You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction/Andrology: Penis/Testis/Urethra: Benign Disease1 Apr 2015PD2-03 NONINFECTED PENILE PROSTHESES CULTURE DURING REVISION SURGERIES; COMPARISON BETWEEN ANTIBIOTIC COATED AND UNCOATED DEVICES Seyfettin Ciftci, Tijen Nemut, Melih Culha, Hasan Yilmaz, Murat Ustuner, Ufuk Yavuz, and Levend Ozkan Seyfettin CiftciSeyfettin Ciftci More articles by this author , Tijen NemutTijen Nemut More articles by this author , Melih CulhaMelih Culha More articles by this author , Hasan YilmazHasan Yilmaz More articles by this author , Murat UstunerMurat Ustuner More articles by this author , Ufuk YavuzUfuk Yavuz More articles by this author , and Levend OzkanLevend Ozkan More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.186AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Some of the clinically uninfected penile prostheses have organisms growing in the implant spaces. These organisims can be cultured during revision surgeries. Aim of this study is to investigate the bacterial growth on uninfected devices and compare antibiotic coated and noncoated implants. METHODS The charts of the 71 patients who underwent revision surgeries for penile prosthesis between 1995 to 2013 were reviewed. Swab cultures were routinely obtained the corporal,pump or reservoir site during the operation. If a bacterial biofilm was determined on the prosthesis, it was also cultured. 31 devices were antibiotic coated prosthesis, while 40 of the implants were noncoated. RESULTS 6 different organisms were cultured from 18 patients. 4 of the devices were antibiotic coated and the other 14, noncoated devices. Staphylococcus Epidermidis was the most common organism, while Bacteriodes vulgatus, Staphylococcus Hominis, Beta Hemolitic Streptococcus, E.coli and Proteus Mirabilis were also cultured. All patients who had positive cultures were treated with appropiate antibiotics for four weeks postoperatively. Mean follow-up time was 41 months ranged from 8 to 82 months. One prosthesis(noncoated) became clinically infected in the follow-up period with a totally different organism. Ratios of the positive cultures of antibiotic coated and noncoated devices were 13% and 35% respectively and the result is significant(p= 0.00254). CONCLUSIONS Positive bacterial cultures are present on uninfected penile prostheses at revision surgeries in some of the patients. Antibiotic coated prostheses have much less positive cultures than noncoated devices. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e41 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Seyfettin Ciftci More articles by this author Tijen Nemut More articles by this author Melih Culha More articles by this author Hasan Yilmaz More articles by this author Murat Ustuner More articles by this author Ufuk Yavuz More articles by this author Levend Ozkan More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract