Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors Therapy.

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with first-line androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Between 2012 and 2023, a total of 127 consecutive patients with nmCRPC received ARSI treatment. Overall survival (OS), metastatic-free survival (MFS), and prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) from ARSI initiation were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical factors associated with OS in nmCRPC were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among the patients, 72, 26, 12, and 17 received enzalutamide (ENZ), abiraterone (ABI), apalutamide (APA), and darolutamide (DARO) as first-line therapy. The median OS and MFS for all patients were 79.0 and 42.0 months, respectively. Median PSA-PFS was 27.0, 20.0, 10.0, and 14.0 months for patients treated with ENZ, ABI, APA, and DARO, respectively (p = 0.33). Multivariate analysis revealed that a baseline PSA level ≥ 3.67 ng/mL at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS (p = 0.002). ARSI demonstrated favorable efficacy in nmCRPC patients. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes among different types of ARSI therapy for nmCRP. Elevated baseline PSA at ARSI initiation was significantly associated with poorer OS.

Impact of a rash management guide in patients receiving apalutamide for high-risk localized prostate cancer in the Apa-RP study.

Based on the SPARTAN and TITAN studies, apalutamide is approved for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Skin rash was a common adverse reaction across indications. We hypothesized that earlier identification and intervention could improve rash outcomes. A prespecified rash management guide outlining recommended skin care practices was provided to all patients enrolled in Apa-RP (NCT04523207). Rash-related safety data from Apa-RP were compared descriptively with data from SPARTAN and TITAN. Patients in Apa-RP experienced improved rash-related outcomes vs those in SPARTAN and TITAN. Increased vigilance and proactive management may reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of rash during apalutamide treatment.

PSA doubling time 4.65 months as an optimal cut-off of Japanese nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

A multicenter study of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) was conducted to identify the optimal cut-off value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) that correlated with the prognosis in Japanese nmCRPC. Of the 515 patients diagnosed and treated for nmCRPC at 25 participating Japanese Urological Oncology Group centers, 450 patients with complete clinical information were included. The prognostic values of clinical factors were evaluated with respect to prostate specific antigen progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). The optimal cutoff value of PSADT was identified using survival tree analysis by Python. The Median PSA and PSADT at diagnosis of nmCRPC were 3.3 ng/ml, and 5.2 months, respectively. Patients treated with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) showed significantly longer PFS (HR: hazard ratio 0.38, p < 0.0001) and PFS2 (HR 0.45, p < 0.0001) than those treated with vintage nonsteroidal antiandrogen agent (Vintage). The survival tree identified 4.65 months as the most prognostic PSADT cutoff point. Among the clinical and pathological factors PSADT of < 4.65 months remained an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.96, p = 0.0003) and CSS (HR 3.66, p < 0.0001). Current data represented optimal cut-off of PSADT 4.65 months for a Japanese nmCRPC.

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial

BackgroundWe performed an exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial to determine whether concomitant exposure to several classes of commonly prescribed medications influenced the effect of apalutamide on overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Patients and methodsSPARTAN was a phase III randomized controlled trial in which nmCRPC patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive androgen deprivation therapy with or without apalutamide. We focused on 5 commonly prescribed classes of medications: metformin, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) based on a plausible biological and clinical rationale. To determine the potential effect modification, we applied multivariable Cox regression models for OS and MFS separately with additional interaction terms. To determine the independent association of concomitant medications with OS and MFS, we used IPTW-based log-rank test. A 2-sided p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. ResultsWe did not find statistically significant differences in effect from apalutamide on OS across subgroups stratified by concomitant exposure to any of the medication classes. While there was some difference in the treatment effect from apalutamide on MFS between patients with concomitant statins (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.20; 95 % CI: 0.15–0.28) versus without concomitant statins (aHR: 0.31 [0.24–0.39]), this did not reach the pre-specified threshold of statistical significance (p = 0.011). On IPTW-based analysis, patients treated concomitantly with metformin (median: not reached versus 31 months; p = 0.002), or ACEI (median: 37 versus 29 months, p = 0.006) had significantly improved MFS. ConclusionsIn this post-hoc exploratory analysis of SPARTAN, effects of apalutamide on MFS and OS were consistent across subgroups stratified by exposure to concomitant medications. Exposure to concomitant metformin and ACEI was independently associated with a significant improvement in MFS.

