Non-permanent Atrial Fibrillation Research Articles

Atrial fibrillation and subtype of atrial fibrillation in cardiac amyloidosis: clinical and echocardiographic features, impact on mortality

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly affects patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Amyloid deposition within the left atrium may be responsible for the subtype of AF in either permanent or non-permanent form. The prognostic implications of AF and its clinical subtype according to the type of CA are still controversial in this population. This study sought to investigate the prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of AF and the clinical subtype of AF (permanent or non-permanent) in patients with CA.Methods: Two hundred and thirty-eight patients with CA and full medical records were retrospectively enrolled in the study: About 115 (48%) with light chain (AL) amyloidosis and 123 (52%) with transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR). Patient’s medical records were reviewed to establish baseline prevalence, incidence and impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality during follow-up of AF.Results: One hundred and four (44%) patients had history of AF at the time of diagnosis: 62 (60%) permanent and 42 (40%) non-permanent. There were 30 (26%) and 74 (60%) patients with history of AF among patients with AL and ATTR (including 5 hereditary and 69 wild-type), respectively (p<.0001). During the follow-up, 48 new patients developed AF (29, 12 and 7 among patients with AL, wild-type ATTR and hereditary ATTR). After adjustment for age, survival was similar in patients with or without history of AF (HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.27; p = .467). AF had no impact on cardiovascular mortality. Among the 152 patients with history of AF included in the whole study, there were 75 (49%) patients with permanent AF. After adjustment for age, survival was similar in patients with permanent and non-permanent AF: HR 1.29 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.99; p = .251). The results were the same among patients with AL or wild-type amyloidosis. Subtype of AF had no impact on cardiovascular mortality.Conclusions: AF is common in patients with CA. However, AF and clinical subtype of AF have no impact on all-cause mortality, whatever the type of amyloidosis.

Left atrium size and red cell distribution width predict atrial fibrillation progression from paroxysmal or persistent to permanent

ABSTRACTObjective: Stratifying patients with paroxysmal or short-term persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at greater risk of developing permanent AF is challenging. Aim of our prospective study was to evaluate association of laboratory parameters (biochemistry and complete blood count (CBC)) together with standard demographic, clinical and echocardiography parameters, with AF progression.Methods: We prospectively recruited 579 patients with AF and divided them into two groups at index hospitalization: paroxysmal or persistent (non-permanent AF), and long-term persistent or permanent AF patients (permanent AF). Clinical, echocardiographic, and relevant CBC parameters were collected. Non-permanent AF patients were selected for follow-up, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. Endpoint was progression to permanent AF.Results: Out of 409 patients with non-permanent AF, 109 (26.6%) progressed within follow-up. In a multivariate Cox regression model only increased left atrium (LA) diameter (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.20–3.87, p = 0.010), and increased red cell distribution width (RDW; HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.39, p = 0.022) showed significant independent association with progression. There were 221/409 patients with both LA ≤45 mm and RDW level ≤14.5% who progressed at a rate of only 17.6%, and showed relative risk of AF progression of 0.47 (95% CI 0.34–0.67; p < 0,001).Conclusion: Together with LA size, RDW was independently associated with AF progression. Patients with both LA size ≤45 mm and RDW level ≤14.5% are most probably the best candidates for rhythm control strategies.

Incomplete endothelialization of WatchmanTM Device: Predictors and Implications from Two Cases

Initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AADx) for atrial fibrillation (AF) on an outpatient basis requires intensive ECG monitoring in order to assess antiarrhythmic efficacy as well as ECG signals of potential proarrhythmia. Dronedarone (DRO) reduces cardiovascular endpoints in AF patients fulfilling criteria of the ATHENA trial [1]. In the present study transtelephonic ECG monitoring was used to guide initiation of AADx in AF patients fulfilling the ATHENA criteria. In 19 consecutive patients (37% female; age 65+10 years; LVEF 62+7%; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.9 + 1.6 (median=2), with symptomatic non-permanent AF and additional cardiovascular risk factors, DRO was prescribed as AADx of first choice. Initiation of therapy and follow-up were monitored by transtelephonic ECG recordings (VITAPHONE™100 IR; Vitaphone GmbH; Germany). In patients with persistent AF, electrical cardioversion was performed on an outpatient basis when DRO was started. Patients were followed for changes in QT intervals as well as AF recurrency. ECGs were transmitted according to a scheduled FU form as well as any time in case of pts symptoms. Patients in whom DRO did not prevent AF recurrence were switched to alternative AADx, or to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), respectively. At the end of long-term follow-up, DRO alone was successful in preventing AF recurrence in 5 of 19 patients (26%). When pts who responded to AADx of second or third choice or who underwent PVI were included, SR could be maintained in 17/19 pts (89%). No patient required discontinuation of AADx due to ventricular depolarization abnormalities, symptomatic bradycardia or pathologic QT prolongation. In conclusion, transtelephonic ECG transmission is useful for close rhythm monitoring during initiation and follow-up of AADx, also during change from DRO to other AADx. DRO was effective to prevent AF recurrence in 26% of patients during a mean long-term follow-up of more than 30 months - which is well in line with data from the literature.

Relations between baseline burden, maximum duration, and relative reduction of atrial fibrillation: Insights from continuous monitoring in rhythm control.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) can measure atrial fibrillation (AF) early; however, the timing for administering antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) to suppress AF remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between baseline values and changes after AAD in terms of relative reduction of AF burden (RRAB) and maximum AF duration (RRMD). This multicenter retrospective study screened all patients with nonpermanent AF who had dual-chamber pacemakers and only enrolled those receiving a naive AAD between September 2009 and December 2014. AF burden and maximum duration were calculated using CIED at 0 and 3 to 6 months after starting rhythm control. All the enrolled patients were divided into four groups according to baseline AF burden. RRAB and RRMD were monitored using CIEDs. Overall, 145 eligible subjects received a naive AAD for nonpermanent AF. The mean RRAB in the four groups (AF burden <1%, 1%-4%, 4%-18%, and ≥18%) were -65.3%, -46.4%, -34.7%, and -27.9% (P = 0.005), respectively. Mean RRMD were -26.8%, -12.4%, 4.2%, and 6.0%, respectively ( P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis revealed that the lowest baseline AF burden (<1%) was significantly associated with greater RRAB, which was not observed in the RRMD model. Lower baseline AF burden was associated with greater RRAB by AADs. Our finding suggests that rhythm control should be started in the early stage to achieve better responses to AADs.

Should antithrombotic therapy be different in patients with atrial fibrillation and a so-called temporary cause and especially after an acute coronary syndrome?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be related to acute, temporary causes such as alcohol use, myocardial ischemia, myocarditis, hyperthyroidism, etc. It remains unclear whether antithrombotic management should be different in this setting after resolution of the episode. Our objective was to describe the outcomes in patients with such a temporary cause of AF (TCAF), and to compare the specific subgroup of patients with TCAF associated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to other patients with TCAF with regard to antithrombotic management. All patients with AF seen in our institution between 2000 and 2010 were identified in a database. The adverse outcomes were investigated during follow-up. Among 8962 patients with AF, 5467 patients with non-permanent AF of whom 920 (17%) had at least one possible temporary cause of AF. TCAF patients had higher CHA2DS2VASc score than other patients (3.6 ± 1.7 versus 3.0 ± 1.7, P < 0.0001) and treatment with oral anticoagulation was less frequent (37% versus 52%, P < 0.0001). After a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, the rate of stroke/thromboembolism (TE) was similar in patients with TCAF than in other AF patients. Mortality was higher in patients with TCAF (Adjusted HR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.18–1.75, P = 0.004). In patients with TCAF and no ACS, prescription of oral anticoagulation was independently associated with a better prognosis for death/stroke/TE (Adjusted HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.29–0.71, P = 0.0005). In patients with TCAF and ACS, the use of oral anticoagulation was independently associated with a better prognosis for death/stroke/TE (adjusted HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.14–0.53, P = 0.0001) and it was the same for antiplatelet therapy (adjusted HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.14–0.42, P < 0.0001). In patients with a possibly TCAF, use of oral anticoagulation was independently associated with a better prognosis. Antiplatelet therapy use was also independently associated with a better prognosis when patients with TCAF had ACS.

