Non-serious Adverse Events Research Articles

377 Real-world use of OPZELURA™: safety analysis at 1 year

Abstract OPZELURA™ (ruxolitinib cream) became the first approved topical Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) in the USA on September 21, 2021, for treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and on July 18, 2022 for nonsegmental vitiligo. This study aims to review postmarketing safety encompassing nearly 14,000 patient-years of treatment during the first year of market approval through September 20, 2022. The Incyte global safety database and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System were queried for adverse event (AE) reports received for OPZELURA between September 21, 2021 and September 20, 2022. Search of these databases found 294 postmarketing individual case safety reports (ICSRs) containing 585 nonserious AEs, four serious AEs and no fatal AEs. Of the 294 ICSRs, 220 (75%) were received from spontaneous sources and 74 (25%) were received from noninterventional/solicited sources. Consumers reported 221 ICSRs (75%) and 73 (25%) were medically confirmed by a healthcare professional (i.e. nurse, pharmacist and physician). Gender was reported in 257 ICSRs; of these, 81 (32%) involved male patients and 176 (68%) involved female patients. Age was reported in 64 ICSRs (22%), with a median age of 39 years. The AEs (any unfavorable sign, symptom or disease) with frequency >2% out of all events included application site pain (16 events), dermatitis atopic, skin irritation (15 events each), scratch (14 events) and condition aggravated (13 events). Application site pain, skin irritation and scratch were mostly related to an initial issue with cream texture that was rapidly addressed. ‘Dermatitis atopic’ and ‘condition aggravated’ reflected worsening of the underlying condition or lack of improvement. The four serious AEs were skin cancer (two events), pericarditis and thrombocytopenia (one event each), all of which had insufficient information for assessment of relatedness to OPZELURA. Because indications for OPZELURA are inflammatory conditions, OPZELURA has been subject to the same class warnings as oral JAKi that include the risk of serious infections, mortality, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events and thrombosis, imposed by FDA subsequent to the ORAL Surveillance trial of tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis (Kragstrup et al., RMD Open, 2022; 8:e002236). Topical application of OPZELURA results in low systemic bioavailability of ruxolitinib, and serious AEs associated with oral JAKi were not reported with OPZELURA. Safety data from the first year of marketing confirm that OPZELURA is well tolerated, without significant systemic AEs, and with a low incidence of application site reactions.

#5215 OFATUMUMAB AS A RESCUE THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH MEMBRANOUS NEPHROPATHY

Abstract Background and Aims Rituximab is the first-line treatment for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and nephrotic syndrome (NS) at high risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease. However, this drug is effective only in approximately two thirds of treated patients, and repeated rituximab infusions may be complicated by hypersensitivity reactions, which contraindicate retreatment. Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 antibody, could overcome these limitations. Method We retrospectively evaluated the response to a single 50–300 mg dose of intravenous ofatumumab in 17 MN patients referred to our institution who either experienced hypersensitivity reactions (rituximab-intolerant, n = 5) or failed to achieve NS remission after rituximab infusion (rituximab-resistant, n = 12). Results Over a median [IQR] follow-up of 5.0 [3.0-9.8] months, ten (58.8%) patients—five rituximab-resistant (41.7%) and all five rituximab-intolerant—achieved complete or partial NS remission, defined as proteinuria <0.3 g/day or proteinuria <3.5 g/day with ≥50% reduction from baseline, respectively. Ofatumumab infusion induced a progressive reduction in 24-hour urinary protein and IgG excretion, and a sharp increase in serum albumin and IgG levels. Peripheral B cells were depleted in all patients and started reconstituting by 3 months from baseline. Seven of the 12 subjects with PLA2R-related disease (i.e. with baseline anti-PLA2R antibody levels >2.7 RU/mL by ELISA) achieved antibody depletion during the follow-up (half of rituximab-resistant and all rituximab-intolerant). There were 14 non-serious infusion-related adverse events in nine patients, all of which completely resolved with temporary interruption of ofatumumab infusion. Conclusion Ofatumumab may be an effective and safe treatment option for all rituximab-intolerant and a substantial proportion of rituximab-resistant MN patients.

