable in urine and useful biomarkers for distinguishing UC- from non-UC patients. METHODS Total RNA of urine was extracted from 54 UCs, 15 urinary tract infections (UTIs) and 27 healthy controls (HCs). A real-time PCR based experiment was used to evaluate expression levels of the miRNAs. The expression level of each miRNA was calculated by a following formula: expression level = 2(40-Ct). RESULTS The expression levels of miR-96 and miR-183 in urine from UCs were significantly higher than that from UTIs or HCs (each p < 0.0001). ROC curve analysis revealed that miR-96 and miR-183 have good sensitivity (70.4 and 74.1%, respectively) and specificity (90.5 and 71.4%, respectively) to distinguish UC from non-UC patient. We found significant difference in miR-96 expressions between invasive (> pTa) and non-invasive (pTa) UCs (p = 0.0271), but a trend in miR-183 (p = 0.0508). There were significant differences in miR-96 or miR-183 expressions between the samples from pre- and post operation (p < 0.05). To our surprise, miR-96 was positively detected in 11 of 20 UC patients who had a negative diagnosis by urine cytology. When we combined microRNA analysis with urine cytology in our cohort, the sensitivity and the specificity reached to 78% and 90.5%, respectively for UC detection. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that detection of miR-96 and miR-183 may serve as potential biomarkers for UC. Diagnostic accuracy for urothelial carcinoma can be improved by a combination of urine cytology and the microRNAs detection. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e441 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hideki Enokida Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Takeshi Chiyomaru Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Kazumori Kawakami Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Kazuya Kawahara Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Masahiko Inahara Chiba, Japan More articles by this author Satoko Kojima Chiba, Japan More articles by this author Kenryu Nishiyama Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Naohiko Seki Chiba, Japan More articles by this author Masayuki Nakagawa Kagoshima, Japan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract