non-HLA Antigens Research Articles

Outcome-based Risk Assessment of Non-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring. Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses. A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies. This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction is associated with an increased number of non-HLA antibodies

BackgroundChronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients. Multiple factors, such as infection, alloimmunity, and autoimmunity, may lead to CLAD. Here, we aim to examine the role of non-HLA antibodies in CLAD in a large retrospective cohort. MethodsWe analyzed non-HLA antibodies in the pre-and post-transplant sera of 226 (100 CLAD, 126 stable) lung transplant recipients from 5 centers, and we used a separate cohort to confirm our findings. ResultsA panel of 18 non-HLA antibodies was selected for analysis based on their significantly higher positive rates in CLAD vs. stable groups. The panel-18 non-HLA antibodies (n>3) may be positive pre- or post-transplant; the risk for CLAD is higher in the latter. The presence of both non-HLA antibody and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) was associated with an augmented risk of CLAD (HR=25.09 [5.52–14.04], p <0.001), which was higher than that for single-positive patients. In the independent confirmatory cohort of 61 (20 CLAD, 41 stable) lung transplant recipients, the risk for CLAD remained elevated in double-positive patients (HR=10.67 [0.98–115.68], p=0.052). After adjusting for non-standard immunosuppression, patients with double-positive DSA/Non-HLA antibodies had an elevated risk for graft loss (HR=2.53 [1.29–4.96], p=0.007). ConclusionsCirculating non-HLA antibodies (n>3) were independently associated with a higher risk for CLAD. Furthermore, when non-HLA antibodies and DSA were detected concomitantly, the risk for CLAD and graft loss was significantly increased. These results show that humoral immunity to HLA and non-HLA antigens may contribute to CLAD development.

Aplastic Anemia Patients Have Diverse T Cell Repertoires and Flexible T Cell Responses Similar to Healthy Individuals

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a bone marrow failure disease caused by T cell-mediated autoimmune attack on hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Identifying autoreactive T cells in AA has been challenging. Advances in T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing and the discovery of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I (HLA-I) risk alleles linked to autoantigen presentation in AA have rekindled interest in exploring T cell repertoires in AA. We hypothesized that autoreactive CD8 + T cells in AA may have convergent TCR structures allowing them to recognize AA autoantigens presented by specific HLA-I risk alleles. To test our hypothesis, we analyzed TCR repertoires and HLA-restricted CD8 + T cell reactivity in AA patients. Using TCR Vβ (TRB) sequencing, we analyzed 83 patient samples obtained at AA diagnosis or relapse. High-risk alleles HLA-B*14:02 and B*40:02 were present in 26% and 10% of patients, respectively. HLA-DR*15 was present in 24%. Patient samples were largely sorted bone marrow (BM) CD8 + T lymphocytes. Patient TRB repertoires were compared to those in 709 control samples, largely of unsorted peripheral blood (PB). To account for sampling differences, we downsampled sequences to the minimum number of clones in the matching tissue. Normalized clone size distributions were visualized on rank plots (Fig 1). TRB repertoires in both patients and controls were diverse. Highly expanded clones (&amp;gt;5%) were rare in either group. Patients had 1,415,069 unique CDR3 amino acid sequences (CDR3AA), of which 106,446 (7.5%) were shared by ≥2 patients. Among the 106,446 shared CDR3AA, 95.4% were found in controls, and 4.3% TCRs had reported specificity to exogenous (mostly viral) or endogenous antigens in VDJdb. 4,920 (4.6%) of the shared CDR3AA were detected only in patients (median 2 patients (2-25)). Of these, 190 exhibited TCR convergence in ≥1 patient, such that the same CDR3AA was encoded by ≥2 distinct nucleotide sequences. Clustering 4,920 patient-associated CDR3AA using GLIPH (Grouping of lymphocyte interactions by paratope hotspots) identified 43 TCR antigen convergence groups. CDR3AA in each cluster were not significantly expanded in the majority of patients and were not enriched for the high-risk alleles HLA-B*14:02 or B*40:02. Our data suggest that most CDR3AA in AA are private (unique to individual patients). Shared autoreactive CDR3AA may exist in patients but are likely to also be present in healthy individuals. As the next step towards identifying autoreactive T cells, we focused on AA patients with known HLA-I risk alleles. We tested their CD8 + T cells for reactivity with endogenously expressed antigens by stimulating T cells with hematopoietic cell lines engineered to express single HLA-I alleles matching those of the patients (Fig 2). TRB sequencing showed increased clonality and significant expansion of a subset of clonotypes after T cell stimulation. Interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assays confirmed the expanded T cells' responsiveness to antigens presented by HLA alleles used for T cell stimulation. Additionally, these expanded T cells demonstrated variable reactivity to cells expressing other HLA alleles from the same patient. Among the 1% of CDR3AA clonotypes most highly expanded with single HLA-I alleles (63-3000-fold), we identified several that were expanded in an HLA-restricted manner. However, several highly expanded CDR3AA were highly expanded with multiple HLA alleles. Potential reasons for expansion of some CDR3AA after stimulation with cells expressing different HLA alleles include 1) binding of the same CDR3AA to different antigens presented by distinct HLA alleles, 2) expansion in response to the same antigens presented by distinct HLA alleles, or 3) expansion in response to non-HLA antigens. In conclusion, our data show diverse and mostly private TRB repertoires in AA patients. Our in vitro findings suggest that much like T cell responses in non-AA individuals, T cell responses in AA are diverse and exhibit flexibility with respect to activation in response to various endogenous antigens in the context of different self HLA-I alleles. Given the diversity of TCR responses observed in AA patients, the tissue specificity of autoimmune attack and established association with risk HLA-I alleles in AA remain a mystery and likely require HSPC-specific autoantigen expression and efficient autoantigen presentation by individual patients' HLA-I alleles.