Intermittent anticoagulation guided by continuous atrial fibrillation burden monitoring using dual-chamber pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results from the Tailored Anticoagulation for Non-Continuous Atrial Fibrillation (TACTIC-AF) pilot study

Chronic anticoagulation is recommended for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with thromboembolic risk factors regardless of AF duration/frequency. Continuous rhythm assessment with pacemakers (PMs)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may allow anticoagulation only around AF episodes, reducing bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility/safety of intermittent DOAC use guided by continuous remote AF monitoring via dual-chamber PMs or ICDs. Patients with nonpermanent AF, current DOAC use, CHADS2 score ≤3, a St. Jude Medical dual-chamber PM or ICD, and rare AF episodes were followed with biweekly and AF-alert based remote transmissions. Patients free of AF episodes lasting ≥6 minutes with a total AF burden <6 hours/day for 30 consecutive days discontinued DOAC. If AF burden surpassed these limits, DOAC was restarted and/or continued. Total days on DOAC and adverse events were assessed. Among 48 patients (mean age 71.3 years; 65% male; 79% paroxysmal AF; 87% CHADS2 score 1-2), 14,826 days of monitoring were completed. Patients used DOACs for 3763 days, representing a 74.6% reduction in anticoagulation time compared to chronic administration. Adverse events included 2 gastrointestinal bleeds (both on DOAC), 1 fatal intracerebral bleed (off DOAC), and no thromboembolic/stroke events. Among patients with rare AF episodes and low-to-moderate stroke risk, PM/ICD-guided DOAC administration is feasible and decreased anticoagulation utilization by 75%. Few adverse events occurred, although the study was not powered to assess these outcomes. PM/ICD-guided DOAC administration may prove a viable alternative to chronic anticoagulation. Future studies are warranted.

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the ORBIT-AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) Registry.

BackgroundMineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy may be beneficial to patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but little is known about their use in patients with AF and subsequent outcomes.Methods and ResultsIn order to better understand MRA use and subsequent outcomes, we performed a retrospective cohort study of the contemporary ORBIT‐AF (Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation) registry. AF progression and cardiovascular outcomes were compared using propensity‐matched Cox proportional hazards modeling according to MRA use at baseline and new MRA use at follow‐up versus patients with no MRA use. Among 7012 patients with nonpermanent AF, 320 patients were taking MRA at enrollment, and 416 patients initiated MRA use during follow‐up. The mean patient age was 72.5 years, 56.3% were men, and 70.4% had paroxysmal AF. Among all patients taking MRAs, 434 (59.0%) had heart failure, 655 (89.0%) had hypertension, and 380 (51.6%) had both. After adjustment, new MRA use was not associated with reduced AF progression (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–1.58; P=0.27) but showed a trend towards lower risk of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic embolism (hazard ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.02–1.23; P=0.08). Results were similar for a comparison of new MRA users and baseline MRA users compared with nonusers.ConclusionsIn community‐based outpatients with AF, the majority of MRA use was for heart failure and hypertension. MRA use also trended towards lower adjusted stroke risk. Future studies should test the hypothesis that MRA use may decrease the risk of stroke in patients with AF.

Effects of exercise training on exercise capacity, cardiac function, BMI, and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.

Exercise training has become part of the standard care for patients with cardiovascular disease. We investigated the effects of exercise training on exercise capacity, cardiac function, BMI, and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We searched for randomized-controlled trials of supervised exercise training versus care without exercise training (the control) in patients with permanent or nonpermanent AF published up to November 2016. Standard mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models. We identified 259 trials, and after an assessment of relevance, five trials with a combined total of 379 participants were analyzed. In AF patients, exercise training significantly improved exercise capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction compared with the control (SMD: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.12; MD: 4.8%, 95% CIs: 1.56 to 8.03, respectively). Compared with the control, exercise training also significantly reduced BMI (MD: -0.47 kg/m, 95% CIs: -0.89 to -0.06) and significantly improved scores in the 'general health' and 'vitality' sections of the 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey (SMD: 0.71, 95% CIs: 0.30 to 1.12; SMD: 0.81, 95% CIs: 0.40 to 1.23, respectively). Exercise training improved exercise capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction, and some the 36-item Short Form Health Status Survey scores, and reduced BMI in AF patients.

