Non-selective Adenosine Antagonist Research Articles

Protective Effects of Early Neonatal Methylxanthine Treatment on Cognitive and Language Outcomes in Premature Infants with and without High-Risk Perinatal Factors.

Caffeine and theophylline are methylxanthines and nonselective adenosine antagonists commonly used to treat apnea of prematurity. Both human and animal data suggest that xanthines also have clinically important long-term neuroprotective effects in the presence of inflammation in the perinatal period as seen following hypoxic-ischemic brain insults. Moreover, these protective effects appear to be more robust when administered shortly (<48 h) after preterm birth. To evaluate the importance of the postdelivery therapeutic window, we collected and analyzed medical data from preterm infants meeting criteria (23-30 weeks' gestational age [GA]), born at the University of Connecticut Health Center (UCHC), and cared for at the UCHC/Connecticut Children's Medical Center (CCMC) NICU from 1991 to 2017 (n = 858). Eighteen-month follow-up data included cognitive and language scores from the Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Clinic records, with a retention of 81% of subjects (n = 696). Differences were analyzed via multivariate ANOVA and ANCOVA. Analyses showed that infants who received xanthine treatment within the first 48 h after preterm birth showed significantly better 18-month behavioral outcomes than those treated later than 48 h, despite a lack of a priori differences in GA, birth, or length of stay. The positive effect of early xanthine therapy was particularly robust for infants exposed prenatally to the inflammatory conditions of chorioamnionitis and/or preeclampsia. Current findings are consistent with human and animal data, showing that caffeine exerts protective effects, at least in part via attenuation of inflammation. Results add to the evidence supporting routine immediate prophylactic neuroprotective xanthine therapy (i.e., caffeine) in preterm infants. Findings also add important new evidence of the augmented value of caffeine for infants with inflammatory exposure due to mothers with preeclampsia or chorioamnionitis.

Sex Dependence in Control of Renal Haemodynamics and Excretion in Streptozotocin Diabetic Rats-Role of Adenosine System and Nitric Oxide.

Recently, we compared an interplay of the adenosine system and nitric oxide (NO) in the regulation of renal function between male normoglycaemic (NG) and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (DM). Considering the between-sex functional differences, e.g., in the NO status, we present similar studies performed in female rats. We examined if the theophylline effects (non-selective adenosine antagonist) in NG and DM females with or without active NO synthases differed from the earlier findings. In anaesthetised female Sprague Dawley rats, both NG and DM, untreated or after NO synthesis blockade with L-NAME, theophylline effects, on blood pressure, renal hemodynamics and excretion, and renal tissue NO were investigated. Renal artery blood flow (Transonic probe), cortical, outer-, and inner-medullary flows (laser-Doppler technique), and renal tissue NO signal (selective electrode) were measured. In contrast to males, in female NG and DM rats, theophylline induced renal vasodilation. In NO-deficient females, theophylline induced comparable renal vasodilatation, confirming the vasoconstrictor influence of the renal adenosine. In NG and DM females with intact NO synthesis, adenosine inhibition diminished kidney tissue NO, contrasting with an increase reported in males. Lowered baseline renal excretion in DM females suggested stimulation of renal tubular reabsorption due to the prevalence of antinatriuretic over natriuretic tubular action of adenosine receptors. An opposite inter-receptor balance pattern emerged previously from male studies. The study exposed between-sex functional differences in the interrelation of adenosine and NO in rats with normoglycaemia and streptozotocin diabetes. The findings also suggest that in diabetes mellitus, the abundance of individual receptor types can distinctly differ between females and males.

Role of 7-methylxanthine in myopia prevention and control: a mini-review.

