Non-immigrant Women Research Articles

Multiculturalism and the Experiences of Visible Minority Immigrant Women in Canada

This essay examines of multiculturalism in Canada’s constitution obscures the persistent experiences of racism and discrimination among minority immigrant women.. Immigrant women often confront an impetus to assimilate; resistance to assimilation may result in their cultural values being silenced because they do not conform to the Canadian national identity. Focusing on the period between 1987–2012, this essay will explore the challenges faced by visible minority immigrant women as they undergo settlement in a “multicultural” Canada. It argues that Canadian multiculturalism fails to adequately provide equal opportunities to visible minority immigrant women by overlooking their negative experiences exacerbated by discrimination and structural inequities. Additionally, this essay contends that visible minority immigrant women are neglected by the multicultural framework in Canada, evidenced by disproportionate experiences of challenges to social alienation, cultural preservation, and the paid labour force. This analysis reveals that multicultural policies provide a narrow definition of racism by reducing it to acts of violence against visible minorities. Policy should expand to also encompass the impacts of racial stereotyping and exclusion directed against these women. Therefore, to better address inequities between visible minority immigrant women, Canadian policy makers should address the issue of systemic racism rather than focusing on cultural homogeneity.

Perinatal outcome of immigrant women with and without refugee status compared to non-immigrant women: results of the pregnancy and obstetric care for refugees (PROREF) cross-sectional study.

International studies show conflicting evidence regarding the perinatal outcome of immigrant women with and without refugee status compared to non-immigrant women. There are few studies about the situation in Germany. The research question of this article is: Is the perinatal outcome (Apgar, UApH (umbilical artery pH), NICU (neontatal intensive care unit) transfer, c-section rate, preterm birth, macrosomia, maternal anemia, higher degree perinatal tear, episiotomy, epidural anesthesia) associated with socio-demographic/clinical characteristics (migration status, language skills, household income, maternal education, parity, age, body mass index (BMI))? In the Pregnancy and Obstetric Care for Refugees (PROREF)-study (subproject of the research group PH-LENS), funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), women giving birth in three centers of tertiary care in Berlin were interviewed with the modified Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire between June 2020 and April 2022. The interview data was linked to the hospital charts. Data analysis was descriptive and logistic regression analysis was performed to find associations between perinatal outcomes and migration data. During the research period 3420 women (247 with self-defined (sd) refugee status, 1356 immigrant women and 1817 non-immigrant women) were included. Immigrant women had a higher c-section rate (36.6% vs. 33.2% among non-immigrant women and 31.6% among women with sd refugee status, p = 0.0485). The migration status did not have an influence on the umbilical artery pH, the preterm delivery rate and the transfer of the neonate to the intensive care unit. Women with self-defined refugee status had a higher risk for anemia (31.9% vs. 26.3% immigrant women and 23.4% non-immigrant women, p = 0.0049) and were less often offered an epidural anesthesia for pain control during vaginal delivery (42.5% vs. 54% immigrant women and 52% non-immigrant women, p = 0.0091). In the multivariate analysis maternal education was explaining more than migration status. Generally, the quality of care for immigrant and non-immigrant women in Berlin seems high. The reasons for higher rate of delivery via c-section among immigrant women remain unclear. Regardless of their migration status women with low degree of education seem at increased risk for anemia.

Satisfaction with maternity care among immigrant women compared to non-immigrant women