Cutting through the weeds: Evaluation of a novel adsorption with crossmatch cells and elution protocol to sharpen HLA antibody identification by the single antigen bead assay.

The single antigen bead (SAB) assay is the most used test for the identification of HLA specific antibodies pre- and post-transplant. Nevertheless, detection of spurious reactivities remains a recognized assay limitation. In addition, the presence of weak reactivity patterns can complicate unacceptable antigen assignment. This work presents the evaluation of the adsorption with crossmatch cells and elution (AXE) technique, which was designed to help differentiate weak HLA specific antibodies targeting native antigens from spurious and background SAB assay reactivity. The AXE protocol uses selected donor cells to adsorb HLA specific antibodies from sera of interest. Bound antibodies are then eluted off washed cells and identified using the SAB assay. Only antibodies targeting native HLA are adsorbed. Assay evaluation was performed using five cell donors and pooled positive control serum. AXE efficiency was determined by comparing SAB reactivity of adsorbed/eluted antibody to that of the antibodies in unadsorbed sera. A robust efficiency was seen across a wide range of original MFI for donor specific antibodies (DSA). A higher absorption/elution recovery was observed for HLA class I antigens vs. class II. Locus-specific variation was also observed, with high-expression HLA loci (HLA-A/B/DR) providing the best recovery. Importantly, negligible reactivity was detected in the last wash control, confirming that AXE eluates were not contaminated with HLA antibody carry-over. Donor cells incubated with autologous and DSA-containing allogeneic sera showed that AXE selectively adsorbed HLA antibodies in a donor antigen-specific manner. Importantly, antibodies targeting denatured epitopes or other non-HLA antigens were not detected by AXE. AXE was particularly effective at distinguishing weak HLA antibodies from background reactivity. When combined with epitope analysis, AXE enhanced precise identification of antibody-targeted eplets and even facilitated the characterization of a potential novel eplet. Comparison of AXE to flow cytometric crossmatching further revealed that AXE was a more sensitive technique in the detection of weak DSA. Spurious reactivities on the current SAB assay have a deleterious impact on the assignment of clinically relevant HLA specificities. The AXE protocol is a novel test that enables users to interrogate reactive patterns of interest and discriminate HLA specific antibodies from spurious reactivity.

