Nine-step Test Research Articles

Establishment of the Normative Value of Classical Bluestone's Nine-Step Inflation/Deflation Tympanometric Eustachian Tube Function Test.

The nine-step inflation/deflation tympanometric Eustachian tube function test (commonly referred to as the nine-step test) is a widely utilized method for evaluating Eustachian tube function (ETF). This study aimed to establish normative values for the nine-step test to facilitate the diagnosis of Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). A total of 160 adults, including 70 healthy volunteers and 90 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), were recruited for this study. Participants were further categorized into "fair ETF" and "poor ETF" groups based on their scores on the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Eustachian tube function was assessed using both the nine-step test and the ETDQ-7. The diagnostic accuracy of the maximal peak pressure difference (MPD) from the nine-step test was evaluated, using an ETDQ-7 score of ≥14 as the reference standard. Discriminative ability was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. An MPD value of ≤4 yielded an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.619, indicating moderate discriminative ability in the Taiwanese population. The median MPD value on the nine-step test was 9.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.5-14.0) in participants with an ETDQ-7 score of <14, compared to a median MPD value of 7.5 (IQR: 2.5-12.0) in those with an ETDQ-7 score of ≥14 (p = 0.033). This finding suggests a potential association between MPD values and ETDQ-7 scores. This study identified an MPD value of 4 as a normative cutoff for screening ETD in a Taiwanese population. However, the diagnostic discriminative power of this parameter was moderate.

Interpretation of the nine-step test for Eustachian tube function should consider mastoid cavity volume.

The modified nine-step test is a classical method for evaluating Eustachian tube function. However, clinical interpretation of the increased maximal difference in middle ear pressure (mdMEP) in the modified nine-step test is unknown. We hypothesised that the different reservoir effects of the mastoid cavity can bias the results of the modified nine-step test. A total of 108 consecutive participants (216 ears) were retrospectively screened. Of these, 55 participants (82 ears) who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled. The volumetric results of the mastoid cavity, parameters of the modified nine-step test (mdMEP, middle ear pressure, tympanic membrane compliance), and demographic data were analysed. A significant negative correlation was found between mdMEP and mastoid cavity volume (R = .467, p < .001). Ears with mdMEP >70 daPa showed poor pneumatization in the mastoid cavity, with volumes less than 3000 mm3 (10th percentile of all ears analysed). Ears with mastoid cavity volumes lower than the 25th percentile showed a significantly higher mdMEP (p < .001). Patients with mastoid cavity volumes higher than the 75th percentile were significantly younger (p < .001). Multivariate regression analysis for mdMEP showed a good fit (R = .854) using factors including middle ear pressure, admittance and, most importantly, the reciprocal of mastoid volume (Beta = 0.752, p < .001). The mdMEP, the main parameter of the modified nine-step test, was negatively correlated with the mastoid cavity volume. Therefore, the results of the modified nine-step test should be interpreted with consideration of mastoid cavity volume.

Results of Eustachian tube balloon dilation measured using the nine-step test

Suggested several decades ago, the nine-step test is an intuitive test of Eustachian tube function. However, studies employing the nine-step test to assess the results of Eustachian tube balloon dilation (EBD) are limited. We aimed to objectively evaluate the efficacy of EBD in opening failure patients with decreased maximal peak pressure difference (MPD) using the nine-step test. Patients who had MPD values ≤ 13 daPa in the nine-step test were enrolled. The patients were categorized into two groups according to treatment decisions after discussion with a clinician: an EBD group (N = 26) and a medication group (N = 30). One month after treatment, the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ7) and the nine-step test were administered to all participants and subgroups of symptomatic participants (ETDQ7 > 15). MPD improved (increased) in both the EBD group and the medication group. ETDQ7 values improved (decreased) in the EBD group, but not in the medication group. In subgroup analysis, MPD and ETDQ7 values improved only in the symptomatic EBD group. According to the nine-step test, EBD can normalize 53.8% of decreased MPD. Posttreatment MPD and ETDQ7 scores were significantly better in the EBD group than in the medication group. However, EBD in patients with abnormal nine-step test results seemed less efficacious when the treatment results of the medication group were considered.