Perioperative complications following open or endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI Trial

ObjectiveAnticipated perioperative morbidity is an important factor for choosing a revascularization method for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Our goal was to assess systemic perioperative complications of patients treated with surgical and endovascular revascularization in the Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial. MethodsBEST-CLI was a prospective randomized trial comparing open (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) revascularization strategies for patients with CLTI. Two parallel cohorts were studied: Cohort 1 included patients with adequate single-segment great saphenous vein (SSGSV), whereas Cohort 2 included those without SSGSV. Data were queried for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE–composite myocardial infarction, stroke, death), non-serious (non-SAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) (criteria–death/life-threatening/requiring hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization/significant disability/incapacitation/affecting subject safety in trial) 30 days after the procedure. Per protocol analysis was used (intervention received without crossover), and risk-adjusted analysis was performed. ResultsThere were 1367 patients (662 OPEN, 705 ENDO) in Cohort 1 and 379 patients (188 OPEN, 191 ENDO) in Cohort 2. Thirty-day mortality in Cohort 1 was 1.5% (OPEN 1.8%; ENDO 1.3%) and in Cohort 2 was 1.3% (2.7% OPEN; 0% ENDO). MACE in Cohort 1 was 4.7% for OPEN vs 3.13% for ENDO (P = .14), and in Cohort 2, was 4.28% for OPEN and 1.05% for ENDO (P = .15). On risk-adjusted analysis, there was no difference in 30-day MACE for OPEN vs ENDO for Cohort 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-2.64; P = .16) or Cohort 2 (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.48-9.88; P = .31). The incidence of acute renal failure was similar across interventions; in Cohort 1 it was 3.6% for OPEN vs 2.1% for ENDO (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.85-3.12; P = .14), and in Cohort 2, it was 4.2% OPEN vs 1.6% ENDO (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 0.75-10.8; P = .12). The occurrence of venous thromboembolism was low overall and was similar between groups in Cohort 1 (OPEN 0.9%; ENDO 0.4%) and Cohort 2 (OPEN 0.5%; ENDO 0%). Rates of any non-SAEs in Cohort 1 were 23.4% in OPEN and 17.9% in ENDO (P = .013); in Cohort 2, they were 21.8% for OPEN and 19.9% for ENDO (P = .7). Rates for any SAEs in Cohort 1 were 35.3% for OPEN and 31.6% for ENDO (P = .15); in Cohort 2, they were 25.5% for OPEN and 23.6% for ENDO (P = .72). The most common types of non-SAEs and SAEs were infection, procedural complications, and cardiovascular events. ConclusionsIn BEST-CLI, patients with CLTI who were deemed suitable candidates for open lower extremity bypass surgery had similar peri-procedural complications following either OPEN or ENDO revascularization: In such patients, concern about risk of peri-procedure complications should not be a deterrent in deciding revascularization strategy. Rather, other factors, including effectiveness in restoring perfusion and patient preference, are more relevant.

THE HIPHOP STUDY: A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF HYBRID VERSUS CEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Studies have shown that 10–30% patients do not achieve optimal function outcomes after total hip replacement (THR). High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of techniques to improve functional outcomes after THR are lacking. We performed this study to evaluate the feasibility of a RCT comparing patient-reported functional outcomes after hybrid or fully cemented THR (ISRCTN11097021).Patients were recruited from two centres and randomised to receive either a fully cemented or hybrid THR. Data collection included Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), non-serious adverse events of special interest (AESI), serious adverse device effects (SADE) and NHS resource use. Qualitative interviews were undertaken to understand a) patient experiences of study processes and their reasons for taking part or not, and b) to understand surgeons’ perceptions of the study, factors affecting willingness to participate, and barriers to implementation of the future RCT findings.The target of 40 patients were successfully recruited for the feasibility RCT; the ratio of successful recruitment to eligible patients was 0.61 across both sites. Treatment crossovers occurred in four patients, all related to bone quality. Four patients were withdrawn due to not undergoing surgery within the study window because of the pandemic. Follow-up was 100% and PROMs were completed by all patients at all time points. The feasibility of conducting a within-trial cost-utility analysis was demonstrated. Interviews were conducted with 27 patients and 16 surgeons. Patients and surgeons generally found the study procedures acceptable and workable. Some declined participation because they did not want treatment allocated at random, or because blinding was off-putting. Surgeons’ perceptions of equipoise varied, and implementation of findings from the future RCT would need to recognise the ‘craft’ nature of surgery and the issue of training.We conclude that a full RCT with economic analysis will be both feasible and practicable, although mechanisms to safely implement potential changes to practice because of RCT findings may need consideration by the wider arthroplasty community.

