Non-anatomical Resection Research Articles

Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The value of anatomic resection (AR) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. This study compares the perioperative safety and long-term outcomes of AR versus non-anatomic resection (NAR) in ICC patients. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) and Wanfang database for prospective or retrospective studies comparing the efficacy of AR and NAR in, ICC published to June 1, 2024. Meta-analyses were performed on surgical factors, perioperative outcomes and long-term prognosis for both the entire cohort and the propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort. The primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Seven studies, including 1801 ICC patients, were analyzed. In both the entire and the PSM cohort , the AR group demonstrated superior OS (HR=0.71, 95% CI=0.57-0.88, P=0.002 and HR=0.70, 95% CI=0.59-0.83, P<0.0001, respectively) and DFS (HR=0.75, 95% CI=0.62-0.91, P=0.004 and HR=0.68, 95% CI=0.58-0.79, P<0.00001, respectively) compared to the NAR group. AR significantly improves 1-year, 3-year, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS(all P<0.05). In the PSM cohort, AR and NAR groups showed comparable blood loss, operative times, overall complications, and major complications (all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with tumor >5 cm, AR achieved better OS and DFS, whereas patients with tumors ≤5 cm did not experience survival benefits from AR. Conclusion: This study suggests that AR, compared to NAR, can improve OS and DFS without increasing perioperative risks, particularly in ICC patients with tumors larger than 5 cm.

Significance of anatomical resection and wide surgical margin for HCC patients with MVI undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: A multicenter study

ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of surgical resection margin and hepatic resection type on prognosis and compare their prognostic significance on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with or without microvascular invasion (MVI) who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 320 patients with HCC who underwent LLR. According to the grading of MVI, patients were classified as M0, M1 and M2. Patients were divided into the anatomical resection (AR) and nonanatomical resection (NAR) groups according to the hepatic resection type. Survival and Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the effects of AR and NAR, wide and narrow resection margin on overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR). ResultsIn the whole cohort, narrow resection margin was an independent risk factor for OS and TTR, whereas NAR was not. Subgroup analysis showed that narrow resection margin and NAR were both independent risk factors for OS and TTR in HCC patients with MVI. The 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M1 were 85.3 % versus 62 % and 34.4 % versus 60.2 %. Similarly, the 5-year OS and TTR rates of the two groups (NAR-wide resection margin and AR-narrow resection margin) with M2 were 80.2 % versus 47.9 % and 30.8 % versus 64.8 %. ConclusionsAnatomical hepatectomy and wide resection margin were independent protective factors for HCC patients with MVI receiving LLR. Nonetheless, wide resection margin had a greater impact on prognosis than anatomical hepatectomy.

Awake thoracoscopic non-anatomic pulmonary resections under thoracic paravertebral block: Results of a tertiary referral centre.

Awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) helps to avoid the adverse effects of general anaesthesia (GA) with single-lung ventilation. Its usage in anatomic and non-anatomic pulmonary resections has spread worldwide, and it is mostly performed under thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). We herein report our surgical experience with awake VATS non-anatomical resections under the thoracic paravertebral block (TPB). This retrospective, single-centred study reviewed patients undergoing awake VATS non-anatomical pulmonary resection under TPB, who voluntarily accepted awake VATS despite being suitable for GA and were found unsuitable for GA based on pre-operative assessment results. Demographic, pre-, per- and post-operative data were collected, analysed and compared with the literature data. Twenty-four patients (16 patients with normal pre-operative assessment results and 8 patients having high risk for GA) were selected. Fourteen bullectomies for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax and 10 wedge resections (nine for metastasectomy and one for lung biopsy) were performed. Global in-operating room time was 77 ± 31 min. The morbidity rate was 20.8% (n = 5), including prolonged air leak in three and pneumonia in two patients. The mean duration of the chest tube was 1.9 ± 1.5 days and mean duration of hospital stay was 3.5 ± 2.1 days. There was no in-hospital mortality. Our results were mostly similar to the literature data. Non-anatomical lung resections by VATS can be performed easily and safely under TPB in awake patients. Although the perioperative and post-operative outcomes are not superior to other anaesthesia approaches, preferring TPB may help to avoid the serious potential complications of TEA.

Pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma: Insights from a referral-center cohort

IntroductionThe low incidence and heterogeneity of sarcomas limit understanding of their progression in metastatic cases. The use of metastasectomy is debated due to lack of consensus and evidence-based data. This study aimed to identify simple prognostic factors that could contribute to the therapeutic strategy. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy from sarcoma in our referral center between 2011 and 2022. Demographic, radiologic, pathologic, and operative data were collected. Oncological follow-up, survival, and risk factor analyses were performed. Results192 patients were identified (mean age 49.3 years). Primary sarcoma arose from the trunk (24.6 %) or limbs (75.4 %), and metastases were metachronous in 85.4 % of cases. The median number of operated lesions was 2, and anatomic resection were performed in 24.1 %. The postoperative course was uneventful in 91.3 % of cases. Post-operative chemotherapy followed lung resection in 68.7 %. 1-, 3-, and 5-year Overall Survival (OS) were 89.6 %, 69.8 %, 57.6 %, respectively, with a plateau phase beyond 5 years. Higher grade or trunk location of the primary sarcoma, incomplete or anatomic pulmonary resection, and post-operative systemic treatment were significantly associated with shorter OS. No histological subtype significantly impacted OS. Location of the primary, resection type, and post-operative systemic treatment independently influenced OS. Non-anatomic and repeated pulmonary resections, were independently associated with “long surviving”. ConclusionIn metastatic sarcoma, pulmonary resections offer prolonged survival in selected patients, supporting its essential role in the whole therapeutic strategy. Anatomic and sequential metastasectomy should be cautiously discussed.

Tumor in the liver: Six inflammatory pseudotumor patient

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) is a rare liver disease confused with liver tumors. It is a disease that should be known in the differential diagnosis for clinicians as the correct diagnosis of IPT will prevent unnecessary surgery. Demographic datas, diagnoses and imaging modalities of six patients with radiologically and/or histopathologically diagnosed hepatic IPT between 2016 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Four out of six patients were female and median age was 57.5 (47-66). C-reactive protein was higher in four patients, and carbohydrate antigen 19.9 level was higher in one patient. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis in five patients. Only in one patient computed tomography was enough for diagnosis. Tumor locations were segment 5 for two patients, segment 7-8 in two patients, segment 7 in one patient, and 8 in one patient. Liver biopsy was performed in five patients because it could not be distinguished from malignancy by imaging methods. Histopathological results of all these biopsies defined as IPT. Initial tumor median size was 31 (17-55) mm. Two patients were operated on. The first one underwent right hepatectomy due to a 2-fold increase in size within 11 months. The second one had a mass indistinguishable from hepatic adenoma by MRI and underwent nonanatomic resection. In one patient, IPT disappeared completely in the 18th month of follow-up period while it regressed in size in two patients. Two of our patients had a history of recurrent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, which we noticed incidentally before IPT was diagnosed. IPTs are liver masses with low malignant potential and may shrink spontaneously during follow-up. We suspected that biliary tract interventions may be the cause of IPT.

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma > 5 cm with surgical indication: is it mandatory a major hepatectomy? a propensity-score weighted analysis.

Single large hepatocellular carcinoma >5cm (SLHCC) traditionally requires a major liver resection. Minor resections are often performed with the goal to reduce morbidity and mortality. Aim of the study was to establish if a major resection should be considered the best treatment for SLHCC or a more limited resection should be preferred. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the HE.RC.O.LE.S. Group register was performed. All collected patients with surgically treated SLHCC were divided in 5 groups of treatment (major hepatectomy, sectorectomy, left lateral sectionectomy, segmentectomy, non-anatomical resection) and compared for baseline characteristics, short and long-term results. A propensity-score weighted analysis was performed. 535 patients were enrolled in the study. Major resection was associated with significantly increased major complications compared to left lateral sectionanectomy, segmentectomy and non-anatomical resection (all p<0.05) and borderline significant increased major complications compared to sectorectomy (p=0.08). Left lateral sectionectomy showed better overall survival compared to major resection (p=0.02), while other groups of treatment resulted similar to major hepatectomy group for the same item. Absence of oncological benefit after major resection and similar outcomes among the 5 groups of treatment was confirmed even in the sub-population excluding patients with macrovascular invasion. Major resection was associated to increased major post-operative morbidity without long-term survival benefit; when technically feasible and oncologically adequate, minor resections should be preferred for the surgical treatment of SLHCC.