Anti-glutathione S-transferase theta 1 antibodies correlate with graft loss in non-sensitized pediatric kidney recipients.

Immunity to Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) cannot explain all cases of ABMR, nor the differences observed in the outcome of kidney recipients with circulating DSAs endowed with similar biologic characteristics. Thus, increasing attention has recently been focused on the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets. We analyzed humoral auto- and alloimmune responses to the non-HLA antigen glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1), along with development of de novo (dn)HLA-DSAs, in a cohort of 146 pediatric non-sensitized recipients of first kidney allograft, to analyze its role in ABMR and graft loss. A multiplex bead assay was employed to assess GSTT1 antibodies (Abs). We observed development of GSTT1 Abs in 71 recipients after transplantation, 16 with MFI > 8031 (4th quartile: Q4 group). In univariate analyses, we found an association between Q4-GSTT1Abs and ABMR and graft loss, suggesting a potential role in inducing graft damage, as GSTT1 Abs were identified within ABMR biopsies of patients with graft function deterioration in the absence of concomitant intragraft HLA-DSAs. HLA-DSAs and GSTT1 Abs were independent predictors of graft loss in our cohort. As GSTT1 Ab development preceded or coincided with the appearance of dnHLA-DSAs, we tested and found that a model with the two combined parameters proved more fit to classify patients at risk of graft loss. Our observations on the harmful effects of GSTT1Abs, alone or in combination with HLA-DSAs, add to the evidence pointing to a negative role of allo- and auto-non-HLA Abs on kidney graft outcome.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients

The role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients. Nineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform. Eleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients. The presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti-non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.

CRISPR/Cas9-Engineered HLA-Deleted Glomerular Endothelial Cells as a Tool to Predict Pathogenic Non-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

After kidney transplantation, donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs) drive antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and are associated with poor transplant outcomes. However, ABMR histology (ABMRh) is increasingly reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without HLA-DSAs, highlighting the emerging role of non-HLA antibodies (Abs). W e designed a non-HLA Ab detection immunoassay (NHADIA) using HLA class I and II-deficient glomerular endothelial cells (CiGEnCΔHLA) that had been previously generated through CRISPR/Cas9-induced B2M and CIITA gene disruption. Flow cytometry assessed the reactivity to non-HLA antigens of pretransplantation serum samples from 389 consecutive KTRs. The intensity of the signal observed with the NHADIA was associated with post-transplant graft histology assessed in 951 adequate biopsy specimens. W e sequentially applied CRISPR/Cas9 to delete the B2M and CIITA genes to obtain a CiGEnCΔHLA clone. CiGEnCΔHLA cells remained indistinguishable from the parental cell line, CiGEnC, in terms of morphology and phenotype. Previous transplantation was the main determinant of the pretransplantation NHADIA result (P<0.001). Stratification of 3-month allograft biopsy specimens (n=298) according to pretransplantation NHADIA tertiles demonstrated that higher levels of non-HLA Abs positively correlated with increased glomerulitis (P=0.002), microvascular inflammation (P=0.003), and ABMRh (P=0.03). A pretransplantation NHADIA threshold of 1.87 strongly discriminated the KTRs with the highest risk of ABMRh (P=0.005, log-rank test). A multivariate Cox model confirmed that NHADIA status and HLA-DSAs were independent, yet synergistic, predictors of ABMRh. The NHADIA identifies non-HLA Abs and strongly predicts graft endothelial injury independent of HLA-DSAs.

Increased Autoantibodies Against Ro/SS-A, CENP-B, and La/SS-B in Patients With Kidney Allograft Antibody-mediated Rejection.

