Non-native Amphipod Research Articles

First record of Grandidierella japonica Stephensen, 1938 (Amphipoda: Aoridae) from mainland Europe

The non-native amphipod Grandidierella japonica Stephensen, 1938 is reported for the first time on the Atlantic coast of mainland Europe, specifically from Marennes-Oleron Bay, France. Likely vectors for this introduction include commercial shellfish transplants and ballast waters. A native of Japan, this species had previously only been reported twice outside the Pacific region; in both cases from coastal waters of England. Adults of both sexes, females carrying eggs, and juveniles were collected in Marennes-Oleron Bay, which suggests the species has become established.

A non-native amphipod consumes eelgrass inflorescences in San Francisco Bay

ABSTRACT: Intense herbivory can alter habitat characteristics, and grazing on reproductivestructures can reduce plant fitness and long-term population stability. Herbivory on seagrasses isoften limited to epiphytes; however, direct grazing has been observed recently in several systems.In San Francisco Bay, California, we documented extensive damage to leaves and especially inflo-rescences of eelgrass Zostera marina concurrent with blooms of the non-native amphipod Ampi -thoe valida. Field surveys found peaks of A. valida abundance when eelgrass was flowering, andgreater abundance on flowering than vegetative shoots, with particularly high abundances onreproductive structures (spathes) in late developmental stages (with ripe fruits or post seedrelease). Laboratory experiments showed that A. valida consumed leaf and spathe tissue (as wellas whole fruits), but usually preferred spathes to leaves. Spathes are structurally complex andlikely provide better habitat, increasing opportunity for consumption. Low field algal abundancesdo not fully explain eelgrass herbivory, as amphipods grazed eelgrass substantially even whenoffered algae. When presented with eelgrass from both the amphipod’s native (Virginia) andinvaded range (California), the latter was consumed at significantly higher rates. Neither nutrientnor phenolic content adequately explain the tissue preference. Greater size of California eelgrassmay have promoted incidental feeding on spathes used as habitat, but does not explain a Califor-nia bias during consumption of structurally simple leaves. Field densities and laboratory consump-tion rates suggest that this non-native amphipod could remove all seeds in a California eelgrassmeadow in 1−3 wk, thus challenging maintenance of genetic diversity and long-term meadowpersistence.KEY WORDS: Seagrass · Zostera marina · Ampithoe valida · Herbivory · Seed predation

Mouthpart Morphology of Three Sympatric Native and Nonnative Gammaridean Species:Gammarus pulex,G. fossarum, andEchinogammarus berilloni(Crustacea: Amphipoda)

In the last 20 years several nonnative amphipod species have immigrated inland waters of Germany and adjacent central European countries. Some of them have been very successful and could establish stabile populations. In some places, they have even replaced native or earlier established species. The gammaridEchinogammarus berillonioriginates from the Atlantic region of France and the north-western part of Spain and coexists in some central European waters with the nativeGammarus pulexandG. fossarum. Here, we describe and compare the mouthparts and other structures involved in food acquisition of these three sympatric gammaridean species. Our hypothesis was that differences in the mode of feeding of the three species could be the reason for their coexistence and that these differences would be expressed in differences in mouthpart morphology. The results of our SEM study demonstrate that there are indeed interspecific differences in details of the morphology of the feeding structures. This is especially true for the setation of antennae, maxillulae, gnathopods, and third uropods, which can be interpreted as adaptations to special modes of feeding. Generally, all three species are omnivorous, but specializations in details point to the possibility to use some food resources in a special effective way.

Effects of coexistence on habitat use and trophic ecology of interacting native and invasive amphipods

