Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Utility of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel combination for the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains a negative prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), even after the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of MPE. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF, is a key agent for patients who develop MPE. However, it is unclear whether MPE is a poor prognostic factor in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC receiving treatment with the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) regimen. Moreover, the effect of ABCP on MPE control is unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the efficacy and safety of ABCP for non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who received treatment with ABCP (January 2019-September 2023). Patients were divided into two groups (non-MPE and MPE), and treatment outcomes were compared. In the MPE group, treatment efficacy for MPE control and toxicity were evaluated. Of the 46 patients enrolled, 17 and 29 were included in the non-MPE and MPE groups, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were not significantly different between the non-MPE and MPE groups (76.5% vs. 51.7%, P=0.13; 88.2% vs. 82.8%, P>0.99; respectively). Similarly, the median progression-free survival and median overall survival were not significantly different (9.9 vs. 10.1 months, P=0.87; 16.0 vs. 19.9 months, P=0.87, respectively). In the MPE group, 25 patients (86.2%) achieved MPE control lasting >8 weeks from the initiation of treatment with ABCP; the median progression-free survival without an unequivocal increase in MPE was 15.0 months. The incidence rates of grade ≥3 non-immune- and immune-related adverse events were 83% and 17%, respectively. There was no treatment-related death. The ABCP regimen may be a promising treatment option for non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer from the randomized Phase II PERLA trial comparing first-line chemotherapy plus dostarlimab or pembrolizumab

BackgroundPERLA (NCT04581824) compared efficacy and safety of dostarlimab (DCT) or pembrolizumab (PCT) plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Here, we report patient-reported outcomes (PROs; exploratory analysis) from PERLA. MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive DCT or PCT every 3 weeks (Q3W) for ≤ 35 cycles [C]. PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13, PRO-CTCAE, FACT-GP5) were collected at baseline, Q3W until C4, Q9W until C16, Q12W until end of treatment and at 30-day safety follow-up. Change from baseline and time to deterioration (TTD) in QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 were analyzed using longitudinal mixed models and Kaplan–Meier estimators, respectively. ResultsThe PRO (DCT/PCT) datasets included 102/99 patients for QLQ-C30, 96/90 for QLQ-LC13, 96/88 for PRO-CTCAE, and 95/87 for FACT-GP5. Completion rates were > 80 % to C4, then decreased in both arms. For QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13, most patients reported stable/improved responses at C13 (∼ 9 months on treatment), with similar responses between arms except more patients reported improvements in dyspnea (QLQ-C30: 36.4 % vs 13.0 %; QLQ-LC13: 40.6 % vs 25.0 %) and chest pain (QLQ-LC13: 34.4 % vs 10.0 %) with DCT vs PCT. TTD per QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 were similar between arms, although TTD in dyspnea was longer with DCT vs PCT (QLQ-LC13: 4.24 vs 1.54 months; p = 0.0168). Most patients in both arms reported that adverse events occurred occasionally/rarely/never with moderate/mild severity. Overall, patients reported little/no bother from treatment side effects. ConclusionsDCT maintained health-related quality of life similarly to PCT and was well tolerated, supporting the PERLA primary results and dostarlimab use in future regimens.

Clinical utility of ctDNA by amplicon based next generation sequencing in first line non small cell lung cancer patients.

The assessment of ctDNA has emerged as a minimally invasive avenue for molecular diagnosis and real-time tracking of tumor progression in NSCLC. However, the evaluation of ctDNA by amplicon-based NGS has been not endorsed by all the healthcare systems and remains to be fully integrated into clinical routine practice. To compare tissue single-gene with plasma multiplexed testing, we retrospectively evaluated 120 plasma samples from 12 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who were part of a prospective study enrolling treatment-naïve patients and in which tissue samples were evaluated using a single-gene testing approach. While the plasma ctDNA detection of EGFR and BRAF mutations had an acceptable level of concordance with the archival tissue (85%), discordance was seen in all the patients in whom ALK alterations were only detected in tissue samples. Among six responders and six non-responders, early ctDNA mutant allelic frequency (MAF) reduction seemed to predict radiologic responses and longer survival, whereas increasing MAF values with the emergence of co-mutations like BRAFV600E, KRASG12V or TP53M237I seemed to be an early indicator of molecular and radiologic progression. This report using an amplicon-based NGS assay on ctDNA underscores the real-life need for plasma and tissue genotyping as complementary tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

FLAIR: A Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Treatment-Naïve NSCLC Patients Harboring EGFR 21L858R Mutation