Patient-reported outcomes in RA patients treated with tofacitinib or bDMARDs in real-life conditions in two Latin American countries

ObjectiveTo describe efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) treated with tofacitinib or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) in real-life conditions. MethodsA noninterventional study was performed between March 2017 and September 2019 at 13 sites in Colombia and Peru. Outcomes measured at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up were disease activity (RAPID3 [Routine Assessment of Patients Index Data] score), functional status (HAQ-DI [Health Assessment Questionnaire] score), and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L [EuroQol Questionnaire]). The Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28-ESR) and frequency of adverse events (AEs) were also reported. Unadjusted and adjusted differences from baseline were estimated and expressed as the least squares mean difference (LSMD). ResultsData from 100 patients treated with tofacitinib and 70 patients with bDMARDs were collected. At baseline, the patients’ mean age was 53.53 years (SD 13.77), the mean disease duration was 6.31 years (SD 7.01). The change from baseline at month 6 was not statistically significant different in the adjusted LSMD [SD] for tofacitinib vs. bDMARDs for RAPID3 score (−2.55[.30] vs. −2.52[.26]), HAQ-DI score (−.56[.07] vs. −.50[.08]), EQ-5D-3L score (.39[.04] vs. .37[.04]) and DAS28-ESR (−2.37[.22] vs. −2.77[.20]). Patients from both groups presented similar proportions of nonserious and serious AEs. No deaths were reported. ConclusionChanges from baseline were not statistically significantly different between tofacitinib and bDMARDs in terms of RAPID3 scores and secondary outcomes. Patients from both groups presented similar proportions of nonserious and serious AEs. Clinical trial numberNCT03073109.

Post-Marketing Safety Surveillance of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (VaxigripTetra) in Children Aged 6 to 35Months in South Korea.

The quadrivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (QIV; VaxigripTetra®) was initially licensed in South Korea in 2017 for immunization against seasonal influenza in those aged ≥ 3years, with the indicated age subsequently lowered to include those aged ≥ 6months in 2018. Here, to comply with South Korean licensure requirements, we undertook a post-marketing surveillance study to assess the safety of QIV in children aged 6-35months (i.e., extension of the previous age indication to include these young children) in routine clinical practice. A multicenter, observational, active safety surveillance of children aged 6-35months who received a single dose of QIV during a routine healthcare visit was undertaken in South Korea from 15June 2018 to 14June 2022. Solicited adverse events (AEs) and unsolicited non-serious AEs were recorded in diary cards, with serious adverse events (SAEs) notified to study investigators. This safety analysis included 676 participants. No AEs led to study termination, and no SAEs were reported. The most frequent solicited injection site reaction was pain in both the ≤ 23-month (12.2% [55/450]) and ≥ 24-month (15.5% [35/226]) age groups. The most frequent solicited systemic reactions were pyrexia and somnolence in the ≤ 23-month age group (6.0% [27/450] each), and malaise (10.6% [24/226]) in the ≥ 24-month age group. Overall, 208 (30.8%) participants experienced 339 unsolicited non-serious AEs, with nasopharyngitis the most common (14.1% [95/676]), and nearly all events (98.8% [335/339]) were considered unrelated to QIV. Grade3 solicited reactions and unsolicited non-serious AEs were reported in five (0.7%) and three (0.4%) participants, respectively, all of whom recovered by day7 after vaccination. This active safety surveillance study confirms that QIV is well tolerated in children aged 6-35months in routine clinical practice in South Korea. There were no safety concerns observed in these young children.

Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorder in developed countries and reduces patients' quality of life, hinders their ability to work, and increases health care costs. A growing number of trials have demonstrated an aberrant gut microbiota composition in IBS, also known as 'gut dysbiosis'. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been suggested as a treatment for IBS. To assess the efficacy and safety of FMT for the treatment of IBS. We searched Cochrane Central, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science up to 24 October 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of FMT compared to placebo (including autologous FMT) in treating IBS. The primary outcome was the number of patients with improvements of symptoms measured using a validated, global IBS symptoms score. Secondary outcomes were changes in quality-of-life scores, non-serious and serious adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95%CI were calculated for dichotomous outcomes, as were the mean differences (MD) and 95%CI for continuous outcomes. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the quality of the trials. GRADE criteria were used to assess the overall quality of the evidence. Eight RCTs (484 participants) were included in the review. FMT resulted in no significant benefit in IBS symptoms three months after treatment compared to placebo (RR 1.19, 95%CI: 0.68-2.10). Adverse events were reported in 97 participants in the FMT group and in 45 participants in the placebo group (RR 1.17, 95%CI: 0.63-2.15). One serious adverse event occurred in the FMT group and two in the placebo group (RR 0.42, 95%CI: 0.07-2.60). Endoscopic FMT delivery resulted in a significant improvement in symptoms, while capsules did not. FMT did not improve the quality of life of IBS patients but, instead, appeared to reduce it, albeit non significantly (MD -6.30, 95%CI: -13.39-0.79). The overall quality of the evidence was low due to moderate-high inconsistency, the small number of patients in the studies, and imprecision. We found insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of FMT for IBS. Larger trials are needed.

Long-term safety of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin 10% treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases: final analysis from a post-authorization safety study conducted in the USA

IntroductionFacilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% is an immunoglobulin replacement therapy that utilizes recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) to enhance immunoglobulin dispersion and absorption. fSCIG 10% is approved in the USA for adult patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs). This study aimed to assess the long-term safety of fSCIG 10% in routine clinical practice. MethodsThis prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multicenter, post-authorization safety study (NCT02593188) was conducted in the USA from Nov-2015 to Aug-2022. Patients with PIDD, aged ≥16 years, prescribed or receiving fSCIG 10% were enrolled. Treatment regimens were planned by the attending physician in accordance with routine clinical practice. Adverse event (AE) data were collected from enrollment to study completion or discontinuation and the presence of anti-rHuPH20 antibodies was evaluated on a voluntary basis. ResultsIn total, 253 patients were enrolled and included in the full analysis set (mean age [standard deviation] 54.3 years [15.6]; 79.1% female). The most common PIDD diagnosis was common variable immunodeficiency (71.9%). Patients received fSCIG 10% treatment for a median (interquartile range) duration of 10.0 (3.7–11.8) months, with most infusions administered every 4 weeks (54.4% [1197 of 2201 infusions]) at home (62.6% [1395 of 2230 infusions]). Overall, 98.5% of infusions were administered without a rate reduction, interruption, or discontinuation due to AEs. Treatment-related, non-serious AEs were experienced by 52 patients (20.6%, 284 events). Two patients (0.8%) each experienced one treatment-related serious AE (aseptic meningitis and deep vein thrombosis). Two fatal AEs (0.8%) were reported; neither were treatment-related. Of 196 patients tested, 14 (7.1%) were positive for treatment-emergent binding anti-rHuPH20 antibodies (titer ≥1:160; maximum titer 10 240); no neutralizing antibodies were detected. There was no relationship between anti-rHuPH20 antibody positivity and the occurrence of treatment-related serious or non-serious AEs. ConclusionsLong-term, repeated, self-administration of fSCIG 10% is well-tolerated in US clinical practice by patients with PIDD. Development of non-neutralizing antibodies against rHuPH20 was uncommon and did not correlate with treatment-related AEs.Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, funded this study. Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG funded writing support.

Unsubstantiated use of Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as an alternative for the treatment of depression

Unsubstantiated use of Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as an alternative for the treatment of depression

Reporting of harms in clinical trials of esketamine in depression: a systematic review.

While previous systematic reviews of trials evaluating conventional antidepressants highlighted inadequacies and inconsistencies in adverse event (AE) reporting, no evaluation is available on esketamine in resistant depression. The objective of this review was to assess quality of reporting AEs in all published clinical trials studying esketamine. It also aimed to compare the proportions of AEs reported in journal articles to those recorded in the ClinicalTrial.gov Registers. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of esketamine in depression were searched using Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov. The quality of reporting harms was assessed using a 21-item checklist from the CONSORT Extension of Harms (1 point by item). The total quality score was graded into four categories: high (17-21), moderate (12-16), low (7-11) and very low (0-6). Ten clinical trials were included in the analysis. Nine trials were classified as 'low quality' with regard to safety, one trial was classified as 'moderate quality'. Compared to AEs recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov, we found that 41.5% of serious AEs and 39% of non-serious AEs were not reported in the published articles. Among them, the majority were psychiatric events but also cardiovascular events and 94% concerned patients from esketamine groups. Quality of AEs reporting in published clinical trials of esketamine was poor and harms were reported less frequently in journal publications than in ClinicalTrial.gov Registers. The study suggests that an assessment of the benefits/risks balance of esketamine based on the results reported in trial publications is flawed due to the poor accuracy and completeness of harm data.

