Topical prostaglandin analogues are safe and effective to treat ocular hypertension (OHT) and open-angle glaucoma (OAG). The preservatives used in prostaglandin, however, drops increase the short- to long-term risk of developing ocular surface disease (OSD). We aimed to compare the 10-year costs and clinical outcomes with Polyquad®-preserved travoprost to costs and outcomes with benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved prostaglandins in 7 Asian countries. A semi-Markov health economic model was developed. Treatment-naïve OHT/OAG patients were initiated on treatment with Polyquad®-travoprost, latanoprost or bimatoprost (1st line) with possible timolol adjunct (2nd line, fixed combination). The literature provided information on the increased risks of treatment change and OSD development due to exposure to BAK, and disease evolution. Further treatment lines, including eye laser/surgery, and other medical resource use were obtained using data from a German observational study (COGIS) that were validated and adapted in each country by clinical experts. Local unit costs were collected and applied to each resource (All-Payer perspective, 2011 costs). Country-specific discounting was used. Compared to BAK-preserved prostaglandins, Polyquad-travoprost was dominant (15% less OSD; total costs reductions vs. latanoprost in Singapore −14%, India and Malaysia −13%, South Korea −9% and vs. bimatoprost from −2% in Thailand to −19% in South Korea), or else cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <1,000US$ per OSD-free year gained). In each country, the estimated reductions in glaucoma medical (non-drug) management costs (range from −18 to −22%), and total OSD costs (from −25 to −27%), were significant as per second-order sensitivity analysis. As a long-term consequence of the modeled lower persistence and impaired compliance the presence of OSD was associated with higher total costs. This multi-country model estimated that treating Asian OHT/OAG patients with Polyquad®-preserved travoprost would generate significantly less OSD compared to BAK-preserved prostaglandins, together with savings on glaucoma and OSD management costs.
Read full abstract