Non-resection Group Research Articles

Should noncurative resection of the primary tumour be performed in patients with stage iv colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (crc) remains controversial. This review compares survival in patients with advanced crc who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour with that in patients not undergoing resection, and determines rates of post-operative mortality and nonfatal complications, the primary tumour complication rate, the non-resection surgical procedures rate, and quality of life (qol). Reports in the central, medline, and embase databases were searched for relevant studies, which were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The search was also restricted to publication dates from 1980 onward, the English language, and studies involving human subjects. Screening, evaluation of relevant articles, and data abstraction were performed in duplicate, and agreement between the abstractors was assessed. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were collected and synthesized per protocol. From among the 3379 reports located, fifteen retrospective observational studies were selected. Of the 12,416 patients in the selected studies, 8620 (69%) underwent surgery. Median survival was 15.2 months (range: 10-30.7 months) in the resection group and 11.4 months (range: 3-22 months) in the non-resection group. Hazard ratio for survival was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.61 to 0.79] favouring surgical resection. Mean rates of postoperative mortality and nonfatal complications were 4.9% (95% ci: 0% to 9.7%) and 25.9% (95%ci: 20.1% to 31.6%) respectively. The mean primary tumour complication rate was 29.7% (95% ci: 18.5% to 41.0%), and the non-resection surgical procedures rate in the non-resection group was 27.6% (95 ci: 15.4% to 39.9%). No study provided qol data. Although this review supports primary tumour resection in advanced crc, the results have significant biases. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

Surgical strategy for T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer: is extrahepatic bile duct resection always necessary?

Resection of the extrahepatic bile duct is not performed uniformly in gallbladder cancer. The study investigated the clinical significance of resection of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) in T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer. Between 2000 and 2010, 71 T2 or T3 gallbladder cancer patients who underwent R0 resection at Korea University Medical Center were included. Clinicopathological data were reviewed retrospectively. Survival analysis and comparison between EHBD resection and non-resection groups were performed. The 32 men and 39 women had 49 T2 tumors and 22 T3 tumors. The overall survival rate was 67.8 % at 3 years and 47.2 % at 5 years. In multivariate analysis for overall survival, lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis were significant independent predictors. Comparing the patients according to EHBD resection, the EHBD resection group demonstrated significantly longer hospital stay, longer operative time, more transfusion requirement, more extensive liver resection, and less treatment of neoadjuvant therapy. Significantly higher proportions of perineural invasion and lymph node metastasis were noted in the EHBD resection group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival between the EHBD resection and non-resection groups. Resection of extrahepatic bile duct was not always necessary in T2 and T3 cancers. However, the patients who undergo resection of extrahepatic bile duct tended to have more aggressive tumor characteristics and undergo more aggressive surgical approach. To enhance overall survival for the patients with T2 and T3 gallbladder cancers, surgeons should try to perform R0 resection including EHBD resection.

Clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood from patients with gastric cancer

The authors hypothesized that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with gastric cancer are associated with prognosis and disease recurrence. In this study, they evaluated CTCs in gastric cancer and clarified the clinical impact of CTCs. In total, 265 consecutive patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. Fourteen patients were excluded from the analysis, including 12 patients who another cancer and 2 patients who refused the treatment. The remaining 251 patients were divided into 2 groups: 148 patients who underwent gastrectomy (the resection group) and 103 patients who did not undergo gastrectomy (the nonresectable group). Peripheral blood samples were collected before gastrectomy or chemotherapy. A proprietary test for capturing, identifying, and counting CTCs in blood was used for the isolation and enumeration of CTCs. CTCs were detected in 16 patients (10.8%) from the resection group and in 62 patients (60.2%) from the nonresectable group. The overall survival rate for the entire cohort was significantly lower in patients with CTCs than in those without CTCs (P < .0001). In the resection group, relapse-free and overall survival in patients with CTCs was significantly lower than in patients without CTCs (P < .0001). It was noteworthy that the expression of CTCs was an independent factor for determining the overall survival of patients with gastric cancer in multivariate analysis (P = .024). In the nonresectable group, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with CTCs than in those without CTCs (P = .0044). The evaluation of CTCs in peripheral blood may be a useful tool for predicting tumor progression, prognosis, and the effect of chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

