Non-eosinophilic Asthma Research Articles

Inflammation-induced loss of CFTR-expressing airway ionocytes in non-eosinophilic asthma.

Severe asthma is a heterogeneous disease with subtype classification according to dominant airway infiltrates, including eosinophilic (Type 2 high), or non-eosinophilic asthma. Non-eosinophilic asthma is further divided into paucigranulocytic or neutrophilic asthma characterized by elevated neutrophils, and mixed Type 1 and Type 17 cytokines in the airways. Severe non-eosinophilic asthma has few effective treatments and many patients do not qualify for biologic therapies. The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is dysregulated in multiple respiratory diseases including cystic fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and has proven a valuable therapeutic target. We hypothesized that the CFTR may also play a role in non-eosinophilic asthma. Patient-derived human bronchial epithelial cells (hBECs) were isolated and differentiated at the air-liquid interface. Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) was used to identify epithelial cell subtypes and transcriptional activity. Ion transport was investigated with Ussing chambers and immunofluorescent quantification of ionocyte abundance in human airway epithelial cells and murine models of asthma. We identified that hBECs from patients with non-eosinophilic asthma had reduced CFTR function, and did not differentiate into CFTR-expressing ionocytes compared to those from eosinophilic asthma or healthy donors. Similarly, ionocytes were also diminished in the airways of a murine model of neutrophilic-dominant but not eosinophilic asthma. Treatment of hBECs from healthy donors with a neutrophilic asthma-like inflammatory cytokine mixture led to a reduction in ionocytes. Inflammation-induced loss of CFTR-expressing ionocytes in airway cells from non-eosinophilic asthma may represent a key feature of disease pathogenesis and a novel drug target.

Mepolizumab depletes inflammatory but preserves homeostatic eosinophils in severe asthma.

Eosinophils are key therapeutic targets in severe asthma that are suppressed by IL5 (mepolizumab) and IL5 receptor (benralizumab) blockade. The effect of IL5 pathway biologics on recently described homeostatic (hEOs) and inflammatory (iEOs) eosinophil subsets is unknown. We aimed to determine the relative impact of mepolizumab and benralizumab treatment on eosinophil subset and phenotype, and explore clinical associations of eosinophil subsets with severe asthma characteristics and treatment response. We performed a cross-sectional observational study of severe asthma (eosinophilic n = 32, non-eosinophilic n = 23, mepolizumab-treated n = 25), with longitudinal follow-up of 30 eosinophilic participants at two timepoints (4-24 weeks, >24 weeks) post-commencement of mepolizumab (n = 20) or benralizumab (n = 10). Blood hEOs and iEOs were measured by flow cytometry assessment of surface CD62L protein. iEO proportion was significantly lower in mepolizumab-treated participants in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Mepolizumab and benralizumab depleted iEOs to a similar extent, however a significantly greater number of hEOs remained in mepolizumab participants at follow-up. Greater iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in eosinophilic but not non-eosinophilic asthma. Higher residual iEO proportion correlated with poorer asthma control in mepolizumab-treated individuals. Reduced blood eosinophil viability was observed in around half of mepolizumab-treated participants, which was associated with significantly better asthma control and spirometry. Mepolizumab depletes iEOs and reduces circulating eosinophil viability in severe asthma but preserves a residual population of circulatory hEOs. In contrast benralizumab depleted both iEOs and hEOs. Higher iEO abundance and eosinophil viability are associated with poorer clinical outcomes following mepolizumab-treatment. Monitoring circulating eosinophil phenotype and viability may be useful to predict biologic treatment response in severe asthma.

Association Between Cytokeratin 19-Specific IgG and Neutrophil Activation in Asthma.

