At first glance the study reported in this issue of the Journal of Neurosurgery by Yordanova et al.,7 “Awake surgery for WHO grade II gliomas within ‘noneloquent’ areas in the left dominant hemisphere: Toward a ‘supratotal’ resection,” may not seem to be a novel observation with significant implications for patient care. However, a closer look at the take-home message could very well change the way in which we, as surgeons, approach lowgrade gliomas in so-called “noneloquent” locations. The authors reviewed, in a retrospective fashion, 17 low-grade gliomas (LGGs) in 15 patients who underwent a resection of the tumor beyond the margins as defined on anatomical MR images. This group of patients who underwent “supracomplete” resection was compared to a similar group of patients who underwent a complete tumor removal, based on volumetric extent of resection. While the number of patients was indeed small and the follow-up not as long as I would like to have seen, the results were quite dramatic. The number of relapses seen during the postoperative period were nonsignificantly greater in the control group (41%) than in the supracomplete resection group (26%), yet, the incidence of anaplastic transformation was significantly greater in the control group. In fact, there were no cases of anaplastic transformation in the supracomplete resection group. Previous work from our own group, and that of others,1,6 has demonstrated that extent of resection significantly impacts the occurrence of anaplastic transformation. In addition to age of the patient and tumor size, this feature is a critical determinant of eventual biological behavior of LGGs. This makes a good deal of sense when one considers the studies demonstrating tumor cell infiltration beyond the anatomical imaging boundaries of LGGs, especially, within 1 to 2 centimeters of the FLAIR MR imaging margin. This makes a strong argument for obtaining physiological imaging studies—such as diffusion weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy, perfusion—to better define the true volume of the lesion beyond the anatomical confines of the mass3–5 and designing a surgical strategy to resect both components (the tumor and the perilesional infiltrated margin). That said, the other major consideration, which, at the same time may be a limitation, is the functional nature of the region to be removed. Herein lies the beauty of this study: utilize awake functional mapping in noneloquent areas to resect the tumor plus the surrounding infiltrated margin—in other words, to perform “supracomplete” resection. This ensures that the resection is not limited by the “suspicion” of functional tissue, and the removal of additional infiltrated tissue does not result in significant permanent deficits.2 Our goal as glioma surgeons is to maximize extent of tumor resection while minimizing morbidity. The results, published throughout the past many years, are convincing to the point of being indisputable. With regard to LGGs, our goal should be to make this a chronic disease and delay anaplastic transformation for as long as possible. Although we have shown this to be possible with a complete radiographic resection, the authors of this study may have found a more effective strategy to achieve this lofty goal. In essence, they are definitely on to something.