Mo2027 Hepatolithiasis Should Be Followed-up Carefully to Detect Cholangiocarcinoma Even After Completeness of Stone Removal Regardless of Treatment Modality

Background/Aims: Hepatolithiasis is a well known risk factor of cholangiocarcinoma. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis still challenging and there are not enough reports on the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patient with hepatolithiasis after treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent liver resection or non-resection. Methods: Among a total of 257 patients who received treatment for hepatolithiasis from 2002 to 2011 at Korea University Anam and Guro Hospital, 236 patients were eligible for analysis; 92 patients underwent liver resection (resection group) and 144 patients did not (non-resection group). The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma was 6.8% (16/236) during follow-up period (mean 41±41 months). The median tumor occurrence time was 28 (13-111) months. Cholangiocarcinoma occurred 6.5% (6/92) and 6.9% (10/144) in resection and non-resection group respectively (P=0.425). In resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 3.6% (2/56) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 13.3% (4/ 30) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.591). In non-resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 5.7% (3/53) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 8.9% (7/79) of patient with incomplete stone removal (p=0.738). When analyzed according to completeness of stone removal regardless of treatment modality, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 4.6% (5/109) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 10.1% (11/109) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.429). Although the site of stone and tumor occurrence concurred in 10/16 patients (3/6 patients in the resection group, 7/10 patient in the non-resection group), it did not match in 6 patients. On univariate analysis, none of the factors (age, gender, abdominal pain, bile duct stenosis, bile duct dilatation, liver atrophy, residual stone, stone recurrence and liver resection) showed relationship with the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma. Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma according to the treatment modality or completeness of stone removal. Therefore, patients with hepatolithiasis should carefully be followed-up to detect cholangiocarcinoma even after treatment.

Mo2030 Treatment of Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis (PVTT) Can Impact Survival of Patients With Advanced HCC?

Background/Aims: Hepatolithiasis is a well known risk factor of cholangiocarcinoma. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis still challenging and there are not enough reports on the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patient with hepatolithiasis after treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent liver resection or non-resection. Methods: Among a total of 257 patients who received treatment for hepatolithiasis from 2002 to 2011 at Korea University Anam and Guro Hospital, 236 patients were eligible for analysis; 92 patients underwent liver resection (resection group) and 144 patients did not (non-resection group). The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma was 6.8% (16/236) during follow-up period (mean 41±41 months). The median tumor occurrence time was 28 (13-111) months. Cholangiocarcinoma occurred 6.5% (6/92) and 6.9% (10/144) in resection and non-resection group respectively (P=0.425). In resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 3.6% (2/56) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 13.3% (4/ 30) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.591). In non-resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 5.7% (3/53) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 8.9% (7/79) of patient with incomplete stone removal (p=0.738). When analyzed according to completeness of stone removal regardless of treatment modality, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 4.6% (5/109) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 10.1% (11/109) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.429). Although the site of stone and tumor occurrence concurred in 10/16 patients (3/6 patients in the resection group, 7/10 patient in the non-resection group), it did not match in 6 patients. On univariate analysis, none of the factors (age, gender, abdominal pain, bile duct stenosis, bile duct dilatation, liver atrophy, residual stone, stone recurrence and liver resection) showed relationship with the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma. Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma according to the treatment modality or completeness of stone removal. Therefore, patients with hepatolithiasis should carefully be followed-up to detect cholangiocarcinoma even after treatment.

