MLR, 97.4, 2002 945 during occupation, 'narratives of resistance', 'nation-buildingnarratives', 'narratives of internal dissent' produced in the immediate wake of postcolonial political independence , and 'transcultural narratives' which emphasize fluidity and post-national sensibilities. It is, clearly, a model based firmlyon the political and historical experiences of 'new Commonwealth' countries in Africa, South Asia, and the Caribbean, and unsurprisingly the majority of Fraser's textual examples come from these regions . Fraser's mapping usefully contextualizes the novels discussed, especially those dealing with representations of the nation, and underwrites his analysis of novelistic language, use of tense, person, voice, typology, symbol, myth,time, duration, politics, and parody. Such is the excellence of Fraser's criticism that one is surprised and disappointed in turning to the final chapter, entitled 'Theocolonialism', to find an unseemly and disingenuous rant against postcolonial studies and theory (although there is the intimation that the author's tongue is perhaps a little in his cheek). In his closing remarks Fraser loses much of his poise and judiciousness in volleying fortha number of questionable critical cliches. Postcolonial theory is dismissed as little more than a raft of bizarre, seductive terminology which constitutes merely a bad case of logorrhea. Fraser never stops here to think about the extent to which his own criticism, especially with its focus upon politics, dissent, and nationalism, is clearly indebted to impor? tant intellectual developments in postcolonial theory. Even worse is his indefensible view that the older paradigm of Commonwealth literary studies 'was an academic annexe to neocolonialism' and equivalent to 'old-style' anthropology. Fraser might do better here to think of scholars such as Arthur Ravenscroft, a major figure in the study of Commonwealth literature who lefthis native South Africa in protest against Apartheid and dedicated his life to bringing attention to the literature of colonized peoples. It is unfortunate that the vital political agency of such scholars is overlooked in Fraser's droll diatribe. Coupled with some rather odd typographical errors (Ishiguro becomes 'Ishiguru', Shirley Hazzard becomes 'Izzard', while the titles of some texts lose their definite article), one abiding impression of the book is impatience. Sadly, this detracts from the enjoyment of what is in the main a refreshing study. University of Leeds John McLeod Language, Poetry andNationhood: Scots as a Poetic Language from 1878 to thePresent. By J. Derrick McClure. East Lothian: Tuckwell Press. 2000. v + 239 pp. ?i4-99Scottish Women's Fiction, ig20s to 1960s: Journeys into Being. Ed. by Carol Anderson and Aileen Christianson. East Lothian: Tuckwell Press. 2000. 177 pp. ?9-99A sure sign that one is dealing with a minor literature is the minor literary criti? cism that usually attaches to it. The criticism of Scottish literature remains decidedly minor, still awaiting the profound intellectual or theoretical milestone that may definitively enlarge that literature's place on the map. Neither of the brace of volumes under review is likely to provide such impetus, dealing as each does with many ofthe minor figures of that minor literature. At best they chart, often in a very summary and overconcise manner, the contributions of a number of miscellaneous figures of widely varying importance. J.Derrick McLure's introductory chapter to his volume does, however, provide one of the most sober discussions of 'Scots' in the last century or so (is it a language, or a dialect, or something indeterminately in-between?) by recourse to a well-balanced historical discussion, concluding that 'the development of a more careful attention to 946 Reviews the nature and appropriate poetic functions of the language, and a clearer awareness of the political implications of its use, led to an enormous widening of the range of Scots, both internally by a vastly more creative and imaginative use of its linguistic resources than had characterised most nineteenth-century poetry, and externally by a challengingand deliberately iconoclastic approach to its potential range of topics and functions' (p. x). There is a worrying circularity about the argument here, indicated by the fact that 'functions' of the language occupy positions of both cause and effect , but the profound point that literary Scots has in fact developed and grown in a period in which spoken Scots has contracted and become...