Abstract Introduction Migration is a worldwide phenomenon leading to challenges for the health care system. There is conflicting evidence on the effect of migration on the satisfaction with obstetric care. Our hypothesis was that satisfaction with obstetric care was lower in immigrant women with and without self-defined (sd) refugee status than in non-immigrant women. Methods In the Pregnancy and Obstetric Care for Refugees (PROREF)-study between June 2020 and April 2022 in Berlin women were interviewed 1-3 days after giving birth with the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ). The interview data was linked to the routine perinatal data of the hospital charts. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify factors influencing satisfaction with obstetric care. Results A total of 3420 women (Frauen (247 with sd refugee status, 1356 immigrant women und 1817 non-immigrant women) could be included in the study, with an overall response rate of 77.5%. Satisfaction measured generally high with over 80% of women being satisfied with obstetric care at all three time points: during pregnancy, during labor and birth and after giving birth. We identified two factors associated with an increased chance of being satisfied with obstetric care: sd refugee status (OR 2.57, 95% Cl 1.48 - 4.44, p-value 0.0008) and being multipara (OR 1.40, 95% Ci 1.18 - 1.67, p-value 0.000). Conclusions Efforts on improving birth experience should focus on primipara. Among the reasons for non-immigrant women being less satisfied with care than women with sd refugee status might be different expectations and the timing of data collection. Key messages • Refugee women might have different expectations regarding birth experience than other immigrant women and non-immigrant women. • Satisfaction with obstetric care in Berlin is generally high among immigrant women and non-immigrant women.

Associations between non-registered ultrasound examination in pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes in immigrant and non-immigrant women: a Norwegian population-based study 1999-2016.

Prenatal ultrasound examinations are important to detect placental dysfunction. Several ultrasound-detected abnormalities can be managed during pregnancy or childbirth, thus improve health outcomes. Maternal birth country is known to influence the risk of placental dysfunction, but little is known about the possible mechanisms of this relation. (a) To estimate the proportion of non-registered prenatal ultrasound examinations; (b) to examine associations between non-registered ultrasound examinations and adverse perinatal outcomes, by migrant-related factors, in women giving birth in Norway. Individually linked data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway, 1999-2016, comprising 999,760 singleton pregnancies to immigrants (n=196,220) and non-immigrants (n=803,540). Crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression with robust standard error estimations, adjusted for year of childbirth, maternal age, parity, maternal smoking, educational level and Norwegian health region at birth. Compared with non-immigrants, immigrant women had a higher proportion of non-registered ultrasound examinations (2.3% vs. 4.3%; aOR 2.0 (95% CI 1.9, 2.0)). Compared with women with ultrasound examination, the aOR for perinatal mortality for women with non-registered ultrasound was 2.27 (95% CI 1.85, 2.79) for immigrants and 3.61 (3.21, 4.07) for non-immigrants. Non-registered ultrasound examination was also associated with placental abruption (aOR 1.32 (1.08, 1.63)) for non-immigrant women, but it was not associated with preeclampsia.

Experiences and meaningfulness of breast cancer survivorship care in improving the quality of life of immigrant women: A qualitative systematic review.

Holistic healthcare approaches tailored to people's needs can enhance quality of life. However, needs of immigrant women in breast cancer survivorship have received little attention. Language barriers can result in significant challenges to accessing healthcare and difficulty in translating information from healthcare providers into self-management. The purpose of this review was to examine the experiences and meaningfulness of breast cancer survivorship care in improving the quality of life for immigrant breast cancer survivors. A qualitative systematic review using a systematic search of peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed articles of empirical research was conducted. Articles about immigrant women who were diagnosed, treated, and completed their initial course of breast cancer treatment were included. Exclusion criteria were non-immigrant women, men, younger than 18 years, no breast cancer diagnosis, not currently undergoing active or advanced treatment, and not receiving palliative or end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis and qualitative systematic review included studies of survivorship care targeting breast cancer treatment and post-treatment. Articles were obtained from PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar searches, with findings configured according to the JBI methodology. Twenty studies, most of moderate-to high-quality were included. The thematic synthesis identified two overall themes regarding breast cancer survivorship care, as well as subthemes for both. The subthemes of the first theme, challenges and experiences accessing and using healthcare services, were inadequate insurance and benefits, less acculturation and decision-making, discrimination and differential treatment, and influencing sociocultural factors. The subthemes of the second theme, facilitators and barriers to accessing and using healthcare services, included ineffective knowledge and communication, lack of continuity and information, cultural and language barriers, limited access to services, and quality of care. Supporting and engaging immigrant women throughout their breast cancer journey is critical. To do so requires integrating advancements in survivorship care as a systematic approach to lead to a better quality of life and improving patient-reported outcomes.