Safety of opicapone after 5 years of post-marketing experience worldwide (P14-11.013)

<h3>Objective:</h3> Review the safety data of opicapone (OPC) after five years of marketing experience worldwide. <h3>Background:</h3> OPC is a once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor proven to be effective in PD patients with motor fluctuations. OPC marketing authorisation was first granted on 24 June 2016 (EU). It was launched in October 2016 and is currently marketed in over 18 countries worldwide (including the US since September 2020). <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> Patient exposure to marketed OPC was estimated based on worldwide ex-factory sales cumulatively until 30 September 2021 (assuming the ex-factory amounts delivered were entirely dispensed and administered, and were used at the dosage of 1 hard capsule/day). From the first marketing authorisation until 30 September 2021, safety data was pooled and analysed from global post-marketing sources, including spontaneous, health authorities, literature reports, and non-interventional studies. Cumulative summary tabulations of adverse events arranged by primary System Organ Class (SOC) and preferred terms within each SOC were retrieved and sorted. <h3>Results:</h3> The estimated patient exposure was 1 413 624 patient-months during the period, corresponding to 117 802 patient-years. In the 5-year period, 4035 events were reported, 545 (13.5%) serious and 3490 (86.5%) non-serious. This corresponds to an incidence of 34.3 reports per 1000 patient-years. The 5 SOCs with the highest number of events were “Nervous system disorders”, “General disorders and administration site conditions”, “Psychiatric disorders”, “Gastrointestinal disorders” and “Surgical and medical procedures”. The 10 most frequently reported adverse events were “Dyskinesia”, “Muscle rigidity”, “Hallucination”, “Bradykinesia”, “Constipation”, “Tremor”, “Gait disturbance”, “Freezing phenomenon”, “Sleep disorder” and “Reduced facial expression”. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Safety reports during 5 years of post-marketing experience with OPC were uncommon, and mostly refer to non-serious adverse events. Motor-symptoms of PD were among the most frequently reported adverse events. No new relevant safety concern was identified. OPC continues to have an adequate safety and tolerability profile with a favourable benefit-risk ratio. <b>Disclosure:</b> Mr. Guedes has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of BIAL - Portela &amp; C.ª, S.A.. Joana Graça has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of BIAL - Portela &amp; C.ª, S.A.. Ms. Sampaio has nothing to disclose. Mariana Vieira has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Bial - Portela &amp; Cª, S.A.. Francisco Rocha has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of BIAL - Portela. Helena Gama has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Bial-Portela &amp; Cª S.A..

Prophylaxis with recombinant von Willebrand factor in patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease: Results of a post hoc analysis from a phase 3 trial.

To describe efficacy/safety of recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) prophylaxis in patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD). This post hoc analysis of a phase 3 open-label trial provides a more detailed analysis of adults with type 3 VWD, categorized based on prior treatment at screening: "Prior On-Demand (OD)" (OD VWF; ≥3 documented spontaneous bleeding events [BEs] requiring VWF in previous 12 months) or "Switch" (plasma-derived [pd] VWF prophylaxis for ≥12 months). Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) were evaluated during 12 months of rVWF prophylaxis versus historical data from medical records. In the Prior OD group (n = 10), mean spontaneous ABR (sABR) for treated BEs was reduced by 91.6% (ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45) versus mean historical sABR. In the Switch group (n = 8), mean sABR for treated BEs was reduced by 47% (ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.08-3.62). One non-serious adverse event (AE) was considered possibly related to rVWF. No treatment-related, fatal, or life-threatening serious AEs were reported, and no patient developed VWF inhibitors. rVWF prophylaxis reduced sABR in type 3 VWD patients previously treated with OD VWF therapy, and maintained a similar level of hemostatic control in those switching from pdVWF prophylaxis to rVWF prophylaxis.

