IN recent decades, the imperfect, and sometimes quite misleading, historiography on Joseph II's sole reign inherited from the periods before and since the watershed of the First World War, has been modified by archival research and textual re-interpretation An early model for this was Professor Derek Beales's ‘The false Joseph II’, published in 1975, which exposed the fraudulent status of the 1790 collection of Joseph's supposed letters on which subsequent historians had relied. Further work on different aspects of the ‘revolutionary emperor’ has repetitively demonstrated that only careful use of original sources can crack the carapace of truths, half-truths and errors which still covers the years (1780–90) of his personal rule. Antal Szántay's volume is a distinguished contribution to this continuing process. His subject is Joseph's introduction of new systems of provincial government in Hungary from 1785, Austrian Lombardy from 1786, and the Austrian Netherlands from 1787. A unifying theme in the book is Joseph's insistence that government in all the parts of the Monarchy should have the same shape, the same principles, and the same aim, the general good (cp. p. 161). Thus, the introduction in Hungary of ten Districts, each with its Commissar; in Lombardy, under a new Supreme Council of Government (Supremo Consiglio di Governo), of seven ‘Political Intendancies’ (Intendenze Politiche); and in the Austrian Netherlands, under a new General Government (Conseil du Gouvernement Général), of nine Circles, each ruled by an Intendant, was marked by a common aim and a common method. The aim was to substitute rational and effective government, based on facts, for Estates-based administrations characterised, in Joseph's view, by self-interest and incompetence. The method was to charge an official (the Commissar, the Intendant), representing monarchical authority, with responsibility for acquiring control, by obsessive tours of duty, of all local problems, and either resolving them or reporting on them. The scope of the work involved, with its heavy social and economic emphasis, was huge (and, as examples show, almost beyond human powers). A casual consequence of this new system was the abolition, or severe curtailment, of Estates functions, and the abrupt end of the career, and pay, of those performing them. The brutality with which, in the edict of March 1787 announcing the new Belgian Circles, those deprived of their salaries were permitted to petition for relief, is breathtaking. Szántay shows, with copious and fascinating footnote extracts from the documents, the progress of the, typically acerbic, dialogue accompanying the working out, and implementation, of these reforms. Acerbic, because Joseph is shown relying on natural law, and the principle of equality, influenced especially, Szántay argues, by the writings of J.G. von Justi, against opponents in the official machine who stressed precedent and political realities. The Hungarian Chancellery, for example, urged a concessionary format for government announcement of the new Commissars, to lessen the hatred they would attract, only to be told by Joseph that he himself attracted it: and so must all who sought the public good (p. 86). As many excerpts demonstrate, Joseph's philosophy was directed towards the common man, and actuated by hatred of noble power, which, in his view, only a beneficent monarch could control (cp. p. 79 n.).
Read full abstract