1. 1. Six hundred and eighty-two normal air force applicants, ages 17–24, were examined electroencephalographically at rest and during provocation with hyperventilation, photic stimulation and Metrazol. Electroencephalograms were classified as normal (84.9 per cent); borderline (5.1 per cent); slightly abnormal, non-paroxysmal (3.8 per cent); markedly abnormal, non-paroxysmal (2.6 per cent); questionably paroxysmal (0.9 per cent); and paroxysmal (2.6 per cent). 2. 2. Clinical information included personal history of head injury (11), birth injury (2), fainting (2), and meningitis (1); family history of convulsions (10), and questionable (12) or definite neurological (36) findings. Seventy-seven subjects had one or a combination of these findings suggesting neurological involvement. 3. 3. The incidence of Metrazol-induced paroxysms was correlated both with the appearance of the EEG at rest, and with the neurological status as indicated by the personal and family history and neurological findings. 4. 4. Metrazol-induced paroxysms occurred in 15 per cent of subjects with a normal EEG; 32 per cent of those with a borderline; 40 per cent of those with a slightly, non-paroxysmally abnormal; 47 per cent of those with a questionably paroxysmal; 50 per cent of those with a paroxysmal pre-Metrazol EEG; and in 27 per cent of those with a markedly but non-paroxysmally abnormal EEG. 5. 5. The “neurologically involved” subjects had eight times the incidence of paroxysmal abnormalities and about two times the incidence of other abnormalities as in the non-involved group. Fifty-three per cent of the “neurologically involved” subjects developed Metrazol-induced paroxysms as compared with 15 per cent of subjects with no such evidence. Neurologically involved subjects with a normal pre-Metrazol EEG had a high incidence (51 per cent) of Metrazol-induced paroxysms. 6. 6. Of the 682 applicants, 30 per cent were rejected, and of these, 16.3 per cent had paroxysmal or markedly abnormal EEGs at rest and with hyperventilation and photic stimulation, and 30.2 per cent Metrazol-induced paroxysms. Twenty-five per cent were dismissed after admission, and of these, 9.6 per cent had paroxysmal or markedly abnormal EEGs, and 16.9 per cent Metrazol-induced paroxysms. Of the 46 per cent who completed training successfully, 8.7 per cent had paroxysmal or markedly abnormal, and 14.2 per cent Metrazol-induced paroxysms. 7. 7. Compared with 682 normals, with an 82.3 per cent incidence of normal EEGs and a 2.9 per cent incidence of paroxysmal EEGs, 100 patients with grand mal epilepsy had a 37 per cent incidence of normal or borderline EEGs and a 36 per cent of paroxysmal abnormalities. Of subjects in both groups with a normal EEG, 15 per cent of normals and 80 per cent of grand mal epileptics developed paroxysms with Metrazol. Corresponding figures for the effect of photic stimulation, indicate that 1.4 per cent of normals and 15 per cent of epileptics develop paroxysmal abnormalities with photic stimulation. An estimate is given for the diagnostic efficacy of Metrazol and photic stimulation in cases of grand mal epilepsy with a normal EEG. 8. 8. Metrazol provocation in this normal group thus confirms the diagnostic value of this method in epilepsy, and also confirms the validity of the usual interpretation of EEG abnormalities in non-epileptic subjects as probably representing acquired or inherent lowered convulsive threshold; and it suggests similarly the presence of such factors in individuals with a normal EEG who develop Metrazol-induced convulsions.
Read full abstract