Pre-pregnancy obesity among immigrant and non-immigrant women in Norway: Prevalence, trends, and subgroup variations.

This study assessed prevalence and time trends of pre-pregnancy obesity in immigrant and non-immigrant women in Norway and explored the impact of immigrants' length of residence on pre-pregnancy obesity prevalence. Observational data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway for the years 2016-2021 were analyzed. Immigrants were categorized by their country of birth and further grouped into seven super regions defined by the Global Burden of Disease study. Pre-pregnancy obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥30.0 kg/m2, with exceptions for certain Asian subgroups (≥27.5 kg/m2). Statistical analysis involved linear regressions for trend analyses and log-binomial regressions for prevalence ratios (PRs). Among 275 609 pregnancies, 29.6% (N = 81 715) were to immigrant women. Overall, 13.6% were classified with pre-pregnancy obesity: 11.7% among immigrants and 14.4% among non-immigrants. Obesity prevalence increased in both immigrants and non-immigrants during the study period, with an average yearly increase of 0.62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 0.70). Obesity prevalence was especially high in women from Pakistan, Chile, Somalia, Congo, Nigeria, Ghana, Sri Lanka, and India (20.3%-26.9%). Immigrant women from "Sub-Saharan Africa" showed a strong association between longer residence length and higher obesity prevalence (≥11 years (23.1%) vs. <1 year (7.2%); adjusted PR = 2.40; 95% CI: 1.65-3.48), particularly in women from Kenya, Eritrea, and Congo. Prevalence of maternal pre-pregnancy obesity increased in both immigrant and non-immigrant women from 2016 to 2021. Several immigrant subgroups displayed a considerably elevated obesity prevalence, placing them at high risk for adverse obesity-related pregnancy outcomes. Particular attention should be directed towards women from "Sub-Saharan Africa", as their obesity prevalence more than doubled with longer residence.

Cultural food practices and sources of nutrition information among pregnant and postpartum migrant women from low- and middle-income countries residing in high income countries: A systematic review.

Women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may engage in a range of cultural food practices during pregnancy, including restricting or avoiding foods high in protein and iron, and foods rich in vitamins and minerals. While research has explored the cultural food practices of pregnant women in LMICs, there is less understanding of the continued cultural food practices of women who migrate to high-income countries and then become pregnant. This systematic review explores the existing research on cultural food practices and sources of nutrition information among pregnant and postpartum migrant women from LMICs, residing in high-income countries. A systematic search was conducted in April 2024 across Global Health, CINAHL, and MEDLINE, published in English, with no date restrictions. Eligible studies included those focused on pregnant and postpartum women who had migrated from LMICs to high-income countries. Studies were excluded if they comprised of non-immigrant women or did not involve LMIC participants. Screened were studies for eligibility, data were extracted, and study quality was assessed. In total, 17 studies comprising qualitative (n = 10) and quantitative (n = 7) approaches were included. In 14 studies participants adhered to cultural food practices, wherein certain nutritious foods were restricted during pregnancy or the postpartum period; three studies noted limited adherence due to support, acculturation, and access to traditional foods. Most studies (n = 10) reported traditional "hot" and "cold" food beliefs during pregnancy and postpartum, aiming to maintain humoral balance for maternal and child health and to prevent miscarriage. Nutrition advice was sought from family members, friends, relatives, healthcare providers, and media sources, with a preference for advice from family members in their home countries. There is a need for culturally appropriate nutrition education resources to guide pregnant migrants through healthy and harmful cultural food practices and overall nutrition during this crucial period. (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023409990).