Prospective Safety Study of Intrathecal Gadobutrol in Different Doses.

In our clinical practice, we increasingly use intrathecal contrast-enhanced glymphatic MR imaging to assess CSF disturbances. However, because intrathecal MR imaging contrast agents such as gadobutrol (Gadovist; 1.0 mmol/mL) are used off-label, a thorough understanding of the safety profile is required. We performed a prospective safety study from August 2020 to June 2022 of intrathecal gadobutrol, including consecutive patients who received either 0.50, 0.25, or 0.10 mmol. Serious and nonserious adverse events were recorded systematically at 1-3 days, 4 weeks, and >6 months after the intrathecal administration. The study included 196 patients who received intrathecal gadobutrol, including patients assessed for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH, n = 144) or patients examined for other CSF disorders (non-iNPH cohort; n = 52). The intrathecal gadobutrol doses were either 0.50 mmol (n = 56), 0.25 mmol (n = 111), or 0.10 mmol (n = 29). No serious adverse events were observed. Nonserious adverse events on days 1-3 after intrathecal gadobutrol were, to some degree, dose-dependent but mild-to-moderate, including severe headache, nausea, and/or dizziness in 6/196 (6.3%) patients, and they were more common in the non-iNPH than in the iNPH cohort. At 4 weeks, none reported severe nonserious adverse events, and 9/179 (5.0%) patients had mild-to-moderate symptoms. After >6 months, 2 patients reported mild headache. The present study adds to the accumulating evidence that intrathecal gadobutrol in doses up to 0.50 is safe.

Targeted Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Evidence is lacking from randomized clinical trials of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of targeted hypoglossal nerve stimulation (THN) of the proximal hypoglossal nerve in patients with OSA. This randomized clinical trial (THN3) was conducted at 20 centers and included 138 patients with moderate to severe OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 20 to 65 events per hour and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or less. The trial was conducted from May 2015 through June 2018. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through January 2023. Implant with THN system; randomized 2:1 to activation at month 1 (treatment) or month 4 (control). All received 11 months of THN with follow-up at months 12 and 15, respectively. Primary effectiveness end points comprised AHI and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) responder rates (RRs). Treatment responses at months 4 and 12/15 were defined as a 50% or greater reduction in AHI to 20 or less per hour and an ODI decrease of 25% or greater. Coprimary end points comprised (1) month 4 AHI and ODI RR in the treatment greater than the control group and (2) month 12/15 AHI and ODI RR in the entire cohort exceeding 50%. Secondary end points included sleep apnea severity (AHI and ODI) and patient-reported outcomes (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale). Among 138 participants, the mean (SD) age was 56 (9) years, and 19 (13.8%) were women. Month 4 THN RRs were substantially greater in those in the treatment vs control group (AHI, 52.3% vs 19.6%; ODI, 62.5% vs 41.3%, respectively) with treatment-control standardized mean differences of 0.725 (95% CI, 0.360-1.163) and 0.434 (95% CI, 0.070-0.843) for AHI and ODI RRs, respectively. Months 12/15 RRs were 42.5% and 60.4% for AHI and ODI, respectively. Improvements in AHI, ODI, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores were all clinically meaningful (medium to large effect size). Two serious adverse events and 100 nonserious related adverse events were observed from the implant procedure or study protocol. This randomized clinical trial found that THN demonstrated improvements in sleep apnea, sleepiness, and quality of life in patients with OSAs over an extended AHI and body mass index range without prior knowledge of pharyngeal collapse pattern. Clinically meaningful improvements in AHI and patient-reported responses compared favorably with those of distal hypoglossal nerve stimulation trials, although clinically meaningful differences were not definitive for ODI. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02263859.