Myopia is becoming increasingly common. By 2050 around 10% of the world's population is expected to be highly myopic (<-5 diopters) and therefore particularly at risk of suffering from sight-threatening complications. Currently used myopia control treatments, such as multifocal soft contact lenses or spectacle lenses, orthokeratology, and atropine eyedrops, either do not completely arrest myopia progression or are associated with significant ocular and possibly systemic side effects. A new candidate for pharmaceutical control of myopia progression and excessive eye elongation, the non-selective adenosine antagonist 7-methylxanthine (7-MX), appears to be non-toxic and effective in reducing myopia progression and axial eye growth in experimental and clinical studies. The latest findings regarding 7-MX for myopia control and evaluate its potential as a supplement to existing treatment options were reviewed.

The non-selective adenosine antagonist theophylline reverses the effects of dopamine antagonism on tremor, motor activity and effort-based decision-making

Considerable evidence indicates that adenosine and dopamine systems interact in the regulation of basal ganglia function. Nonselective adenosine antagonists such as the methylxanthine caffeine as well as selective adenosine A2A antagonists have been shown to produce antiparkinsonian and antidepressant effects in animal models. The present studies were conducted to assess if another methylxantine, theophylline, can reverse motor and motivational impairments induced by dopamine antagonism in rats. ResultsTheophylline (3.75–30.0 mg/kg, IP) reversed tremulous jaw movements (TJMs), catalepsy, and locomotor suppression induced by the dopamine D2 antagonist pimozide. It also reversed TJMs induced by the muscarinic receptor agonist pilocarpine, which is a well-known tremorogenic agent. Parallel studies assessed the ability of theophylline (5.0–20.0 mg/kg, IP) to reverse the changes in effort-related choice behavior induced by the dopamine D1 antagonist ecopipam (0.2 mg/kg, IP) and the D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, IP). Rats were tested on two different operant choice tasks which assess the tendency to work for a preferred reinforcer by lever pressing (for palatable pellets or a high 5% sucrose solution) vs. approaching and consuming a less preferred reinforcer (freely available lab chow or a less concentrated 0.3% sucrose solution). Theophylline restored food and sucrose-reinforced lever pressing in animals treated with the D2 antagonist. However, it was unable to reverse the effects of the D1 antagonist. Overall, the effects of theophylline resembled those previously reported for adenosine A2A antagonists, and suggest that theophylline could be clinically useful for the treatment of motor and motivational symptoms in humans.

Purinergic Signaling and Related Biomarkers in Depression.

It is established that purinergic signaling can shape a wide range of physiological functions, including neurotransmission and neuromodulation. The purinergic system may play a role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders, influencing neurotransmitter systems and hormonal pathways of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Treatment with mood stabilizers and antidepressants can lead to changes in purinergic signaling. In this overview, we describe the biological background on the possible link between the purinergic system and depression, possibly involving changes in adenosine- and ATP-mediated signaling at P1 and P2 receptors, respectively. Furthermore, evidence on the possible antidepressive effects of non-selective adenosine antagonist caffeine and other purinergic modulators is reviewed. In particular, A2A and P2X7 receptors have been identified as potential targets for depression treatment. Preclinical studies highlight that both selective A2A and P2X7 antagonists may have antidepressant effects and potentiate responses to antidepressant treatments. Consistently, recent studies feature the possible role of the purinergic system peripheral metabolites as possible biomarkers of depression. In particular, variations of serum uric acid, as the end product of purinergic metabolism, have been found in depression. Although several open questions remain, the purinergic system represents a promising research area for insights into the molecular basis of depression.

Caffeine and Selective Adenosine Receptor Antagonists as New Therapeutic Tools for the Motivational Symptoms of Depression.

