No Evidence Of Disease Activity Research Articles

The role of ADC values within the normal-appearing brain in the prognosis of multiple sclerosis activity during interferon-\u03b2 therapy in the 3-year follow-up: a preliminary report

Predictors of multiple sclerosis (MS) activity during disease-modifying treatment are being extensively investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the prognosis of NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) status during IFN-β (interferon-β) treatment, using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements obtained at initial MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). In 87 MS patients treated with IFN-β, ADC values were calculated for 13 regions of normal-appearing white and grey matter (NAWM, NAGM) based on MRI performed with a 1.5 T magnet before (MS0, n = 45) or after one year of therapy (MS1, n = 42). Associations were evaluated between ADC, conventional MRI findings, demographic and clinical factors and NEDA status within the following 3 years using logistic, Cox and multinomial logistic regression models. NEDA rates in the MS0 group were 64.4%, 46.5% and 33.3% after the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year of treatment, respectively and in MS1 patients 71.4% and 48.7% for the periods 1st–2nd and 1st–3rd years of treatment, respectively. ADC values in the NAWM regions contributed to loss of NEDA and its clinical and radiological components, with a 1–3% increase in the risk of NEDA loss (p = 0.0001–0.0489) in both groups. ADC measurements may have an additional prognostic value with regard to NEDA status.

Long-term outcome in multiple sclerosis patients treated with fingolimod

Background and PurposeOngoing disease activity during treatment has been associated to worse disability outcomes in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to assess the 5-year response to fingolimod (FTY) treatment in patients with relapsing-remitting (RRMS) in a real-life setting. MethodsWe included RRMS patients who received FTY for at least 6 months and had a follow-up ≥ 60 months. Treatment response was assessed through the No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA)-3 status. ResultsEighty-eight patients were included, of which 51 (58.0%) were NTZ-naïve and 37 (42.0%) NTZ-switchers. The mean age was 38.9 (9.5) years and 58 (65.9%) were females. The proportion of patients on FTY treatment who maintained the NEDA-3 status at 5 years was 55.9% among NTZ-naïve patients and 35.0% among NTZ-switchers (p=0.138). Predictors of NEDA-3 status were lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score at baseline (adjOR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.77; p=0.013) in NTZ-naïve patients and fewer relapses in the 12 months before starting FTY in NTZ-switchers (adjOR=0.05, 95% CI 0.003-0.79; p=0.034). ConclusionsThis study supports the potential of FTY as a disease-modifying treatment for the long-term management of RRMS patients. Patients with milder disability and fewer clinical relapses before treatment may achieve a better disease control.

Health economics and patient outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus disease-modifying therapies for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the United States of America

ObjectiveTo estimate differences in treatment costs and health outcomes between non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). MethodsWe collected data on costs and reimbursements for patients who underwent HSCT for RRMS at Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago (USA) between January 2017 and January 2019. The costs of HSCT were compared against those for DMTs in the United States, obtained from the literature. We also conducted a literature review to interpret the cost comparisons in terms of disease control and patients’ wellbeing defined as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), neurologic disability by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and quality of life by the short form SF-36, respectively. ResultsOutside of the data, herein, no other studies on cost of HSCT for RRMS were found in the literature. HSCT mean total costs, based on our own hospital, were $85,184 (range $70,635 to $120,260). Mean revenue collected was $95,268 (range $16,544 to $173,204). In comparison, according to the literature, 2019 DMT costs in the USA ranged from $80,000 to $100,000 per year per patient. Compared to DMTs, studies of HSCT reported greater improvement in no evidence of disease activity, disability, and quality of life. LimitationsCosts of HSCT would be expected to vary by conditioning regimen utilized, patient selection, center experience, and regional variation. No cost data on other HSCT regimens or on the three most recently licensed DMTs, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, and cladribine, are available. Randomized trials for cost comparisons are missing and variations in HSCT designs, populations, and methodology preclude more precise cost estimates. ConclusionCosts of non-myeloablative HSCT after which DMTs are indefinitely discontinued, are approximately the same cost as those for one year of prescription DMTs. Since DMTs assessed in this analysis are given on an ongoing basis, whilst HSCT is not, HSCT is expected to produce long-term cost-savings. When considered alongside the available clinical evidence, which suggests that HSCT may generate more health gains than DMTs, HSCT is likely to represent a cost-effective use of resources. Model-based health economic analyses are required to substantiate this conclusion.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT): Standard of Care for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been used in the treatment of highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) for over two decades. It has been demonstrated to be highly efficacious in relapsing–remitting (RR) MS patients failing to respond to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs). AHSCT guarantees higher rates of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) than those achieved with any other DMDs, but it is also associated with greater short-term risks which have limited its use. In the 2019 updated EBMT and ASBMT guidelines, which review the clinical evidence of AHSCT in MS, AHSCT indication for highly active RRMS has changed from “clinical option” to “standard of care”. On this basis, AHSCT must be proposed on equal footing with second-line DMDs to patients with highly active RRMS, instead of being considered as a last resort after failure of all available treatments. The decision-making process requires a close collaboration between transplant hematologists and neurologists and a full discussion of risk–benefit of AHSCT and alternative treatments. In this context, we propose a standardized protocol for decision-making and informed consent process.