Effects of Tai Chi Chuan on Cognitive Function in Adults 60 Years or Older With Type 2 Diabetes and Mild Cognitive Impairment in China

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with the progression of cognitive dysfunction. Physical activity benefits cognition, but no evidence from randomized clinical trials has shown whether tai chi chuan has better long-term benefits than fitness walking in cognitive function for patients with T2D and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). To compare the effectiveness of tai chi chuan, a mind-body exercise, for improving cognitive function in older adults with T2D and MCI, with fitness walking. This randomized clinical trial was conducted between June 1, 2020, and February 28, 2022, at 4 sites in China. Participants included 328 adults (aged ≥60 years) with a clinical diagnosis of T2D and MCI. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a tai chi chuan group, a fitness walking group, or a control group. The tai chi chuan group received 24-form simplified tai chi chuan. The fitness walking group received fitness walking training. Both exercise groups took the training for 60 min/session, 3 times/wk, for 24 weeks in a supervised setting. All 3 groups were provided with a 30-minute diabetes self-management education session, once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The participants were followed up for 36 weeks. The primary outcome was the global cognitive function measured at 36 weeks by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes included MoCA at 24 weeks and other cognitive subdomain measures and blood metabolic indices at 24 and 36 weeks. A total of 328 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.55 [5.02] years; mean [SD] T2D duration, 10.48 [6.81] years; 167 [50.9%] women) were randomized to the tai chi chuan group (n = 107), fitness walking group (n = 110), or control group (n = 111) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At 36 weeks, the tai chi chuan group showed improved MoCA scores compared with the fitness walking group (mean [SD], 24.67 [2.72] vs 23.84 [3.17]; between-group mean difference, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.02-1.66]; P = .046) in the intention-to-treat analysis. The per-protocol analysis data set and subgroup analysis at 36 weeks showed similar results. Based on the generalized linear models, the treatment effects were similar in each group after adjusting for self-reported dietary calories and physical activity. There were 37 nonserious adverse events (tai chi chuan group, 8; fitness walking group, 13; control group, 16) unrelated to the study with no statistically significant difference among the 3 groups (P = .26). In this randomized clinical trial including older adults with T2D and MCI, tai chi chuan was more effective than fitness walking in improving global cognitive function. The findings support a long-term benefit, suggesting the potential clinical use of tai chi chuan as an exercise intervention to improve cognitive function for older adults with T2D and MCI. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04416841.

Safety of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in adolescents and adults in the vaccine safety Datalink

Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) is routinely administered to children; however, adolescents and adults may receive MMR for various reasons. Safety studies in adolescents and adults are limited. We report on safety of MMR in this age group in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. We included adolescents (aged 9-17years) and adults (aged≥18years) who received≥1 dose of MMR from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2018. Pre-specified outcomes were identified by diagnosis codes. Clinically serious outcomes included anaphylaxis, encephalitis/myelitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, immune thrombocytopenia, meningitis, and seizure. Non-serious outcomes were allergic reaction, arthropathy, fever, injection site reaction, lymphadenopathy, non-specific reaction, parotitis, rash, and syncope. All serious outcomes underwent medical record review. Outcome-specific incidence was calculated in pre-defined post-vaccination windows. A self-controlled risk interval design was used to determine the relative risk of each outcome in a risk window after vaccination compared to a more distal control window. During the study period, 276,327 MMR doses were administered to adolescents and adults. Mean age of vaccinees was 34.8years; 65.8% were female; 53.2% of doses were administered simultaneously with≥1 other vaccine. Serious outcomes were rare, with incidence≤6 per 100,000 doses for each outcome assessed, and none had a significant elevation in incidence during the risk window compared to the control window. Incidence of non-serious outcomes per 100,000 doses ranged from 3.4 for parotitis to 263.0 for arthropathy. Other common outcomes included injection site reaction and rash (157.0 and 112.9 per 100,000 doses, respectively). Significantly more outcomes were observed during the risk window compared to the control window for all non-serious outcomes except parotitis. Some variability was observed by sex and age group. Serious outcomes after MMR are rare in adolescents and adults, but vaccinees should be counseled regarding anticipated local and systemic non-serious adverse events.