Mo2028 Comparison Between Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (TACE-RFA) for Treatment of Intermediate Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims: Hepatolithiasis is a well known risk factor of cholangiocarcinoma. Despite advances in diagnostic modalities, diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis still challenging and there are not enough reports on the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patient with hepatolithiasis after treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent liver resection or non-resection. Methods: Among a total of 257 patients who received treatment for hepatolithiasis from 2002 to 2011 at Korea University Anam and Guro Hospital, 236 patients were eligible for analysis; 92 patients underwent liver resection (resection group) and 144 patients did not (non-resection group). The data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma was 6.8% (16/236) during follow-up period (mean 41±41 months). The median tumor occurrence time was 28 (13-111) months. Cholangiocarcinoma occurred 6.5% (6/92) and 6.9% (10/144) in resection and non-resection group respectively (P=0.425). In resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 3.6% (2/56) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 13.3% (4/ 30) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.591). In non-resection group, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 5.7% (3/53) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 8.9% (7/79) of patient with incomplete stone removal (p=0.738). When analyzed according to completeness of stone removal regardless of treatment modality, cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 4.6% (5/109) of patients with complete stone removal, and in 10.1% (11/109) of patients with incomplete stone removal (p=0.429). Although the site of stone and tumor occurrence concurred in 10/16 patients (3/6 patients in the resection group, 7/10 patient in the non-resection group), it did not match in 6 patients. On univariate analysis, none of the factors (age, gender, abdominal pain, bile duct stenosis, bile duct dilatation, liver atrophy, residual stone, stone recurrence and liver resection) showed relationship with the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma. Conclusion: There was no difference in the incidence of cholangiocarcinoma according to the treatment modality or completeness of stone removal. Therefore, patients with hepatolithiasis should carefully be followed-up to detect cholangiocarcinoma even after treatment.

Surgical lesions of the small colon and post operative survival in aUKhospital population

There is limited information about risk factors and survival associated with disorders of the small colon requiring surgical management. 1) To document the types of surgical lesion in horses where pathology of the small (descending) colon was the primary cause of abdominal pain, 2) to describe the short- and long-term survival of these cases and identify factors associated with survival and 3) to identify preoperative variables associated with localisation of a lesion to the small colon. Clinical data and long-term follow-up were obtained for horses that underwent exploratory laparotomy over a 10-year period. Descriptive data were generated for short- and long-term survival and survival analysis performed to identify factors associated with reduced survival. Univariable and multivariable relationships were explored using a Cox proportional hazards model. Preoperative factors associated with increased likelihood of a small colon lesion were explored, using controls randomly selected from horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy for treatment of colic unrelated to the small colon. The study population included 84 horses. Of horses with small colon lesions recovered from anaesthesia, the percentage that survived until discharge, one year and 2 years following surgery, was 91.0, 81.0 and 73.5%, respectively. Median survival time for horses in which a resection had been performed was 1029 vs. 3072 days in the nonresection group. Small colon cases were more likely to have shown a longer duration of colic signs prior to admission (P<0.001) and to develop post operative diarrhoea (P = 0.001) when compared with surgical controls. Lesions of the small colon carry a good prognosis for survival following surgery. Resection and anastomosis was the only factor associated with reduced long-term survival. This study provides information about lesion types and post operative survival that may be used to assist informed decision-making when managing these cases.

Polypropylene mesh repair of incarcerated and strangulated hernias: a prospective clinical study

There is a common doubt regarding the application of polypropylene mesh to treat incarcerated and strangulated hernias due to the possibility of surgical site infection. We aimed to investigate the results of mesh repair of incarcerated and strangulated hernias, and to evaluate the incidence of wound infection and recurrence. One hundred and fifty-three consecutive patients with incarcerated and strangulated hernias underwent surgery with mesh repair. The patients were divided into two groups: a resection group and a nonresection group. Fisher's exact test, the Chi-square test and independent samples t test were used to determine the statistical significance level (p < 0.05). While 53 patients required organ resection, the remaining 100 patients did not. The most frequently incarcerated organs were the omentum (86), small bowel (74) and colon (15). Most of the resections were performed in the omentum (36), small bowel (23) and colon (2). While five of the 53 patients (9.4%) in the resection group developed wound infections, no infections were observed in the nonresection group (p = 0.004). The infection rate in all patients was 3.3% (five of 153 patients). None of the infected patients required mesh removal. There were no mortalities or recurrence in either group. The findings revealed effective and safe usage of mesh along with antibiotic therapy in patients undergoing incarcerated and strangulated hernia repair.