Introduction of day-case robotic liver surgery: a case series from a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre

BackgroundLiver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient’s recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient’s post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery.MethodsSingle surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery.ResultsThis is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien–Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities.ConclusionThis case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.

Impact of anatomical liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in preventing early-phase local recurrence after surgery.

The superiority of anatomical liver resection (AR) for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over nonanatomical liver resection (NR) remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the impact of AR in preventing local and early HCC recurrence. A total of 280 patients who underwent initial liver resection for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter were categorized into the AR and NR groups and compared using propensity score matching analysis. Between the matched pairs (n = 87 in each group), the incidence rates of local and early (recurrence within 2 years after surgery) recurrences in the AR group were significantly lower than those in the NR group (13.8% vs. 28.7%, p = .025; 20.7% vs. 35.6%, p = .028, respectively). The overall survival in the AR group was better than that in the NR group (median: 13.4 vs. 7.6 years, p = .003). NR was among independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1-3.6, p = .023) and prognostic factors for local recurrence (hazard ratio: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.4-4.4, p = .003). AR is superior in controlling local and early recurrence postoperatively for solitary HCC ≤5 cm in diameter compared with NR.

New predictors of microvascular invasion for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3cm.

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a risk factor for postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in early-stage HCC. In small HCC ≤ 3cm, treatment options include anatomical resection or non-anatomical resection, and MVI has a major effect on treatment decisions. We aimed to identify the predictors of MVI in small HCC ≤ 3cm. We retrospectively studied 129 patients with very early or early-stage HCC ≤ 3cm who had undergone 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and subsequent hepatic resection from January 2016 to August 2023. These patients were divided into the derivation cohort (n = 86) and validation cohort (n = 43). We examined the risk factors for MVI using logistic regression analysis, and established a predictive scoring system in the derivation cohort. We evaluated the accuracy of our scoring system in the validation cohort. In the derivation cohort, a Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP-L3), prothrombin induced by vitamin K deficiency or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were independent predictors of MVI. We established the scoring system using these three factors. In the validation test, there were no MVI-positive cases with a score of 0 and 1, and all cases were MVI-positive with a score of 4. Moreover, with a score ≥ 2, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of our scoring system were 100%, 71.4%, and 81.4%, respectively. Our scoring system can accurately predict MVI in small HCC ≤ 3cm, and could contribute to establishing an appropriate treatment strategy.

Which Surgical Technique for Liver Resection is Favourable in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases?

Abstract Background The liver is the most common metastatic site after curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Around 50% of all patients with CRC will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Liver resection (LR) represents a curative treatment option. Benefits of anatomic (ALR) versus non-anatomic liver resection (NALR) show a lack of consistent evidence. While ALR seems to be associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, NALR could lead to more recurrences. Aims We investigated complication and survival rates of patients with CRLM after both resection types. Methods This is a multicentre cohort study using retrospectively and prospectively collected data. All patients undergoing LR for CRLM between 2009 and 2020 from 3 specialised centres in Switzerland and Germany were included. Complication and survival rates after ALR versus NALR were analysed using uni- and multivariate Cox regression models. Results 624 patients were included. Median follow-up time was 25.49 months. In 292/624 patients (47%) ALR was performed, while 53% underwent NALR. Complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification have been observed significantly more often in the ALR group (p=0.001). Especially severe complications grade III and IV have been more present after ALR (36/292 vs. 26/332 and 13/292 vs. 11/332, respectively). Both, length of ICU and postoperative hospital stay have been significantly longer in the ALR group (p&amp;lt;0.001 each). The uni- and multivariate models have shown no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival rates (RFS) between both groups (for OS adjusted HR of 0.84 (95% CI 0.59 - 1.21; p=0.35) and for RFS adjusted HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.69 - 1.22, p=0.56)). Conclusion This multicentre prospective study investigating ALR versus NALR for CRLM has shown no significant differences in OS and RFS. However, postoperative complications have been reported significantly more often after ALR. NALR seems to be the better choice for patients with CRLM undergoing LR.

Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An Umbrella Review.

Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: "simultaneous", "bowel-first", and "liver-first". Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to "bowel-first" resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to "liver-first" resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing "liver-first" to "bowel-first" resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.

Segmental Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis.

Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is performed in select patients who may be at increased risk for postoperative morbidity. To identify patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent segmental colectomy and assess their postoperative and long-term outcomes. Retrospective case series. A tertiary care IBD center. Patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surgery between 1995 and 2022. Segmental colectomy. Postoperative complications, early and late colitis, metachronous cancer development, completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates, and stoma at follow-up. Fifty-five patients were included (20 [36.4%] women; age 67.8 (57.4-77.1) years at surgery; BMI 27.7 (24.2-31.1) kg/m 2 ; median follow-up 37.3 months). Thirty-two patients (58.2%) had ASA score of 3, 48 (87.3%) had at least 1 comorbidity, and 48 (87.3%) had Mayo endoscopic subscores of 0 to 1. Patients underwent right hemicolectomy (n = 28; 50.9%), sigmoidectomy (n = 17; 30.9%), left hemicolectomy (6; 10.9%), low anterior resection (n = 2; 3.6%), or a nonanatomic resection (n = 2; 3.6%) for endoscopically unresectable polyps (n = 21; 38.2%), colorectal cancer (n = 15; 27.3%), symptomatic diverticular disease (n = 13; 23.6%), and stricture (n = 6; 10.9%). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (29.1%; n = 7 [12.7%] Clavien-Dindo class III-V). Early and late postoperative colitis rates were 9.1% and 14.5%, respectively. Metachronous cancer developed in 1 patient. Four patients (7.3%) underwent subsequent completion proctocolectomy with ileostomy. Six patients (10.9%) had a stoma at follow-up. Two- and 5-year completion proctocolectomy-free survival rates were 91% and 88%, respectively. Retrospective study and small sample size. Segmental colectomy in ulcerative colitis is associated with low postoperative complication rates, symptomatic early colitis and late colitis rates, metachronous cancer development, and the need for subsequent completion proctocolectomy. Therefore, it can be safe to consider select patients, such as the elderly with quiescent colitis and other indications, for colectomy. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se realiza en pacientes seleccionados que pueden tener un mayor riesgo de morbilidad posoperatoria.OBJETIVO:Identificar pacientes con colitis ulcerosa sometidos a colectomía segmentaria y evaluar sus resultados postoperatorios y a largo plazo.DISEÑO:Serie de casos retrospectivos.AMBIENTE:Un centro de atención terciaria para enfermedades inflamatorias intestinales.PACIENTES:Pacientes con colitis ulcerosa intervenidos quirúrgicamente entre 1995 y 2022.INTERVENCIÓN(S):Colectomía segmentaria.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Complicaciones postoperatorias, colitis temprana y tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico, tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa y estoma en el seguimiento.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron cincuenta y cinco pacientes [20 (36,4%) mujeres; 67,8 (57,4-77,1) años de edad al momento de la cirugía; índice de masa corporal 27,7 (24,2-31,1) kg/m2; mediana de seguimiento 37,3 meses]. La puntuación ASA fue III en 32 (58,2%) pacientes, 48 (87,3%) tenían al menos una comorbilidad y 48 (87,3%) tenían una subpuntuación endoscópica de Mayo de 0-1. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a hemicolectomía derecha (28, 50,9%), sigmoidectomía (17, 30,9%), hemicolectomía izquierda (6, 10,9%), resección anterior baja (2, 3,6%) o resección no anatómica (2, 3,6%) para; pólipos irresecables endoscópicamente (21, 38,2%), cáncer colorrectal (15, 27,3%), enfermedad diverticular sintomática (13, 23,6%) y estenosis (6, 10,9%). Se produjeron complicaciones postoperatorias en 16 (29,1%) pacientes [7 (12,7%) Clavien-Dindo Clase III-V]. Las tasas de colitis posoperatoria temprana y tardía fueron del 9,1% y el 14,5%, respectivamente. Un paciente desarrolló cáncer metacrónico. A 4 (7,3%) pacientes se les realizó posteriormente proctocolectomía completa con ileostomía. Seis (10,9%) pacientes tenían estoma en el seguimiento. Las tasas de supervivencia sin proctocolectomía completa a dos y cinco años fueron del 91% y 88%, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo, tamaño de muestra pequeño.CONCLUSIONES:La colectomía segmentaria en la colitis ulcerosa se asocia con bajas tasas de complicaciones postoperatorias, tasas de colitis sintomática temprana y tasas de colitis tardía, desarrollo de cáncer metacrónico y la necesidad de una posterior proctocolectomía completa. Por lo tanto, puede ser seguro considerar pacientes seleccionados, como los ancianos con colitis inactiva y otras indicaciones de colectomía. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Impact of prolonged liver ischemia during intermittent Pringle maneuver on postoperative outcomes following liver resection