Patients with non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA) are less responsive to anti-inflammatory drugs and suffer from frequent asthma exacerbations. The pathogenic mechanism of NEA is not fully understood; however, the roles of monocytes and autoimmune mechanisms targeting airway epithelial cell (AEC) antigens have been proposed. The effects of monocyte extracellular traps (MoETs) on cytokeratin 19 (CK19) production in AECs, as well as the impact of CK19-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G on neutrophil and monocyte activation, were investigated both in vivo and in vitro. Sixty asthmatic patients and 15 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled, and the levels of serum immune complexes containing CK19-specific IgG and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-specific IgG were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassay. MoETs induced CK19 and CK19-specific IgG production. Furthermore, the levels of serum CK19-specific IgG were significantly higher in the NEA group than in the eosinophilic asthma group. Among patients with NEA, asthmatics with high levels of CK19-specific IgG had higher levels of myeloperoxidase and NET-specific IgG than those with low levels of CK19-specific IgG (P = 0.020 and P = 0.017; respectively). Moreover, the immune complexes from asthmatics with high CK19-specific IgG enhanced NET formation and reactive oxygen species production (neutrophil activation), which were suppressed by N-acetylcysteine and anti-CD16 antibody treatment. These findings suggest that circulating CK19 and CK19-specific IgG may contribute to NET formation, leading to airway inflammation and steroid resistance in NEA.

Real-World Data on Tezepelumab in Patients With Severe Asthma in Germany

Tezepelumab is a novel biologic blocking thymic stromal lymphopoetin, approved for severe asthma irrespective of biomarker levels or phenotype. To characterize a real-world tezepelumab patient cohort and the efficacy among various asthma phenotypes. We performed a retrospective, multicenter study on patients with severe asthma initiating tezepelumab. Clinical response was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. We included 129 patients with an average age of 52.5 ± 13.1 years, 59.7% were female. The majority (86.0%) had increased type 2 (T2) biomarkers, 68.2% an allergic and 31.8% an eosinophilic phenotype. 23.3% of patients were biologic-naive. 22 (18.2%) patients discontinued tezepelumab therapy owing to suspected side effects or insufficient efficacy. At 6 months' follow-up, median reduction in annualized exacerbation rate was-1 [25th percentile; 75% percentile {-2.9; 0.0}], the reduction of oral corticosteroid dose among patients with long-term oral corticosteroid therapy was -5 mg [-10; 0] and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved by 2 [0; 5] points. A treatment response according to Biologic Asthma Response Score of 80.8% was demonstrated. There were no significant differences in treatment response between T2-high versus T2-low, early- versus adult-onset and eosinophilic versus non-eosinophilic asthma. Prior treatment with other biologics was associated with inferior treatment response. In this real-life cohort, including a large proportion of patients with history of previous biologic use and encompassing various subgroups, the majority responded to tezepelumab. Our data further suggest a steroid-sparing effect of tezepelumab.

8-Iso-prostaglandin F2α as a biomarker of type 2 low airway inflammation and remodeling in adult asthma

BackgroundAlthough 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a has been proposed as a potential biomarker for oxidative stress in airway diseases, its specific role in asthma remains poorly understood. ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic potential of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a in assessing airway inflammation, airway remodeling, airway hyperresponsiveness, and oxidative stress in asthma. MethodsBlood and urine concentrations of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a were quantified using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in 128 adults with asthma who had maintained antiasthma medications. Their correlations with clinical data, sputum cell counts, lung function parameters, and serum markers of epithelial/neutrophil activity and airway remodeling were then analyzed. ResultsThe urinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a concentrations were significantly higher in patients with noneosinophilic asthma than in those with eosinophilic asthma (P < .05). The area under the curve was 0.678, indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy for noneosinophilic asthma. There were significant correlations with neutrophilic inflammation markers and airway remodeling markers (all P < .05). Negative correlations were observed with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%), forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity, forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% of forced vital capacity, and serum club cell protein 16 levels (all P < .05). High 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a concentrations were also noted in obese and smoking subgroups (all P < .05). However, the serum 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a concentrations were not correlated with these asthma-related parameters. ConclusionUrinary 8-iso-prostaglandin F2a concentrations are a potential biomarker for phenotyping severe asthma, particularly noneosinophilic asthma, offering oxidative stress-induced epithelial inflammation/remodeling as an additional target in asthma management.

The Determinants of Eosinophilia in Patients With Severe Asthma.