Can We Improve the Monitoring of People With Multiple Sclerosis Using Simple Tools, Data Sharing, and Patient Engagement?

Technological innovation is transforming traditional clinical practice, enabling people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) to contribute health care outcome data remotely between clinic visits. In both relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients may experience variable disability accrual and symptoms throughout their disease course. The potential impact on the quality of life (QoL) in pwMS and their families and carers is profound. The introduction of treatment targets, such as NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) and NEPAD (no evidence of progression or active disease), that guide clinical decision-making, highlight the importance of utilizing sensitive instruments to measure and track disease activity and progression. However, the gold standard neurological disability tool—expanded disability severity scale (EDSS)—has universally recognized limitations. With strides made in our understanding of MS pathophysiology and DMT responsiveness, maintaining the status quo of measuring disability progression is no longer the recommended option. Outside the clinical trial setting, a comprehensive monitoring system has not been robustly established for pwMS. A 21st-century approach is required to integrate clinical, paraclinical, and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from electronic health records, local databases, and patient registries. Patient and public involvement (PPI) is critical in the design and implementation of this workflow. To take full advantage of the potential of digital technology in the monitoring and care and QoL of pwMS will require iterative feedback between pwMS, health care professionals (HCPs), scientists, and digital experts.

Natalizumab in patients with multiple sclerosis in Colombia: a case series

INTRODUCTION:Natalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody prescribed in the treatment of multiple sclerosis, the most prevalent chronic and inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) status is the goal of multiple sclerosis treatment. METHODOLOGY:The clinical records of 22 patients with multiple sclerosis, followed for a mean of 9.2 years (range: 1.9 -18.3 years) between 2000 and 2018 were analyzed. These patients received treatment with natalizumab in a high-complexity neurological outpatient clinic in Bogotá, Colombia. RESULTS:Eighteen patients (82%) reached NEDA status within a median time of six months. Seven patients (32%) tested positive for anti-JC virus antibodies. However, none of them developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. During the evaluation period, five patients (23%) presented new lesions and 17 patients (77%) had relapses before reaching NEDA status. CONCLUSIONS:This study gave an exploratory analysis of the characteristics of a series of patients with MS in the Colombian context. In the retrospective analysis, it was observed that more than 80% of the studied sample that received treatment with natalizumab, reached NEDA status. Despite the methodological limitations inherent to this type of study and sample size, it suggests that natalizumab could be an appropriate medication for the management of multiple sclerosis in Colombia.

Lipid Mediator Profiles Predict Response to Therapy with an Oral Frankincense Extract in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Lipid mediators (LMs) are a unique class of immunoregulatory signalling molecules and known to be affected by frankincense extracts. We performed LM profiling by metabololipidomics in plasma samples from 28 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) patients who took a standardised frankincense extract (SFE) daily for eight months in a clinical phase IIa trial (NCT01450124) and in 28 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Magnetic resonance imaging, immunological outcomes and serum neurofilament light chain levels were correlated to changes in the LM profiles of the RR-MS cohort. Eight out of 44 analysed LMs were significantly reduced during an eight-month treatment period by the SFE and seven of these eight significant LM derive from the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) pathway. Baseline levels of 12- and 15-LO products were elevated in patients who exhibited disease activity (EDA) during SFE treatment compared to no-evidence-of-disease-activity (NEDA) patients and could predict treatment response to the SFE in a prediction model at baseline. Oral treatment with an SFE significantly reduces 5-LO-derived LMs in RR-MS patients during an eight-month treatment period. Treatment response to an SFE, however, seems to be related to 12-,15-LO and cyclooxygenase product levels before SFE exposure. Further studies should confirm their biomarker potential in RR-MS and SFE treatment.

