Nonsteroidal Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Research Articles

Targeted Metabolic Investigation of Ligandrol and Analytical Methods Validation for Its Main Long-term Metabolite.

Prompted by the need for related analytical reference material in the frame of the fight against doping in sports, synthetic efforts towards the main long-term bishydroxylated metabolite (LGD-LTM1) of the nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) ligandrol have produced related derivatives that were exploited for a targeted metabolite analysis of urine samples obtained in the course of previous excretion studies of this SARM. Further clarifying ligandrol's metabolic profile, the availability of synthetic reference material permitted the structural elucidation of a previously reported pyrrolidinone-type metabolite and revealed its potential analytical utility as an additional long-term marker. Moreover, synthetic reference material enabled the comparison and validation of liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based detection and identification methods focusing on the LGD-LTM1 marker.

Effects of Ostarine and Endurance Training on Some Functional, Hematological, and Biochemical Parameters in Male Rats

Background: Non-steroidal Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) are currently a group of drug candidates with anabolic effects, tissue selectivity, and the potential to improve the therapeutic process in a number of socially significant diseases. There is insufficient data on their effects during exercise and on their adverse side effects. Objectives: Our objective was to examine the role of selective androgen receptor modulators for the physical working capacity of the body, hematological and biochemical parameters, and to evaluate any side effects of SARMs. We studied the effects of ostarine (S-22, MK-2866, GTx-024, Enobosarm) alone or in combination with submaximal training in sexually mature male Wistar rats. Methods: The rats used were divided into a treadmill-trained group and a sedentary group. Half of each group received either ostarine or vehicle for 8 weeks (n = 10 each). We performed functional tests and blood analysis at the end of the experiment to analyze clinical chemistry and hematological indicators. Results: Ostarine did not affect maximal sprint speed, VO2max, and running economy, while submaximal training increased these parameters. Ostarine increased total plasma cholesterol and energy expenditure and decreased plasma glucose concentration. Neither treatment changed the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood, the respiratory quotient, the concentration of triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol, or creatine kinase. Combined treatment neutralized the negative effect of ostarine on plasma total cholesterol levels. Conclusions: Ostarine did not affect the examined hematological and physical working capacity parameters, but it changed some clinical chemistry indicators. Training improved the physical working capacity but did not affect the clinical chemistry and hematological parameters. Further research is needed to clarify other aspects of the influence of non-steroidal SARMs on the physical working capacity and possible side effects during long-term use, as their administration, along with physical activity, is becoming popular among healthy adult bodybuilders in gyms.

In-depth metabolic study of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator GSK2881078 in thoroughbred horses and horse liver microsomes for doping control.

Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a novel class of compounds that have not yet been clinically approved; however, they appear to have a better anabolic/androgenic ratio than steroids and cause slighter side effects. Sports drug testing laboratories are required to maintain continuously updated doping control analytical methods in light of the widespread misuse of SARMs in elite and amateur sports. This paper describes the metabolic conversion of SARM GSK2881078 in thoroughbred horses following oral administration and in vitro with equine liver microsomes. A liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry method was used to postulate the plausible structures of the detected metabolites. A total of five (M1-M5) in vivo metabolites and six (M1-M6) in vitro metabolites were detected under experimental conditions. Phase I metabolites mainly result from hydroxylation. Methoxylated and side-chain dissociated metabolites were also detected. Neither sulfonic acid nor glucuronic acid conjugated metabolites were observed in this study. Data reported here could aid in the detection of nonsteroidal SARM GSK2881078 and reveal its illicit use in competitive sports.

Detection of the selective androgen receptor modulator GSK2881078 and metabolites in urine and hair after single oral administration.

Hair and urine concentrations of the nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator GSK2881078 were examined following single oral administration to investigate its hair incorporation and estimate the general suitability of hair testing for selected androgen receptor modulators. Hair segments were collected following a single dose of 1.5 mg GSK2881078 by repeated shaving of scalp hair at Week 0 (blank), Week 1 (representing the pre-application period), Week 3 (ideally focusing the time of incorporation), and Weeks 5 and 9 (post-administration period). The intact compound and various (at least 4) hydroxy-metabolites exhibited similar elimination profiles. The peak urinary concentration (approximately 920 pg/ml) was observed after 8 h and is reduced to the detection limit (2 pg/ml) on Day 42 following administration of 760 μg GSK2881078. Correspondingly, hair concentrations of GSK2881078 (intact compound only) following a single oral dose of 1.5 mg GSK2881078 reached a peak concentration of 1.7 pg/mg in the segments collected 3 weeks post administration, representing the time of ingestion. The concentration rapidly declined to trace amounts of 0.7 (Week 5) and 0.2 pg/mg (Week 9), respectively. In conclusion, measurement of the intact compound GSK2881078 is feasible for both urine and hair analysis. However, concentrations in hair after single oral administration are in the low pg/mg range and can only be detected, if the segments cover the administration period.