Asthma is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) as a heterogeneous disease characterized by chronic airway inflammation. The pathogenesis of the disease is better understood with the comprehension of immunological pathways. These pathways differ by the type of recruited cells and released interleukin (IL). Thus, asthma can be classified into subtypes based on the underlying immune mechanism: eosinophilic asthma (EA) and non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA). Patients with EA tend to respond better to inhaled corticosteroid as compared to those with NEA. The distinction of EA is very important in the light of emergent type 2 inflammation targeted therapies. We performed a 1-year (2018) retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Database (NIS). We included all adult patients presenting with severe asthma. Patients were stratified into two groups: eosinophilic severe asthma and non-eosinophilic severe asthma. The primary outcomes measures were the prevalence of chronic steroid use, status asthmaticus, family history of asthma, food, drug and environmental allergies, presence of nasal polyps, allergic rhinitis, allergic dermatitis, need for mechanical ventilation, need for oxygen supplementation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. We performed descriptive statistics. Continuous parametric variables were reported using a mean and standard deviation. Continuous nonparametric variables were reported using a median and interquartile range. To compare the characteristics of the two groups, we used the independent t-test for continuous parametric variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous nonparametric variables. The Chi-square test was used to assess differences in categorical variables. A total of 2,646 patients were included, out of which 882 belonged to the eosinophilic group and 1,764 were in the non-eosinophilic group. Comparing EA versus NEA, we have found that eosinophilic group was characterized by higher percentage of steroid use (18.3% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.001). This group also had higher rates of status asthmaticus and positive family history (P = 0.009 and 0.004, respectively). The presence of allergies, allergic rhinitis, nasal polyps, and allergic dermatitis was higher among patients with eosinophilia. The need for mechanical ventilation and supplemental oxygen was also higher among this group (P < 0.001 for both); however, there was no significant difference in mortality rate (P = 0.347) and the length of hospital stay was similar in both groups (P < 0.001). We showed herein that the eosinophilic subtype of asthma differs widely from the non-eosinophilic phenotype. Clinically, patients with eosinophilia might exhibit different symptomatology, more atopy, and concomitant comorbidities. However, this group might have better response to steroid therapy and might benefit from the new emergent T2 immune targeted therapy. The identification of EA is crucial for better disease control.

Galectin-10 in serum extracellular vesicles reflects asthma pathophysiology

Novel biomarkers (BMs) are urgently needed for bronchial asthma (BA) with various phenotypes and endotypes. We sought to identify novel BMs reflecting tissue pathology from serum extracellular vesicles (EVs). We performed data-independent acquisition of serum EVs from 4 healthy controls, 4 noneosinophilic asthma (NEA) patients, and 4 eosinophilic asthma (EA) patients to identify novel BMs for BA. We confirmed EA-specific BMs via data-independent acquisition validation in 61 BA patients and 23 controls. To further validate these findings, we performed data-independent acquisition for 6 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps and 7 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. We identified 3032 proteins, 23 of which exhibited differential expression in EA. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed that protein signatures from each phenotype reflected disease characteristics. Validation revealed 5 EA-specific BMs, including galectin-10 (Gal10), eosinophil peroxidase, major basic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and arachidonate 15-lipoxygenase. The potential of Gal10 in EVs was superior to that of eosinophils in terms of diagnostic capability and detection of airway obstruction. In rhinosinusitis patients, 1752 and 8413 proteins were identified from EVs and tissues, respectively. Among 11 BMs identified in EVs and tissues from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, 5 (including Gal10 and eosinophil peroxidase) showed significant correlations between EVs and tissues. Gal10 release from EVs was implicated in eosinophil extracellular trapped cell death invitro and invivo. Novel BMs such as Gal10 from serum EVs reflect disease pathophysiology in BA and may represent a new target for liquid biopsy approaches.