Major depressive disorder is one of the most common and debilitating psychiatric disorders. Some of the motivational symptoms of depression, such anergia (lack of self-reported energy) and fatigue are relatively resistant to traditional treatments such as serotonin uptake inhibitors. Thus, new pharmacological targets are being investigated. Epidemiological data suggest that caffeine consumption can have an impact on aspects of depressive symptomatology. Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine antagonist for A1/A2A receptors, and has been demonstrated to modulate behavior in classical animal models of depression. Moreover, selective adenosine receptor antagonists are being assessed for their antidepressant effects in animal studies. This review focuses on how caffeine and selective adenosine antagonists can improve different aspects of depression in humans, as well as in animal models. The effects on motivational symptoms of depression such as anergia, fatigue, and psychomotor slowing receive particular attention. Thus, the ability of adenosine receptor antagonists to reverse the anergia induced by dopamine antagonism or depletion is of special interest. In conclusion, although further studies are needed, it appears that caffeine and selective adenosine receptor antagonists could be therapeutic agents for the treatment of motivational dysfunction in depression.

The perinatal effects of maternal caffeine intake on fetal and neonatal brain levels of testosterone, estradiol, and dihydrotestosterone in rats.

Testosterone, estradiol, and dihydrotestosterone are the main sex steroid hormones responsible for the organization and sexual differentiation of brain structures during early development. The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, adrenal cells, and gonads play a key role in the production of sex steroids and express adenosine receptors. Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine antagonist; therefore, it can modulate metabolic pathways in these tissues. Besides, the proportion of pregnant women that consume caffeine is ∼60%. That is why the relationship between maternal caffeine consumption and fetal development is important. Therefore, we aimed to investigate this modulatory effect of maternal caffeine consumption on sex steroids in the fetal and neonatal brain tissues. Pregnant rats were treated with a low (0.3g/L) or high (0.8g/L) dose of caffeine in their drinking water during pregnancy and lactation. The testosterone, estradiol, and dihydrotestosterone levels in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus were measured using radioimmunoassay at embryonic day 19 (E19), birth (PN0), and postnatal day 4 (PN4). The administration of low-dose caffeine increased the body weight in PN4 male and female rats and anogenital index in PN4 males. The administration of high-dose caffeine decreased the adrenal weight in E19 male rats and increased testosterone levels in the frontal cortex of E19 female rats and the hypothalamus of PN0 male rats. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy affects sex steroid levels in the frontal cortex and hypothalamus of the offspring. This concentration changes of the sex steroids in the brain may influence behavioral and neuroendocrine functions at some point in adult life.

Susceptibility to seizure-induced sudden death in DBA/2 mice is altered by adenosine

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is rare but is an important public health burden due to the number of patient years lost. Respiratory dysfunction following generalized convulsive seizure is a common sequence of events in witnessed SUDEP cases. The DBA/2 mouse model of SUDEP exhibits generalized convulsive audiogenic seizures (AGSz), which result in seizure-induced respiratory arrest (S-IRA) in ∼75% of these animals, while the remaining DBA/2 mice exhibit AGSz without S-IRA. SUDEP induction may involve actions of adenosine, which is released during generalized seizures in animals and patients and is known to depress respiration. This study examined the effects of systemic administration of agents that alter the actions of adenosine on the incidence of S-IRA in DBA/2 mice. DBA/2 mice that consistently exhibited AGSz without S-IRA showed a significantly increased incidence of S-IRA following treatment with 5-iodotubercidin, which blocks adenosine metabolism. Treatment of DBA/2 mice that consistently exhibited AGSz followed by S-IRA with a non-selective adenosine antagonist, caffeine, or an A2A adenosine receptor subtype-selective antagonist (SCH 442416) significantly reduced S-IRA incidence. By contrast, an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist (DPCPX) was not effective in reducing S-IRA incidence. These findings suggest that preventative approaches for SUDEP should consider agents that reduce the actions of adenosine.

Hindbrain cytoglucopenia-induced increases in systemic blood glucose levels by 2-deoxyglucose depend on intact astrocytes and adenosine release.