A267 RECENT IMMIGRANTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE HAVE SIGNIFICANT HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION FROM PRECONCEPTION TO POSTPARTUM: A POPULATION-BASED COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in health-care utilization, such as hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits, in immigrant people with IBD compared to non-immigrants. This may be even higher from preconception to postpartum due to heightened provider and patient concerns, though this remains to be confirmed. Aims To characterize differences in health-care utilization from preconception to postpartum amongst immigrant and non-immigrant women with IBD. Methods We accessed administrative databases to identify women (age 18-55) with IBD with a singleton pregnancy between 2003-2018. Immigration status was defined as recent (ampersand:003C 5 years of date of conception), remote (ampersand:003E5 years since date of conception), and none. Differences in ambulatory, ED, hospitalization and endoscopic visits during 12-months preconception, pregnancy and 12-months postpartum were characterized. World region of immigration origin was also ascertained. Adequate prenatal care was defined by using the validated R-GINDEX which assesses the date of first prenatal visit and total number of prenatal visits. Multivariable negative binomial regression was used to report adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) and modified Poisson regression with quasi-likelihood models and robust error variance procedures were used to report adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results 8880 pregnancies were included, 8304 in non-immigrants, 96 in recent immigrants, 480 in remote immigrants. Compared to non-immigrants, recent immigrants had the highest rates of IBD-specific ambulatory visits during preconception (aIRR 3.06, 95% CI, 1.93-4.85), pregnancy (aIRR 2.15, 95% CI, 1.35-3.42), and postpartum (aIRR 2.21, 1.37-3.57) and the greatest rates of endoscopy visits during preconception (aIRR 2.69, 95% CI, 1.64-4.41) and postpartum (aIRR 2.01, 95% CI, 1.09-3.70). There were no differences in ED and hospitalization visits between groups. Compared to non-immigrants, immigrant women were much less likely to have a first trimester prenatal visit (remote: aRR 0.78, 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; recent: aRR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.42-0.88) or receive adequate prenatal care (remote: aRR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.46-0.98; recent: aRR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.22-0.96). Those immigrating from the Americas, Africa, or the Middle East were the most likely to be hospitalized during pregnancy, have a postpartum endoscopy visit, and receive inadequate prenatal care. Conclusions There remain significant disparities in health-care utilization amongst immigrant women with IBD from preconception to postpartum. Health policy endeavors are required to provide standardized and equitable care to all women with IBD during these otherwise high risk periods. Funding Agencies CCC, CIHR

Somali women's perceptions and experiences of pain and pain relief during childbirth in Norway: A qualitative study.

Research shows that Somali women are less likely to receive epidural analgesia for labor pain compared to non-immigrant women in Norway. It is unclear why. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of Somali women regarding pain relief during childbirth. In January 2023, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 Somali women who had lived in Norway for at least ten years and given birth within the past 12 months. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis as described by Graneheim and Lundman. Three themes emerged from the data: a cultural understanding of epidural analgesia, religious and cultural coping strategies, and the midwife's role during labor. The participants expressed that there is a prevalent understanding in the Somali community that epidural analgesia in childbirth subsequently causes physical problems. Participants felt the influence of friends and family, expressed the need for culturally adapted information prior to labor, and concluded that, ultimately, what they decided upon was their own choice. They emphasized the belief that women were designed by God for childbirth. Prayer and placing oneself in God's hands were mentioned as pain management strategies. Nevertheless, the Somali women highlighted the importance of having a culturally competent midwife who is present when needed, creates trust, and provides information and access to different methods of pain relief, including epidural analgesia. Understanding Somali women's cultural and religious background while listening to individual needs for information and pain relief is essential to ensure a positive birth experience for women from a Somali background.

Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012-2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women.