Evidence for 2 clusters among patients with noneosinophilic asthma

BackgroundAlthough asthma is often seen as an eosinophilic disease associated with atopy, patients with noneosinophilic asthma represent a substantial part of the population with asthma. ObjectiveTo apply an unsupervised clustering method in a cohort of 588 patients with noneosinophilic asthma (sputum eosinophils < 3%) recruited from an asthma clinic of a secondary care center. MethodsOur cluster analysis of the whole cohort identified 2 subgroups as cluster 1 (n = 417) and cluster 2 (n = 171). ResultsCluster 1 comprised a predominantly female group with late disease onset, a low proportion of atopy (24%), and a substantial smoking history (53%). In this cluster, treatment burden was low (<50% of inhaled corticosteroid users); asthma control and quality of life were poor, with median Asthma Control Test, Asthma Control Questionnaire, and Asthma Quality of Life scores of 16, 1.7, and 4.5, respectively, whereas lung function was preserved with a median postbronchodilation forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 93% predicted. Cluster 2 was a predominantly male group, almost exclusively comprising patients with atopy (99%) with early disease onset and a moderate treatment burden (median inhaled corticosteroids dose 800 µg/d equivalent beclomethasone). In cluster 2, asthma was partially controlled, with median Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores reaching 18 and 1.3, respectively, and lung function well preserved with a median postbronchodilation of 95% predicted. Although systemic and airway neutrophilic inflammation was the dominant pattern in cluster 1, cluster 2 essentially comprised paucigranulocytic asthma with moderately elevated fraction exhaled nitric oxide. ConclusionNoneosinophilic asthma splits into 2 clusters distinguishing by disease onset, atopic status, smoking history, systemic and airway inflammation, and disease control and quality of life.

Effect of Azithromycin on Asthma Remission in Adults With Persistent Uncontrolled Asthma: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Anonymized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BackgroundAsthma remission is a potential treatment goal. Research questionDoes adding azithromycin to standard therapy in patients with persistent uncontrolled asthma induce remission compared to placebo? Study Design and MethodsThis secondary analysis used data from the AMAZES clinical trial – a double-blind placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations. The primary remission definition (referred to as clinical remission) was zero exacerbations and zero oral corticosteroids (OCS) during the previous six months evaluated at 12 months and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) ≤1 at 12 months. Secondary remission definitions included clinical remission plus lung function criteria (post-bronchodilator FEV1≥80% or post-bronchodilator FEV1≤5% decline from baseline) and complete remission (sputum eosinophils<3% plus the above criteria). Sensitivity analyses explored the robustness of primary and secondary remission definitions. The predictors of clinical remission were identified. Results335 participants (41.5% male; median [Q1, Q3] age 61.01 [51.03, 68.73] years) who completed the 12-month treatment period were included in the analysis. Twelve months treatment with azithromycin induced asthma remission in a subgroup of patients, and a significantly higher proportion in the azithromycin arm achieved both clinical remission (50.6% vs 38.9%; p=0.032) and clinical remission plus lung function criteria (50.8% vs 37.1%; p=0.029) compared with placebo. In addition, a higher proportion of the azithromycin group achieved complete remission (23% vs 13.7%; p=0.058). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Baseline factors such as better asthma-related quality of life and absence of OCS burst in the previous year predicted the odds of achieving clinical remission. Azithromycin induced remission in both eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma. InterpretationAdults with persistent symptomatic asthma achieved a higher remission rate when treated with azithromycin. Remission on treatment may be an achievable treatment target in moderate/severe asthma, and future studies should consider remission as an outcome measure.

Autoimmune Mechanisms and Extracellular Traps in Non-eosinophilic Asthma

Autoimmune Mechanisms and Extracellular Traps in Non-eosinophilic Asthma

A five-gene qPCR signature can classify type 2 asthma comparably to microscopy of induced sputum from severe asthma patients