We analyzed non-HLA antibodies in sera from 80 kidney transplant patients with AMR, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection (ACR), or acute tubular necrosis. IgM and IgG antibodies against 134 non-HLA antigens were measured in serum samples collected pretransplant or at the time of diagnosis. Fifteen non-HLA antibodies were significantly increased (P < 0.05) in AMR and mixed rejection compared with ACR or acute tubular necrosis pretransplant, and 7 at diagnosis. AMR and mixed cases showed significantly increased pretransplant levels of IgG anti-Ro/Sjögren syndrome-antigen A (SS-A) and anti-major centromere autoantigen (CENP)-B, compared with ACR. Together with IgM anti-CENP-B and anti-La/SS-B, these antibodies were significantly increased in AMR/mixed rejection at diagnosis. Increased IgG anti-Ro/SS-A, IgG anti-CENP-B, and IgM anti-La/SS-B were associated with the presence of microvascular lesions and class-II donor-specific antibodies (P < 0.05). Significant increases in IgG anti-Ro/SS-A and IgM anti-CENP-B antibodies in AMR/mixed rejection compared with ACR were reproduced in an external cohort of 60 kidney transplant patients. This is the first study implicating autoantibodies anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-CENP-B in AMR. These antibodies may participate in the crosstalk between autoimmunity and alloimmunity in kidney AMR.

Set Up for Failure: Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Lung Transplant.

Lung transplant patients have the lowest long-term survival rates compared to other solid organ transplants. The complications after lung transplantation such as primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) are the main reasons for this limited survival. In recent years, lung-specific autoantibodies that recognize non-HLA antigens have been hypothesized to contribute to graft injury and have been correlated with PGD, CLAD, and survival. Mounting evidence suggests that autoantibodies can develop during pulmonary disease progression before lung transplant, termed pre-existing autoantibodies, and may participate in allograft injury after transplantation. In this review, we summarize what is known about pulmonary disease autoantibodies, the relationship between pre-existing autoantibodies and lung transplantation, and potential mechanisms through which pre-existing autoantibodies contribute to graft injury and rejection.

POS-747 A SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM WITHIN THE FCGR3A 158 F/V GENE IS ASSOCIATED WITH DECREASED SURVIVAL OF RENAL ALLOGRAFTS WITH CHRONIC ACTIVE ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION

Long-term allograft survival has shown little improvement over the last decades. An important factor compromising long-term allograft survival in kidney transplantation is chronic active antibody mediated rejection (c-aABMR). Histomorphologic lesions of c-aABMR develop over time and are associated with recurrent and episodic endothelial cell activation by immunoglobulin G (IgG)-antibodies recognizing donor-specific leukocyte antigens (HLA) (DSA) or non-HLA antigens. Immune cells expressing Fc-receptors (FCGRs) interact with IgG antibodies bound to endothelial cells and genetic variation in FCGR genes may affect susceptibility for antibody-mediated rejection.

POS-732 A STUDY OF ANGIOTENSIN ii TYPE II RECEPTOR ANTIBODY IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION

Preformed antibodies influence the graft outcome. The detrimental impact of anti HLA antibodies on kidney transplantation has been extensively studied. However, the impact of antibodies against non-HLA antigens is less well understood. Recent studies suggest Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies(AT1RAbs) have been an independent risk factor of graft failure and Acute rejection. This study was done to determine the incidence, type of rejections and graft outcome in renal allograft recipients with high AT1R Abs level.

Donor-recipient Matching in Heart Transplantation

Heart transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage Heart Failure (HF). Due to the shortage of organs for transplantation and the occurrence of perioperative complications, a key problem is donor matching, which should result in increased survival and improved quality of life for patients. The success of this procedure depends on various parameters such as gender, weight, ABO blood group and Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) system of both the recipient and the donor. Furthermore, non-HLA antigens may also be valuable in donor-recipient matching. The aim of this article is to summarize the recent knowledge on the impact of various factors on accurate donor-recipient matching to heart transplantation.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Clinical Relevance and Treatment Options for Antibody-mediated Rejection Associated With Non-HLA Antibodies.

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell–dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

The role of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: a complex deliberation.