Immigrant women in Norway have lower cervical cancer screening participation than non-immigrant women. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the observed increase in screening participation during 2012-2017 was different between Norwegian-born women and immigrant women. Data were collected from three national registries. The study included 1,409,561 women, categorized according to country of birth and immigrant background: (i) Norway, Norwegian parents; (ii) Norway, immigrant parent(s); (iii) Europe, excluding Norway; (iv) Africa; (v) Asia, including Turkey; and (vi) other countries. Trends and differences between groups were analyzed using Poisson regression analyses with adjustments for variables other studies have found to influence screening participation. Trends were assessed by including half-years as a continuous variable in the models and reported as prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Screening participation increased in all groups, but was not statistically significant among women from Africa in the adjusted model. The highest increase was among Norwegian women, with a 2.2% increase per year. Interaction tests showed significantly smaller increases in screening among women born in Europe (p interaction < 0.0001), Africa (p interaction < 0.0001), Asia (p interaction < 0.0001), and countries in the "Other" category (p interaction = 0.004). There was also a smaller increase among Norwegian-born women with one or more immigrant parent(s), but this was not significant (p interaction = 0.178). The gap in screening participation and the increasing differences in trends suggest that healthcare services do not reach all women in Norway to the same extent. One should attempt to improve this while working toward further increasing screening participation for all.

Inequalities in intimate partner violence screening and receiving information among diverse groups of women: an online survey during COVID-19 lockdowns

BackgroundResearch shows violence against women likely increases during emergencies. COVID-19’s emergence exacerbated intimate partner violence (IPV), suggesting that healthcare services (HCS) should have increased IPV screening efforts and referrals of...

Predictors of non-adherence to cervical cancer screening among immigrant women in Ontario, Canada

Cervical cancer is one of the most common types of cancer among women and is largely preventable with regular screening using Papanicolau (Pap) tests. In Canada, all provinces have regular screening programs, although with slightly differing recommendations. Previous research has found that immigrant women, who are a large proportion of the Canadian population, are at higher risk of being under-screened, or non-adherent to the recommended screening frequency.Using data from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey, this study examined: (1) the extent to which immigration status and time since immigration are associated with Pap test adherence in Ontario, and (2) predictors of Pap test adherence for immigrants and Canadian born populations in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, with a focus on the role of racial or ethnic identity among immigrants. Estimates of 3-year test adherence were 71.3 % (95 %CI: 66.9–75.7) among immigrant women and 75.4 % (95 %CI: 73.1–77.1) among non-immigrant women. Recent immigrants (6–10 years in Canada) had lower adherence (63.5 %, 95 %CI: 48.0–80.0). Logistic regression models found that immigrant women had lower adherence than Canadian-born women, controlling for age, household income, education, and having a primary care physician. Subgroup analysis found that South Asian immigrant women were least likely to be adherent.These results support targeted programming to increase screening adherence among recent immigrants and raise concerns regarding potential barriers to screening. Data that allow better disaggregation of racial and ethnic identities are important for better understanding the potential implications of these patterns for racial inequities in health.

Traditional postpartum rituals among immigrant and non-immigrant Chinese women.

Due to cultural and systemic factors, Chinese-Canadians tend to use mental health services less or when mental health problems are more severe. Services need to be more culturally responsive in their treatment of mental illness. Around important life events, when there may be heightened vulnerability to mental illness, this is especially important. In this study, postpartum cultural practices were examined among recent immigrant, longer-term immigrant, and Canadian-born Chinese women. We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 493 women in Toronto, Ontario, with livebirths in 2011-2014. Participants completed a demographic survey and Postpartum Rituals Questionnaire. Most women (82.2%) practiced at least one postpartum ritual. Younger age (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.87-0.99) and greater participation in the heritage culture (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.02-1.61) were associated with ritual practice. From among five types of postpartum rituals identified (i.e., avoidance of homeostatic disturbances, dietary practices, wind avoidance, organized support, and cold avoidance), dietary practices were most commonly undertaken and cold avoidance was least commonly undertaken. There were differences in postpartum ritual patterns by immigration status, with immigrant women being more likely to undertake a greater number of rituals, to attribute these rituals to Chinese culture, and to ascribe health benefits to these rituals and being less likely to feel forced into performing these rituals. Our findings underscore the importance of clinicians becoming more aware of Chinese postpartum rituals to provide women with culturally competent and patient-centered care.