ABSTRACT Asthma is a heterogenous disease characterized by airway inflammation and variable expiratory airflow limitation resulting in variable respiratory symptoms. Characterization of airway inflammation is important to choose the optimal treatment for severe asthma patients eligible for biological treatment. However, counting cells in induced sputum samples are a time-consuming process, highly dependent on personal skills. Replacing eosinophil and neutrophil cell counting with qPCR for transcripts of selected mast cell, and basophil genes may provide more reproducible results. Aims The objective of this study was to compare qPCR with microscopy in asthma endotyping. Methods A qPCR method measuring five mast cell/basophil genes was applied on induced sputum samples from 30 severe asthma patients and compared with microscopy. Target gene Ct-values (CPA3, GATA2, HDC, MS4A2, TPSAB1/TPSB2) were referenced to household β-actin Ct values as a measure of relative mRNA abundance of the target in each sample. Target/β-actin-ratios in eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups determined by microscopy with an eosinophil threshold of 3% in 400 cells were compared using Mann–Whitney U Test. Spearman´s correlations were used to test for correlation between targets vs. FENO and targets vs. blood eosinophil counts. Results The study demonstrated a statistical difference in relative mRNA abundance for four mast cell/basophil specific genes. CPA3, GATA2, HDC and MS4A2 were elevated in eosinophilic asthma versus non-eosinophilic asthma patients. The study found that GATA2, CPA3, MS4A2 and TPSAB1/TPSB2 transcripts are positively correlated with FENO. Neither the five mast cell genes nor the five-gene signature correlated with blood eosinophils. The five-gene signature with a target/β-actin-ratio cut-off ≥2 generated sensitivity = 87%, specificity = 94%, NPV = 88% and PPV = 92% compared to microscopy. Conclusion This study confirms the contribution of mast cells in the pathogenesis of EA and suggests that mast cell mRNA markers could be one of the biomarkers used to identify EA

Exogenous IL-25 ameliorates airway neutrophilia via suppressing macrophage M1 polarization and the expression of IL-12 and IL-23 in asthma

BackgroundSevere asthma is associated with substantial mortality and has unmet therapeutic need. A subset of severe asthma is characterized by neutrophilic airway inflammation. Classically activated (or M1) macrophages which express IL-12 and IL-23 are associated with airway neutrophilia in asthma. Exogenous IL-25 was reported to suppress intestinal inflammation in animal models of inflammatory bowel diseases via suppressing IL-12 and IL-23 production. We hypothesize that IL-25 ameliorates airway neutrophilia via inhibiting macrophage M1 polarization and the expression of IL-12 and IL-23 in asthma.MethodsIn a mouse model of neutrophil-dominant allergic airway inflammation, the effect of mouse recombinant IL-25 on airway inflammation were assessed by H&E staining and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cell counting. The percentage of M1 macrophages in lung tissue and BAL cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Quantitative PCR and immunostaining were performed to measure the expression of Il12, Il23, and inflammatory cytokines. Mechanistic experiments were performed in primary culture of macrophages from mouse lungs. The expression of IL-12, IL-23 and IL-25 in sputum was analyzed in a cohort of severe asthma and subjects with eosinophilic or non-eosinophilic asthma.ResultsIntranasal administration of IL-25 markedly decreased the number of neutrophils in BAL cells in a murine model of neutrophil-dominant allergic airway inflammation. Moreover, exogenous IL-25 decreased the number of M1 macrophages, and reduced the expression of IL-12, IL-23 in the lungs of the mouse model. Exogenous IL-25 also inhibited the expression of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-17 A. In vitro, IL-25 suppressed IL-12 and IL-23 expression in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated primary culture of mouse pulmonary macrophages. Mechanistically, IL-25 inhibited LPS-induced c-Rel translocation to nucleus via STAT3-dependent signaling. In a cohort of severe asthma, IL-25 protein levels in sputum were significantly lower than control subjects. The transcript levels of IL-12 and IL-23 were increased whereas IL-25 transcripts were decreased in sputum cells from subjects with non-eosinophilic asthma compared to eosinophilic asthma.ConclusionsIL-25 expression is downregulated in subjects with severe or non-eosinophilic asthma. Exogenous IL-25 ameliorates airway neutrophilia, at least in part, via inhibiting macrophage M1 polarization and the expression of IL-12 and IL-23.

Molecular T2 asthma phenotypes are stable but heterogeneous: the usefulness of periostin for endotyping.