There is tremendous interest in understanding when, if, and how non-HLA antibodies contribute to allograft injury. Numerous non-HLA target antigens have been identified and sensitization to these targets have been associated with delayed allograft function, rejection, and allograft failure. This review focuses on the clinical utility of HLA antibody testing, highlighting the strengths and limitations of current clinical studies, and the need for defining characteristics to inform non-HLA antibody pathogenicity. Clinical studies continue to show associations between non-HLA antibodies and rejection and reduced allograft survival across multiple transplanted organ types. The worst clinical outcomes continue to be observed among recipients testing positive for both non-HLA and donor-specific HLA antibodies. Mechanistic insights from both animal and clinical studies support a model in which tissue injury accompanied by an inflammatory environment influence non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity. Immune triggers that lead to non-HLA antibody formation and pathogenicity are complex and poorly understood. The ability of non-HLA antibodies to mediate allograft injury may depend upon their affinity and strength (titer), target specificity, density of the target antigen, and synergy with donor-specific HLA antibodies.

Extracellular Matrix Injury of Kidney Allografts in Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Proteomics Study.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) accounts for >50% of kidney allograft loss. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against HLA and non-HLA antigens in the glomeruli and the tubulointerstitium cause AMR while inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα trigger graft injury. The mechanisms governing cell-specific injury in AMR remain unclear. Unbiased proteomic analysis of laser-captured and microdissected glomeruli and tubulointerstitium was performed on 30 for-cause kidney biopsy specimens with early AMR, acute cellular rejection (ACR), or acute tubular necrosis (ATN). A total of 107 of 2026 glomerular and 112 of 2399 tubulointerstitial proteins was significantly differentially expressed in AMR versus ACR; 112 of 2026 glomerular and 181 of 2399 tubulointerstitial proteins were significantly dysregulated in AMR versus ATN (P<0.05). Basement membrane and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins were significantly decreased in both AMR compartments. Glomerular and tubulointerstitial laminin subunit γ-1 (LAMC1) expression decreased in AMR, as did glomerular nephrin (NPHS1) and receptor-type tyrosine-phosphatase O (PTPRO). The proteomic analysis revealed upregulated galectin-1, which is an immunomodulatory protein linked to the ECM, in AMR glomeruli. Anti-HLA class I antibodies significantly increased cathepsin-V (CTSV) expression and galectin-1 expression and secretion in human glomerular endothelial cells. CTSV had been predicted to cleave ECM proteins in the AMR glomeruli. Glutathione S-transferase ω-1, an ECM-modifying enzyme, was significantly increased in the AMR tubulointerstitium and in TNFα-treated proximal tubular epithelial cells. Basement membranes are often remodeled in chronic AMR. Proteomic analysis performed on laser-captured and microdissected glomeruli and tubulointerstitium identified early ECM remodeling, which may represent a new therapeutic opportunity.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

Role of non-HLA antigens in cardiac transplant rejection

Abstract Although immunosuppressive drugs improve short term survival, rejection incidence and long term survival remain largely unchanged in heart transplant patients. While Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) is a common initiator of graft-specific immune responses, non-HLA antibody mediated rejection (AMR) also commonly occurs. Furthermore, non-HLA antibodies have been implicated in cell mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Therefore, there is a need to identify the role of non-HLA antigens in heart transplant rejection. Serum from heart transplant patients lacking donor specific anti-HLA antibodies was collected longitudinally; pre-transplantation, acute rejection, and post-rejection for patients with AMR and matched controls. Serum IgG was used to form anti-human heart affinity columns and antigenic proteins from donor heart extracts captured. Antigens were eluted from the columns and subjected to LC-MS/MS. Longitudinal graft-specific changes in immune response were calculated. Response toward non-HLA antigens increased longitudinally, with 41 high prevalence antigens found in ≥50% of the cohort. Co-culturing cardiomyocyte and endothelial cells with patient IgG indicated cell function changes correlated with specific antigens (e.g., Prohibitin). Immunofluorescence staining of patient biopsies revealed that longitudinal increase in antigen expression correlated with non-HLA antibody response. The non-HLA antigens identified in this study elicit acute and chronic graft-specific adaptive immune responses in heart transplant recipients. Antibodies against these non-HLA antigens induced cellular dysfunction by changing expression of their target protein in the donor heart.