531P - Should Palliative Resection of Primary Tumor be Performed in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer? A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death. Surgical resection of the primary tumor in patients with advanced CRC remains controversial. Limited data is available regarding potential benefits and risk of primary tumor resection in such patients. Objectives To compare survival of patients with advanced CRC who underwent surgical resection of primary tumor with patients without resection. The review also aims to determine post-operative mortality & non-fatal complications rates, primary tumor complications rate (PTCR), non-resection surgical procedures rate (NSPR) and quality of life (QOL). Methods A literature search was conducted by using CENTRAL (2012), Medline (1946-2012), and EMBASE (1947-2012). Selection Criteria: Studies involving patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent primary tumor resection were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria with restriction to publication dates from 1980, English language and human studies. Data Collection and analysis: Screening, evaluation of relevant articles and data abstraction was done in duplication and agreement was assessed. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality by using Ottawa-Newcastle score. Data was collected and synthesized as per protocol. Results Of total of 3379 reports, 15 retrospective observational studies were selected with patients population of 12456. Among 12456 patients, 8620 (69%) underwent surgery with a median overall survival of the 15.2 months (range: 10-30.7) compared with 11.4 months (range: 3-22) of the non-resection group. Hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.26-1.64) favoring surgical intervention. Mean 30 days post-operative mortality and non-fatal complications rates were 4.9% (95% CI: 0-9.7) & 25.9% (95%CI: 20.1-31.6) respectively. Mean PTCR & NSPR in the control group were 29.7% (95%CI: 18.5-41.0) and 27.6% (95 CI: 15.4-39.9) respectively. No study provided QOL data. Sub-group analysis that were defined a priori revealed HR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.20-1.78) favoring surgical intervention in patients treated with modern chemotherapy. Conclusions The retrospective data favors primary tumors resection in advanced CRC. Future prospective randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Impact of primary tumour resection on survival of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases treated by chemotherapy: Results from the multicenter, randomised trial Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9601

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of primary tumour resection on overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). DesignAmong the 294 patients with non-resectable colorectal metastases enrolled in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 phase III trial, which compared different first-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens, 216 patients (73%) presented with synchronous metastases at study entry and constituted the present study population. Potential baseline prognostic variables including prior primary tumour resection were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS curves were compared with the logrank test. ResultsAmong the 216 patients with stage IV CRC (median follow-up, 33months), 156 patients (72%) had undergone resection of their primary tumour prior to study entry. The resection and non-resection groups did not differ for baseline characteristics except for primary tumour location (rectum, 14% versus 35%; p=0.0006). In multivariate analysis, resection of the primary was the strongest independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4–0.8; p=0.0002) and OS (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3–0.6; p<0.0001). Both median PFS (5.1 [4.6–5.6] versus 2.9 [2.2–4.1] months; p=0.001) and OS (16.3 [13.7–19.2] versus 9.6 [7.4–12.5]; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the resection group. These differences in patient survival were maintained after exclusion of patients with rectal primary (n=43). ConclusionResection of the primary tumour may be associated with longer PFS and OS in patients with stage IV CRC starting first-line, single-agent chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine (G) plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