Bone health and body composition in prostate cancer: Meet-URO and AIOM consensus about prevention and management strategies

Prostate cancer (PCa) treatments are associated with a detrimental impact on bone health (BH) and body composition. However, the evidence on these issues is limited and contradictory. This consensus, based on the Delphi method, provides further guidance on BH management in PCa. In May 2023, a survey made up of 37 questions and 74 statements was developed by a group of oncologists and endocrinologists with expertise in PCa and BH. In June 2023, 67 selected Italian experts, belonging to the Italian scientific societies Italian Association of Medical Oncology and Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO), were invited by e-mail to complete it, rating their strength of agreement with each statement on a 5-point scale. An agreement ≥75% defined the statement as accepted. In non-metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa, the panel agreed that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone implies sufficient fracture risk to warrant antifracture therapy with bone-targeting agents (BTAs) for cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) prevention (79%). Therefore, no consensus was reached (48%) for the treatment with BTAs of patients receiving short-term ADT (<6 months). All patients receiving active treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa (75%), non-metastatic castration-resistant PCa (89%) and metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) without bone metastases (84%) should be treated with BTAs at the doses and schedule for CTIBL prevention. All mCRPC patients with bone metastasis should be treated with BTAs to reduce skeletal-related events (94%). In all settings, the panel analyzed the type and timing of treatments and examinations to carry out for BH monitoring. The panel agreed on the higher risk of sarcopenic obesity of these patients and its correlation with bone fragility. This consensus highlights areas lacking major agreement, like non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients undergoing short-term ADT. Evaluation of these issues in prospective clinical trials and identification of early biomarkers of bone loss are particularly urgent.

Real-world study: Impact of multidisciplinary management of apalutamide-associated adverse events in prostate cancer.

To analyse the adverse events (AEs) associated with apalutamide and the impact of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) protocol on its management at a tertiary care hospital in a real-world setting. This was an observational, prospective, cohort study based on real-world evidence at the Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Includes patients diagnosed with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and who started treatment with apalutamide between May 2019 and March 2023 in a real-world clinical setting. Of the 121 patients treated with apalutamide, 52.1% experienced an AE, 19.8% experienced temporarily interruption or a reduction in the dose of apalutamide, and 13.2% discontinued treatment due to AEs. Without MDT protocol (49 patients), 24.5% of patients had to temporarily interrupt or reduce the dose of apalutamide due to AEs, with a median time from the start of treatment of 10.1 months, and 24.5% discontinued apalutamide due to AEs, with a median time from the start of treatment of 3.1 months. Meanwhile, whit MDT protocol (72 patients), 16.7% of patients had to temporarily interrupt or reduce the dose of apalutamide due to AEs, with a median time from the start of treatment of 1.6 months, and 5.6% discontinued apalutamide due to AEs, with a median time from the start of treatment of 4 months. The risk reduction associated with treatment discontinuation was statistically significant (p-value = 0.003). This study highlights the importance of MDT management of AEs associated with apalutamide to reduce treatment discontinuation.

Appropriate definition of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and optimal timing of androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI)

BackgroundDefined by rising PSA levels under androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) despite no visible metastases on conventional imaging, non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) represents a complex clinical challenge. A significant subset of these patients rapidly develops metastatic disease, negatively impacting survival. We examined the difference in prognosis of nmCRPC patients according to the timing of therapeutic interventions with androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI).MethodsWe examined 102 nmCRPC patients treated with ARSI. We divided patients according to their PSA levels when ARSI was administered: Cohort A (PSA 0.5–2.0 ng/mL), Cohort B (PSA 2.0–4.0 ng/mL), and Cohort C (PSA > 4.0 ng/mL). Utilizing the Kaplan–Meier method for survival analysis, our analytical starting point was the moment when PSA levels exceeded 0.5 ng/mL post-ADT nadir, ensuring a fair comparison and minimizing lead-time bias.ResultsAfter excluding 5 patients whose PSA nadir after ADT > 0.5 ng/mL, patient distribution across Cohort A, Cohort B, and Cohort C was 32, 24, and 41 patients, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis highlighted a 2-year metastasis-free survival rate of 97% for Cohort A, 87% for Cohort B, and 73% for Cohort C. A marked statistical difference emerged when comparing Cohort A with Cohorts B and C, with a p-value of 0.043.ConclusionThe timely initiation of ARSI is paramount in nmCRPC management. Our findings strongly advocate for consideration of ARSI administration in nmCRPC patients before their PSA levels exceed 2.0 ng/mL. Our results indicated a PSA threshold of 1.0 ng/mL for nmCRPC definition which is more reasonable to administer ARSI without delay.

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of the SPARTAN trial.