The risks of adverse events with venlafaxine and mirtazapine versus ‘active placebo’, placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for two separate systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder causes a great burden on patients and societies. Venlafaxine and mirtazapine are commonly prescribed as second-line treatment for patients with major depressive disorder worldwide. Previous systematic reviews have concluded that venlafaxine and mirtazapine reduce depressive symptoms, but the effects seem small and may not be important to the average patient. Moreover, previous reviews have not systematically assessed the occurrence of adverse events. Therefore, we aim to investigate the risks of adverse events with venlafaxine or mirtazapine versus ‘active placebo’, placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder in two separate systematic reviews.MethodsThis is a protocol for two systematic reviews with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. The assessments of the effects of venlafaxine or mirtazapine will be reported in two separate reviews. The protocol is reported as recommended by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols, risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2, clinical significance will be assessed using our eight-step procedure, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. We will search for published and unpublished trials in major medical databases and trial registers. Two review authors will independently screen the results from the literature searches, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We will include published or unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing venlafaxine or mirtazapine with ‘active placebo’, placebo, or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder. The primary outcomes will be suicides or suicide attempts, serious adverse events, and non-serious adverse events. Exploratory outcomes will include depressive symptoms, quality of life, and individual adverse events. If feasible, we will assess the intervention effects using random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses.DiscussionVenlafaxine and mirtazapine are frequently used as second-line treatment of major depressive disorder worldwide. There is a need for a thorough systematic review to provide the necessary background for weighing the benefits against the harms. This review will ultimately inform best practice in the treatment of major depressive disorder.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022315395.

Increased inhaled corticosteroids for treating acute asthma exacerbations

Increased inhaled corticosteroids for treating acute asthma exacerbations

Feasibility Study of Cord Tissue Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Treatment options for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are desperately needed. Allogeneic human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hCT-MSCs) have potential therapeutic benefits in these critically ill patients, but feasibility and safety data are lacking. In this phase I multisite study, 10 patients with COVID-19-related ARDS were treated with 3 daily intravenous infusions of hCT-MSCs (1 million cells/kg, maximum dose 100 million cells). The primary endpoint assessed safety. Ten patients (7 females, 3 males; median age 62 years (range 39-79)) were enrolled at 2 sites and received a total of 30 doses of study product. The average cell dose was 0.93 cells/kg (range 0.56-1.45 cells/kg and total dose range 55-117 million cells) with 5/30 (17%) of doses lower than intended dose. Average cell viability was 85% (range 63%-99%) with all but one meeting the >70% release criteria. There were no infusion-related reactions or study-related adverse events, 28 non-serious adverse events in 3 unique patients, and 2 serious adverse events in 2 unique patients, which were expected and unrelated to the study product. Five patients died: 3 by day 28 and 5 by day 90 of the study (median 27 days, range 7-76 days). All deaths were determined to be unrelated to the hCT-MSCs. We were able to collect relevant safety outcomes for the use of hCT-MSCs in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Future studies to explore their safety and efficacy are warranted.

Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 prime-boost vaccinations: Homologous BBIBP-CorV versus heterologous BNT162b2 boosters in BBIBP-CorV-primed individuals.

Booster vaccine doses against SARS-CoV-2 have been advocated to address evidence of waning immunity, breakthrough infection, and the emergence of immune-evasive variants. A heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategy may offer advantages over a homologous approach, but the safety and efficacy of this approach with the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (BNT: Pfizer) and inactivated BBIBP-CorV (BBIBT: Sinopharm) vaccines have not been studied. We conducted a non-randomized, non-blinded phase II observational community trial acrossBahrain, investigating the reactogenic and immunogenic responseof participants who had previously received two doses of BBIBP, followed by a third booster dose of either BBIBP (homologous booster) or BNT (heterologous booster). Immunogenicity through serological statuswas determined at baseline and on the following 8thweek. Reactogenicity data (safety and adverse events) were collected throughout study period, in addition to participant-led electronic journaling. 305 participants (152 BBIBP and 153 BNT booster) were enrolled in the study,with 246 (127 BBIBP and 119 BNT booster) included in the final analysis. There was a significant increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels post booster administration in both groups; however, the heterologous BNT arm demonstrated a significantly larger mean increase in the level of spike (S) antigen-specific antibodies (32.7-fold increase versus 2.6, p<0.0001) and sVNT neutralising antibodies (3.4-fold increase versus 1.8, p<0.0001), whereas the homologous arm demonstrated a significant increase in the levels of nucleocapsid (N) antigen-specific antibodies (3.8-fold increase versus none). Non-serious adverse events (injection site pain, fever, and fatigue) were more commonly reported in the heterologous arm, but no serious adverse events occurred. Heterologous prime-boost vaccination with the mRNA BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine in those who had received two doses of inactivated virus BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine demonstrated a more robust immune response against SARS-CoV-2 than the homologous BBIBP booster and appears safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registry Number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT04993560.