Background: Conventional salvage chemotherapy has limited efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). In the last decade, several novel agents have been approved; however, their impact on real world survival remains to be defined. In this multi-center retrospective analysis, we assessed survival following initial progression with respect to novel agent exposure in patients who did not receive stem cell transplant (SCT). Methods: Patients with PTCL from 1998 to 2021 at Columbia and Cornell were included after IRB approval. Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, treatment including (1) novel agents, (2) chemotherapy, and (3) auto- and/or allo-SCT across all lines of therapy. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated as time from 1st progression to 2nd progression, re-treatment, or death. Subsequent OS (sOS) was calculated from date of first progression to death or last follow-up. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival probability. Survival difference was tested by log-rank and Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 348 patients with PTCL were identified, of which 189 had R/R disease and 156 had sufficient data for analysis. The median follow-up was 45.4 m from 1st progression. Baseline characteristics are shown in Figure 1A. The major PTCL subtypes were AITL (N = 52, 27%), PTCL-NOS (N = 41, 21.7%), ATLL (N = 33, 17.5%), and ALCL (N = 23, 12.2%). Median age at diagnosis was 58. Following initial progression, 21 (11.1%) received auto-SCT, and 42 (22.2%) received allo-SCT in second or later lines. Out of those patients who did not undergo SCT (n = 93), 66 (70.9%) received novel-agent-containing regimen only and 27 (29%) received chemo-only in second and later lines. Median sOS from date of initial progression for the entire cohort was 21.3 m. In patients who did not receive SCT, sOS for chemo-only versus novel-agent-containing regimen only was 4.9 m versus 13.0 m, respectively (p = 0.132) with hazard ratio 0.66 (95% CI: 0.39–1.14, p = 0.1349), illustrated in Figure 1B. EFS from first progression in novel-agent-containing regimen only was 4.2 m versus chemo-only 3.6 m (p = 0.6131) with hazard ratio 0.88 (95% CI: 0.54–1.44, p = 0.6137). Keywords: Aggressive T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Molecular Targeted Therapies Conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract. M. R. Seshadri Consultant or advisory role: Consulting for Gilead and Beigene Research funding: Research support from Roche and Eli Lilly
Read full abstract