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of the SPARTAN trial.

PSA Outcomes and Clinical Surveillance Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With a Next-Generation Androgen Receptor Inhibitor in Urology Practices With or Without In-Office Dispensing

This retrospective study used electronic medical record data from community-based urology practices in the US (February 1, 2017, to September 17, 2021) to describe prostate-specific antigen (PSA) outcomes and clinical sur­veillance patterns among patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant pros­tate cancer (nmCRPC) receiving next-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) with or without in-office dispensing (IOD) services. Patients who were prescribed apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide were classified in IOD+ (IOD access + fill), IOD– (IOD access + no fill), or non-IOD cohorts (no IOD ac­cess). Outcomes were described by cohort from 14 days following initial prescrip­tion to the earliest of initiation of a new ARI or advanced prostate cancer medi­cation, end of clinical activity, or end of data availability. In total, 3300 patients were included (IOD+: n = 615; IOD–: n = 2474; non-IOD: n = 211). PSA response defined as a decline ≥50% from the baseline PSA value (PSA50) achieved by 6 and 12 months was observed in 80.0% and 83.8% of patients in the IOD+ cohort, 63.8% and 72.3% in the IOD– cohort, and 62.5% and 69.1% in the non-IOD cohort. Patients in the IOD+ cohort underwent fewer bone scans, computerized tomog­raphy, and next-generation imaging than IOD– and non-IOD cohorts and also had longer time from treatment initiation to first follow-up imaging. IOD services may better support comprehensive disease management for patients with nmCRPC receiving next-generation ARIs and may be associated with better long-term clin­ical outcomes.

The Effect of Apalutamide on Thyroid Function in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Apalutamide (APT) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen medication used to treat metastatic castrate-sensitive and nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Early clinical trials of APT identified thyroid dysfunction as a common adverse effect of therapy, but the clinical presentation and management of APT-induced hypothyroidism has not been studied. The objective of our study is to elucidate the clinical presentation and treatment approach of APT-associated thyroid dysfunction in prostate cancer patients. We report a case series of 16 patients with APT-associated thyroid dysfunction during prostate cancer treatment at 2 academic medical centers. Patient clinical parameters, thyroid function laboratory data, and thyroid hormone requirements over the course of APT treatment were analyzed. Among the 16 patients in our case series with APT-associated hypothyroidism, 3 had no prior thyroid disease and 13 had preexisting hypothyroidism. The patterns of thyroid dysfunction included overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. The median time from APT initiation to thyroid function test abnormality was 19 weeks, but occurred in some cases as early as 2 to 4 weeks. Hypothyroidism was effectively managed with thyroid hormone replacement using levothyroxine (LT4), though some patients with preexisting hypothyroidism required a 2- to 3-fold dose increase while on APT to achieve a euthyroid state. In the subset of patients who completed or stopped APT therapy, thyrotropin levels fell at a median of 11 weeks post APT therapy and thyroid hormone requirements decreased to near pre-APT levels. APT-associated thyroid dysfunction presents as new or worsening hypothyroidism and should prompt initiation or increase in thyroid hormone replacement. Monitoring of thyroid function tests is recommended every 1 to 2 months for all patients on APT and 2 to 3 months after completion of APT.

Physician preferences for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment in China.

The treatment preferences of Chinese physicians who treat nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and how they weigh the benefits and risks of nmCRPC treatment are still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate Chinese physicians' benefit-risk treatment preferences for nmCRPC and assist in setting nmCRPC treatment goals. A paper-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was administered to 80 nmCRPC-treating physicians. DCE responses were analyzed to produce the preference weight and the relative importance score for each attribute level. The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) was used to quantify the amount of overall survival (OS) physicians were willing to trade for a reduction in treatment-related adverse events (AEs). We further conducted the exploratory analysis, stratifying physicians from 5 perspectives into different subgroups and examining the treatment preferences and OS trade-off in each subgroup. In terms of efficacy attributes, physicians placed greater emphasis on OS than time to pain progression. With regard to safety attributes, serious fracture was perceived as the most important AE by physicians, followed by serious fall, cognitive problems, skin rash, and fatigue. In the exploratory analysis, we found generally that physicians with less clinical practice experience and those from more economically developed regions placed more emphasis on AEs and were willing to give up more of their patients' OS to reduce the risk of AEs. Physicians from mainland China value the importance of minimizing treatment-related AEs when considering different treatment options for patients with nmCRPC, and they are willing to trade a substantial amount of OS to avoid AEs.

