Models suggest that communication between brain areas could be mediated by oscillations in specific frequency bands. This hypothesis is supported by electrophysiological measurements wherein direction and frequency of interaction between brain areas varied during different stages of a cognitive task. Frequency-resolved granger causality (GC) is used often for this analysis, but it has been derived for stationary linear processes, which may not be appropriate for brain activity. Our goal was to determine whether for nonlinear processes conditional GC could still distinguish direct connections from indirect ones and to what extent dynamic changes in frequency & direction of interaction could be accurately detected. For this properties of GC determined parametrically, through fitting an autoregressive process of a fixed order, were compared to those obtained via non-parametric GC, which only uses measured spectral matrix. Oscillations in each cortical area were represented by a low-dimensional nonlinear model driven by white noise, whose standard deviation represented level of activity in respective areas. In addition, we analyzed responses from two coupled networks of spiking neurons in same way. We found that direction of interaction between reciprocally connected cortical areas was determined by level of activity, going from areas with high activity to those with low activity, which could be modulated on fast time scales. The frequency band of interaction was determined by sending area. For linear processes, parametric GC had lowest bias and variance compared to non-parametric GC, but was not appropriate for nonlinear model and network model, because oscillations could not be modeled accurately by autoregressive processes of a reasonable order. The non-parametric GC correctly represented ground truth connectivity when multi-taper spectral estimates were used, but when multi-tapering made spectral peaks too broad, artifacts emerged. Taken together, GC analysis revealed a simple rule for direction and frequency band of communication between cortical areas, specifically the loudest area gets heard, which can account for recent experimental results in which frequency band of communication was direction dependent.