Loop Recorder Detected High Rate of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after a Single Balloon- or Basket-Based Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the MACPAF Study.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established approach to treat symptomatic non-permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Detecting AF recurrence after PVI is important, if discontinuation of oral anticoagulation after ablation is considered. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were enrolled in the prospective randomized mesh ablator vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein (PV) ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal AF study, comparing efficacy and safety of the HD Mesh Ablator® (C.R. Bard, Lowell, MA, USA) and the Arctic Front® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) catheter. Rhythm status post-PVI was closely monitored for 1 year using the implantable loop recorder (ILR) Reveal XT® (Medtronic Minneapolis, MN, USA). The study was terminated after the first interim analysis due to the inability of the HD Mesh Ablator® to achieve the predefined primary study endpoint, an exit block of all PVs. After a 90-day blanking period, 23 (62.2%) out of 37 study patients (median 63.0 years; 41% females) had at least one episode of AF. AF recurrence was associated with AF episodes during the blanking period {hazard ratios (HR) 5.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-21.4]; p = 0.038}, and a common left-sided PV ostium [HR 4.17 (95%CI 1.48-11.8); p = 0.039] but not with catheter type, age, gender, cardiovascular risk profile, or left atrial volume. There was a trend toward AF recurrence in patients without complete PVI of all PV (p = 0.095). Overall, 337 (59.4%) out of 566 ILR-detected episodes represented AF. Comparing patients with AF recurrence to those without, there was no difference in cognitive performance 6 months post-ablation. Using an ILR, in more than 60% of all patients with paroxysmal AF, a recurrence of AF was detected within 12 months after ablation. In patients with a common PV ostium, the first generation balloon-based catheter is obviously less effective. http://Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01061931.

Non-permanent atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant therapy are related to survival during 10 years after first-ever ischemic stroke

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) detection in ischemic stroke patients triggers initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC). However, little is known regarding whether the persistency of AF affects long-term prognosis after ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess the impact of AF types and OAC on the outcome during a 10-year follow-up (FU) after first-ever ischemic stroke. Material and methodsThe study sample comprised 336 first-ever ischemic stroke patients (median age 76, interquartile range 25–75% (IQR) 67–82years, 136 female) included in the Lund Stroke Register (LSR) in 2001–2002. At baseline, 109 patients had either permanent (n=44) or recurrent (n=65) AF. OAC was assessed using the Lund University Hospital anticoagulation database. All-cause mortality was assessed via linkage with the Swedish Causes of Death Register. ResultsDuring FU, 200 patients died. AF independently predicted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.52 95% CI 1.14–2.04, p=0.005); the worst prognosis was observed for permanent AF (HR 1.86 95% CI 1.29–2.69, p=0.001). Patients with recurrent AF receiving OAC had similar survival rates to patients without AF (HR 0.73 95% CI 0.38–1.39, p=0.333), while prognosis was worst for patients with permanent AF without OAC (HR 2.28 95% CI 1.38–3.77, p=0.001) and intermediate for patients with permanent AF on OAC (HR 1.57 95% CI 0.92–2.67, p=0.099). ConclusionAll-cause mortality was independently associated with AF and was the greatest in stroke patients with permanent AF. Patients with recurrent AF receiving OAC have the most favorable outcome, similar to those without AF and significantly better than OAC-treated patients with permanent AF.

Prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation and a presumed "temporary cause" in a community-based cohort study.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be related to acute and temporary causes, whether cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular. It remains unclear whether the risk of ischemic stroke is different in this setting, and whether antithrombotic management should be different in these patients. The objective of the study was to describe and compare the risk of stroke in AF patients with and with no such temporary precipitating cause. Among 8962 patients with AF seen between 2000 and 2010, we focused our analysis on 4587 patients with non-permanent AF, of whom 740 (16%) had at least one possible temporary cause of AF. During a mean follow-up of 944days (median 451, interquartile range 8-1624), the adjusted rates of stroke/TE were non-significantly different between patients with a temporary cause of AF and other AF patients (HR=1.08, 95% CI 0.82-1.41, p=0.59 after adjustment on age, gender, CHA2DS2VASc score, OAC use and antiplatelet therapy use). Cardiovascular mortality was higher in patients with a temporary cause when compared to other AF patients (adjusted HR=1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.86, p=0.01). In patients with a temporary cause of AF, prescription of oral anticoagulation was independently associated with a better prognosis for cardiovascular death/stroke/thromboembolism (HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67, p=0.0001). AF patients with presumed temporary cause of AF had a similar risk of stroke/thromboembolism and a worse prognosis for cardiovascular mortality than other AF patients. Use of oral anticoagulation was associated with a better prognosis in these patients.

Dronedarone: a real innovation or a mere second-best choice? How to find the way among guidelines, regulatory agencies and daily clinical practice

Dronedarone is the antiarrhythmic drug with the most complete and wide literature preceding its marketing. Most of these studies showed a good efficacy along with an excellent risk profile, especially in low- and medium-risk patients. Recently, updates of European, American and even Italian guidelines gave dronedarone its own spot into the antiarrhythmic armamentarium, recommending its use both for rhythm control and rate control in non-permanent atrial fibrillation. In Italy, however, dronedarone prescription is still possible only when amiodarone is not tolerated, making dronedarone a mere second choice of its older "relative". Moreover, patients taking dronedarone must undergo a strict alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin follow-up, which usefulness in predicting drug-induced liver damage (probably idiosyncratic in nature and therefore unpredictable) is far from demonstrated. The aim of this review is to sum up actual evidences on dronedarone, describe how these evidences had been differently transposed by panel of experts and drug agencies into guidelines and recommendations, and define the current difficulties encountered by the cardiologist in the correct use of this new antiarrhythmic agent in clinical practice.

Dronedarone: Basic Pharmacology and Clinical Use.

Dronedarone is the newest antiarrhythmic drug approved for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (AF). It is a multi-channel blocker with diverse electrophysiologic properties. Dronedarone decreases the incidence of AF recurrence and the ventricular rate during recurrence. Dronedarone decreases rates of cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Dronedarone increases mortality in patients with permanent AF and those with moderate-severe heart failure, and should thus be avoided in these populations. Dronedarone is less effective than amiodarone but also has less toxicity. Direct comparison with other antiarrhythmic drugs is not available.

ECG Features Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Combined AFFIRM and AF-CHF Analysis.

The association between standard parameters from a simple 12-lead ECG (i.e., QRS duration and PR, JT, and QT intervals) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, arrhythmic mortality, and hospitalizations) in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been previously studied. A pooled analysis of patient-level data was conducted on 5,436 patients, age 68.2 ± 8.3 years, 34.8% female, with a history of non-permanent AF randomized in AFFIRM and AF-CHF trials. The predictive value of ECG parameters was assessed in AF and sinus rhythm in multivariate Cox regression models. During a follow-up of 40.8 ± 16.3 months, QRS duration >120 milliseconds was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.21-1.76] in AF, P < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.75, 95% CI (1.15-2.65) in sinus rhythm, P = 0.009; HR 1.56, 95% CI [1.27-1.93] in AF, P < 0.001), arrhythmic mortality (HR 1.90, 95% CI [1.09-3.32] in sinus, P = 0.024; HR 1.84, 95% CI [1.35-2.51] in AF, P < 0.001), any hospitalization (HR 1.15, 95% CI [1.02-1.29] in AF, P = 0.027), and cardiovascular hospitalization (HR 1.21, 95% CI [1.06-1.37] in AF; P = 0.004). Increased PR interval (>200 milliseconds) was independently associated with cardiovascular (HR 1.56, 95% CI [1.11-2.21], P = 0.010) and arrhythmic (HR 1.91, 95% CI [1.14-3.18], P = 0.004) mortality. The JT and QTc intervals were not predictive of mortality. Simple parameters from standard ECGs are significantly and independently associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with a history of AF.