Effectiveness and safety of enzalutamide and apalutamide in the treatment of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): a multicenter retrospective study.

Phase III clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of enzalutamide and apalutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and PSA doubling time ≤10months. Although these drugs have been shown to vary in their adverse event (AE) profiles, the differences in their efficacy profiles remain to be evaluated. Therefore, this retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these drugs in patients with nmCRPC. This study evaluated 191 patients with nmCRPC treated with enzalutamide (n = 137) or apalutamide (n = 54) in the first-line setting at Jikei University Hospital or its affiliated hospitals between May 2014 and November 2022. Endpoints were defined as oncological outcomes (i.e., PSA response, PFS, PSA-PFS, MFS, CSS, and OS) and AEs. No significant differences were noted in patient backgrounds between the two groups. Patients exhibiting a maximum PSA response of >50% and >90% accounted for 74.5% and 48.9% of patients in the enzalutamide group, and 75.9% and 42.6% of patients in the apalutamide group, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups. The median PSA-PFS was 10months in the enzalutamide group but not in the apalutamide group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.48). No significant differences were observed in MFS, CSS, or OS between the groups. Patients reporting AEs of all grades and grade 3 or higher accounted for 56.2% and 4.3% of those in the enzalutamide group and 57.4% and 7.4% of those in the apalutamide group, respectively. The most common AE was fatigue (26.3%) in the enzalutamide group and skin rash (27.8%) in the apalutamide group. In this retrospective study of their efficacy and safety, enzalutamide and apalutamide were shown to exhibit comparable oncological outcomes but quite different AE profiles, suggesting that their differential use may be warranted based on these findings.

Drug–drug interaction potential among patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with novel androgen receptor inhibitors

ABSTRACT Background Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients are often older and use concurrent medications that increase the potential for drug–drug interactions (pDDIs). This study assessed pDDI prevalence in real-world nmCRPC patients treated with apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide. Research design and methods Castrated prostate cancer patients without metastases prior to androgen receptor inhibitor initiation were identified retrospectively via Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims data (8/2019–3/2021). The top 100 concomitant medications were assessed for pDDIs. Results Among 1,515 patients (mean age: 77 ± 8 years; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index: 3 ± 3), 340 initiated apalutamide, 112 darolutamide, and 1,063 enzalutamide. Common concomitant medication classes were cardiovascular (80%) and central nervous system (52%). Two-thirds of the patients received ≥5 concomitant medications; 30 (30/100 medications) pDDIs were identified for apalutamide and enzalutamide each and 2 (2/100 medications) for darolutamide. Most pDDIs had risk ratings of C or D, but four for apalutamide were rated X. Approximately 58% of the patients on apalutamide, 5% on darolutamide, and 54% on enzalutamide had ≥1 identified pDDI. Conclusions Results showed a higher frequency of pDDIs in patients receiving apalutamide and enzalutamide vs darolutamide. The impact of these could not be determined retrospectively. DDI risk should be carefully evaluated when discussing optimal therapy for patients with nmCRPC.

A Real World Observational Study Characterizing Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated With or Without Androgen Receptor-Pathway-Inhibitor Therapies in Alberta, Canada

BackgroundData are needed to improve the current understanding of clinical management and characteristics of patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapy. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study using real-world, population-level data from Alberta, Canada included all individuals diagnosed in 2017-2020 with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive PC (mCSPC) or nonmetastatic castration-resistant PC (nmCRPC) who initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). For mCSPC, patients were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 180 days of initiating ADT, while patients with nmCRPC were classified as ARPI-exposed if they received an ARPI within 2 years of diagnosis. ResultsThis study included 976 patients with mCSPC and 233 with nmCRPC of which 33.5% and 25.3% received an ARPI, respectively. The proportion of patients with mCSPC treated with an ARPI increased considerably for patients diagnosed in 2020 compared to 2017 (56.2% vs. 6.0%). In contrast, the use of ARPI to treat nmCRPC only increased marginally from 2017 to 2019/2020 (19.7% vs. 28.9%). Patients with mHSPC who were ARPI-exposed had longer median survival than patients who were ARPI-naive (38.47 (95% CI = 32.84-NA) vs. 34.19 (95% CI = 33.33-38.83; P = .03)), with a higher proportion of patients surviving to 2-years. For nmCRPC, survival was similar between ARPI-exposed and ARPI-naive. In multivariable analyses, receiving ARPI for mCSPC was associated with younger patient age, more recent diagnoses, fewer comorbidities, a higher number of metastatic sites, referral to a medical oncologist as well as receiving surgery and radiation before ADT. Receiving ARPI for nmCRPC was associated with referral to a medical oncologist, younger age, and more recent diagnoses. ConclusionsOutcome analyses in this population suggest a continued unmet clinical need and complex clinical management pathways. Given that treatment pathways have evolved considerably, continued follow-up to understand the impact of these advancements on patient outcomes are warranted.