e14714 Background: 30-40 % of PC pts present with LAPC. Optimal management remains controversial. Current NCCN guidelines, suggests clinical trial, FOLFIRINOX, G, G based combination therapy, chemo followed by CRT as options in pts with good PS. This single institution retrospective review, evaluated the UC experience of the impact of G+nab-p+/- CRT in LAPC. Methods: From 05/01/09-09/01/11,105 newly registered pts were identifiedusing ICD code 157, 13pts met inclusion criteria: ECOG PS 0-2, histologically proven LAPC, without prior therapy that received G + nab-P, pre or post radiation as part of their treatment. G+nab-p was given as cycles of G=1,000mg/m2 and nab-P=100mg/m2 weekly x3 every 4 weeks with appropriate modifications. CT scans and CA19-9 levels were followed. PFS was estimated from the date of diagnosis to date of progression or death if this occurred first and OS was estimated from date of diagnosis until date of death or loss to follow up. Kaplan Meier survival estimates were obtained with 95% confidence interval (CI). Log rank test was used to compare the PFS according to categorical variables. Results: Median duration of follow up was estimated to be 14.4 months (M) range(R) (5.8-19). CA19-9 data was available for 12 pts, 2 had baseline &lt;1 (R&lt;1-12,861), CA19-9 decrease &gt; 50% from baseline was seen in 9/10. Mean # of G+nab-P cycles administered was 3, R (1-10). 77% received G based CRT with only 1pt receiving this post op. 38% (5/13) underwent resection, 4 post CRT with R0 margins and -ve LN’s and 1 pre CRT with R0 margins but 1/13 LN’s +ve. 11 pts were evaluable for response by RECIST (4PR, 6SD, 1PD). Disease control rate 91%. PFS 92% (CI: 57- 99%) at 6 M and 65% (CI: 31-85%) at 12 M. OS was 85% (CI: 51-96%) at 6M and 77 %(CI: 44-92%) at 12M. At 6M, 100% PFS was observed in resected group, whereas 88% PFS in non-resected group (p=0.12). There was no significant difference in PFS according to gender (p=0.44) and T lesion (p=0.49). Grade III/IV toxicity was mainly hematologic and gastrointestinal. (4/7) 57% received further therapy upon progression. Conclusions: Compared to contemporary G- based trials, the UC experience of G+ nab-P with CRT appears to be associated with improved survival in LAPC and warrants further study.

Evaluation of the necessity of primary tumor resection for synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer.

592 Background: Recent advances in chemotherapy have improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Resection of primary tumor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer remains controversial. Primary tumor with obstruction or bleeding may be recommended to resection pior to chemotherapy. In contrast, it should be considered potential complications associated with resection of primary tumor and disadvantage of the delay in chemotherapy. Here, we evaluate the needs of primary tumor resection for colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer treated at Kumamoto University Hospital between April, 2005 and December, 2009 was performed. We compared the survival of resected patients and non-resected patients. Results: 104 patients were identified. Sixty-four and 40 patients were included in the resected group and the non-resected group respectively. The mean follow-up time was 16.1 months. Median age was 61.9 and 64.3 years respectively. The non-resected group was more likely to have right-sided tumors (resected: 28%, non-resected: 43%). The number of patient with metastatic disease limited to the liver was similar in both group(resected: 48%, non-resected: 50%). In the resected group, 12 patients (18%) developed postoperative complications. In the nonresected group, 5 patients (12.5%) required creation of a diverting colostomy during the course of their treatment due to obstruction, and 2 patients (5%) required emergency surgical treatment for intestinal perforation due to the primary tumor. No significant difference in survival was observed between the groups, (logrank P=0.33). Median survival period was not significantly different (resected: 27.3 months, non-resected: 21.5 months, P=0.43). Conclusions: We concluded that it was not necessary to resect the primary lesion in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer when obstruction or bleeding was not found in primary lesions.