Wearing-off at the end of natalizumab dosing interval and risk of MS disease activity: A prospective 1-year follow-up study

Natalizumab effectively prevents disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis by binding α4 integrin and inhibiting leukocyte migration to the central nervous system. We recently reported an association between low natalizumab receptor occupancy and subjective wearing-off symptoms at the end of the 4-week dosing interval. Here, we aimed to evaluate the short-term risk of disease activity in a 1-year prospective follow-up of the same patient cohort (n = 40). We found that all patients available for follow-up after one year (n = 35) fulfilled the criteria for no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). Thus, wearing-off symptoms were not associated with increased short-term risk of disease activity. Longer follow-up in a larger patient cohort is required to establish whether therapeutic efficacy is maintained in patients with wearing-off symptoms.

A phase 2 multicenter study of ublituximab, a novel glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis

Background: Ublituximab, a novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen, is glycoengineered for enhanced B-cell targeting through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Greater ADCC may allow lower doses and shorter infusion times versus other anti-CD20 mAbs. Objective: The objective was to determine optimal dose, infusion time, and activity of ublituximab in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Methods: This is a phase 2, placebo-controlled study. Patients received three ublituximab infusions (150 mg over 1–4 hours on day 1 and 450–600 mg over 1–3 hours on day 15 and week 24) in six dosing cohorts. The primary endpoint was B-cell depletion. Results: In all cohorts (N = 48), median B-cell depletion was >99% by week 4, maintained at weeks 24 and 48. Most common adverse events (AEs) were infusion-related reactions (all grade 1–2), with no apparent increased incidence at shorter infusion times. There were no AE-related discontinuations. At weeks 24 and 48, no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (p = 0.003) and a 10.6% decrease in T2 lesion volume (p = 0.002) were detected. The annualized relapse rate was 0.07; 93% remained relapse free on study. Overall, 74% of patients had no evidence of disease activity (NEDA). Conclusion: Ublituximab was safely infused as rapid as 1 hour, producing robust B-cell depletion and profound reductions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and relapses.

Experience with rituximab therapy in a real-life sample of multiple sclerosis patients.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, neuroinflammatory, and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. B cells have recently emerged as a promising target to significantly reduce inflammatory disease activity in MS, with successful trial studies using antiCD20 therapies. However, real-life data about safety and efficacy are limited. To analyze the clinical and radiological inflammatory activity, adherence to therapy, and safety of rituximab (RTX) in an MS patients' sample, treated from 2015 to 2018 in our center PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study on prospectively collected data about relapses, disability progression, and radiological activity (new T2 lesions and Gd-enhancing lesions) were recorded and used to assess no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) at 12months. RTX-related adverse events were recorded. RTX was administered intravenously at a dosage of 1000mg twice 2weeks apart, then every 6months. Sixty-nine patients were included. Fifty-three (76.8%) had a relapsing-remitting, two a primary progressive course, and 14 a secondary progressive course. The mean follow-up period was 16 ± 9.7months. Thirty-five (50.7%) patients had relapses in the year prior to RTX therapy, with a mean annualized relapse rate of 0.75, significantly reduced to 0.36 at 12months (p < 0.001). Among the 36 patients included in the study who had an MRI available at 12months, MRI activity was reduced from 88% (n = 32) to 8.3% (n = 3) at follow-up (p < 0.001). Twelve (17.4%) patients suspended RTX during the study. Our real-life experience confirms that off-label therapy with RTX may represent a valid, cost-effective therapeutic option in MS.

Monoclonal antibodies - a revolutionary therapy in multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has an increasing incidence and affects a young s egment of t he population, having a major impact on patients and consequently on society. The multifactorial aetiology and pathogenesis of this disease are incompletely known at present, but autoimmune aggression has a documented mechanism. Since the 1990s, immunomodulatory drugs of high efficacy and a good safety profile have been launched. But the concept of NEDA (No Evidence of Disease Activity) remains the target to achieve. Thus, the new revolutionary class of monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) used in multiple medical fields, from this perspective represents a challenge even for multiple sclerosis, including the primary progressive form, for which there has been no treatment until recently. In this article, we will review monoclonal antibodies' use for MS, presenting their advantages and disadvantages, based on data accumulated since 2004 when the first monoclonal antibody was approved for active forms of the disease. There is still a need for personalised medicines, with a specific target, which should have fewer adverse effects and drug interactions.