The hindbrain contains critical neurocircuitry responsible for generating defensive physiological responses to hypoglycemia. This counter-regulatory response (CRR) is evoked by local hindbrain cytoglucopenia that causes an autonomically mediated increase in blood glucose, feeding behavior, and accelerated digestion; that is, actions that restore glucose homeostasis. Recent reports suggest that CRR may be initially triggered by astrocytes in the hindbrain. The present studies in thiobutabarbital-anesthetized rats show that exposure of the fourth ventricle (4V) to 2-deoxyglucose (2DG; 15 μmol) produced a 35% increase in circulating glucose relative to baseline levels. While the 4V application of the astrocytic signal blocker, fluorocitrate (FC; 5 nmol), alone, had no effect on blood glucose levels, 2DG-induced increases in glucose were blocked by 4V FC. The 4V effect of 2DG to increase glycemia was also blocked by the pretreatment with caffeine (nonselective adenosine antagonist) or a potent adenosine A1 antagonist (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; DPCPX) but not the NMDA antagonist (MK-801). These results suggest that CNS detection of glucopenia is mediated by astrocytes and that astrocytic release of adenosine that occurs after hypoglycemia may cause the activation of downstream neural circuits that drive CRR.

Disclosing caffeine action on insulin sensitivity: Effects on rat skeletal muscle

Caffeine, a non-selective adenosine antagonist, has distinct effects on insulin sensitivity when applied acutely or chronically. Herein, we investigated the involvement of adenosine receptors on insulin resistance induced by single-dose caffeine administration. Additionally, the mechanism behind adenosine receptor-mediated caffeine effects in skeletal muscle was assessed.The effect of the administration of caffeine, 8-cycle-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, A1 antagonist), 2-(2-Furanyl)-7-(2-phenylethyl)-7H-pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-5-amine (SCH58261, A2A antagonist) and 8-(4-{[(4-cyanophenyl)carbamoylmethyl]-oxy}phenyl)-1,3-di(n-propyl)xanthine (MRS1754, A2B antagonist) on whole-body insulin sensitivity was tested. Skeletal muscle Glut4,5′-AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) and adenosine receptor protein expression were also assessed. The effect of A1 and A2B adenosine agonists on skeletal muscle glucose uptake was evaluated in vitro. Sodium nitroprussiate (SNP, 10nM), a nitric oxide (NO) donor, was used to evaluate the effect of NO on insulin resistance induced by adenosine antagonists.Acute caffeine decreased insulin sensitivity in a concentration dependent manner (Emax=55.54±5.37%, IC50=11.61nM), an effect that was mediated by A1 and A2B adenosine receptors. Additionally, acute caffeine administration significantly decreased Glut4, but not AMPK expression, in skeletal muscle. We found that A1, but not A2B agonists increased glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. SNP partially reversed DPCPX and MRS1754 induced-insulin resistance.Our results suggest that insulin resistance induced by acute caffeine administration is mediated by A1 and A2B adenosine receptors. Both Glut4 and NO seem to be downstream effectors involved in insulin resistance induced by acute caffeine.

Español

Energy drinks are highly consumed beverages rich in caffeine. In humans, energy drinks are very frequently consumed with alcohol in order to reduce the sedation and incoordination induced by high doses of this drug of abuse. Both drugs have shown to exert AG OR A DE SALU T I ISSN: 2443-9827. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/AgoraSalut.2015.1.30 pp. 379-385 380 AGORA DE SALUT. VOL. I. ISSN: 2443-9827. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/AgoraSalut.2015.1.30 pp. 379-385 effects on the adenosine system. Ethanol is a central nervous system (CNS) depressant that increases the adenosinergic tone, and this effect is thought to mediate the sedative and incoordinating effects observed after alcohol consumption. On the other hand, caffeine is a methylxanthine that acts as a non-selective adenosine antagonist, binding to the two main types of adenosine receptors present in the cns: the A1 and A2A subtypes. The aim of the present study was to fold: to explore the effect of an acute caffeine administration (15 or 30 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally, IP) on the incoordination effects of ethanol, and to study the acute effect of this methylxanthine in animals that had been repeatedly pre-exposed to ethanol before being tested. The acute administration of ethanol (1.5 g/kg, IP) produced motor impairment in the rotarod when is compared to the control vehicle group. However, caffeine was unable to reverse the impairing effects of an acute dose of ethanol, and did not improved the ataxia produced by a repeated administration of ethanol (1.5 g/kg). Thus, these results show that the non-selective adenosine antagonist caffeine at moderate to high doses (15 and 30 mg/kg) is not efficacious at counteracting the incoordination produced by alcohol in mice, neither after acute, nor after repeated pre-exposure to alcohol.