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes following liver resection between patients with prolonged cumulative ischemia time (CIT) which exceeded 60 min and patients with CIT less than 60 min. MethodsBetween March 2020 and October 2022, 164 consecutive patients underwent liver resection at the Unit for hepato-bilio-pancreatic surgery, University Clinic for Digestive Surgery in Belgrade, Serbia. Intermittent Pringle maneuver was routinely applied. Depending on CIT during transection, patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (CIT <60 min) included 101 patients, and group 2 (CIT ≥60 min) included 63 patients. ResultsMedian operative time (210 vs. 400 min) and CIT (30 vs. 76 min) were longer in the Group 2 (p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was higher in the Group 2 (150 vs 500 ml), p < 0.001. The perioperative transfusion rate was similar between the groups (p = 0.107). There was no difference in postoperative overall morbidity (50.5% vs. 58.7%, p = 0.337) and major morbidity (18.8 vs. 19%, p = 0.401). In-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality were similar between the groups (p = 0.408; p = 0.408; p = 0.252, respectively). Non-anatomical liver resection was the only predictive factor of 90-day mortality identified by multivariate analysis (p = 0.047; Relative Risk = 0.179; 95% Confidence Interval 0.033–0.981). ConclusionIntermittent Pringle maneuver with CIT exceeding 60 min is a safe method for bleeding control during liver resection with no impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Keywords: intermittent Pringle maneuver, liver ischemia, liver resection.

Minimally Invasive Simultaneous Colorectal and Liver Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastasis-Short-Term Outcomes.

Surgical management of colorectal disease and liver metastatectomy can be staged or synchronous. A minimally invasive approach in synchronous resection in the selected group of patients may improve postoperative outcomes. The present study aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of simultaneous liver and colorectal resection for synchronous metastasis by a minimally invasive approach in terms of major morbidity and R0 resection rates. The present study is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. All patients who underwent minimally invasive simultaneous resection of colorectal malignancy and liver metastases between January 2020 and April 2023 were included. A total of 39 patients were included in the study. The median age was 54 (23-79) years with 28 male (72%) and 11 female (28%) patients. Rectum (n = 21, 54%) was the most common primary location. The most commonly performed procedures were low anterior resection (n = 12) and parenchymal sparing non-anatomical resection (n = 23, 59%). The median surgery duration was 280 (150-520) min, and the median blood loss was 400 (50-2100) ml. The median hospital stay was 7 (5-18) days. Five (12.6%) patients had major complications. With a median follow-up of 12months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 84.6% and 37%, respectively. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resection by minimal access approach is feasible in selected groups of patients depending on the extent of hepatectomy, the patient's general condition, and surgical team experience. A minimal access approach leads to faster recovery without compromising on the oncological radicality.