Impact of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation on disability and brain atrophy in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Background: Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a valuable option in aggressive relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), but its efficacy in secondary progressive (SP)-MS is still controversial. Objective: Assessing efficacy of aHSCT in SP-MS by clinical-radiological outcomes. Methods: Open-label monocentric retrospective study enrolling consecutive SP-MS patients treated with BEAM-aHSCT in the period 1999–2016. Results: In total, 26 SP-MS patients with moderate–severe disability were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) at years 5 and 10 after aHSCT were, respectively, 42% and 30%. Out of 16 patients who worsened, only 6 patients (23% overall) maintained continuous disability accrual (CDA), whereas 10 patients stabilized following one single-step Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening. CDA-free survival was 74% at 5–10 years. No relapses or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity were reported, thus no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 corresponded to PFS. Annualized rate of brain atrophy (AR-BVL) normalized after 1 year in 55% of the cases analysed (12/22). Conclusion: BEAM-aHSCT halted CDA and normalized AR-BVL in most of the treated patients, inducing long-term remission of inflammatory activity at a median follow-up of 99 months (range 27–222). These data suggest that CDA might still be mainly driven by inflammation in a subgroup of SP-MS and could therefore be reversed by treatments. CDA should be analysed independently from any isolated disability worsening.

Event-Driven Immunoprofiling Predicts Return of Disease Activity in Alemtuzumab-Treated Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), characterized by specific patterns of depletion and repopulation. As an induction-like treatment concept, two mandatory infusion courses can inhibit long-term disease activity in the majority of patients, and additional courses can successfully manage subsequent re-emergence of disease activity. Currently, there are no biomarkers to identify patients with re-emergent disease activity requiring retreatment.Methods: In this study, we systematically characterized 16 MS patients commencing alemtuzumab. Clinical parameters, MRI and detailed immunoprofiling were conducted every 3 months for up to 84 months.Results: Alemtuzumab led to significant decrease in clinical disease activity in all evaluated patients. Nine out of 16 patients presented with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 up to 84 months (“complete-responder”), while 7 patients demonstrated clinical or/and subclinical MRI disease activity and received alemutzumab retreatment (“partial-responder”). In both response categories, all T- and B-cell subsets were markedly depleted after alemtuzumab therapy. In particular, absolute numbers of Th1 and Th17 cells were markedly decreased and remained stable below baseline levels—this effect was particularly pronounced in complete-responders. While mean cell numbers did not differ significantly between groups, analysis of event-driven immunoprofiling demonstrated that absolute numbers of Th1 and Th17 cells showed a reproducible increase starting 6 months before relapse activity. This change appears to predict emergent disease activity when compared with stable disease.Conclusion: Studies with larger patient populations are needed to confirm that frequent immunoprofiling may assist in evaluating clinical decision-making of alemtuzumab retreatment.

Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered to be a central nervous system (CNS) chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease, affecting more than 2 million individuals worldwide. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (aMSCs) in treating MS patients. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trial databases were searched in September 2019. The analysis was conducted for three endpoints: transplant-related mortality (TRM), rate of disease progression, and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status. RevMan and the metaprop command of the meta package in R was used in assessing the efficacy and safety of aMSCs. Subgroup analyses were performed for exploration of heterogeneity regarding outcomes. Nine studies comprising 133 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of TRM was 0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0%–0.3%). The rate of progression was 16% at 6 months (95% CI 10%–27%) and 35% at 1 year (95% CI 27%–46%). Lower 6-month and 1-year progression rates were significantly associated with intrathecal injection (p = 0.02; p = 0.003). The pooled proportion of NEDA patients at 6 months was 72% (95% CI 58%–89%) and at 1 year was 62% (95% CI 42%–81%). Cell transplantation with aMSCs in MS patients is safe, with the largest benefit profile obtained in patients with aMSCs intrathecal injection.