Aerobic Interval Training Reduces the Burden of Atrial Fibrillation in the Short Term: A Randomized Trial.

Exercise training is an effective treatment for important atrial fibrillation (AF) comorbidities. However, a high level of endurance exercise is associated with an increased AF prevalence. We assessed the effects of aerobic interval training (AIT) on time in AF, AF symptoms, cardiovascular health, and quality of life in AF patients. Fifty-one patients with nonpermanent AF were randomized to AIT (n=26) consisting of four 4-minute intervals at 85% to 95% of peak heart rate 3 times a week for 12 weeks or to a control group (n=25) continuing their regular exercise habits. An implanted loop recorder measured time in AF continuously from 4 weeks before to 4 weeks after the intervention period. Cardiac function, peak oxygen uptake (o2peak), lipid status, quality of life, and AF symptoms were evaluated before and after the 12-week intervention period. Mean time in AF increased from 10.4% to 14.6% in the control group and was reduced from 8.1% to 4.8% in the exercise group (P=0.001 between groups). AF symptom frequency (P=0.006) and AF symptom severity (P=0.009) were reduced after AIT. AIT improved o2peak, left atrial and ventricular ejection fraction, quality-of-life measures of general health and vitality, and lipid values compared with the control group. There was a trend toward fewer cardioversions and hospital admissions after AIT. AIT for 12 weeks reduces the time in AF in patients with nonpermanent AF. This is followed by a significant improvement in AF symptoms, o2peak, left atrial and ventricular function, lipid levels, and QoL. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01325675.

Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: Results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial

More advanced atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with lower success rates after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the optimal ablation strategy is uncertain. To assess the impact of additional linear ablation (lines) compared to PVI alone. In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 122 patients (mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years; left atrial diameter 43 ± 6 mm) with persistent AF (PeAF) or sustained (>12 hours) paroxysmal AF (SusPAF) with risk factors for atrial substrate were included and followed up for 12 months. Patients were randomized to PVI-only or PVI + lines (left atrial roof line, mitral isthmus line, and tricuspid isthmus line) group. Holter monitoring was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and according to symptoms. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting ≥30 seconds. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups; 61% had PeAF and 39% SusPAF. Successful PVI was achieved for 98% of pulmonary veins, and bidirectional block was obtained in 90% of lines. The primary end point occurred in 38% of the PVI + lines group and 32% of the PVI-only group (P = .50), which was consistent in both PeAF (36% vs 28%; P = .45) and SusPAF (42% vs 39%; P = .86). Compared with the PVI-only group, the PVI + lines group had higher procedure duration (209 ± 52 minutes vs 172 ± 44 minutes; P < .001), ablation time (4352 ± 1084 seconds vs 2503 ± 1061 seconds; P < .001), and radiation exposure (Dose-area product 3992 ± 6496 Gy·cm(2) vs 2106 ± 1679 Gy·cm(2); P = .03). Quality of life (disease-specific Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life questionnaire and mental component scale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey) improved significantly during the study but did not differ between groups. Adding lines to wide antral PVI in substrate-based AF requires significantly more ablation, increases procedure duration and radiation dose, but provides no additional clinical benefit.

Stroke : Highlights of Selected Articles

<i>Stroke</i> : Highlights of Selected Articles

Residual Risk of Stroke and Death in Anticoagulated Patients According to the Type of Atrial Fibrillation: AMADEUS Trial.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure frequently coexist and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We investigated the prognosis of anticoagulated patients with permanent AF and nonpermanent AF according to preexisting heart failure in the AMADEUS (Evaluating the Use of SR34006 Compared to Warfarin or Acenocoumarol in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) trial. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and stroke or systemic embolism, analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for baseline age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, creatinine, and previous cardiovascular diseases. The median follow-up was 11.6 months (interquartile range, 6.2-15.2). Nonpermanent AF was present in 2072 patients (46% of cohort), of which 339 (16%) had preexisting heart failure. A total of 2484 patients had permanent AF (54% of cohort), with a higher burden of heart failure including 730 patients (29%; P<0.001). Overall, death because of cardiovascular causes occurred in 57 patients and 45 had stroke or systemic embolism (1.4/100 person-years for each). Overall, the adjusted incidence of the composite outcome was higher in patients with permanent AF than in patients with nonpermanent AF. In multivariate analysis, permanency of AF, creatinine, prior cerebrovascular events, and previous coronary disease were independently associated with the primary outcome. The hazard ratio for permanent versus nonpermanent AF was 1.68 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.55; P=0.02). The presence of heart failure increased the risk of adverse outcomes in a similar way in both permanent and nonpermanent AF (interaction P value=0.76). The risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, or systemic embolism is higher in anticoagulated patients with permanent AF than in those with nonpermanent AF, regardless of preexisting heart failure.