Caffeine's Attenuation of Cocaine-Induced Dopamine Release by Inhibition of Adenosine.

Background: It is well known that the reinforcing properties of cocaine addiction are caused by the sharp increase of dopamine (DA) in the reward areas of the brain. However, other mechanisms have been speculated to contribute to the increase. Adenosine is one system that is associated with the sleep-wake cycle and is most important in regulating neuronal activity. Thus, more and more evidence is pointing to its involvement in regulating DA release. The current study set out to examine the role of adenosine in cocaine-induced DA release. Methods: Increasing doses of cocaine, caffeine, and their combination, as well as, 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), an adenosine A1 antagonist (alone and in combination with cocaine) were used to denote a response curve. A novel biosensor, the BRODERICK PROBE® was implanted in the nucleus accumbens to image the drug-induced surge of DA release in vivo, in the freely moving animal in real time. Results: Combinations of cocaine and caffeine were observed to block the increased release of DA moderately after administration of the low dose (2.5 mg/kg cocaine and 12.5 mg/kg caffeine) and dramatically after administration of the high dose (10 mg/kg cocaine and 50 mg/kg caffeine), suggesting neuroprotection. Similarly, CPT and cocaine showed a decreased DA surge when administered in combination. Thus, the low and high dose of a nonselective adenosine antagonist, caffeine, and a moderate dose of a selective adenosine antagonist, CPT, protected against the cocaine-induced DA release. Conclusions: These results show a significant interaction between adenosine and DA release and suggest therapeutic options for cocaine addiction and disorders associated with DA dysfunction.

Differences between the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine and theophylline in motor and mood effects: Studies using medium to high doses in animal models

RationaleCaffeine and theophylline are methylxanthines that are broadly consumed, sometimes at high doses, and act as minor psychostimulants. Both are nonselective adenosine antagonists for A1 and A2A receptors, which are colocalized with dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in striatal areas. Adenosine antagonists generally have opposite actions to those of dopamine antagonists. Although the effects of caffeine are widely known, theophylline has been much less well characterized, especially at high doses. MethodsAdult male CD1 mice were used to study the effect of a broad range of doses (25.0, 50.0 or 100.0mg/kg) of caffeine and theophylline on measures of spontaneous locomotion and coordination, as well as the pattern of c-Fos immunoreactivity in brain areas rich in adenosine and dopamine receptors. In addition, we evaluated possible anxiety and stress effects of these doses. ResultsCaffeine, at these doses, impaired or suppressed locomotion in several paradigms. However, theophylline was less potent than caffeine at suppressing motor parameters, and even stimulated locomotion. Both drugs induced corticosterone release, however caffeine was more efficacious at intermediate doses. While caffeine showed an anxiogenic profile at all doses, theophylline only did so at the highest dose used (50mg/kg). Only theophylline increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in cortical areas. ConclusionTheophylline has fewer disruptive effects than caffeine on motor parameters and produces less stress and anxiety effects. These results are relevant for understanding the potential side effects of methylxanthines when consumed at high doses.

The effect of pentobarbital anesthesia on “intrinsic” heart rate.