No evidence of disease activity status in patients treated with early vs. delayed subcutaneous interferon β-1a

BackgroundClinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is defined as a monophasic clinical episode highly suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). Regardless, studies have shown that treatment at this early stage of MS can delay a second event and prolong the transition to clinically diagnosed MS. The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to determine the effect of early CIS treatment with once weekly (qw) or three times weekly (tiw) subcutaneous interferon (scIFN) β-1a vs. delayed treatment (DT) on the composite endpoint of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3. MethodsIn REFLEX, patients with CIS were randomized to double-blind scIFN β-1a 44 µg tiw, qw, or placebo for 24 months. Upon clinically-definite MS, patients switched to open-label scIFN β-1a tiw. Patients who completed REFLEX entered an extension (REFLEXION). Patients initially randomized to placebo switched to tiw (DT); scIFN β-1a patients continued their initial qw/tiw regimen for up to 60-months post-randomization. This post-hoc analysis was conducted in the integrated intent-to-treat REFLEX plus REFLEXION population (tiw, n = =171; qw, n = =175; DT, n = =171). All p values are nominal. CIS was defined using the McDonald 2010 criteria. ResultsPatients receiving early treatment (ET) with scIFN β-1a tiw and qw were more likely to achieve NEDA-3 than DT at year 2 (tiw vs. DT: OR 4.26, 95% CI 2.02–8.98, p = =0.0001; qw vs. DT: OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.39–6.43, p = =0.005). Compared with DT, ET with scIFN β-1a tiw was more likely to achieve NEDA-3 at year 3 (OR 3.73, 95% CI 1.63–8.55, p = =0.002) and year 5 (OR 12.96, 95% CI 1.66–101.04, p = =0.015). Between ET regimens, the odds of achieving NEDA-3 were not significantly improved by scIFN β-1a 44 µg tiw at year 2 (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.81–2.50, p = =0.22) but were at year 3 (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.11–4.60, p = =0.024) and year 5 (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.01–10.22, p = =0.048), indicating that the beneficial effects of more frequent scIFN β-1a dosing become more apparent over time in patients with CIS. In the subgroup of patients with Gd+ lesions at baseline the odds for achieving NEDA-3 were higher for ET up to year 2 compared with DT (tiw: OR 10.21, 95% CI 1.23–84.82, p = =0.03; qw: OR 8.97, 95% CI 1.08–74.28, p = =0.04). In patients without Gd+ lesions at baseline, those receiving ET were more likely to achieve NEDA-3 at year 2 (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.56–8.10, p = =0.003), year 3 (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.05–6.18, p = =0.04) and year 5 (OR 9.63, 95% CI 1.19–77.79, p = =0.034) than patients who received DT. ConclusionsET with scIFN β-1a tiw was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving NEDA-3 not only at 2 but also at 3 and 5 years.

No evidence of disease activity including cognition (NEDA-3 plus) in naïve pediatric multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab.

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by high inflammatory activity, aggressive course and early development of physical and cognitive disability. A highly effective early treatment must be considered in POMS. To evaluate safety and efficacy of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS. 20 naïve POMS (13F, 7M; mean age: 13.8 ± 2.7years) were treated with NTZ for at least 24months (mean number of infusions: 42 ± 20). No evidence of disease activity (NEDA)-3 plus status, i.e., no relapse, no disease progression (EDSS score), no radiological activity and no cognitive decline, was evaluated. After 2years of NTZ treatment, a significant reduction in the mean EDSS score (p < 0.0001) was observed in the whole cohort. During the follow-up, evidence of disease activity on MRI was observed in two patients (10%) and a mild decline in cognition was observed in other two. No patient had clinical relapse. At the time of last visit NEDA-3 plus status was maintained in 16 (80%) patients. No major adverse event was observed. Early treatment of aggressive POMS with NTZ proved to be highly effective in achieving and maintaining the NEDA-3 plus status. Our data support the use of NTZ as first treatment choice in POMS.

Clinical efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in postmarketing practice

Clinical trials confirm alemtuzumab efficacy for multiple sclerosis treatment in terms of both conventional measures and combined criteria such as NEDA (no evidence of disease activity). However, established drug efficacy and convenient dosing schedule are balanced by the risk of serious adverse events. Therefore, it is necessary to inform physicians about the benefits of alemtuzumab therapy along with the pattern of its safety profile.The present review provides the analysis of alemtuzumab real-world studies in Europe, USA and other parts of the world. The information obtained can help physicians to prescribe and administer the drug properly and to perform effective safety monitoring for early detection of adverse events and saving the maximum treatment benefit for the patient.