An individual patient-based meta-analysis of the effects of dronedarone in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Dronedarone is a non-iodinated benzofuran derivative with antiarrhythmic properties. In placebo-controlled atrial fibrillation (AF) trials, the drug was found to have divergent effects on endpoints such as cardiovascular death or hospitalization. The objective of this meta-analysis of all placebo-controlled studies was to provide insights on possible reasons for these divergent effects. Individual data on 9664 patients were used from all AF placebo-controlled studies. The primary outcome measure was cardiovascular death. Cardiovascular hospitalization and hospitalization for heart failure were secondary endpoints. Predefined procedures were used to reduce inter-study heterogeneity adjusting for important baseline variables using a Cox model. Despite adjustments, a significant inter-trial heterogeneity of the outcome of cardiovascular mortality persisted (P-value of 0.005 for the treatment effect × study interaction). Further analyses were conducted in subgroups based on baseline clinical criteria: digoxin co-prescription, advanced heart failure, coronary artery disease, or the presence of permanent AF. These analyses allowed the calculation of a global treatment effect in two important patient subgroups, those with permanent AF in whom there was harm with respect to cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-4.75] and hospitalization for heart failure (HR = 1.674; 95% CI 1.05-2.67); and those with non-permanent AF in whom there was benefit in terms of cardiovascular hospitalization [HR = 0.751 95% CI (0.68-0.83)]. This meta-analysis demonstrates significant heterogeneity of dronedarone treatment effects across the placebo-controlled randomized trials. The most important predictor of a harmful effect of dronedarone on cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization was the presence of permanent AF.

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Control of Permanent vs. Nonpermanent Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from the RealiseAF Survey

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation can be categorized into nonpermanent and permanent atrial fibrillation. There is less information on permanent than on nonpermanent atrial fibrillation patients. This analysis aimed to describe the characteristics and current management, including the proportion of patients with successful atrial fibrillation control, of these atrial fibrillation subsets in a large, geographically diverse contemporary sample.Methods and ResultsData from RealiseAF, an international, observational, cross-sectional survey of 10,491 patients with atrial fibrillation, were used to characterize permanent atrial fibrillation (N = 4869) and nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (N = 5622) patients. Permanent atrial fibrillation patients were older, had a longer time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis, a higher symptom burden, and were more likely to be physically inactive. They also had a higher mean (SD) CHADS2 score (2.2 [1.3] vs. 1.7 [1.3], p<0.001), and a higher frequency of CHADS2 score ≥2 (67.3% vs. 53.0%, p<0.001) and comorbidities, most notably heart failure. Physicians indicated using a rate-control strategy in 84.2% of permanent atrial fibrillation patients (vs. 27.5% in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation). Only 50.2% (N = 2262/4508) of permanent atrial fibrillation patients were controlled. These patients had a longer time since atrial fibrillation diagnosis, a lower symptom burden, less obesity and physical inactivity, less severe heart failure, and fewer hospitalizations for acute heart failure than uncontrolled permanent atrial fibrillation patients, but with more arrhythmic events. The most frequent causes of hospitalization in the last 12 months were acute heart failure and stroke.ConclusionPermanent atrial fibrillation is a high-risk subset of atrial fibrillation, representing half of all atrial fibrillation patients, yet rate control is only achieved in around half. Since control is associated with lower symptom burden and heart failure, adequate rate control is an important target for improving the management of permanent atrial fibrillation patients.