The stability of molecular T2/non-T2 phenotypes remains uncertain. The objectives of this study were to assess the stability of these phenotypes and the correlation between serum periostin and asthma T2 phenotypes and endotypes. Demographics, clinical data, and blood samples were collected. Patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe asthma were classified into T2 or non-T2 according to previously defined thresholds of blood eosinophilia and serum total IgE levels. Asthma endotype was also determined. After at least 1 year of follow-up, the stability of T2 phenotypes and endotypes was assessed. A total of 53 patients (72% women), mean age 47 years (range 16-77), were included. In the initial and second evaluations, the T2 phenotype was found in 41.5% and 43.4% of patients and the non-T2 phenotype was found in 58.4% and 56.7%, respectively. The mean [standard deviation (SD), range] serum periostin level was 52.7 (26.2, 22.6-129.7) ng/mL in patients with T2 phenotype, and 39.3 (25.6, 7.7-104.) ng/mL in non-T2 patients (P = 0.063). Periostin levels correlated to endotypes (P = 0.001): 45.7 (27.9) ng/mL in allergic asthma (n = 16 patients), 64.7 (24.9) in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (n = 14), 59.0 (27.6) ng/mL in late-onset eosinophilic asthma (n = 4), and 28.3 (13.3) ng/mL in non-eosinophilic asthma (n = 18). T2 and non-T2 asthma phenotypes assessed by accessible methods in daily practice are stable over time yet widely heterogeneous. Serum periostin does not discriminate between T2 and non-T2 phenotypes. Nevertheless, its correlation to asthma endotypes may contribute to guide therapies targeting T2 cytokines in a more personalized approach.

Clinical characteristics and cytokine profiles of adult obese asthma with type2 inflammation

Obesity-related non-eosinophilic asthma has been identified as a phenotype of asthma. However, mepolizumab and omalizumab improve asthma control in severe asthma with obesity, implying that type-2 cytokines may be involved in the deterioration of control in obese asthma. Despite this, the clinical details of obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers have not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers. Adult obese asthmatic patients were enrolled and were classified into two groups: obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers (T2) and obese asthma with negative type-2 inflammation markers (NT2), then data were compared. In total, 434 patients were enrolled (85% of patients were at GINA therapy step 4–5). The T2 group had a higher proportion of patients with persistent asthma since childhood and with allergic rhinitis. A higher percentage of patients used high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and experienced acute exacerbations (annual exacerbation ratio ≥ 1) in the T2 group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the T2 group was independently associated with younger age, comorbidity of allergic rhinitis, persistent asthma since childhood, use of high-dose ICS, and acute exacerbation rate ≥ 1. Adipocytokine levels were similar between the groups. Collectively, obese asthma with positive type-2 inflammation markers is characterised by a higher percentage of persistent asthma since childhood and more severe asthma.

Adverse Events during Adulthood, Child Maltreatment, and Asthma among British Adults in the UK Biobank.

Rationale: Intimate partner violence and child maltreatment have been separately associated with asthma in adults. No study has concurrently examined of adulthood adverse events (including, but not limited to, intimate partner violence) and child maltreatment on asthma in adults. Objectives: To concurrently examine of adulthood adverse events and child maltreatment on asthma in adults. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of adulthood adverse events and child maltreatment on current asthma in 87,891 adults 40-69 years old who participated in the UK Biobank. Adulthood adverse events were assessed using questions adapted from a national crime survey. Child maltreatment was ascertained using the Childhood Trauma Screener questionnaire. Current asthma was defined as physician-diagnosed asthma and current wheeze and was further classified as noneosinophilic or eosinophilic according to eosinophil count (<300 vs. ⩾300 cells per microliter). Results: In a multivariable analysis, participants who reported two or more types of adulthood adverse events had 1.19-1.45 times significantly higher odds of asthma than those who did not, whereas participants who reported two or more types of child maltreatment had 1.25-1.59 significantly higher odds of asthma than those who reported no child maltreatment. After stratification by sex, similar results were obtained for child maltreatment in women and men, whereas adulthood adverse events were only significantly associated with asthma in women. Similar findings were observed in analyses that were restricted to never-smokers and former smokers with <10 pack-years of smoking and in analyses of noneosinophilic and eosinophilic asthma. Conclusions: In a cohort of British adults, child maltreatment was associated with current asthma in men and women, whereas adulthood adverse events were associated with current asthma in women only. This was independent of cigarette smoking or eosinophil count.

Prospective Real-World Analysis of Asthma Patients With Preserved and Reduced Physical Activity.

