BackgroundFor patients with pneumonia, the rapid detection of pathogens is still a major global problem in clinical practice because traditional diagnostic techniques for infection are time-consuming and insensitive. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel technique that has the potential to improve pathogen diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the microbiological diagnostic ability of mNGS compared with conventional culture and to determine the optimal time to test patients for pneumonia.MethodsA prospective study using data from June 2020 to June 2021 was performed at a tertiary teaching hospital in China. We included 56 patients from all adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were taken for simultaneous mNGS and conventional culture testing.ResultsAll 56 patients underwent both conventional culture and mNGS. Of these patients, 37 were diagnosed with severe pneumonia and 17 were diagnosed with non-severe pneumonia. The top three pathogenic bacteria detected by mNGS were Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Enterococcus faecium was detected more frequently in the non-severe pneumonia group (4 vs. 0, p < 0.05). The findings revealed that the detection rate of mNGS (84%) was superior to that of conventional culture methods (48%). Notably, the percentage of mNGS-positive BALF samples (46/56, 82.14%) was significantly greater than that of blood samples (27/56, 48.21%). The etiological comparison demonstrated that mNGS-positive samples, which received clinical approval, tended to be associated with a more normalized temperature, lower PCO2 levels, and a higher SOFA score than mNGS-negative samples (p = 0.022, p = 0.0.028, and p = 0.038, respectively).ConclusionsIn this study, we discovered that the etiology of lung infections frequently involves multiple pathogens. The use of mNGS in BALF is instrumental for detecting nonviral pathogens associated with lung infections. Although the rate of positive blood NGS results is significantly influenced by various clinical factors, for patients suspected of having viral, Legionella, or tsutsugamushi infections, plasma mNGS could serve as a complementary diagnostic tool.