Non-living Categories Research Articles

Semantic Category Dissociations, Familiarity and Gender

We carried out four experiments to assess the extent to which familiarity with certain objects in everyday life is related to gender and can account, at least partially, for the semantic category dissociation observed in a few brain-damaged patients. In the first experiment, 210 normal subjects, half males and half females, were given the names of 60 stimuli from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart's set, 30 belonging to living categories and 30 to non-living categories. The task was to rate their familiarity, based on the frequency with which one (i) thinks or speaks of a given item, (ii) sees it represented in the media, and (iii) is confronted with real exemplars. The three indices were highly correlated and their average value was, therefore, used. Females gave higher familiarity ratings to fruit, vegetables and furniture and males to tools. The second experiment was aimed to verify whether the gender difference was responsible for the category dissociation found following brain damage. A male patient with greater impairment for living categories and a female patient with greater impairment for non-living categories were requested to name the same 60 stimuli and their scores were analysed, partialling out the familiarity effect, measured both with the non-gender specific index of Snodgrass and Vanderwart and with the new gender-specific index. In either case, the category dissociation remained significant. To determine if the mean general population familiarity index was valid for the single subject, we studied whether a cohabitant first degree relative was able to predict a normal subject's familiarity better than the population index. Contrary to expectations, the better predictor was the population index. The test-retest reliability of each subject's familiarity ratings was satisfactory, but not higher than the correlation between the personal judgement of each subject and the population index.

Semantic category dissociations in naming : is there a gender effect in Alzheimer’s disease?

Several studies on picture naming in Alzheimer’s disease have reported inconsistent findings regarding semantic category dissociation. To clarify this point, 26 patients suffering from dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) were given a naming task, based on 60 black and white drawings, which allowed us to take into account several variables that might influence performance, notably word frequency, stimulus familiarity and prototypicality, name and image agreement and visual complexity. On a raw analysis, DAT patients as a group gave a lower performance with stimuli of Living Categories (LC) than with stimuli of Non-Living Categories (NLC), but when all the confounding factors were taken into account the category effect disappeared. Nevertheless, with a multiple single case approach, some patients presented a true dissociation : 11 were significantly better with Non-Living stimuli, and 3 with Living stimuli. In order to find what factors were involved in determining this distribution, we took the distribution of asymmetry indices of each patient, and plotted the individual category effect against the level of the general performance. In our sample, the distribution of asymmetry indices was skewed, and included a definite cluster of male subjects who were better at performing with Non-Living stimuli. Multivariate analysis suggested that the greater discrepancy shown by male patients was due to a protection acting on Non-Living stimuli rather than to a selective hampering of Living stimuli. The greater personal experience of males with Non-Living things could explain the relative preservation of these in male DAT subjects.

Retrograde Memory Deficits in Severe Closed-Head Injury Patients

A battery of tests evaluating different aspects of retrograde memory (autobiographical, public events, semantic knowledge) was administered to a group of 20 patients who had suffered from a severe closed-head injury (CHI) and who had recovered from the post- traumatic amnesia period and to a group of sex-, age- and education-matched normal controls. Results document a high prevalence of retrograde memory deficits among CHI individuals. The deficit involves both autobiographical and public events memories and extends to early acquired basic and cultural knowledge. The severity of the deficit does not vary according to some kind of temporal gradient or according to a presumed hierarchical or modality organization of the semantic system. However, in the domain of basic knowledge it more severely affects information pertaining to living than nonliving categories of objects. With the exception of a more severe deficit in retrieving autobiographical events occurred in the last year before trauma in a subgroup of patients with focal lesions restricted to the right hemisphere as compared to left lesioned patients, no clear relationship emerges between severity of the retrograde memory deficit and locus of focal cerebral lesions as demonstrated by neuroradiological exams.