Asthma is a highly heterogeneous airway disease, and the clinical characteristics of patients with asthma with preserved and reduced physical activity are poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the risk factors and clinical phenotypes associated with reduced physical activity in a wide range of patients with asthma. We conducted a prospective observational study of 138 patients with asthma, including patients with asthma without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n= 104) and asthma-COPD overlap (n= 34), and 42 healthy controls. Physical activity levels were measured for 2 weeks using a triaxial accelerometer at baseline and 1 year later. Higher eosinophils and body mass index (BMI) were associated with reduced physical activity in patients with asthma without COPD. Cluster analysis of asthma without COPD revealed 4 asthma phenotypes. We identified a cluster with preserved physical activity (n= 43) that was characterized by good symptom control and lung function and included a high proportion of biologics users (34.9%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that patients with late-onset eosinophilic (n= 21), high-BMI noneosinophilic (n= 14), and symptom-predominant asthma phenotypes (n= 26) had lower levels of physical activity than controls. Patients with asthma-COPD overlap also had significantly lower physical activity levels than controls. Similar trends in physical activity levels were observed in each asthma group at 1-year follow-up. This study showed the clinical features of patients with asthma with preserved and reduced physical activity. Reduced physical activity was observed in various asthma phenotypes and in asthma-COPD overlap.

Obese Asthma Phenotype Is Associated with hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p Modulating the IGF Axis.

Clarifying inflammatory processes and categorising asthma into phenotypes and endotypes improves asthma management. Obesity worsens severe asthma and reduces quality of life, although its specific molecular impact remains unclear. We previously demonstrated that hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p, biomarkers related to an inflammatory profile, discriminate eosinophilic from non-eosinophilic asthmatics. We aimed to study hsa-miR-26a-1-3p, hsa-miR-376a-3p, and their target genes in asthmatic subjects with or without obesity to find biomarkers and comprehend obese asthma mechanisms. Lung tissue samples were obtained from asthmatic patients (n = 16) and healthy subjects (n = 20). We measured miRNA expression using RT-qPCR and protein levels (IGF axis) by ELISA in confirmation samples from eosinophilic (n = 38) and non-eosinophilic (n = 39) obese (n = 26) and non-obese (n = 51) asthma patients. Asthmatic lungs showed higher hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p expression than healthy lungs. A study of seven genes regulated by these miRNAs revealed differential expression of IGFBP3 between asthma patients and healthy individuals. In obese asthma patients, we found higher hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and IGF-1R values and lower values for hsa-miR-376a-3p and IGFBP-3. Hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and IGFBP-3 were directly and inversely correlated with body mass index, respectively. Hsa-miR-26a-1-3p and hsa-miR-376a-3p could be used as biomarkers to phenotype patients with eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic asthma in relation to comorbid obesity.

Differences in Mortality Among Patients With Asthma and COPD Hospitalized With COVID-19

It remains unclear whether patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Compare in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes among patients with asthma, COPD, and no airway disease. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 8,395 patients admitted with COVID-19 between March 2020 and April 2021. Airway disease diagnoses were defined using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. Mortality and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were compared among groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify and adjust for confounding clinical features associated with mortality. The median SOFA score in patients without airway disease was 0.32 and mortality was 11%. In comparison, asthma patients had lower SOFA scores (median 0.15; P < .01) and decreased mortality, even after adjusting for age, diabetes, and other confounders (odds ratio 0.65; P= .01). Patients with COPD had higher SOFA scores (median 0.86; P < .01) and increased adjusted odds of mortality (odds ratio 1.40; P < .01). Blood eosinophil count of 200 cells/μL or greater, a marker of type 2 inflammation, was associated with lower mortality across all groups. Importantly, patients with asthma showed improved outcomes even after adjusting for eosinophilia, indicating that noneosinophilic asthma was associated with protection as well. COVID-19 severity was increased in patients with COPD and decreased in those with asthma, eosinophilia, and noneosinophilic asthma, independent of clinical confounders. These findings suggest that COVID-19 severity may be influenced by intrinsic immunological factors in patients with airway diseases, such as type 2 inflammation.