Clinical benefit of radiation therapy and metallic stenting for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma

To determine the efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT), in patients with non-resected locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. We analyzed 64 patients with locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, including 25 who underwent resection (17 curative and 8 non-curative), 28 treated with radiotherapy, and 11 who received best supportive care (BSC). The radiotherapy group received EBRT (50 Gy, 30 fractions), with 11 receiving an additional 24 Gy (4 fractions) ILBT by iridium-192 with remote after loading. ILBT was performed using percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) route. Uncovered metallic stents (UMS) were inserted into non-resected patients with obstructive jaundice, with the exception of four patients who received percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage only. UMS were placed endoscopically or percutaneously, depending on the initial drainage procedure. The primary endpoints were patient death or stent occlusion. Survival time of patients in the radiotherapy group was compared with that of patients in the resection and BSC groups. Stent patency was compared in the radiotherapy and BSC groups. No statistically significant differences in patient characteristics were found among the resection, radiotherapy, and BSC groups. Three patients in the radiotherapy group and one in the BSC group did not receive UMS insertion but received PTBD alone; cholangitis occurred after endoscopic stenting, and patients were treated with PTBD. A total of 16 patients were administered additional systemic chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-based regimen in 9, S-1 in 6, and gemcitabine in 1). Overall survival varied significantly among groups, with median survival times of 48.7 mo in the surgery group, 22.1 mo in the radiotherapy group, and 5.7 mo in the BSC group. Patients who underwent curative resection survived significantly longer than those who were not candidates for surgery (P = 0.0076). Cumulative survival in the radiotherapy group was significantly longer than in the BSC group (P = 0.0031), but did not differ significantly from those in the non-resection group. Furthermore, the median survival time of patients in the radiotherapy group who were considered for possible resection (excluding the seven patients who were not candidates for surgery due to comorbid disease or age) was 25.9 mo. Stent patency was evaluated only in the 24 patients who received a metallic stent. Stent patency was significantly longer in the radiotherapy than in the BSC group (P = 0.0165). Biliary drainage was not eliminated in any patient. To determine the efficacy of ILBT, we compared survival time and stent patency in the EBRT alone and EBRT plus ILBT groups. However, we found no significant difference in survival time between groups or for stent patencies. Hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcers were observed in 5 patients (17.9%), three in the EBRT plus ILBT group and two in the EBRT alone group. Ulcers occurred 5 mo, 7 mo, 8 mo, 16 mo, and 29 mo following radiotherapy. All patients required hospitalization, but blood transfusions were unnecessary. All 5 patients recovered following the administration of anti-ulcer medication. Radiotherapy improved patient prognosis and the patency of uncovered metallic stents in patients with locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma, but ILBT provided no additional benefits.

Extent of resection for T2N0 gallbladder carcinoma regarding concurrent extrahepatic bile duct resection.

Backgrounds/AimsGallbladder carcinoma (GBCa) T2 lesions are considered to be advanced tumors showing diverse features in tumor extent. When this T2 lesion does not involve the cystic duct and there is no evidence of lymph node metastasis, we have to consider what is the most reasonable extent of resection - that is, whether to perform concurrent extra-hepatic bile duct resection (EHBD) resection or not. This study intends to evaluate the adequacy of EHBD resection in patients undergoing resection for T2N0 GBCa.MethodsFrom our institutional database of GBCa, 48 cases of T2N0 GBCa who underwent R0 resection during November 1995 and August 2008 were selected. Patients who underwent prior laparoscopic cholecystectomy were excluded. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively.ResultsTheir mean age was 63.2±83.3 years and females were 25. The mean serum CA19-9 level was 37.3±89.3 ng/ml. The extents of liver resection were wedge resection (n=36) and segment 4a+5 resection (n=12). Concurrent EHBD resection was performed in 16 (33.3%) patients. No fatal surgical complication occurred. The majority of tumor pathology was adenocarcinoma (n=42), with additional unusual types as papillary (n=3), saromatoid (n=1), signet ring cell (n=1) and adenosquamous (n=1) cancers. The overall survival rate was 87.1% at 1 year, 69.5% at 3 years and 61.7% at 5 years. After exclusion of mortalities not related to cancer, the overall patient survival rate was 89.6% at 1 year, 72.9% at 3 years and 64.7% at 5 years, with 3-year survival rates of 72% in the EHBD resection group and 69.2% in the non-resection group (p=0.661).ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that concurrent EHBD resection did not improve patient survival when R0 resection was achieved in patients with T2N0 GBCa. Therefore, routine EHBD resection may not be indicated for T2N0 GBCa unless the tumor is close to the cystic duct.