Outcomes of natalizumab treatment within 3\u2009years of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis diagnosis: a prespecified 2-year interim analysis of STRIVE

BackgroundSTRIVE is a multicenter, observational, open-label, single-arm study of natalizumab in anti–JC virus (JCV) seronegative patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The objective of this prespecified 2-year interim analysis was to determine the effectiveness of natalizumab in establishing and maintaining no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) in early RRMS.MethodsPatients aged 18–65 years had an RRMS diagnosis < 3 years prior to screening, an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 4.0, and anti-JCV antibody negative status. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and yearly thereafter. Cumulative probabilities of 24-week–confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement were evaluated at 2 years. NEDA (no 24-week–confirmed EDSS worsening, no relapses, no gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and no new/newly enlarging T2-hyperintense lesions) was evaluated over 2 years. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Score (MSIS-29) were assessed at baseline and 1 and 2 years. Statistical analysis used summary statistics and frequency distributions.ResultsThe study population (N = 222) had early RRMS, with mean (standard deviation [SD]) time since diagnosis of 1.6 (0.77) years and mean (SD) baseline EDSS score of 2.0 (1.13). NEDA was achieved in 105 of 187 patients (56.1%) during year 1 and 120 of 163 (73.6%) during year 2. Over 2 years, 76 of 171 patients (44.4%) attained overall NEDA. Probabilities of 24-week–confirmed EDSS worsening and improvement were 14.1% and 28.4%, respectively. After 2 years, patients exhibited significant improvements from baseline in SDMT (n = 158; mean [SD]: 4.3 [11.8]; p < 0.001) and MSIS-29 physical (n = 153; mean [SD]: − 3.9 [14.7]; p = 0.001), psychological (n = 152; mean [SD]: − 2.0 [7.9]; p < 0.001), and quality-of-life (n = 153; mean [SD]: − 6.0 [21.3]; p < 0.001) scores.ConclusionsThese results support natalizumab’s effectiveness over 2 years, during which nearly half of early RRMS patients achieved NEDA. During year 2, nearly 75% of patients exhibited NEDA. Over 2 years, patients continued to experience significant cognitive and quality-of-life benefits. These results are limited by the lack of a comparator group to determine the extent of a placebo effect.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT01485003, registered 5 December 2011.

Long-term disease activity and disability progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients on natalizumab

BackgroundNatalizumab is an effective treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Data on clinical and imaging measures predictive of disease activity and progression during treatment is limited. ObjectiveTo determine clinical and imaging predictors of long-term inflammatory disease activity and disability progression in RRMS patients on natalizumab. MethodsPatients (n = 135) were selected from our prospective observational natalizumab cohort and monitored using brain MRI and extensive clinical testing. Progression and improvement on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) and no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) status were determined using measurements after the initial phase of inflammation and the early anti-inflammatory impact of natalizumab. ResultsEDSS progression was seen in 43.7% of patients and EDSS improvement in 17.8%. Median follow-up was 4.9 years (IQR 3.6–6.0). Patients with a longer disease duration at natalizumab initiation have a higher hazard for earlier EDSS progression (HR 1.05, CI 1.00–1.09, p = 0.037) and a higher pre-baseline relapse rate predicted a longer NEPAD status (HR 1.70, CI 1.06–2.72, p = 0.028). ConclusionThe results suggest that starting natalizumab early, during active inflammatory disease results in a more favourable outcome. When taking into account early inflammation and the impact of natalizumab on disease activity during the initial treatment phase, a higher than expected proportion of patients showed disability progression.

Optimal response to dimethyl fumarate is mediated by a reduction of Th1-like Th17 cells after 3months of treatment.

AimDimethyl fumarate (DMF) is one of the most promising therapies for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients since it has shown immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects. However, a percentage of RRMS patients do not exhibit an optimal response to DMF. The objective of this study was to identify early biomarkers of treatment response by analyzing changes in peripheral leukocyte subpopulations directly in whole blood samples.MethodsA longitudinal and prospective study analyzing peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations in 22 RRMS patients before initiating DMF treatment (baseline) and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow‐up was performed. Differences between no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) and ongoing disease activity (ODA) patients were analyzed.ResultsThe beneficial effect of DMF was associated with a specific depletion of memory CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and B cells. Importantly, only NEDA patients showed (a) a shift from a pro‐ to an antiinflammatory profile, with an increase of Th2 cells and a decrease of Th1‐like Th17 lymphocytes; and (b) an increase of regulatory CD56bright NK cells.ConclusionThe optimal response to DMF is mediated by a shift to antiinflammatory and immunoregulatory profile, which puts forward Th1‐like Th17 lymphocytes as a potential early biomarker of treatment response.