Immigration and C-sections incidence: Maternal care and perinatal outcomes in the context of the pandemic in Chile

IntroductionImmigration has increased significantly in Chile. Despite that all pregnant women, regardless of nationality and immigration status, have the right to access to all healthcare services during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum, inequities in health care outcomes and health provision have been reported. During COVID-19 pandemic, these inequities are completely unknown.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the incidence of c-sections according to mother's migration status, as well as other maternal care and perinatal outcomes in women giving birth at San José Hospital in Santiago, Chile, during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was designed including 10,166 registered single births at the San José Hospital between March 2020 and August 2021. To compare between groups, statistical tests such as Chi-square and Fisher's exact were used. Log Binomial regression models were performed adjusted for potential confounding variables. To estimate the strength of association the relative risk was used.ResultsImmigrant mothers account for 48.1% of the registered births. Compared to non-immigrant women, immigrants exhibit a higher proportion of c-section, specifically, emergency c-section (28.64% vs. 21.10%; p-value &amp;lt; 0.001) but a lower proportion of and having a preterm birth (8.24% vs. 13.45%; p &amp;lt; 0.05), receiving personalized childbirth care (13.02% vs. 14.60%; p-value &amp;lt; 0.05), companion during labor and childbirth (77.1% vs. 86.95%; p-value &amp;lt; 0.001), And postpartum attachment to newborn (73% vs. 79.50%; p-value &amp;lt; 0.001). The proportion of COVID exposure was not significant between groups, not the severity also. Haitians had a highest risk of undergoing emergency c-section (aRR = 1.61) and Venezuelans had a highest risk of elective c-section (aRR = 2.18) compared to non-immigrants.ConclusionThis study reports high rates of c-sections in the entire population, but in immigrant populations it is even higher. Additionally, it found gaps in maternal care and perinatal outcomes between immigrants and non-immigrants. More studies are needed to elucidate the possible causes of these differences and establish new regulations to protect the reproductive rights of the immigrant population.

Dental Insurance Coverage, Dentist Visiting, and Oral Health Status among Asian Immigrant Women of Childbearing Age in Canada: A Comparative Study.

This study examined the dental insurance coverage, dentist visits, self-perceived oral health status, and dental problems among Asian immigrant women of childbearing age in contrast to Canadian women of childbearing age and non-Asian immigrant women of childbearing age. Potential barriers to dental care services among Asian immigrant women were explored. This analysis utilized data from the combined Canadian Community Health Survey from 2011 to 2014. The analytical sample consisted of 5737 females whose age was between 20 and 39 years. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed immigrant status and other factors in relation to the indicators of dental health (i.e., dental visit, self-perceived oral health, acute teeth issue, and teeth removed due to decay). Amongst Asian women immigrants of childbearing age, there was a significantly lower frequency of dentist visits compared to non-immigrant counterparts (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76). The most commonly reported reason for not seeking dental care in the last three years was that the "respondent did not think it was necessary". Relative to Canadian born women of same age bracket, Asian women of childbearing age reported fewer acute teeth issues (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.49-0.91) and had a greater risk of tooth extracted due to tooth decay (OR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.64-6.68). Furthermore, for Asian women immigrants, their major barriers to dental care included low household income (≤$39,999 vs. $40,000-$79,999 OR = 0.26) and a lack of dental insurance (no vs. yes OR = 0.33). Asian immigrant women showed lower utilization of dental services than non-immigrant women. A perceived lack of necessity, lower household income, and dental insurance coverage were major barriers to professional dental usage for most Asian immigrants of childbearing age.