Group 3 innate lymphoid cells secret neutrophil chemoattractants and are insensitive to glucocorticoid via aberrant GR phosphorylation

BackgroundPatients with neutrophil-mediated asthma have poor response to glucocorticoids. The roles and mechanisms of group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) in inducing neutrophilic airway inflammation and glucocorticoid resistance in asthma have not been fully clarified.MethodsILC3s in peripheral blood were measured by flow cytometry in patients with eosinophilic asthma (EA) and non-eosinophilic asthma (NEA). ILC3s were sorted and cultured in vitro for RNA sequencing. Cytokines production and signaling pathways in ILC3s after IL-1β stimulation and dexamethasone treatment were determined by real-time PCR, flow cytometry, ELISA and western blot.ResultsThe percentage and numbers of ILC3s in peripheral blood was higher in patients with NEA compared with EA, and negatively correlated with blood eosinophils. IL-1β stimulation significantly enhanced CXCL8 and CXCL1 production in ILC3s via activation of p65 NF-κB and p38/JNK MAPK signaling pathways. The expression of neutrophil chemoattractants from ILC3s was insensitive to dexamethasone treatment. Dexamethasone significantly increased phosphorylation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) at Ser226 but only with a weak induction at Ser211 residues in ILC3s. Compared to human bronchial epithelial cell line (16HBE cells), the ratio of p-GR S226 to p-GR S211 (p-GR S226/S211) was significantly higher in ILC3s at baseline and after dexamethasone treatment. In addition, IL-1β could induce Ser226 phosphorylation and had a crosstalk effect to dexamethasone via NF-κB pathway.ConclusionsILC3s were elevated in patients with NEA, and associated with neutrophil inflammation by release of neutrophil chemoattractants and were glucocorticoid (GC) resistant. This paper provides a novel cellular and molecular mechanisms of neutrophil inflammation and GC-resistance in asthma.Trial registration The study has been prospectively registered in the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ChiCTR1900027125)

Sputum inflammatory, neural, and remodeling mediators in eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma

BackgroundNeural and remodeling mechanisms may play a role in asthma, particularly noneosinophilic asthma (NEA). ObjectiveTo assess sputum mediators associated with neural, remodeling, and inflammatory mechanisms in eosinophilic asthma (EA), NEA, and participants without asthma. MethodsA total of 111 participants with and 62 without asthma (14-21 years old) underwent sputum induction, exhaled nitric oxide, atopy, and spirometry tests. There were 24 mediators measured in sputum using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or bead array. Eosinophilic asthma (n = 52) and NEA (n = 59) were defined using a sputum eosinophil level cut-point of greater than or equal to 2.5%. ResultsElevated levels of nociceptin (median: 39.1 vs 22.4 ng/mL, P = .03), periostin (33.8 vs 9.4 ng/mL, P = .01), and ECP; (220.1 vs 83.7 ng/mL, P = .03) were found in patients with asthma compared with those without asthma. Nociceptin was elevated in EA (54.8 vs 22.4 ng/mL, P = .02) compared with participants without asthma. Eosinophilic asthma had higher levels of inflammatory mediators (ECP: 495.5 vs 100.3 ng/mL, P ≤ .01; interleukin-1β: 285.3 vs 209.3 pg/mL, P = .03; histamine: 5805.0 vs 3172.5 pg/mL, P < .01) and remodeling mediators (VEGF-A); 3.3 vs 2.5 ng/mL, P = .03; periostin: 47.7 vs 22.1 ng/mL, P = .04) than NEA. Whereas macrophages were associated with neural mediators, for example, neurokinin A (r = 0.27, P = .01) and nociceptin (r = 0.30, P = .02), granulocytes were associated with inflammatory and remodeling mediators (eg, ECP and VEGF-A correlated with neutrophils (r = 0.53 and r = 0.33, respectively, P < .01) and eosinophils (r = 0.53 and r = 0.29 respectively, P ≤ .01). ConclusionElevated levels of nociceptin and inflammatory and remodeling markers were found in EA, but no evidence for neural and remodeling pathways was found in NEA. Neural and remodeling mechanisms seem to coexist with inflammation.