YES,31, 200o YES,31, 200o mentioned the fact that the RuskinMay Queen ceremony (seep. I25) recentlytook the formof crowning a (black)May King. May it catch on in Virginia. UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK MALCOLM HARDMAN Ventures intoChildland.Victorians, FairyTales,andFemininity.By U. C. KNOEPFLMACHER. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. I998. xxi + 444 pp. $35; ?27.95. U. C. Knoepflmacheris a well-knownname in children'sliteraturecriticismas well as in the area of Victorian literature,and with thisbook he announces his ambitious claim that 'I may well have produced the most comprehensivehistory(literaryand cultural)yet writtenabout the so-called golden age of children'sliterature'(pp. xiixiii ).Knoepflmacher'sprojectisto examine sevenauthors,John Ruskin,Thackeray, George MacDonald, Lewis Carroll,Jean Ingelow, ChristinaRossetti, and Juliana Horatia Ewing, and their writings from the early I850s to the early I87os. He particularlywishesto arguethattheirworksfor childrenare determinedby issuesof gender and the relationshipsbetween fantasy,as a genre, and gender. Knoepflmacher's main framework is biographical, which he feels he needs to defend somewhat against 'poststructuralistliterary critics, who distance the text from the author by insistingon the impersonalityof all writing' (p. xiv), in the two very shortsectionson theory and methodology in the whole book (in the 'prefaceof sorts'and in the 'epilogue').He writes,then, that 'sinceI never look at biographyas being in any way independent of culture and history, and since my biographical forays always allow the instability and incompleteness of any author's ostensible design, I hope that you will not be too put off by my occasional probings into adult and child selves' (p. xiv). But, as his own comment, apparently inadvertently, reveals, these 'biographicalforays' have extensive consequences for his argument that Knoepflmacherseems unaware of. The most importantand pervasiveresultis the positing of unproblematic 'adult' and 'child' selves, as well as assuming a relatively straightforwardcategory of 'femininity'as being constituted by the selfevidently female (either in the texts or in the biographies). The outcome is that Knoepflmacher'sreadingsof his chosen texts,particularlyin thefirstseven chapters, are largelyproduced by, and in the service of, his 'biographicalforays'.Biography, moreover, here effaces much of the very 'culture' and 'history' Knoepflmacher himselfseems so anxious to capture,forpositingunproblematic'childselves'entails the creation of a consistent, trans-historical, and trans-cultural identity. Knoepflmacherfollowsthispath (stillfavouredin most children'sliteraturestudies) in the established way: some twentieth-century psychologists and psychoanalysts (Jessica Benjamin, Nancy Chodorow, Melanie Klein, Julia Kristeva, and Donald Winnicott) are drafted in, apparently at random, to validate assertionsabout this 'child'. With respect to gender, too, an inadequate theorization of 'femininity', and its production by biography, lead to the first seven chapters of the book consisting primarily of thematic examinations of texts used to confirm and amplify psychobiographical speculations about boys separated too early from their mothers and seeking female 'complements'. The problems about the 'child' and the 'feminine' are maintained too by the fact that Knoepflmacher in this (lengthy) book does not mention, orengage with, criticswho have raisedimportantchallengesand questions about his field: Claudia Nelson's study of gender in nineteenth-century children's fiction, BoysWillBe Girls:TheFeminine EthicandBritishChildren's Fiction,I857-I9I7 (New Brunswick,NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1991), for instance, or Jacqueline mentioned the fact that the RuskinMay Queen ceremony (seep. I25) recentlytook the formof crowning a (black)May King. May it catch on in Virginia. UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK MALCOLM HARDMAN Ventures intoChildland.Victorians, FairyTales,andFemininity.By U. C. KNOEPFLMACHER. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. I998. xxi + 444 pp. $35; ?27.95. U. C. Knoepflmacheris a well-knownname in children'sliteraturecriticismas well as in the area of Victorian literature,and with thisbook he announces his ambitious claim that 'I may well have produced the most comprehensivehistory(literaryand cultural)yet writtenabout the so-called golden age of children'sliterature'(pp. xiixiii ).Knoepflmacher'sprojectisto examine sevenauthors,John Ruskin,Thackeray, George MacDonald, Lewis Carroll,Jean Ingelow, ChristinaRossetti, and Juliana Horatia Ewing, and their writings from the early I850s to the early I87os. He particularlywishesto arguethattheirworksfor childrenare determinedby issuesof gender and the relationshipsbetween fantasy,as a genre, and gender. Knoepflmacher's main framework is biographical, which he feels he needs to defend somewhat against 'poststructuralistliterary critics, who distance the text from the author by insistingon the impersonalityof all writing' (p. xiv), in the two very shortsectionson...
Read full abstract