Image-Guided VATS in the Hybrid Operation Room Facilitates Early Diagnosis and Concurrent Treatment of Subcentimeter Nonpalpable Lung Nodules.

As lung cancer screening increases, the detection of small, nonpalpable lung lesions is on the rise. The hybrid operation room (OR), which combines percutaneous or endobronchial fiducial placement with on-table computed tomography (CT) and fluoroscopic guidance, improves localization and facilitates the diagnosis and treatment of smaller, nonpalpable lung nodules with greater accuracy. In 35 consecutive months, 55 veterans underwent 60 image-guided video-assisted thoracic surgery procedures for lesion resection. Of the cases, 36% were found during lung cancer screening. All patients received their care in the hybrid OR, where cone-beam CT scan technology was used to place an average of 1.6 fiducials percutaneously (n = 55) or via augmented navigational bronchoscopy (n = 5). A total of 66 lesions were resected. The median lesion size was 8 mm with an interquartile range of 6 to 14. The patients underwent nonanatomical resection with lymph node dissection using radiologic guidance. When indicated, an anatomical resection was subsequently performed. Of 47 total non-small cell lung cancer lesions, 83% were diagnosed at stage IA1 or IA2. The median surgical margin was 15 mm; the margin was usually 1.5 times as wide as the lesion. The hybrid OR technology gives a 3-dimensional assessment of the small lung lesions, allowing for a tissue-saving resection while achieving good surgical margins. During lung cancer screening, smaller, nonpalpable lung nodules are frequently found. This technology allows resection of subcentimeter lesions, which would otherwise be unresectable at this early stage, possibly improving survival.

Enhanced recovery after surgery pathway leads to decreased length of stay for patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resection.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in thoracic surgery have been demonstrated to impact length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and postoperative opioid use. However, ERAS protocols for minimally invasive lung resections have not been well described. Given most lung resections are now performed minimally invasively, there is a gap in the literature regarding the efficacy of ERAS protocols in this setting. In this study, we analyzed patient outcomes following implementation of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive lung resections. Outcome data was retrospectively collected for 442 patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resections between January 1st, 2015 and October 26th, 2021. Patients were divided into either a pre-ERAS (n=193) or ERAS (n=249) group. Primary outcomes included LOS, postoperative complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission status, 30-day hospital readmissions, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included common postoperative complications required for the Society for Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. We observed an overall decrease in median LOS (4.0 vs. 3.0 days, P=0.030) and ICU admission status (15% vs. 7.6%, P=0.020) after implementation of our ERAS protocol. The difference in LOS was significantly lower for anatomic lung resections, but not non-anatomic resections. There was no difference in 30-day readmissions and a 0% mortality rate in both groups. Overall, there was a low complication rate that was similar between groups. The implementation of an ERAS protocol led to decreased LOS and decreased ICU admission in patients undergoing minimally invasive lung resection. Process standardization optimizes performance by providers by decreasing decision fatigue and improving decision making, which may contribute to the improved outcomes observed in this study.

Anatomical thermal ablation as an alternative to surgical resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma.

To simulate the advantages of anatomical resection, a new strategy of anatomical thermal ablation was proposed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of anatomical thermal ablation (ATA) to treat subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma by comparing it with anatomical resection (AR) and non-anatomical resection (NAR). This retrospective cohort study enrolled hepatocellular carcinoma patients with subcapsular tumor diameter ≤ 50mm treated by ATA or surgical resection at our center from October 2015 to December 2018. ATA features ablation of the Glisson capsule, ablation of the liver parenchyma between the tumor and hepatic veins or inferior vena cava and then puncture from the surrounding part to the central part of the tumor. Outcome parameters were compared. Seventy-six patients were grouped into ATA group, 95 patients into AR group and 41 patients into NAR group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local recurrence rates were 0.0%, 0.0%, 0.0% for ATA group, 0.0%, 1.4%, 1.4% for the AR group and 0.0%, 0.0%, and 0.0% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.449). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 90.6%, 80.9%, and 74.6% for ATA group, 91.5%, 80.2%, and 80.2% for the AR group and 82.9%, 73.8%, and 73.8% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.608). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 95.2%, and 95.2% for the ATA group, 96.8%, 95.6%, and 95.6% for the AR group and 97.6%, 95.0%, and 95.0% for the NAR group, respectively (P = 0.970). No difference was found in major complication rate among these groups (P = 0.091). For subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma, ATA could be an alternative to surgical resection with its comparable treatment effect and safety.