Naming deficit for non-living items: Neuropsychological and PET study

We report a patient with progressive left hemisphere atrophy who presented a lexical retrieval deficit more pronounced in naming non-living items than in naming living items. Word frequency and familiarity strongly influenced the performance, but the dissociation persisted when the items were controlled for these factors. In addition, the prevalent deficit for non-living items in respect to living items could be confirmed in tasks where other patients presented the opposite pattern. A PET study showed a significant hypometabolism in the left hemisphere regions suggesting that, at variance with living deficit which is observed in patients with bilateral lesions, non-living deficit is produced by unilateral left hemispheric lesions. This patient confirms that living and non-living categories may dissociate and that distinct neural systems subsume their knowledge. Copyright©1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Semantic Category Dissociations: A Longitudinal Study of two Cases

We report the neuropsychological findings of two patients (LF and EA) with herpes simplex encephalitis. Both patients presented a greater deficit for living than non-living categories in a number of tasks, although EA was much more impaired than LF. We controlled the several stimulus variables that might affect the performance and could demonstrate that the dissociation was not artifactual. Neither LF nor EA revealed a selective or preferential involvement of perceptual semantic knowledge, and both showed a homogeneous impairment of perceptual and associative encyclopaedic notions. At a second examination, carried out from 1 to 2 years later, LF showed a good recovery, whereas EA's improvement was confined to the non-living categories. The lesion of both patients affected the left temporal pole and the basal neocortical regions of the left temporal lobe. The involvement of limbic areas was more marked in LF, while the Wernicke area and the posterior parts of the middle and inferior temporal gyri were only involved in EA. Besides the basal temporal areas, also the posterior temporal regions are likely to play a role in determining the clinical picture of such patients, and their prospect of recovery.

The Production of Specific and Generic Associates of Living and Nonliving, High- and Low-Familiarity Stimuli in Alzheimer's Disease

The goal of this paper was to address three issues relevant to the semantic–lexical deficit of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients: (1) the nature of the deficit (contrasting the loss of information with the difficulty of intentional access hypothesis), (2) stimulus familiarity effects, (3) semantic category effects (contrasting living with nonliving categories). Sixteen patients affected by AD and 11 matched control subjects were given a naming task, a word–picture matching task and a generative associative naming task, constructed by using as stimuli the same 40 items. Stimuli were either living or nonliving items of high, medium, and low familiarity. Responses given on the generative associative naming task were classified as generic (poorly informative) or specific (more informative). As expected, AD patients were poorer than controls both in naming and in word-to-picture matching tasks. In the generative associative naming task, AD patients tended to produce fewer specific than generic associations with respect to controls. Category effects had a significant influence on performance only on the naming task, but not on the word-to-picture matching or on the generative associative naming task. Stimulus familiarity, on the other hand, strongly influenced performance both in AD patients and in controls: naming and comprehension were better for high familiarity items with respect to low familiarity items. For generative associative naming, the tendency of AD patients to produce fewer specific than generic associations was mainly significant for low familiarity items.

Living and non-living categories. Is there a “normal” asymmetry?

A picture naming task and a semantic memory verbal questionnaire were given to normal subjects to assess the possible asymmetry between knowledge for non-living and living things. We first examined 60 elderly subjects with low education. Asymmetry between non-living and living things was found in the semantic knowledge questionnaire and living things fared worse. This difference was not explained by discrepancy in item frequency, familiarity or prototypicality. Using the same questionnaire, we analysed difficulty judgements given by younger, better-educated subjects: questions about living things were slightly, but significantly more difficult than questions regarding non-living things. In order to check for a possible sample bias, we submitted another verbal questionnaire with an analogous structure to different judges and replicated the previous results. These findings are discussed with regard to the selective semantic memory deficit for living things observed in patients. We suggest that the cognitive pattern presented by these cases may be linked to, but not fully explained by the greater difficulty living things present for normal subjects.

Implicit access to semantic information

Three experiments investigating the patient M.S.'s semantic memory are reported. Experiments 1 and 2 involved a category-membership decision task, in which M.S. was asked to determine whether a noun was a member of a specified semantic category. His performance in Experiment 1 was impaired for nouns from living categories in comparison with nouns from nonliving categories, and this impairment was especially marked for nouns of low typicality. Experiment 2 demonstrated an equivalent pattern of very poor performance to nouns of low familiarity from living categories. In Experiment 3 the effect of a category label on lexical decision was examined, using category labels as primes preceding nouns or pronounceable nonwords. Facilitation from related category label primes was found for typical and untypical members of living and nonliving semantic categories. These findings demonstrate that M.S. has impaired knowledge of the structure of living semantic categories when explicit access to this information is required (Experiments 1 and 2), but that some form of preserved category structure can be demonstrated in tasks which assess this implicitly (Experiment 3).