IntroductionOsimertinib, the 3rd generation EGFR-TKI, has emerged as standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with exon 21 L858R mutation showed lower efficacy with EGFR-TKIs than those with 19Del mutation, even with osimertinib, it remains an unmet medical need to further improve the efficacy in L858R population. We present the rationale and design for FLAIR (NCT04988607), which will investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab versus osimertinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve recurrent or metastatic NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation. Materials and MethodsFLAIR is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study, which is initiated by Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group (CTONG2002). Patients age ≥18 years with primary recurrent or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC who are treatment-naïve with documented EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation is eligible. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily plus bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks or osimertinib monotherapy 80 mg once daily until progression or another discontinuation criterion is met. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include: overall survival rate at 24 months, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), central nervous system (CNS) PFS, CNS ORR and safety. ResultsFLAIR has completed the enrollment, and results are expected in the fourth quarter of 2025 (depending on the actual event rate). ConclusionsThis study will offer better perspectives on the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab combination therapy in treatment-naïve recurrent or metastatic NSCLC patients harboring EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, providing valuable guidance for clinical practice.

Identifying patients who benefit more from perioperative immunotherapy combinations for resectable non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical and molecular characteristics: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

This study aims to identify patient subgroups who benefit more from perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO-CT) based on clinical and molecular characteristics in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative IO-CT were searched. Beneficial differences of IO-CT regimens across different patient subgroups were assessed by pooling trial-specific ratios in event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR), and major pathological response (MPR). Six studies (n = 3003) involving five IO-CT regimens were included. Compared to CT alone, all IO-CT regimens significantly improved EFS, OS, MPR, and pCR, but increased toxicity. Toripa-chemo showed the best EFS and nivo-chemo showed the best OS. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% had more EFS benefits compared to those with PD-L1 < 1% (HR [hazard ratio]: 1.55, 95% CI 1.17-2.04). Squamous NSCLC patients had significantly more pCR and MPR benefits than non-squamous NSCLC patients (pCR: OR [odds ratio] 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95; MPR: OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82). Former smokers had significantly higher pCR benefits than non-smokers (OR: 2.18; 95% CI 1.21-3.92). Additionally, OS benefit was significantly higher in patients < 65years compared to those ≥ 65years (HR ratio: 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). For MPR, males benefited significantly more from IO-CT compared to females (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18-2.42). Perioperative IO-CT is more effective but more toxic than CT alone in resectable NSCLC. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1%, squamous NSCLC, a history of smoking, age < 65years and male gender may experience greater benefits from perioperative IO-CT.

Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar SCT510 Compared with Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.

SCT510 is a biosimilar to bevacizumab (Avastin) reference product (RP) that is approved for various metastatic cancers. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the equivalence of SCT510 and bevacizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with non-squamous NSCLC were randomized equally to the SCT510 group (comprising SCT510, paclitaxel, and carboplatin) and the bevacizumab group (comprising bevacizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin) for 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance monotherapy with SCT510. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included 18-week ORR, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 1-year survival rate, as well as assessments of safety, immunogenicity, and multi-dose PK analysis. Between March 29, 2019, and April 27, 2021, 989 patients were screened and 567 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the SCT510 group (285 patients) and the bevacizumab group (282 patients). The ORR at week 12 was 52.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46.66-58.55%] in the SCT510 group and 52.5% (95% CI 46.47-58.47%) in the bevacizumab group. The ORR at week 18 was 55.4% (95% CI 49.46-61.30%) for SCT510 and 55.7% (95% CI 49.68-61.62%) for bevacizumab. The ORR risk ratio (RR) at weeks 12 and 18 was 0.99 (90% CI 0.873-1.133) and 0.99 (90% CI 0.872-1.114), respectively, both within the pre-specified equivalence margin of 0.75-1.33. There were no differences between the two groups in relation to other secondary endpoints, specifically DCR, DOR, PFS, OS, and 1-year survival rate. The overall safety findings were similar between the two treatment groups, and both SCT510 and bevacizumab RP exhibited low immunogenicity. SCT510 is similar to bevacizumab in clinical efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. The totality of the evidence supports the clinical equivalence of SCT510 and bevacizumab. NCT03792074.

1345P Surufatinib plus toripalimab combined with pemetrexed (A), and platinum (P) in patients (pts) with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC): Updated results of a single-center, phase II trial

1345P Surufatinib plus toripalimab combined with pemetrexed (A), and platinum (P) in patients (pts) with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC): Updated results of a single-center, phase II trial

132P The potential of VEGF-A in the peripheral blood serum as a biomarker of response in the addition of bevacizumab with chemotherapy-combined immunotherapy for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

132P The potential of VEGF-A in the peripheral blood serum as a biomarker of response in the addition of bevacizumab with chemotherapy-combined immunotherapy for metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer

1329P Fruquintinib combined with sintilimab and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in advanced naïve EGFR- and ALK-negative non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC): Updated results

1329P Fruquintinib combined with sintilimab and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment in advanced naïve EGFR- and ALK-negative non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC): Updated results

165P Consistency analysis of c-Met protein expression over time in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