Management of advanced prostate cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: Summary of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2023.

The aim of the third Asia-Pacific Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APAC APCCC 2023) was to discuss the application in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region of consensus statements from the 4th Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022). The one-day meeting in July 2023 brought together 27 experts from 14 APAC countries. The meeting covered five topics: (1) Intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer; (2) Management of newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; (3) Management of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; (4) Homologous recombination repair mutation testing; (5) Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Pre- and post-symposium polling gathered APAC-specific responses to APCCC consensus questions and insights on current practices and challenges in the APAC region. APAC APCCC highlights APAC-specific considerations in an evolving landscape of diagnostic technologies and treatment innovations for advanced prostate cancer. While new technologies are available in the region, cost and reimbursement continue to influence practice significantly. Individual patient considerations, including the impact of chemophobia on Asian patients, also influence decision-making. The use of next-generation imaging, genetic testing, and new treatment combinations is increasing the complexity and duration of prostate cancer management. Familiarity with new diagnostic and treatment options is growing in the APAC region. Insights highlight the continued importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes nuclear medicine, genetic counseling, and quality-of-life expertise. The APAC APCCC meeting provides an important opportunity to share practice and identify APAC-specific issues and considerations in areas of low evidence where clinical experience is growing.

The treatment landscape of nonmetastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: A contemporary perspective

ObjectivesThe incidence of nonmetastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is not well defined in contemporary practice. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and patterns of treatment of nmCRPC over the last 6 years at a single high-volume Australian health institution. Subjects and methodsAll men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer at Western Health, Melbourne from January 2016 to December 2021 were included in the study. Those diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and treated with medical or surgical castration for biochemical failure post attempted curative therapy were retrospectively reviewed for signs of castration resistance using prostate specific antigen (PSA) and testosterone biochemical markers up until October 2022. ResultsFrom January 2016 to December 2021, 822 patients were diagnosed with prostate cancer, 590 had localized disease, 373 underwent definitive locoregional therapy, and 31 went on to have biochemical recurrence and were commenced on androgen deprivation therapy. Twenty-five patients had undetectable PSA levels and were classified as having nonmetastatic castrate sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC), whilst the remaining 6 patients experienced a rising PSA and were thus classified as nmCRPC. The incidence rate of nmCRPC was 228 cases per 100,000 person-years.The median age at the time of prostate biopsy was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64–79) in the nmCRPC group and 62 years (IQR 57–69) in the nmCSPC group. The median prebiopsy PSA (ng/ml) in the nmCRPC and nmCSPC groups were 27.5 (IQR 19.9–50.4), and 16.5 (IQR 9.0–26.0), respectively. The median duration from prostate cancer diagnosis to onset of nmCRPC was 24 months (IQR 17–29) and the median PSA doubling time was 3.4 months (IQR 2.2–5.7). ConclusionsThus, nmCRPC is an uncommon disease. Further population-based studies are required to better understand the incidence of nmCRPC.

Pharmacoeconomic Position of Darolutamide in the Treatment of Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Pharmacoeconomic Position of Darolutamide in the Treatment of Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Abstract 688: Radium-223 in combination with darolutamide exhibits synergistic antitumor efficacy in LNCaP prostate cancer models