While it is well established that pentobarbital alters cardiac autonomic regulation, the effects of this anesthetic agent on intrinsic heart rate (HRi) remain to be determined. Therefore, HRi, was measured in purpose‐bred mixed breed dogs (n = 11, 22.2 ± 0.9 kg, age 1–3 y) by means of combined adrenergic (propranolol HCl 1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and muscarinic (atropine sulfate 50 ug/kg iv.) receptor inhibition before (Control, Con) and, at least one week later, during pentobarbital anesthesia (Pen, 30–40 mg/kg, i.v). Pentobarbital significantly (ANOVA, P&lt;0.01) depressed the high frequency component (0.24 – 1.04 Hz, an index of cardiac parasympathetic regulation) of heart rate variability (Con, 7.2 ± 0.4 vs. Pen, 1.0 ± 0.4 ln ms2) and increased baseline heart rate (Con, 105.9 ± 8.7 vs. Pen, 139.1 ± 6.8 beats/min) but decreased HRi (Con, 148.7 ± 6.7 vs. Pen, 128.9 ± 5.3 beats/min). The nonselective adenosine antagonist aminophylline (10 mg/kg, i.v.) did not alter heart rate variability (0.4 ± 0.3 ln ms2) but restored HRi to control (i.e., without pentobarbital) values (141.5 ± 6.7 beats/min). These data suggest that pentobarbital both alters cardiac autonomic regulation and depresses intrinsic heart rate. These data further indicate that the activation of adenosine receptors may play an important role in this apparent depression of cardiac pacemaker rate.

Antihyperalgesic activity of nucleoside transport inhibitors in models of inflammatory pain in guinea pigs

Background and methodsThe role of the endogenous purine nucleoside, adenosine, in nociception is well established. Inhibition of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1) prevents adenosine uptake into cells, and could therefore enhance the antinociceptive properties of adenosine. The effects of ENT1 inhibition were studied in two animal models of inflammatory pain. Analgesic activity was assessed in a complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced and carrageenan-induced mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia model in the guinea pig.ResultsDraflazine, dipyridamole, dilazep, lidoflazine, soluflazine, and KF24345 showed efficacy in the CFA thermal hyperalgesia model. Draflazine, the most potent compound in this test, was further characterized in the CFA model of mechanical hyperalgesia and the carrageenan inflammation model of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia, where it completely reversed the hypersensitivity. The antihyperalgesic effects of draflazine (10 mg/kg, administered subcutaneously) were attenuated by the A1 receptor antagonist, cyclopentyltheophylline (5–40 mg/kg, administered intraperitoneally), by the nonselective adenosine antagonist, caffeine (10–40 mg/kg intraperitoneally), and by the A2 antagonist, DMPX (10 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally).ConclusionENT1 inhibition is an effective way of reversing mechanical and thermal inflammatory hyperalgesia in the guinea pig, and these effects are mediated by enhancement of endogenous adenosine levels. Both A1 and A2 adenosine receptor subtypes are likely to be involved.

Caffeine for treatment of Parkinson disease

Epidemiologic studies consistently link caffeine, a nonselective adenosine antagonist, to lower risk of Parkinson disease (PD). However, the symptomatic effects of caffeine in PD have not been adequately evaluated. We conducted a 6-week randomized controlled trial of caffeine in PD to assess effects upon daytime somnolence, motor severity, and other nonmotor features. Patients with PD with daytime somnolence (Epworth >10) were given caffeine 100 mg twice daily ×3 weeks, then 200 mg twice daily ×3 weeks, or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Secondary outcomes included motor severity, sleep markers, fatigue, depression, and quality of life. Effects of caffeine were analyzed with Bayesian hierarchical models, adjusting for study site, baseline scores, age, and sex. Of 61 patients, 31 were randomized to placebo and 30 to caffeine. On the primary intention-to-treat analysis, caffeine resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (-1.71 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.57, 0.13). However, somnolence improved on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (+0.64; 0.16, 1.13, intention-to-treat), with significant reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score on per-protocol analysis (-1.97; -3.87, -0.05). Caffeine reduced the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score (-4.69 points; -7.7, -1.6) and the objective motor component (-3.15 points; -5.50, -0.83). Other than modest improvement in global health measures, there were no changes in quality of life, depression, or sleep quality. Adverse events were comparable in caffeine and placebo groups. Caffeine provided only equivocal borderline improvement in excessive somnolence in PD, but improved objective motor measures. These potential motor benefits suggest that a larger long-term trial of caffeine is warranted. This study provides Class I evidence that caffeine, up to 200 mg BID for 6 weeks, had no significant benefit on excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with PD.

Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task

Preclinical studies suggest that cost/benefit decision-making involves interactions between adenosine and dopamine (DA). In rats, DA depletion decreases willingness to incur effort costs, while adenosine antagonism reverses these effects, likely by increasing DA transmission. Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine antagonist commonly used to facilitate effortful tasks, and thus may affect decisions involving effort costs in humans. The current study examined acute effects of 200mg of caffeine on willingness to exert effort for monetary rewards at varying levels of reward value and reward probability, in young adult light caffeine users. Based on previous findings with amphetamine, we predicted that caffeine would increase willingness to exert effort. At separate sessions, 23 healthy normal adults received placebo or 200mg caffeine under counterbalanced double-blind conditions, then completed the effort expenditure for rewards task (EEfRT). Measures of subjective and cardiovascular effects were obtained at regular intervals. Caffeine produced small but significant subjective and cardiovascular effects, and sped psychomotor performance on the EEfRT. Caffeine did not alter willingness to exert effort, except in high cardiovascular responders to caffeine, in whom it decreased willingness to exert effort. These results were contrary to our predictions, but consistent with rodent studies suggesting that moderate doses of caffeine alone do not affect effort, but rather only influence effort in the context of DA antagonism. Our results demonstrate that psychomotor speeding and decisional effects on the EEfRT are dissociable, providing additional evidence for the EEfRT as a specific measure of effort-based decision-making. This study provides a starting point for exploring contributions of the adenosine system to motivation in humans.

Stimulant effects of adenosine antagonists on operant behavior: differential actions of selective A2A and A1 antagonists

Adenosine A(2A) antagonists can reverse many of the behavioral effects of dopamine antagonists, including actions on instrumental behavior. However, little is known about the effects of selective adenosine antagonists on operant behavior when these drugs are administered alone. The present studies were undertaken to investigate the potential for rate-dependent stimulant effects of both selective and nonselective adenosine antagonists. Six drugs were tested: two nonselective adenosine antagonists (caffeine and theophylline), two adenosine A(1) antagonists (DPCPX and CPT), and two adenosine A(2A) antagonists (istradefylline (KW6002) and MSX-3). Two schedules of reinforcement were employed; a fixed interval 240-s (FI-240 sec) schedule was used to generate low baseline rates of responding and a fixed ratio 20 (FR20) schedule generated high rates. Caffeine and theophylline produced rate-dependent effects on lever pressing, increasing responding on the FI-240 sec schedule but decreasing responding on the FR20 schedule. The A(2A) antagonists MSX-3 and istradefylline increased FI-240 sec lever pressing but did not suppress FR20 lever pressing in the dose range tested. In fact, there was a tendency for istradefylline to increase FR20 responding at a moderate dose. A(1) antagonists failed to increase lever pressing rate, but DPCPX decreased FR20 responding at higher doses. These results suggest that adenosine A(2A) antagonists enhance operant response rates, but A(1) antagonists do not. The involvement of adenosine A(2A) receptors in regulating aspects of instrumental response output and behavioral activation may have implications for the treatment of effort-related psychiatric dysfunctions, such as psychomotor slowing and anergia in depression.