Ostarine and Ligandrol Improve Muscle Tissue in an Ovariectomized Rat Model.

In postmenopausal women, hormonal decline changes muscle function and structure. The non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) Ostarine (OS) and Ligandrol (LG) have been shown to increase muscle mass and physical function while showing a relative low risk profile. Information about their effects on muscle structure and metabolism is lacking. To analyze this, two experiments were performed using ovariectomized rats as a standard model for postmenopausal conditions. In each experiment, 3-month old Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups (n = 12 to 15). One group remained intact (Non-OVX), the other four groups were ovariectomized (OVX) and remained untreated for eight (OS Experiment) or nine (LG Experiment) weeks. Thereafter, rats of three of the four OVX groups were treated with OS or LG (with doses of 0.04, 0.4, or 4 mg/kg body weight/day) for 5 weeks. Then, uterus, gastrocnemius, and soleus muscles were weighed, fiber size, capillary density, and enzyme activity (lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], citrate synthase [CS], and complex I) were analyzed. In the LG experiment, intramuscular fat content was determined in the quadriceps femoris muscle. All OS treatments resulted in a higher capillary density in the gastrocnemius and longissimus muscles compared with the Non-OVX and the OVX rats, whereas all LG treatments showed a higher capillary density compared with the Non-OVX group. Muscle fiber size and distribution patterns were not changed under either SARM. The CS activity was higher in the longissimus muscle under OS treatment. LG resulted in a higher activity of CS in the gastrocnemius and of LDH in the longissimus muscle. Both SARMs showed an uterotrophic effect, OS at 4 and 0,4 mg dosages, LG at 4 mg dosage. In sum, beneficial effect on muscle vascularization was observed for both SARMs with a stronger impact for OS. LG showed more effect on muscle metabolism. However, a higher muscle weight and intramuscular fat content observed after LG treatment (4 mg) as well as an uterotrophic effect of both SARMs at higher dosages could be considered as an unfavorable side effects and might be a limitation for their application at these dosages.

Detection and identification of ACP-105 and its metabolites in equine urine using LC/MS/MS after oral administration.

ACP-105 is a novel nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) with a tissue-specific agonist effect and does not have side effects associated with the use of common androgens. This research reports a comprehensive study for the detection of ACP-105 and its metabolites in racehorses after oral administration (in vivo) and postulating its structures using mass spectrometric techniques. To obtain the metabolic profile of ACP-105, a selective and reliable LC-MS/MS method was developed. The chemical structures of the metabolites were determined based on their fragmentation pattern, accurate mass, and retention time. Under the current experimental condition, a total of 19 metabolites were detected in ACP-105 drug administered equine urine samples. The study results suggest the following: (1) ACP-105 is prone to oxidation, which gives corresponding monohydroxylated, dihydroxylated, and trihydroxylated metabolites; (2) along with oxidation, there is a possibility of elimination of water molecule (dehydration) from the third position of the tropine moiety, resulting in the dehydrated analogs of corresponding monohydroxylated, dihydroxylated, and trihydroxylated metabolites; (3) from the study on the metabolites using LC-MS/MS, it is clear that the fragmentation pattern is identical and a great number of fragment ions are common in all the metabolites and the parent drug. (4) The ACP-105 and its metabolites were detected for up to 72 h; thus, the result is a valuable tool for evaluating its use and/or misuse in sport.

Effect of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Enobosarm on Bone Healing in a Rat Model for Aged Male Osteoporosis

