Although the statins have effectively ended the debate on the benefit of cholesterol lowering, there is less agreement on how and when they should be used in the primary prevention of vascular disease. Some investigators favour aggressive intervention, on the premise that endemic diseases need fundamental action;1 others take a more conservative stance, fearful that the high prevalence of occlusive arterial disease a wholesale attempt to counter would overwhelm an already stressed healthcare system.2 Geoffrey Rose,3 the doyen of preventive cardiology, stated in 1991 that 'all policy decisions should be based on absolute measures of risk; relative risk is strictly for researchers only'. By extrapolation then, risk management for prevention of coronary heart disease should be based on absolute global risk assessment, so that scarce healthcare resources can be targeted at those patients in greatest need. Remarkably, within the space of a decade, this advice has been enshrined in two series of guidelines providing recommendations for prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. In 1994, a Task Force with representation from the European Atherosclerosis Society, the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension emphasized the importance of overall vascular risk assessment in a report4 that unified preventive strategies for vascular disease across Europe. This document has recently been updated and modified5 to make it applicable to more than thirty European countries.6 Enlightenment in Europe has spread to the USA. The third report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults—a group within the framework of the National Cholesterol Education Program that has driven national policy on cholesterol management since the 1980s—although still focusing on LDL cholesterol as the primary target of therapy, expands its horizons to include other lipid and non-lipid risk factors within a management portfolio for prevention of vascular disease based on the absolute risk of the patient.7 The principles of the European and US coronary prevention guidelines are therefore fundamentally the same, promoting the use of global risk assessment and treatment strategies that broaden choice for the clinician and expand options for the citizen.
Read full abstract