Cervical, liver and stomach cancer incidence and mortality in non-Western immigrant women: a retrospective cohort study from four Nordic countries

Background Cervical, liver and stomach cancers are the most common infection-associated malignancies and the leading cause of morbidity in non-Western regions. We compared the incidence and mortality of these cancers between non-Western immigrant and non-immigrant Nordic female populations. We also analysed the effect of age at immigration, duration of residence and education on cancer burden. Material and Methods Study population consisted of women residents in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway in 1973–2020. Non-Western women contributed 3.1% of the total 260 million person-years at risk. All women were followed from their 20th birthday, or from the date of immigration if after, until the date of their first primary cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, or the end of the country-specific study period. All data were adjusted for 10-year age groups and calendar periods, and immigrant data was further broken down by region of birth, age at immigration and education level. Country-specific estimates were produced by multivariable Poisson regression and pooled in Finland with a random effects model. Results Altogether, there were 60 982 cases of cervical, liver and stomach cancer in the study population, causing 36 582 deaths. The immigrant women had significantly higher liver (rate ratio [RR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–3.06) and stomach cancer incidence (RR 1.68, CI 1.29–2.18), and stomach cancer mortality (RR 1.49, CI 1.17–1.92) than non-immigrant women. In the immigrant population, high education was related to lower incidence and mortality of studied cancers. The rate ratio of cervical cancer decreased with duration of residence and increased with rising age at immigration. Conclusion Due to the increased incidence and mortality of infection-related cancers and changes in cancer patterns by age at immigration and duration of residence, attention should be paid to targeted health care services for immigrants. Special efforts should be given to women who have spent their youth in high-risk areas.

Experiences of childbirth care among immigrant and non-immigrant women: a cross-sectional questionnaire study from a hospital in Norway

BackgroundImmigrant women have higher risks for poor pregnancy outcomes and unsatisfactory birth experiences than the general population. The mechanisms behind these associations remain largely unknown, but they may result from differential care provided to immigrant women or unsatisfactory interactions with health providers. This study aimed to investigate immigrant and non-immigrant women's experiences of health care during childbirth, particularly assessing two dimensions: perceived general quality of care and attainment of health care needs during childbirth.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study carried out over 15 months in 2020 and 2021, and data were collected from a self-completed questionnaire. The labour and birth subscale from the Experience of Maternity Care questionnaire was used to assess the primary outcome of care experiences. A total of 680 women completed the questionnaire approximately within two days after birth (mean 2.1 days) at a hospital in Trondheim, in central Norway. The questionnaire was provided in eight languages.ResultsThe 680 respondents were classified as immigrants (n = 153) and non-immigrants (n = 527). Most women rated their quality of care during childbirth as high (91.5%). However, one-quarter of the women (26.6%) reported unmet health care needs during childbirth. Multiparous immigrant women were more likely than multiparous non-immigrant women to report that their health care needs were unmet during childbirth (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.91–5.72, p < 0.001, aOR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.53–5.18, p = 0.001). No other significant differences between immigrant versus non-immigrant women were found in subjective ratings of childbirth care experiences. Having a Norwegian-born partner and a high level of Norwegian language skills did not influence the immigrant women's experience of childbirth care.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that many women feel they receive high-quality health care during childbirth, but a considerable number still report not having their health care needs met. Also, multiparous immigrant women report significantly more unmet health care needs than non-immigrants. Further research is required to assess immigrant women's childbirth experiences and for health care providers to give optimal care, which may need to be tailored to a woman's cultural background and individual expectations.