Laparoscopic anatomic vs. nonanatomic liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma (≥5 cm) in the right lobe

ObjectiveTo determine the impacts and outcomes of laparoscopic anatomic liver resection (LAR) and laparoscopic nonanatomic resection (LNAR) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the right lobe of the liver. BackgroundThere are few comparative studies of LAR and LNAR for large HCC. MethodThree hundred thirty-seven patients underwent liver resection for large HCC (≥5 cm) at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between January 2004 and December 2022. After the exclusion of patients treated with open hepatic resection and those who had left-lobe or bilobar tumors, 94 patients were ultimately included. Patients were divided into LAR group (61 patients) and LNAR group (33 patients). After propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 matching, 31 patients were included in each group. The outcomes in the two groups were compared. ResultsLAR group had longer operative time than LNAR group (333.7 ± 113.7 vs 210 ± 117.6 min, respectively, P < 0.001), wider safety margin (1.4 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 0.7 cm, respectively, P = 0.015), and lower incidence of recurrence (25.8% vs. 54.8%, respectively, P = 0.021). ConclusionLAR required longer operative time, achieved wider safety margin, and had lower incidence of recurrence than LNAR.

An update on liver surgery- a new terminology and modern techniques.

Liver surgery is the cornerstone of the curative treatment of malignant liver tumors. However, the liver anatomy is very complex, and liver surgery is still associated with relevant morbidity despite many technical advances. The Brisbane nomenclature is used worldwide to classify liver resection. However, this nomenclature has several limitations as multiple terms are used for the same type of resection. Non-anatomical resections, multiple resections, and combined bilio-vascular resections were not mentioned. Therefore, new terminologies have been proposed for the precise and simple classification of liver resection. Furthermore, in recent years, many technical innovations have been introduced in liver surgery, such as 3D imaging systems and indocyanine green fluorescence, for better preoperative and intraoperative identification of tumor localization and critical vascular structures. Minimally invasive techniques are used more frequently in liver surgery. Potential benefits include less intraoperative blood loss, less pain, and a shorter hospital stay. The implementation of robotic systems also has an impact on liver surgery, and the number of cases reported in the literature is constantly increasing. The potential benefits of robotic liver resection over laparoscopic liver resection will be the subject of future studies.

The Sling Technique for Laparoscopic Liver Mobilization.

As liver surgery continues to evolve, be it open, laparoscopic or robotic, it remains a procedure that can deteriorate in the blink of an eye. Liver surgery in patients with hepatoma is further complicated, as the vast majority have significant fibrosis, if not cirrhosis. Thus, parenchymal sparing resection is increasingly necessary. Effective and safe intracorporeal mobilization of the liver is essential for minimal access parenchymal-sparing and conventional resection. This retrospective review of over 150 cases performed provides a hands-on approach to laparoscopic hepatic mobilization with the use of an inexpensive technique using a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver in-order to divide the ligaments holding the liver in place and optimally position the liver for parenchymal transection. Use of a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver intracorporeally is demonstrated to enable mobilization of the liver for tissue sparing non-anatomic, anatomic and major resections. Use of a 1" packing tape to "Sling" the liver intracorporeally can facilitate mobilization for resection. Surgeons hoping to master minimal access resection should also be well versed in the use of laparoscopic ultrasound and liver transplant "Piggyback" technique.