Enobosarm (ostarine, MK-2866, or GTx-024) is a non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulator. This study evaluated the effect of various regimens of enobosarm (EN) on bone healing in an orchiectomized rat model for aged male osteoporosis and compared it to testosterone (T) treatment. Ninety eight-month-old male Sprague Dawley rats were either orchiectomized (Orx) or left intact (Non-Orx) and divided into groups (n = 15/group): (1) Non-Orx; (2) Orx; (3) Orx+T-th; (4) Orx+EN-th; (5) Orx+T-pr; and (6) Orx+EN-pr. Prophylaxis (Pr) treatments were applied immediately after Orx for up to 18 weeks. Therapy (Th) treatments were applied 12 weeks after Orx for up to 6 weeks. Bilateral tibia osteotomy with plate osteosynthesis was performed 12 weeks after Orx in all groups. EN and T were mixed with the diet; the daily dosage was 0.35 ± 0.06 and 41 ± 8 mg/kg BW, respectively. Both T treatments improved bone healing by increasing callus volume and area, bone volume and density, and cortical width; they had no effect on prostate or levator ani weight. EN-pr increased the callus area and callus density and decreased cortical density, but increased prostate weight. The effect of T-pr and T-th on bone was stronger than EN-pr. EN-th affected bone healing negatively by reducing callus density and area and delaying osteotomy bridging. Levator ani weight was increased in both EN groups. EN treatment after fracture is not advisable in aged males. EN-pr treatment as a therapy for bone healing in men could be further investigated; endocrinological side effects must be closely monitored.

The clinical relevance and mechanism of skeletal muscle wasting.

Skeletal muscle wasting occurs in both chronic and acute diseases. Increasing evidence has shown this debilitating process is associated with short- and long-term outcomes in critical, cancer and surgical patients. Both muscle quantity and quality, as reflected by the area and density of a given range of attenuation in CT scan, impact the patient prognosis. In addition, ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) are also widely used in the assessment of body composition due to their bedside viability and no radioactivity. Mechanism researches have revealed complicated pathways are involved in muscle wasting, which include altered IGF1-Akt-FoxO signaling, elevated levels of myostatin and activin A, activation of NF-κB pathway and glucocorticoid effects. Particularly, central nervous system (CNS) has been proven to participate in regulating muscle wasting in various conditions, such as infection and tumor. Several promising therapeutic agents have been under developing in the treatment of muscle atrophy, such as myostatin antagonist, ghrelin analog, non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs). Notably, nutritional therapy is still the fundamental support in combating muscle wasting. However, the optimizing and tailored nutrition regimen relies on accurate metabolism measurement and large clinical trials in the future. Here, we will discuss the current understanding of muscle wasting and potential treatment in clinical practice.

Abstract P5-11-01 : Phase 1 dose escalation study of a novel selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), RAD140, in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in ~90% of ER+ BC. Androgen-based therapies have demonstrated response rates from 20-25% in advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC). RAD140 is an oral nonsteroidal SARM with tissue-selective AR agonist activity in BC cells but attenuated activity in other androgen-responsive tissues. In in vivo and in vitro models recapitulating various stages of AR/ER+ BCs, RAD140 exhibited potent anti-tumor activity as a single agent and in combination with inhibitors (i) of CDK4/6 or mTOR. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase 1 dose escalation study with a 3+3 design and pharmacokinetic (PK) expansion cohort. The primary endpoint is safety, tolerability, and to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose (RD). Secondary endpoints are PK and antitumor activity by RECIST. In the dose escalation phase, patients (pts) were treated with RAD140 once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles. In the subsequent PK expansion (PKE) cohort, pts were treated with a single dose of 100 mg followed by 1 wk of PK sampling before entering continuous 28-day treatment cycles with 100 mg QD dosing. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed during the first 28-day cycle. Key eligibility criteria included: ER+/HER2- and inoperable/mBC, post-menopausal, and ineligible for standard therapy. Archival tumor samples within 2 years or fresh tumor biopsies collected at the time of enrollment were analyzed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for AR, ER, progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 and Ki67. Serum sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were used to assess AR engagement. Results: Dose escalation and PKE enrollment (n=22) is complete. Median age = 60 years, 100% stage IV, 86% visceral disease, 95% AR+, 91% AR+/ER+, and 82% AR+/ER+/HER2-. Median number of prior lines of therapy for mBC = 4; prior fulvestrant 86%, aromatase inhibitor 96%, CDK4/6i 91%, mTORi/PI3Ki 46%, chemotherapy 91%. Starting dose levels were 50 mg (n=6), 100 mg (n=13), and 150 mg (n=3) QD. Median time on treatment = 9 wk (range <1-32+ wk). Most frequent (>30%) treatment-emergent adverse events were elevated AST (27% grade [G] 1; 9% G2; 18% G3; 5% G4) and elevated ALT (18% G1; 23% G3). DLTs at 150 mg were hypophosphatemia (n=2). DLTs at 100 mg were hypophosphatemia (n=1), elevated ALT (n=3), and elevated AST (n=1). All DLTs were grade 3 and reversible. No drug-related deaths occurred. PK samples collected for 144 hrs after the 100 mg single dose showed variable absorption with a half-life of approximately 60 hrs. The observed human steady-state PK exposure at 100 mg exceeds the PK exposure of the efficacious dose in mouse of 10 mg/kg. Of 9 evaluable pts at the MTD of 100 mg, there was 1 partial response (PR; ORR=11%) and 3 pts (33%) with stable disease ≥12 wk. Time to PR was 15.9 wk with duration 18.6+ wk. Three pts remain on treatment. SHBG decreased in 18/18 pts and PSA increased in 15/20 pts with paired samples available, indicative of AR target engagement, most notably in the pt with PR. In 1 pt with paired pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies, a strong induction of AR by IHC, predominantly in the nucleus was seen, further suggesting AR activation by RAD140 at the tissue level. Conclusions: The MTD and recommended dose for RAD140 is 100 mg QD. RAD140 is a novel oral AR-targeted agent for the treatment of AR+/ER+ mBC with an acceptable safety profile and preliminary evidence of target engagement and antitumor activity. This study is ongoing. NCT03088527 Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Patricia LoRusso, Cynthia Ma, Neelima Vidula, Rebecca G Bagley, Steven Troy, Miriam Annett, Ziyang Yu, Aaron Weitzman, Maureen G Conlan, Amy Weise. Phase 1 dose escalation study of a novel selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), RAD140, in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-01.