Patient reported symptom burden amongst immigrant and Canadian long-term resident women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Immigrants are susceptible to marginalization due to social isolation, economic disadvantage and systemic bias. Our goal was to compare symptom burden between immigrant and long-term resident women undergoing breast cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada. A population-level retrospective cohort-study using administrative databases was conducted. Women who underwent surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer and were treated at regional cancer centers between 2010 and 2016 were included. The primary outcome was a moderate or severe (≥ 4) symptom score on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Scale (ESAS). There were 12,250 (87.2%) long-term Canadian residents and 1,806(12.8%) immigrants. Immigrants were younger (mean age 53 vs. 61years); had a higher proportion residing in a lowest income quintile neighbourhood (22.2% vs 15.4%); were less often on a primary-care physician roster (83.7% vs. 90.4%); and were less often diagnosed with Stage I/II disease (80.9% vs. 84.6%) (all p < 0.01). The proportion of women with scores ≥ 4 was significantly higher amongst immigrant women for 7/9 symptom categories; with the largest differences for depression (24.9% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.01) and pain (28.0% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.01). On multivariable regression analysis, immigration status was associated with scores ≥ 4 for pain (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.23). There was an association between moderate/severe pain and region of origin, but not length of stay in Canada or immigration class. This is the first study comparing symptom burden amongst immigrant and non-immigrant women with breast cancer at a population-level. Immigrant women with breast cancer undergoing surgery were found to have a higher burden of pain.

Exploring the Breastfeeding Desires and Decision-Making of Women Living with HIV in the Netherlands: Implications for Perinatal HIV Management in Developed Countries.

Introduction: Guidelines in high-income countries recommend women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to formula feed their newborns, because the possibility of mother-to-child-transmission of HIV during breastfeeding cannot be ruled out. It is an ongoing debate if the possible transmission risk outweighs the medical, cultural, psychological, and social importance of breastfeeding in women stable on current first-line suppressive antiretroviral regimens. The study aim was to explore breastfeeding desires and decision-making of immigrant and nonimmigrant women living with HIV in the Netherlands. Method: A questionnaire was administered orally or online to 82 women living with HIV in the Netherlands. The breastfeeding desires of the participants were collected as categorical data, and breastfeeding decision-making and willingness to adhere to additional monitoring were collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Categorical data were presented as proportions, and Likert scale data were presented in Likert scale bar plots. Results: Seventy-one percent of the participants expressed a desire to breastfeed in the future. The most important factors influencing decision-making to breastfeed were the chance of transmission of HIV to the infant and the advice by the doctor or nurse practitioner. Of the participants, 42% expressed their interest in breastfeeding with a <1/100 transmission risk. More than half of the participants expressed their interest to breastfeed with additional monitoring. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of the women living with HIV in the Netherlands has a desire to breastfeed, of which the majority are willing to adhere to additional monitoring to do so.

Risk of Subsequent Preeclampsia by Maternal Country of Birth: A Norwegian Population-Based Study

In this nationwide population-based study, we investigated the associations of preeclampsia in the first pregnancy with the risk of preeclampsia in the second pregnancy, by maternal country of birth using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway (1990-2016). The study population included 101,066 immigrant and 544,071 non-immigrant women. Maternal country of birth was categorized according to the seven super-regions of the Global Burden of Disease study (GBD). The associations between preeclampsia in the first pregnancy with preeclampsia in the second pregnancy were estimated using log-binomial regression models, using no preeclampsia in the first pregnancy as the reference. The associations were reported as adjusted risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for chronic hypertension, year of first childbirth, and maternal age at first birth. Compared to those without preeclampsia in the first pregnancy, women with preeclampsia in the first pregnancy were associated with a considerably increased risk of preeclampsia in the second pregnancy in both immigrant (n = 250; 13.4% vs. 1.0%; adjusted RR 12.9 [95% CI: 11.2, 14.9]) and non-immigrant women (n = 2876; 14.6% vs. 1.5%; adjusted RR 9.5 [95% CI: 9.1, 10.0]). Immigrant women from Latin America and the Caribbean appeared to have the highest adjusted RR, followed by immigrant women from North Africa and the Middle East. A likelihood ratio test showed that the variation in adjusted RR across all immigrant and non-immigrant groups was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Our results suggest that the association between preeclampsia in the first pregnancy and preeclampsia in the second pregnancy might be increased in some groups of immigrant women compared with non-immigrant women in Norway.