1. Invasive species in aquatic systems are major drivers of changes in biodiversity. Amphipods are key species in freshwaters, with invasive amphipods either replacing or coexisting with native species and often damaging local biodiversity. However, the consequences of interactions among native and invasive amphipods for their habitat use and feeding ecology and ecosystem function are not yet well understood. 2. We examined a number of streams in Brittany and Northern Ireland, with native and invasive amphipods, to evaluate the consequences of species interactions for both habitat use and diet. Our field studies centred on testing two proposed models: a cohabitation model without competition between two native species (Gammarus pulex vs Echinogammarus berilloni), and a competition model between an invasive and a native species (Gammarus pulex vs Gammarus duebeni celticus). For these three species, alone and in combination, we assessed their habitat use and feeding patterns, the latter through gut contents and stable C and N isotope analyses of their tissues. 3. When existing as single-species populations, all three species used stream habitats broadly similarly, although G. pulex was more strongly associated with leaf litter and vegetation compared to pebble substrata than the other species. When G. pulex coexisted with either E. berilloni or G. d. celticus, the latter two changed to using all habitats equally, whereas the former retained its habitat preferences. 4. Similarly, all three species when alone had similar gut contents, with inorganic material predominating, followed by leaf and woody material and more rarely algae and invertebrates. When G. pulex coexisted with E. berilloni, the diet of the latter did not change; however, the frequency of inorganic matter, leaves and wood declined in the gut contents of G. pulex. When G. pulex coexisted with G. d. celticus, the pattern of gut contents did not change in either species. 5. When existing as single-species populations, G. pulex had a broader range of isotopic signatures, both for δ13C and for δ15N, than the two other species, indicating a more variable diet among individuals. When G. pulex coexisted with either E. berilloni or G. d. celticus, the latter two had similar ranges of δ13C and δ15N, whereas for G. pulex the range was much less for δ13C and δ15N, suggesting a less diverse diet. 6. Our results infer two different modes of coexistence between native and non-native amphipods. We have shown that the native species, which coexist stably, appear to show interference competition, leading to spatial habitat segregation, whereas competition for food and possible intraguild predation by G. pulex on G. d. celticus would explain why the distribution and density of the latter is affected by G. pulex. However, since all the species have a similar diet and feeding habit, we expect no great overall effect on ecosystem processes as a consequence of species interactions and displacements.

First confirmed records of the non-native amphipod Caprella mutica (Schurin 1935) along the coast of British Columbia, Canada, and the potential for secondary spread via hull fouling

Here, we report the first records of the non-native amphipod Caprella mutica along the coast of British Columbia, Canada. Between 2006 and 2009, we surveyed marine fouling communities across 81 subtidal sites, and sampled hulls and sea-chests from 18 domestically operated commercial vessels. Caprella mutica was present at 33% of the sites and on 22% of the vessels, sometimes at remarkably high densities (>10,000 individuals m -2 ). Our findings confirm an extensive distribution of C. mutica along the coast of the northeast Pacific, and offer additional evidence in support of hull fouling as an important vector for secondary spread.

Are amphipod invaders a threat to regional biodiversity?

The impact of invasions on local biodiversity is well established, but their impact on regional biodiversity has so far been only sketchily documented. To address this question, we studied the impact at various observation scales (ranging from the microhabitat to the whole catchment) of successive arrivals of non-native amphipods on the amphipod assemblage of the Loire River basin in France. Amphipod assemblages were studied at 225 sites covering the whole Loire catchment. Non-native species were dominant at all sites in the main channel of the Loire River, but native species were still present at most of the sites. We found that the invaders have failed to colonize most of tributaries of the Loire River. At the regional scale, we found that since the invaders first arrived 25 years ago, the global amphipod diversity has increased by 33% (from 8 to 12 species) due to the arrival of non-native species. We discuss the possibility that the lack of any loss of biodiversity may be directly linked to the presence of refuges at the microhabitat scale in the Loire channel and in the tributaries, which invasive species have been unable to colonize. The restoration of river quality could increase the number of refuges for native species, thus reducing the impact of invaders.

Non-native habitat as home for non-native species: comparison of communities associated with invasive tubeworm and native oyster reefs

Introduction vectors for marine non-native species, such as oyster culture and boat foul- ing, often select for organisms dependent on hard substrates during some or all life stages. In soft- sediment estuaries, hard substrate is a limited resource, which can increase with the introduction of hard habitat-creating non-native species. Positive interactions between non-native, habitat-creating species and non-native species utilizing such habitats could be a mechanism for enhanced invasion success. Most previous studies on aquatic invasive habitat-creating species have demonstrated posi- tive responses in associated communities, but few have directly addressed responses of other non- native species. We explored the association of native and non-native species with invasive habitat- creating species by comparing communities associated with non-native, reef-building tubeworms Ficopomatus enigmaticus and native oysters Ostrea conchaphila in Elkhorn Slough, a central Califor- nia estuary. Non-native habitat supported greater densities of associated organisms—primarily highly abundant non-native amphipods (e.g. Monocorophium insidiosum, Melita nitida), tanaid (Sinelebus sp.), and tube-dwelling polychaetes (Polydora spp.). Detritivores were the most common trophic group, making up disproportionately more of the community associated with F. enigmaticus than was the case in the O. conchaphila community. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) showed that native species' community structure varied significantly among sites, but not between biogenic habi- tats. In contrast, non-natives varied with biogenic habitat type, but not with site. Thus, reefs of the invasive tubeworm F. enigmaticus interact positively with other non-native species.