Profiling of anabolic androgenic steroids and selective androgen receptor modulators for interference with adrenal steroidogenesis

Anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS) are testosterone derivatives developed for steroid-replacement and treatment of debilitating conditions. They are widely used by athletes in elite sports and bodybuilding due to their muscle-building and performance-enhancing properties. Excessive AAS use is associated with cardiovascular diseases, mood changes, endocrine and metabolic disorders; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) aim to reduce adverse androgenic effects, while maximizing anabolic effects. This study assessed potential steroidogenic disturbances of 19 AAS and 3 SARMs in human adrenocortical carcinoma H295R cells, comparing basal and forskolin-activated states by mass spectrometry-based quantification of nine major adrenal steroids. Mesterolone, mestanolone and methenolone increased mineralocorticoid but decreased adrenal androgen production, indicating CYP17A1 dysfunction. Cell-free activity assays failed to detect direct CYP17A1 inhibition, supported by molecular modeling. The mRNA expression levels of 3β-HSD2, CYP17A1, CYP21A2, CYP11B1 and CYP11B2 were unaffected, suggesting indirect inhibition involving post-translational modification and/or impaired protein stability. Clostebol and oxymetholone decreased corticosteroid but increased dehydroepiandrosterone biosynthesis in H295R cells, suggesting CYP21A2 inhibition, sustained by molecular modeling. These AAS did not affect the expression of key steroidogenic genes. None of the SARMs tested interfered with steroidogenesis. The chosen approach allowed the grouping of AAS according to their steroidogenic-disrupting effects and provided initial mechanistic information. Mesterolone, mestanolone and methenolone potentially promote hypertension and cardiovascular diseases via excessive mineralocorticoid biosynthesis. Clostebol and oxymetholone might cause metabolic disturbances by suppressing corticosteroid production, resulting in adrenal hyperplasia. The non-steroidal SARMs exhibit an improved safety profile and represent a preferred therapeutic option.

Effect of ostarine (enobosarm/GTX024), a selective androgen receptor modulator, on adipocyte metabolism in Wistar rats.

Synthetic ligands of androgen receptor (AR) are a standard in the treatment of androgen deficiency. One of the effects of androgen deficiency is the disturbance in the homeostasis of lipid metabolism. Till date, there are no effective compounds developed to treat androgen deficiency without having any side effects. Nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a promising solution for various clinical indications. In this study, we investigated the effect of ostarine (enobosarm), a nonsteroidal SARM, on the rat adipocyte metabolism using in vitro techniques. Isolated rat adipocytes were incubated in the presence of different concentrations of ostarine. Control incubation with testosterone as the natural ligand for AR was performed. AR inhibitors were used to investigate the genomic activity of ostarine. Changes in the intensity of lipolysis, lipogenesis, and the secretion of leptin and adiponectin were measured. Moreover, the gene expression of leptin and adiponectin was assessed. For the first time, we have shown that ostarine has a significant effect on the intensity of lipid metabolism. Ostarine downregulates the expression of leptin and adiponectin mRNAs, as well as decreases their release from rat adipocytes. According to our results, ostarine acts via AR with a similar effect as testosterone in the regulation of lipid metabolism and endocrine function of mature rat adipocytes in vitro. Our results indicate the need for further studies on the effects of SARM on the whole organism.

The Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator Ostarine Improves Bone Healing in Ovariectomized Rats.

Non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators, including ostarine, have been developed as an alternative to steroidal hormones. Ostarine has shown a beneficial effect on bone in experimental studies, but no data regarding the effect of ostarine on bone healing have yet been reported. We investigated effects of ostarine on bone healing in ovariectomized rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (3months old) were ovariectomized (Ovx, n = 46) or left intact (Non-Ovx, n = 10). After 8weeks, an osteotomy of the tibia metaphysis was created in all rats, and the Ovx rats were divided into four groups: untreated Ovx (n = 10) and three Ovx groups (each of 12 rats) treated with ostarine at doses of 0.04, 0.4, or 4mg/kg BW (OS-0.04, OS-0.4, and OS-4 groups). Five weeks later, bone healing was analyzed. The OS-4 dose enhanced callus formation, increased callus density, accelerated bridging time of the osteotomy, and elevated alkaline phosphatase gene expression in callus and its protein expression in serum. In the Ovx group, most of the callus parameters were diminished. All OS treatments increased the weight of the gastrocnemius muscle, but only partly enhanced uterus weight in OS-0.4 and OS-4. Serum cholesterol level was reduced, and serum phosphorus was elevated in OS-0.04 and OS-4. Ostarine appeared to have a positive effect on early bone healing in ovariectomized rats. Considering its favorable effect on non-osteotomized bone and muscle, this treatment could be further explored as a therapy for osteoporosis. However, possible metabolic side effects should first be evaluated.

A phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab and selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 in patients with advanced androgen receptor-positive triple-negative breast cancer.

1069 Background: Androgen receptor (AR) targeting therapy has shown single agent activity in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). GTx-024, a nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), demonstrated preclinical and clinical activity in AR+ breast cancer. The current study is designed to test the safety and efficacy of GTx-024 and pembrolizumab in patients with AR+ metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Methods: This is an open-label phase 2 study for AR+ mTNBC. Eligible participants receive pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks in combination with GTx-024 18mg po daily. Key eligibility criteria include patients with AR+ ( > 10%, 1+ by IHC); mTNBC; ECOG 0-1; measurable disease per RECIST 1.1. Patients are excluded if they had prior checkpoint inhibitors or AR targeted agents. The primary objective is to evaluate the tolerability of GTx-024 and pembrolizumab, and determine the response rate. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled in the study. One patient was ineligible due to previously undiagnosed brain metastases. Ten of 16 patients had visceral metastasis (lung or liver), and 15% of patients had received ≥ 3 previous lines of therapy for mTNBC. Among 16 patients evaluable for response, 2 patients achieved a best response of partial response (PR), 2 patient had stable disease (SD, 18 and 19 weeks ), 11 patients had progressive disease (PD), and 1 patient is too early for restaging imaging. Durable response was found in 1 patient. Grade 3 toxicities include 1 diarrhea and 1 dry skin. Grade 2 adverse events include 3 elevated liver function, 1 adrenal insufficiency, 1 hyperthyroidism, 1 palpitation, 1 diarrhea, 1 hyperhydrosis, 1 hot flashes and 1 headache. Three patients had dose delay and two patients had dose reduction. Conclusions: AR targeted therapy GTx-024 combined with pembrolizumab is well tolerated with clinical activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02971761.