Discovery of non-HLA antibodies associated with cardiac allograft rejection and development and validation of a non-HLA antigen multiplex panel: From bench to bedside.

We analyzed humoral immune responses to nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with allograft rejection. Protein microarray identified 366 non-HLA antibodies (>1.5 fold, P<.5) from a discovery cohort of HLA antibody-negative, endothelial cell crossmatch-positive sera obtained from 12 cardiac allograft recipients at the time of biopsy-proven rejection. From these, 19 plasma membrane proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins identified through literature search to generate a multiplex bead array. Longitudinal sera from a multicenter cohort of adult cardiac allograft recipients (samples: n=477 no rejection; n=69 rejection) identified 18 non-HLA antibodies associated with rejection (P<.1) including 4 newly identified non-HLA antigenic targets (DEXI, EMCN, LPHN1, and SSB). CART analysis showed 5/18 non-HLA antibodies distinguished rejection vs nonrejection. Antibodies to 4/18 non-HLA antigens synergize with HLA donor-specific antibodies and significantly increase the odds of rejection (P<.1). The non-HLA panel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n=21 no rejection; n=42 rejection, >1R) with an area under the curve of 0.87 (P<.05) with 92.86% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity. We conclude that multiplex bead array assessment of non-HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.

The Importance of Non-HLA Antibodies After Heart Transplant

Antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are associated with adverse patient and allograft outcomes after heart transplantation. Non-HLA antibodies have increasingly been recognized as important mediators of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and allograft injury. In particular, these antibodies have been implicated in a subset of heart transplant recipients who have clinical and/or pathologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection in the absence of detectable antibodies against HLA. Non-HLA antigens have been identified to have important roles in both the innate and adaptive immune response in transplantation. These antigens are predominantly expressed on vascular endothelium of the donor heart and include major histocompatibility class I related chain A (MICA), G protein coupled receptor angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), cytoskeletal elements such as myosin and vimentin. A growing number of studies have demonstrated antibodies to these antigens in rejection and development of CAV. At present, non-HLA antibodies are not routinely monitored post-transplant, and laboratory evaluation remains non-standardized. Further investigation is required to improve the detection of non-HLA antibodies, define pathophysiological mechanisms involved in allograft injury, and better understand their impact on clinical outcomes. Non-HLA antibodies have been identified as important mediators of rejection, allograft dysfunction, and CAV in heart transplantation. Ongoing investigations and improving laboratory detection methods will determine their potential role in post-transplant risk stratification and management.

Non-HLA Antibodies as a Cause for Biopsy Negative Rejection: Is It Worth Testing for Them?

Purpose Biopsy negative rejection (BNR) after heart transplantation is not uncommon. BNR is diagnosed when there is an acute reduction in cardiac function along with symptoms of heart failure. As the endomyocardial biopsy shows no rejection, a search for other causes is pursued. Non-HLA antibodies may not demonstrate C4d deposition in the heart biopsy therefore remains a possible cause of this form of rejection. It is not clear if non-HLA antigens are detected during these cases. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with BNR and detection of non-HLA antibodies. Methods Between 2000 and 2017 we performed 1391 heart transplants and identified 96 cases of BNR (6.9%). Non-HLA antibodies were obtained at the time of BNR and included angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class I-related chain A (MICA) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies. All patients with BNR were treated with various anti-rejection regimens including high dose corticosteroids, immune globulin (IVIG), anti-lymphocyte globulin (ATG) and/or plasmapheresis. Results BNR was detected in 96 patients. The following non-HLA antibodies were detected: AT1R (15 patients), MICA (7 patients), and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (3 patients). This constituted 26% of BNR patients. 24% percent of patients recovered with initial anti-humoral therapy. The percent of BNR with anti-HLA antibodies was 12.0% percent. Conclusion BNR is not uncommon after heart transplantation. Non-HLA antibodies are observed in approximately 26.0% percent of patients with BNR, thus, non-HLA testing is worthwhile to initiate appropriate anti-rejection therapy.