Thyroid cancers with laryngotracheal invasion

Management of thyroid cancers with laryngotracheal invasion is controversial. A retrospective analysis of our database found 69 patients (38 females, mean age 59.6 ± 11.6) between March 1995 and July 2010; of them 42 (61%) were managed by non-resectional methods due to the extensive airway or regional involvement, severe co-morbidities, diffuse metastases or patient's preference. Segmental airway resection was performed in 27 (39%) patients; concurrent with thyroidectomy in 17 (Immediate group (IG)), and as a delayed procedure in 10 referred patients (Delayed group (DG)), who had previously undergone thyroidectomy with conservative airway management, like shaving procedures. Follow-up was completed in 81% of patients with a mean duration of 30 months. Tracheal or laryngotracheal resection and reconstruction was performed in 18, laryngectomy in eight and pharyngolaryngectomy in one patient. There were two anastomotic dehiscence (11.1%), one resulted in mortality (3.7%). One or a combination of bronchoscopic core-out, laser, tracheostomy and stent placement was performed in 42 non-resected patients with two mortalities (4.7%). Overall 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival was 85, 85, 68 and 49% in resected group, as well as 56, 46, 40 and 31% in non-resected group (P = 0.049), respectively. Among resected group, the overall 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival was 92, 92, 76 and 61% in the IG as well as 75, 75, 56 and 28% in the DG (P = 0.43). Complete segmental airway resection during or even after thyroidectomy could be safely performed, might be curative and may be associated with improved survival.

Morphometrical Differences between Resectable and Non-Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Fractal Analysis

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive cancer with a rising incidence and poor prognosis despite active surgical treatment. Candidates for surgical resection should be carefully selected. In order to avoid unnecessary laparotomy it is useful to identify reliable factors that may predict resectability. Nuclear morphometry and fractal dimension of pancreatic nuclear features could provide important preoperative information in assessing pancreas resectability. Sixty-one patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study between 2003 and 2005. Patients were divided into two groups: one resectable cancer group and one with non-resectable pancreatic cancer. Morphometric parameters measured were: nuclear area, length of minor axis and length of major axis. Nuclear shape and chromatin distribution of the pancreatic tumor cells were both estimated using fractal dimension. Morphometric measurements have shown significant differences between the nuclear area of the resectable group and the non-resectable group (61.9 ± 19.8µm vs. 42.2 ± 15.6µm). Fractal dimension of the nuclear outlines and chromatin distribution was found to have a higher value in the non-resectable group (p<0.05). Objective measurements should be performed to improve risk assessment and therapeutic decisions in pancreatic cancer. Nuclear morphometry of the pancreatic nuclear features can provide important pre-operative information in resectability assessment. The fractal dimension of the nuclear shape and chromatin distribution may be considered a new promising adjunctive tool for conventional pathological analysis.