Synergism of theophylline and anticholinergics to inhibit haloperidol-induced catalepsy: A potential treatment for extrapyramidal syndromes

Extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS) impose a heavy burden on patients receiving antipsychotic therapy. Anticholinergics are the drugs of choice for preventing EPS, but they also produce many adverse reactions. Using the EPS model of haloperidol-induced catalepsy we evaluated the potential therapeutic value of a mixture of low doses of the non-selective adenosine antagonist theophylline (0.93 and 1.86 mg/kg), and the muscarinic antagonists benztropine (0.134 and 0.268 mg/kg) and ethopropazine (0.116 and 0.232 mg/kg). In rats pretreated with vehicle (distilled water), the cumulative catalepsy time over 5 h was 4199 ± 228 s, and the mean latency was 67.5 ± 7.8 min. Applied separately, neither of the drugs at the doses used caused significant changes of catalepsy intensity vs. control rats. However, the combination of the larger doses of theophylline and benztropine caused a significant reduction of catalepsy intensity (− 41 ± 10%) compared with the effects of the vehicle, vs. the lower dose of benztropine, and vs. both doses of theophylline alone. The mixture of the larger doses of theophylline and benztropine also delayed catalepsy onset (156 ± 21 min) as compared with the lower doses of these same drugs applied alone. In the case of theophylline plus ethopropazine, only the association of the larger doses showed a non-significant tendency to inhibit catalepsy (− 21 ± 8%) and to prolong its latency (108 ± 13 min). Further, neither catalepsy intensity nor its latency was affected by a combination of the selective A 1R antagonist DPCPX (1 mg/kg,) with the larger doses of both anticholinergics. In contrast, the anticholinergics showed synergism with a subthreshold dose of the selective A 2AR antagonist ZM 241395 (0.5 mg/kg), causing a significant reduction of catalepsy intensity (ethopropazine, − 27 ± 5%; benztropine, − 35 ± 9%) and prolonging its latency (ethopropazine, 65 ± 9 min; benztropine, 78 ± 11 min), compared with the effect of their respective vehicle (DMSO plus mineral oil: catalepsy time, 5100 ± 196 s; latency, 17.5 ± 2.5 min). These findings suggest that neuroleptic-induced EPS could be effectively controlled by a combination of lower doses of theophylline and anticholinergics, with the advantage of maximizing their efficacy and minimizing their adverse reactions.

Interactions between adenosine and dopamine receptor antagonists with different selectivity profiles: Effects on locomotor activity

Forebrain dopamine (DA) is a critical component of the brain circuitry regulating behavioral activation. Adenosine A 2A antagonists reverse many of the behavioral effects of DA antagonists, and A 2A receptors are co-localized with D 2 receptors on striatal medium spiny neurons. The present work was undertaken to determine if the ability of an A 2A antagonist, a non-selective adenosine antagonist, or an A 1 antagonist to reverse the locomotor effects of DA blockade in rats differed depending upon whether D 1 or D 2 family receptors were being antagonized. The adenosine antagonists MSX-3, caffeine, DPCPX and CPT were studied for their ability to reverse the locomotor suppression induced by the D 1 antagonist SCH 39166 (ecopipam) and the D 2 antagonist eticlopride. The D 1 and D 2 antagonists suppressed locomotion in all experiments. The adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist MSX-3 (0.5–2.0 mg/kg IP) significantly reversed the suppression of locomotion induced by eticlopride. The non-selective adenosine antagonist caffeine (5.0–20.0 mg/kg IP) also reversed the effect of eticlopride, though the effect was not as robust as that seen with MSX-3. The adenosine A 1 antagonists DPCPX (0.375–1.5 mg/kg) and CPT (3.0–12.0 mg/kg IP) were unable to reverse the locomotor impairment elicited by eticlopride. Furthermore, the attenuation of locomotion induced by the D 1 antagonist could only be reversed by the highest dose of MSX-3, but not by caffeine, DPCPX or CPT. DA and adenosine receptor antagonists interact in the regulation of locomotor activation, but the nature of this interaction appears to depend upon the receptor selectivity profiles of the specific drugs being tested.