Background: CCTA offers an exceptional negative predictive value when evaluating patients with suspected coronary disease. Many non-cardiology clinicians remain unaware of this test option and patients for which CCTA is appropriate. We hypothesized that a redesign of the noninvasive imaging ordering menu in our electronic health system, paired with didactic education, could increase ordering of CCTA. Methods: We designed a new ordering menu to guide noninvasive cardiac testing. A series of yes/no questions guided clinicians through a decision tree about which test modality would be best for a given patient: CCTA, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), or exercise treadmill test (ETT). This menu change was paired with education in the form of flyers, PowerPoint-guided lectures, and question-answer sessions. We measured the volume of each test modality (CCTA, ETT, and MPS) ordered for 6 months prior and 4 months after our intervention in two-week intervals, mapped on a runchart. We compared the median number of tests for each modality before and after the intervention. We surveyed clinicians’ opinions about ordering CCTA before and after the intervention and also asked their opinions about the change in a post-intervention survey. Results: Before the intervention, the median numbers of CCTA, ETT, and MPS ordered per two-week interval were 8.5, 10, and 60, respectively. Post-intervention, CCTA, ETT, and MPS were ordered 14, 10, and 60 times per two-week period, respectively. We saw a 67% increase in ordering of CCTA post-intervention (p=0.001, 95% CI: 3.0-12.0) while there were no significant changes in ordering patterns for ETT or MPS. Based on the surveys, 38% of clinicians were not comfortable ordering cardiac CTA prior to our intervention which decreased to 32% of clinicians after our intervention (p=0.64). 36% of providers reported that they liked the new ordering menu, while 52% were neutral, and 12% of providers expressed their dislike. Conclusion: A simple change in the ordering menu for noninvasive cardiology testing resulted in a substantial increase in CCTA ordering. A large majority of clinicians felt either neutral or positive towards the changes. We did not observe an offsetting decrease in other test modality ordering raising the question as to whether clinicians changed their test choice or increased the amount of testing being performed.