165P Consistency analysis of c-Met protein expression over time in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

1311P Phase II, open-label study of frontline tusamitamab ravtansine with pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results from CARMEN-LC05 trial

1311P Phase II, open-label study of frontline tusamitamab ravtansine with pembrolizumab ± chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated results from CARMEN-LC05 trial

1257MO ABBV-400, a c-Met protein-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients (Pts) with advanced EGFR wildtype (WT) non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from a phase I study

1257MO ABBV-400, a c-Met protein-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients (Pts) with advanced EGFR wildtype (WT) non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from a phase I study

1312P Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs docetaxel (DTX) in patients (pts) with advanced nonsquamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (mets): Results from TROPION-Lung01

1312P Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs docetaxel (DTX) in patients (pts) with advanced nonsquamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (mets): Results from TROPION-Lung01

1355P Real-world (RW) treatment patterns and survival outcomes by PD-L1 expression in stage IV non-squamous (nsq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A retrospective analysis of the UK National Cancer Registry Database (NCRAS)

1355P Real-world (RW) treatment patterns and survival outcomes by PD-L1 expression in stage IV non-squamous (nsq) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A retrospective analysis of the UK National Cancer Registry Database (NCRAS)

Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Recurrence in Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are the most common targetable gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Japan, approximately 40% of patients who undergo surgical resection for non-squamous NSCLC have EGFR mutations. However, no long-term studies have been conducted including a large number of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with postoperative recurrence (PR). We conducted a retrospective observational study of the data of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with PR who had undergone surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between October 2002 and November 2017. We evaluated post-recurrence overall survival (PRS) and postoperative overall survival (POS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and identify any associations between the clinical variables at recurrence and PRS using univariate and multivariate analysis. We enrolled 162 patients. The median observation time for PRS was 4.95 years (range, 0.82-13.25) and POS was 5.81 years (range, 2.84-16.71). The median PRS was 5.17 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.90-5.61) and POS was 7.07 years (95% CI, 5.88-8.01). Univariate analysis identified male sex (median PRS: 3.32 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05), bone metastasis (median PRS: 2.43 vs. 5.33 years; p < 0.05), and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (median PRS: 3.05 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05) and multivariate analysis identified bone metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.28; p < 0.05) and CNS metastasis (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.98; p < 0.05) as poor prognostic factors. The pattern of recurrence (oligo vs. non-oligo recurrence) was not a prognostic factor. Logistic regression analysis revealed the association between sex and the presence bone/CNS metastasis at recurrence. Our data may help visualize future prospects and determine the timing of osimertinib initiation. New treatment strategies need to be developed for patients with bone/CNS metastasis at the first recurrence.

Final Analysis Data and Exploratory Biomarker Analysis of a Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib Monotherapy for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: The WJOG9717L Study

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been the standard treatment for patients with NSCLC who have sensitive EGFR mutations. This study revealed final analysis survival data, biomarkers, and resistance mechanisms of osimertinib plus bevacizumab or osimertinib monotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced EGFR-positive nonsquamous NSCLC. MethodsWe previously reported the primary results of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study comparing osimertinib plus bevacizumab with osimertinib monotherapy for this population. In this exploratory analysis using tissue and plasma samples, we evaluated gene profiles at baseline and disease progression or the last dose using targeted deep sequencing. ResultsThe median progression-free survival (PFS) by the blinded independent central reviewer was 22.1 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.864, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.549–1.359). The 3-year overall survival was not different between the two arms (osimertinib plus bevacizumab: 57.1%; osimertinib monotherapy: 65.0%; HR 1.271, 95% CI: 0.727–2.223). A total of 94 patients had assessable plasma samples at baseline, and 40 had assessable pretreatment tissue samples. EGFR mutations (76.6%) and TP53 mutations (44.7%) were detected in plasma samples at baseline. In patients with plasma TP53 mutations (n = 42), the median PFS by blinded independent central reviewer was 19.8 months for the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 20.2 months for the osimertinib arm (HR = 1.107, 95% CI: 0.534–2.297). ConclusionsThere was also no significant difference in the PFS between the two arms, even in patients with TP53 mutations.

Phase III KEYNOTE-789 Study of Pemetrexed and Platinum With or Without Pembrolizumab for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor‒Resistant, EGFR-Mutant, Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, most patients experience disease progression. We report results from the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-789 study of pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab for TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03515837). Adults with pathologically confirmed stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC, documented DEL19 or L858R EGFR mutation, and progression after EGFR-TKI treatment were randomly assigned 1:1 to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo once every 3 weeks plus four cycles of pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin once every 3 weeks and then maintenance pemetrexed. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Final PFS testing was completed at the second interim analysis (IA2; data cutoff, December 3, 2021); OS was tested at final analysis (FA; data cutoff, January 17, 2023). Efficacy boundaries were one-sided P = .0117 for PFS and OS. Four hundred ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 245) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n = 247). At IA2, the median PFS was 5.6 months for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus 5.5 months for placebo plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97]; P = .0122). At FA, the median OS was 15.9 versus 14.7 months, respectively (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02]; P = .0362). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43.7% of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy recipients versus 38.6% of placebo plus chemotherapy recipients. Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy in patients with TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutant, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC did not significantly prolong PFS or OS versus placebo plus chemotherapy in KEYNOTE-789.