Abstract Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) is a targeted alpha therapy that binds to newly formed abnormal bone in bone metastases and induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cancer cells, osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Radium-223 is used for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Darolutamide is an androgen receptor inhibitor indicated for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer or non-metastatic CRPC. We studied the antitumor effects of radium-223 in combination with darolutamide using LNCaP human prostate cancer cells in vitro and an intratibial LNCaP model mimicking prostate cancer metastasized to bone. The in vitro antiproliferative effects of radium-223 and darolutamide were determined using LNCaP cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted on RNA sequencing data from LNCaP cells treated with the synthetic androgen R1881 alone or in combination with darolutamide. LNCaP cells were inoculated into the right tibia of male NOD.scid mice. The mice (n=7-9/group) were randomized based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and treated with vehicle, radium-223 (330 kBq/kg, Q4Wx2, i.v.), darolutamide (100 mg/kg, BID, p.o.), or with a combination of radium-223 and darolutamide, for 41 days. PSA and the bone turnover markers PINP and CTX-I were measured every second week in serum. Tumor-induced abnormal bone area, bone formation rate and radium-223 uptake in tumor-bearing tibiae were determined by X-ray, histomorphometry and gamma counter, respectively. The combination of radium-223 and darolutamide showed synergistic antiproliferative effects with combination indexes between 0.69-0.75 in vitro. GSEA demonstrated a prominent darolutamide-induced downregulation of DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathways. In vivo, the combination treatment showed synergistic antitumor efficacy (p=0.04) as demonstrated by lower PSA concentrations when compared with the vehicle, radium-223 or darolutamide monotherapies (p=0.004, p=0.011 and p=0.002, respectively). In the vehicle and combination treatment groups, the mean serum PSA was 541% and 95.9% of the pre-treatment level, respectively. Furthermore, radium-223 alone or in combination with darolutamide inhibited increased bone turnover, tumor-induced abnormal bone growth and trabecular bone formation when compared to vehicle. Concurrent administration of darolutamide did not affect radium-223 uptake in tibiae. Radium-223 in combination with darolutamide exhibited synergistic antitumor efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. The synergistic effects could be due to the radiosensitization of cancer cells by darolutamide-induced downregulation of DDR pathways. Our results suggest that the combination of targeted alpha therapy with an androgen receptor inhibitor is a promising treatment strategy for mCRPC. Citation Format: Christoph A. Schatz, Mari I. Suominen, Andreas Schlicker, Matias Knuuttila, Esa Alhoniemi, Sanna-Maria Käkönen, Bernard Haendler, Urs B. Hagemann, Arne Scholz. Radium-223 in combination with darolutamide exhibits synergistic antitumor efficacy in LNCaP prostate cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 688.

A multidisciplinary approach to address unmet needs in the management of patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

With the availability of second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (SGARIs), the treatment landscape has changed dramatically for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). In clinical trials, the SGARIs (apalutamide, enzalutamide, darolutamide) increased metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and patient quality of life compared to placebo. These drugs were subsequently integrated into nmCRPC clinical practice guidelines. With advances in radiographic imaging, disease assessment, and patient monitoring, nmCRPC strategies are evolving to address limitations related to tracking disease progression using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics. A panel of 10 multidisciplinary experts in prostate cancer conducted reviews and discussions of unmet needs in the management and monitoring of patients with nmCRPC in order to develop consensus recommendations. Across the SGARI literature, patient MFS and OS are generally comparable for all treatments, but important distinctions exist regarding short- and long-term drug safety profiles and drug-drug interactions. With respect to disease monitoring, a substantial proportion of patients using SGARIs may experience disease progression without rising PSA levels, suggesting a need for enhanced radiographic imaging in addition to PSA monitoring. Recent data also indicate that novel prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography radiotracers provide enhanced accuracy for disease detection, as compared to conventional imaging. Clinical decision-making in nmCRPC has become more complex, with new opportunities to apply precision medicine to patient care. Multidisciplinary teams can ensure that patients with nmCRPC receive optimal and individualized disease management.

Extended Safety and Tolerability of Darolutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Adverse Event Time Course in ARAMIS.

Patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) are usually asymptomatic and seek treatments that improve survival but have a low risk of adverse events. Darolutamide, a structurally distinct androgen receptor inhibitor (ARi), significantly reduced the risk of metastasis and death versus placebo in ARAMIS. We assessed the extended safety and tolerability of darolutamide and the time-course profile of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to ARis and androgen-suppressive treatment. Patients with nmCRPC were randomized 2:1 to darolutamide (n = 955) or placebo (n = 554). After trial unblinding, patients could receive open-label darolutamide. Tolerability and TEAEs were assessed every 16 weeks. Time interval-specific new and cumulative event rates were determined during the first 24 months of the double-blind period. Darolutamide remained well tolerated during the double-blind and open-label periods, with 98.8% of patients receiving the full planned dose. The incidence of TEAEs of interest in the darolutamide group was low and ≤2% different from that in the placebo group, except for fatigue. When incidences were adjusted for exposure time, there were minimal differences between the darolutamide double-blind and double-blind plus open-label periods. The rate of initial onset and cumulative incidence of grade 3/4 TEAEs and serious TEAEs were similar for darolutamide and placebo groups over 24 months. Extended treatment with darolutamide was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. Most ARi-associated and androgen-suppressive treatment-related TEAEs occurred at low incidences with darolutamide, were similar to placebo, and showed minimal increase over time with continued treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02200614.