Abstract OT1-02-02: A phase 1, first-in-human, multi-part study of RAD140, an oral nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator, in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer accounts for about 75% of breast cancer cases. Despite initial response to ER-targeted therapies, subsequent tumor progression remains an important clinical problem, highlighting the need for new therapies with activity in endocrine-resistant tumors. The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in up to 90% of ER+ breast cancers, and until the 1970s, breast cancer was commonly treated with androgens with single-agent response rates ranging from 20% to 25%. However, androgen-based therapy for breast cancer declined due to lack of tissue selectivity, potential for aromatization to estrogen, and the emergence of ER-targeted agents such as tamoxifen. RAD140 is an oral nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) that cannot be converted to estrogen by aromatase. RAD140 has high AR affinity and target selectivity, demonstrating marked tissue-selective AR agonist activity comparable to natural androgens in breast cancer cells, but lacking agonist activity in prostate cancer cells. Preclinical efficacy studies in multiple in vivo and in vitro models of AR+/ER+ breast cancer demonstrate potent anti-tumor activity of RAD140 as a single agent and in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. This first-in-human study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical activity of RAD140 in patients with HR+ breast cancer. Trial Design and Specific Aims: This is a Phase I, open-label dose escalation and safety expansion study of RAD140 in postmenopausal patients (pts) with advanced HR+ breast cancer for whom no standard therapy is available. During dose escalation (Part A), pts are assigned sequentially to escalating doses of RAD140 using a standard 3+3 design to establish a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended dose (RD) based on safety, PK and preliminary clinical activity. The Safety Expansion (Part B) will further evaluate the safety, tolerability and clinical activity of the RD. Eligibility Criteria: Pts must be post-menopausal females ≥18 years old with locally advanced or metastatic ER+/HER2- (Part A) or ER+/AR+/HER2- (Part B) breast cancer and ECOG 0 or 1. Part A pts must not be eligible for standard therapy. Pts in Part B must have had at least 1 line of prior systemic therapy in the metastatic setting and at least 6 months of prior endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting and progressed on the most recent endocrine therapy. Measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 is also required for enrollment in Part B. Statistical Methods: Descriptive statistics (including mean, standard deviation, median for continuous variables; frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables) will be presented by dose. Plasma or serum PK parameters for RAD140 will be estimated using non-compartmental methods. Present Accrual and Target Accrual: The study will enroll up to 40 pts, including up to approximately 24 pts enrolled in cohorts of 3 to 6 in Part A, and another 15 pts enrolled in Part B. As of June 2018, 11 pts have enrolled at 5 sites. (NCT03088527) Citation Format: Hamilton E, Vidula N, Ma C, LoRusso P, Saeh J, Reichert V, Yu Z, Annett M, Weitzman A, Hattersly G, O'Neill A, Weise A. A phase 1, first-in-human, multi-part study of RAD140, an oral nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator, in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-02-02.

Development of a selective androgen receptor modulator for transdermal use in hypogonadal patients

We have identified a non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), termed LY305, that is bioavailable through a transdermal route of administration while highly cleared via hepatic metabolism to limit parent compound exposure in the liver. Selection of this compound and its transdermal formulation was based on the optimization of skin absorption properties using both invitro and invivo skin models that supported PBPK modeling for human PK predictions. This molecule is an agonist in perineal muscle while being a weak partial agonist in the androgenic tissues such as prostate. When LY305 was tested in animal models of skeletal atrophy it restored the skeletal muscle mass through accelerated repair. In a bone fracture model, LY305 remained osteoprotective in the regenerating tissue and void of deleterious effects. Finally, in a small cohort of healthy volunteers, we assessed the safety and tolerability of LY305 when administered transdermally. LY305 showed a dose-dependent increase in serum exposure and was well tolerated with minimal adverse effects. Notably, there were no statistically significant changes to hematocrit or HDL after 4-week treatment period. Collectively, LY305 represents a first of its kind de novo development of a non-steroidal transdermal SARM with unique properties which could find clinical utility in hypogonadal men.

Abstract OT1-05-02: A phase II clinical trial of the combination of pembrolizumab and selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 in patients with advanced androgen receptor positive triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Androgen receptor (AR) targeted therapy and immunotherapy represent one of the most promising strategies for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), which accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers. As a nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM), GTx-024 demonstrated preclinical activity in AR+ TNBC PDX model. Pembrolizumab is a highly selective humanized monoclonal antibody of the programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1). The complementary modes of action and low potential for overlapping toxicity make the combination promising in patients with AR+ mTNBC. Trial Design: This is an open-label Phase 2 study for AR+ mTNBC. Eligible participants receive pembrolizumab 200mg IV every 3 weeks in combination with GTx-024 18mg po daily. Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients must have AR+ (>10%, 1+ by IHC) TNBC; failed up to 2 lines of therapy in metastatic setting; and have measurable disease per RECIST1.1. Patients are excluded if they have had prior checkpoint inhibitors or AR targeted agents. Patients with current or prior use of testosterone, testosterone-like agents, androgenic compounds, or anti-androgens (including systemic steroids and immunosuppressive medications)are excluded, as well as current or prior history of noninfectious pneumonitis requiring systemic steroid therapy. Specific Aims: The primary objective is to evaluate the safety/tolerability of GTx-024 and pembrolizumab and determine the response rate (CR or PR via RECIST 1.1) in patients with advanced AR+ TNBC. We will use clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS to test the efficacy of this novel drug combination. Statistical Design: A Simon's MiniMax two-stage Phase 2 design will be utilized. Based on the previously reported response rate associated with single agent pembrolizumab (19%), we consider a response rate of 19% for the combination as discouraging, and a 39% response rate as encouraging. As a result, we will initially accrue 15 patients (including 6 patients from safety lead-in treated at the tolerable dose). If 2 or fewer patients respond, we will stop accrual for futility. Otherwise, the study will accrue an additional 14 patients for a total of 29 patients. With 29 patients, if only 8 or fewer respond (≤27.6%), the study will be considered discouraging unless secondary evidence of clinical benefit is substantial. With more than 8 patients responding out of the 29 patients, the combination would be considered promising. This design has 85% power to declare a true response rate of 39% as promising (power), and a 10% probability of declaring a true 19% response rate as encouraging (type I error). The probability of early termination if the true response rate is 19% is 44%. Target Accrual: 29 Study Contact: Yuan Yuan MD PhD, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center; Duarte, CA 91030; Email: yuyuan@coh.org Citation Format: Yuan Y, Frankel P, Synold T, Lee P, Yost S, Martinez N, Tang A, Mendez B, Schmolze D, Apple S, Hurria A, Waisman J, Somlo G, Tank N, Sedrak M, Mortimer J. A phase II clinical trial of the combination of pembrolizumab and selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 in patients with advanced androgen receptor positive triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-05-02.

Chemical Composition and Labeling of Substances Marketed as Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators and Sold via the Internet

Recent reports have described the increasing use of nonsteroidal selective androgen receptor modulators, which have not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to enhance appearance and performance. The composition and purity of such products is not known. To determine the chemical identity and the amounts of ingredients in dietary supplements and products marketed and sold through the internet as selective androgen receptor modulators and compare the analyzed contents with product labels. Web-based searches were performed from February 18, 2016, to March 25, 2016, using the Google search engine on the Chrome and Internet Explorer web browsers to identify suppliers selling selective androgen receptor modulators. The products were purchased and the identities of the compounds and their amounts were determined from April to August 2016 using chain-of-custody and World Anti-Doping Association-approved analytical procedures. Analytical findings were compared against the label information. Products marketed and sold as selective androgen receptor modulators. Chemical identities and the amount of ingredients in each product marketed and sold as selective androgen receptor modulators. Among 44 products marketed and sold as selective androgen receptor modulators, only 23 (52%) contained 1 or more selective androgen receptor modulators (Ostarine, LGD-4033, or Andarine). An additional 17 products (39%) contained another unapproved drug, including the growth hormone secretagogue ibutamoren, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist GW501516, and the Rev-ErbA agonist SR9009. Of the 44 tested products, no active compound was detected in 4 (9%) and substances not listed on the label were contained in 11 (25%). In only 18 of the 44 products (41%), the amount of active compound in the product matched that listed on the label. The amount of the compounds listed on the label differed substantially from that found by analysis in 26 of 44 products (59%). In this limited investigation involving chemical analyses of 44 products marketed as selective androgen receptor modulators and sold via the internet, most products contained unapproved drugs and substances. Only 52% contained selective androgen receptor modulators and many were inaccurately labeled.

Study Design and Rationale for the Phase 3 Clinical Development Program of Enobosarm, a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator, for the Prevention and Treatment of Muscle Wasting in Cancer Patients (POWER Trials).

