The authors conducted a surreptitious, prospective, cohort study during a 2-day series of lectures to a group of internists to determine how often physicians nod off during scientific meetings and to examine risk factors for nodding off. The incidence density curve, based upon a single nodding episode per lecture, ranged from 3 to 24 (median, 16) nod-off episodes per lecture per 100 attendees. The greatest risk factors for nodding off were speaker-related, including monotonous tone (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval 5.4 to 8.0), tweed jacket (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.0), and losing place in the lecture (odds ratio, 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.6). Other major risk factors included poor slides, failure to speak into the microphone, postprandial timing of the lecture, and dim lighting. Surprisingly, talks on obscure topics, those with little data, or those with absent analysis were at low risk for nodding off episodes, presumably because of the bizarreness of the presentation. Factors such as wandering off to inspect the screen, dropping the microphone, or just raving, although disconcerting to the audience, helped keep the listeners awake. The authors conclude that nodding off at presentations is common and may pose a risk to the health of patients. Studies are required to assess the effectiveness of interventions (eg, lessons in public speaking, wardrobe makeovers, drama classes) in preventing nodding off during lectures. —Michael D. Wagoner The authors conducted a surreptitious, prospective, cohort study during a 2-day series of lectures to a group of internists to determine how often physicians nod off during scientific meetings and to examine risk factors for nodding off. The incidence density curve, based upon a single nodding episode per lecture, ranged from 3 to 24 (median, 16) nod-off episodes per lecture per 100 attendees. The greatest risk factors for nodding off were speaker-related, including monotonous tone (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval 5.4 to 8.0), tweed jacket (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 3.0), and losing place in the lecture (odds ratio, 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.6). Other major risk factors included poor slides, failure to speak into the microphone, postprandial timing of the lecture, and dim lighting. Surprisingly, talks on obscure topics, those with little data, or those with absent analysis were at low risk for nodding off episodes, presumably because of the bizarreness of the presentation. Factors such as wandering off to inspect the screen, dropping the microphone, or just raving, although disconcerting to the audience, helped keep the listeners awake. The authors conclude that nodding off at presentations is common and may pose a risk to the health of patients. Studies are required to assess the effectiveness of interventions (eg, lessons in public speaking, wardrobe makeovers, drama classes) in preventing nodding off during lectures. —Michael D. Wagoner
Read full abstract