The Value of Palliative Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer with Distant Metastasis

The purpose of this study was to examine the value of surgical resection and to find prognostic factors for metastatic gastric cancer. Clinicopathological data of 257 cM1 gastric cancer patients who underwent an operation at Seoul National University Hospital from January 1999 to December 2004 were reviewed. Patients were grouped into the resection (RS, n=165) and nonresection groups (NR, n=92). To evaluate whether there was any selection bias, patients were stratified according to chemotherapy and preoperative CT findings were compared. There were no significant differences in clinicopathologic features and preoperative CT findings between the RS and NR groups. For chemotherapy, the RS group had a survival benefit (median survival; 12.7 vs. 11.2 months, p=0.0107). In the subanalysis, there was a survival benefit to the RS group when metastasis was confined to one site (14 vs. 9.7 months, p=0.04). In patients with no chemotherapy, the RS group had no benefit (p=0.151). In univariate and multivariate analyses, resection (p=0.001), chemotherapy (p<0.001), the number of organs with metastatic lesions (p=0.003), and elective operation (p<0.001) were significant prognostic factors. This retrospective study suggests that surgical resection in metastatic gastric cancer may improve survival when combined with chemotherapy, especially when metastasis is confined to one site.

Prognostic Value of Resection of Primary Tumor in Patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of Two Randomized Studies and a Review of the Literature

BackgroundIn patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with an asymptomatic primary tumor, there is no consensus on the indication for resection of the primary tumor.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the outcome of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with or without resection of the primary tumor treated in the phase III CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies. A review of the literature was performed.ResultsIn the CAIRO and CAIRO2 studies, 258 and 289 patients had undergone a primary tumor resection and 141 and 159 patients had not, respectively. In the CAIRO study, a significantly better median overall survival and progression-free survival was observed for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 16.7 vs. 11.4 months [P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61], and 6.7 vs. 5.9 months (P = 0.004; HR 0.74), respectively. In the CAIRO2 study, median overall survival and progression-free survival were also significantly better for the resection compared to the nonresection group, with 20.7 vs. 13.4 months (P < 0.0001; HR 0.65) and 10.5 vs. 7.8 months (P = 0.014; HR 0.78), respectively. These differences remained significant in multivariate analyses. Our review identified 22 nonrandomized studies, most of which showed improved survival for mCRC patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor.ConclusionsOur results as well as data from literature indicate that resection of the primary tumor is a prognostic factor for survival in stage IV CRC patients. The potential bias of these results warrants prospective studies on the value of resection of primary tumor in this setting; such studies are currently being planned.

Prognostic Factors for Gastric Cancer Patients with Synchronous Metastasis

Purpose: The prognosis for gastric cancer patients with distant metastasis is very poor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognosis and survival for gastric cancer patients with synchronous metastasis. Methods: Among 2,083 gastric cancer patients who received surgery at the Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital from 1992 to 2009, 164 patients revealed distant metastasis. However, 3 patients who died of postoperative complications were excluded. For the remaining patients, various clinicopathological factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Results: Systemic chemotherapy (SC), type of surgery, lymph node dissection, degree of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), presence of ascites and tumor location were significant prognostic factors. However, sex, age, number of metastatic sites and histologic classification were not significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, the type of surgery, the SC and the degree of PC were independent prognostic factors. Survival benefit by SC was significant in single site metastasis. The significant survival difference between resection and non-resection groups was observed regardless of number of metastatic sites. Conclusion: In gastric cancer patients with metastasis, the favorable prognostic factors were type of surgery and SC in single metastasis. The gastrectomy improves the prognosis regardless of number of metastatic sites. However, a prospective randomized clinical trial is mandatory to attain more accurate information.

Surgical resection with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination

The prognosis for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination is very poor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit from gastrectomy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination. From 1992 to 2002, 128 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival were compared between the resection and the non-resection groups, and between the resection alone and the resection with HIPEC groups. The 5-year survival rates were 5.5% for patients in the resection group and 0% for patients in the non-resection group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed surgical resection was significantly associated with better prognosis in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination. In the patients who underwent resection, the survival difference between the resection alone and the resection with HIPEC groups was significant (P = 0.025), and HIPEC was an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. The HIPEC procedure was an independent prognostic factor after resection for patients with peritoneal dissemination. Therefore, gastrectomy with HIPEC may be an option for those patients. The survival benefit of this strategy should be validated by large cohort prospective clinical trials.