Combination Therapy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel for Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance and EGFR Mutations.

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapyhas a potential efficacy in a specific subset of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. However, there is a dearth of investigations on the effectiveness of ABCP therapy as the primary outcome of EGFR-TKI use. A single-center retrospective analysis was performed on 24 cases of stage IV EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC patients who received one or more lines of EGFR-TKItherapy and subsequently initiated ABCP therapy within the timeframe of April 1, 2019, to April 30, 2023. This study assessed overall survival and progression-free survival associated with ABCP therapy, further analyzing the overall survival data based on EGFR subgroups. The mean age of the cohort was 65 ± 9 years with 14 females (58%). The performance status (PS) was recorded as 0 in 13 out of 24 patients (54%) and 1 in 11 out of 24 patients (46%). Thirteen (54%) patients had a history of smoking. Adenocarcinoma histology was prevalent in all cases. The EGFR mutations included Ex19del in 14 patients (58%) and L858R in 10 (42%) patients. At ABCP therapy initiation, liver metastases were evident in three cases (13%) and brain metastases in eight (33%). Programmed death ligand 1 (22C3) expression levels varied, with <1%, 1-49%, and ≥50% observed in five, 11, and five cases, respectively, while data were missing for three cases. The median follow-up duration was 14.1 months, with median overall survival estimated at 23.6 months (95% CI: 14.5 months - not reached) and median progression-free survival at 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.9-11.5 months). The EGFR L858R mutation showed a favorable trend in overall survival compared with the EGFR Ex19del mutation (not evaluated vs. 23.6 months). ABCP therapy for EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC is a promising option, similar to immune checkpoint inhibitor-free platinum-based combination therapy. Therefore, prospective trials are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these treatments.

REZILIENT3: Phase 3 study of zipalertinib plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations.

TPS219 Background: Despite recent advances, tolerable and effective treatments for patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations are needed, particularly in the first-line setting where platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care. Zipalertinib (CLN-081/TAS6417), an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of EGFR with broad activity against EGFR mutations, showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins–mutant NSCLC, leading to ‘Breakthrough Therapy’ designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in January 2022. Data suggest that combining EGFR TKIs with chemotherapy can improve antitumor efficacy versus chemotherapy or TKI treatment alone in patients with EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC. REZILIENT3 is a pivotal phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of zipalertinib plus first-line standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. Methods: This randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 3 study (NCT05973773) will be conducted in two parts. Part A (safety lead-in) will confirm the safety of zipalertinib 100 mg twice daily as the recommended dose in combination with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations or other uncommon single/compound EGFR mutations. In Part B (randomized part), patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations and at least one measurable lesion (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1) will be randomized 1:1 to zipalertinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0/1), brain metastases (yes/no), and geography (Asia/rest of world). Zipalertinib will be administered orally at a starting dose of 100 mg twice daily (pending confirmation in Part A). Chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min) will be administered intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (carboplatin/cisplatin for four cycles). Patients randomized to chemotherapy alone will be allowed to cross over to zipalertinib monotherapy after documented progressive disease. The primary endpoint in Part B is progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, intracranial efficacy endpoints, and quality of life. Part A is anticipated to enroll between 6 and 12 patients, while Part B is estimated to enroll approximately 260 patients. Enrollment started in June 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05973773 .

Identifying key circulating tumor DNA parameters for predicting clinical outcomes in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after first-line chemoimmunotherapy

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides valuable tumor-related information without invasive biopsies, yet consensus is lacking on optimal parameters for predicting clinical outcomes. Utilizing longitudinal ctDNA data from the large phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) of atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with stage IV non-squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), here we report that post-treatment ctDNA response correlates significantly with radiographic response. However, only modest concordance is identified, revealing that ctDNA response is likely not a surrogate for radiographic response; both provide distinct information. Various ctDNA metrics, especially early ctDNA nadirs, emerge as primary predictors for progression-free survival and overall survival, potentially better assessing long-term benefits for chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC. Integrating radiographic and ctDNA assessments enhances prediction of survival outcomes. We also identify optimal cutoff values for risk stratification and key assessment timepoints, notably Weeks 6–9, for insights into clinical outcomes. Overall, our identified optimal ctDNA parameters can enhance the prediction of clinical outcomes, refine trial designs, and inform therapeutic decisions for first-line NSCLC patients.