Muscle wasting in cancer is a common and often occult condition that can occur prior to overt signs of weight loss and before a clinical diagnosis of cachexia can be made. Muscle wasting in cancer is an important and independent predictor of progressive functional impairment, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Although several therapeutic agents are currently in development for the treatment of muscle wasting or cachexia in cancer, the majority of these agents do not directly inhibit muscle loss. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) have the potential to increase lean body mass (LBM) and hence muscle mass, without the untoward side effects seen with traditional anabolic agents. Enobosarm, a nonsteroidal SARM, is an agent in clinical development for prevention and treatment of muscle wasting in patients with cancer (POWER 1 and 2 trials). The POWER trials are two identically designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, and multinational phase 3 trials to assess the efficacy of enobosarm for the prevention and treatment of muscle wasting in subjects initiating first-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To assess enobosarm’s effect on both prevention and treatment of muscle wasting, no minimum weight loss is required. These pivotal trials have pioneered the methodological and regulatory fields exploring a therapeutic agent for cancer-associated muscle wasting, a process hereby described. In each POWER trial, subjects will receive placebo (n = 150) or enobosarm 3 mg (n = 150) orally once daily for 147 days. Physical function, assessed as stair climb power (SCP), and LBM, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), are the co-primary efficacy endpoints in both trials assessed at day 84. Based on extensive feedback from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the co-primary endpoints will be analyzed as a responder analysis. To be considered a physical function responder, a subject must have ≥10 % improvement in physical function compared to baseline. To meet the definition of response on LBM, a subject must have demonstrated no loss of LBM compared with baseline. Secondary endpoints include durability of response assessed at day 147 in those responding at day 84. A combined overall survival analysis for both studies is considered a key secondary safety endpoint. The POWER trials design was established with extensive clinical input and collaboration with regulatory agencies. The efficacy endpoints are a result of this feedback and discussion of the threshold for clinical benefit in patients at risk for muscle wasting. Full results from these studies will soon be published and will further guide the development of future anabolic trials. Clinical Trial ID: NCT01355484. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01355484, NCT01355497. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01355497?term=g300505&rank=1.

In vitro metabolism study of a black market product containing SARM LGD-4033.

Anabolic agents are often used by athletes to enhance their performance. However, use of steroids leads to considerable side effects. Non-steroidal selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) are a novel class of substances that have not been approved so far but seem to have a more favourable anabolic/androgenic ratio than steroids and produce fewer side effects. Therefore the use of SARMs has been prohibited since 2008 by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Several of these SARMs have been detected on the black market. Metabolism studies are essential to identify the best urinary markers to ensure effective control of emerging substances by doping control laboratories. As black market products often contain non-pharmaceutical-grade substances, alternatives for human excretion studies are needed to elucidate the metabolism. A black market product labelled to contain the SARM LGD-4033 was purchased over the Internet. Purity verification of the black market product led to the detection of LGD-4033, without other contaminants. Human liver microsomes and S9 liver fractions were used to perform phase I and phase II (glucuronidation) metabolism studies. The samples of the in vitro metabolism studies were analyzed by gas chromatography-(tandem) mass spectrometry (GC-MS(/MS)), liquid chromatography-high resolution-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-(HR)MS/MS). LC-HRMS product ion scans allowed to identify typical fragment ions for the parent compound and to further determine metabolite structures. In total five metabolites were detected, all modified in the pyrrolidine ring of LGD-4033. The metabolic modifications ranged from hydroxylation combined with keto-formation (M1) or cleavage of the pyrrolidine ring (M2), hydroxylation and methylation (M3/M4) and dihydroxylation (M5). The parent compound and M2 were also detected as glucuronide-conjugates. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Characterization of GLPG0492, a selective androgen receptor modulator, in a mouse model of hindlimb immobilization.

BackgroundMuscle wasting is a hallmark of many chronic conditions but also of aging and results in a progressive functional decline leading ultimately to disability. Androgens, such as testosterone were proposed as therapy to counteract muscle atrophy. However, this treatment is associated with potential cardiovascular and prostate cancer risks and therefore not acceptable for long-term treatment. Selective Androgen receptor modulators (SARM) are androgen receptor ligands that induce muscle anabolism while having reduced effects in reproductive tissues. Therefore, they represent an alternative to testosterone therapy. Our objective was to demonstrate the activity of SARM molecule (GLPG0492) on a immobilization muscle atrophy mouse model as compared to testosterone propionate (TP) and to identify putative biomarkers in the plasma compartment that might be related to muscle function and potentially translated into the clinical space.MethodsGLPG0492, a non-steroidal SARM, was evaluated and compared to TP in a mouse model of hindlimb immobilization.ResultsGLPG0492 treatment partially prevents immobilization-induced muscle atrophy with a trend to promote muscle fiber hypertrophy in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, GLPG0492 was found as efficacious as TP at reducing muscle loss while sparing reproductive tissues. Furthermore, gene expression studies performed on tibialis samples revealed that both GLPG0492 and TP were slowing down muscle loss by negatively interfering with major signaling pathways controlling muscle mass homeostasis. Finally, metabolomic profiling experiments using 1H-NMR led to the identification of a plasma GLPG0492 signature linked to the modulation of cellular bioenergetic processes.ConclusionsTaken together, these results unveil the potential of GLPG0492, a non-steroidal SARM, as treatment for, at least, musculo-skeletal atrophy consecutive to coma, paralysis, or limb immobilization.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-291) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.