Revisiting the Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Nine-Step Test for Obstructive and Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.

The nine-step test is a classical method for evaluating Eustachian tube function. It directly assesses the patient’s capacity to equilibrate middle ear pressure by swallowing. However, there are insufficient studies to appraise its diagnostic performance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off value of the nine-step test in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (oETD) and patulous Eustachian tube (PET). Enrolled subjects were divided into three groups. Control (50 ears of healthy volunteers), oETD (19 ears with oETD), and PET (29 ears with PET). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of maximal peak pressure difference (ETTmd) in the nine-step test. Both the oETD group and the PET group showed decreased ETTmd. The nine-step test showed moderate accuracy when used to diagnose oETD (area under the curve = 0.875) and PET (area under the curve = 0.769). The highest diagnostic performance was observed when the cut-off value was 13 daPa for both the oETD group (sensitivity = 73.7%, specificity = 90.0%) and the PET group (sensitivity = 58.6%, specificity = 90.0%). The nine-step test has moderate diagnostic performance for oETD and PET.

A paradigm approach toward predicting barotrauma

Barotrauma is one of the most common medical problems associated with aviation and has been a causal factor for significant loss of trained aircrew hours. The occurrence of barotrauma has been reported not only in flight but also during simulated exposures to changing pressures as a part of aeromedical evaluation and training. This occurrence is despite the screening of individuals by otoscopy and tympanometry before exposure to barometric changes. In such cases, baro-challenge-induced eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction has been identified as the most probable cause, leading to decreased ability to equalize pressures across the middle ear. This paper describes a paradigm approach to the prediction of baro-challenge-induced ET dysfunction using the nine-step test and ET dysfunction questionnaire. The inclusion of the test as a screening tool before exposure of aircrew to baro-challenge after recovery from their ear, nose, and throat ailments is recommended to prevent occurrence/ reoccurrence of barotrauma.

Outcome Measures for Baro-Challenge-Induced Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.

Baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction (baro-induced ETD) is characterized by failure of the Eustachian tube (ET) to open adequately to permit middle-ear pressure regulation during ambient pressure changes. There are no well-characterized tests for identifying the condition, which makes both patient diagnosis and research into treatment efficacy challenging. This systematic review evaluates ET function tests as potential outcome measures for baro-induced ETD. MEDLINE and CENTRAL were searched (database inception to March 2017) and reference lists reviewed for all relevant English Language articles. Tests in included studies were required to measure ET function in patients reporting baro-induced ear symptoms or barotrauma. Data were extracted in a standardized manner, and studies assessed according to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) criteria. The primary outcome of interest was the accuracy of ET function tests. Heterogeneity of subject demographics, ET function test methodology, and reference standards only permitted narrative systematic review. Sixteen studies involving seven different types of ET function tests were identified. The nine-step test was the most commonly used outcome measure, with overall test sensitivity and specificity ranges of 37 to 100% and 57 to 100%, respectively. Tympanometry test sensitivity was consistently poor (0-50%) while specificity was higher (52-97%). Published accuracy data for other ET function tests and test combinations were limited. Currently, no single test can be recommended for use in clinical practice. A combination of the nine-step test with other objective tests or patient-reported measures appears most promising as a core set of outcome measures for baro-induced ETD.

Tests of Eustachian Tube Function: the Effect of Testing Technique on Tube Opening in Healthy Ears.

There is no agreement on the best clinical test for Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction. Numerous tests have been developed to detect ET opening, and all require a patient to perform a Valsalva, Toynbee or sniff maneuver, or to swallow on demand. We aimed to characterize existing tests of ET function in healthy ears, and identify the optimal method and patient maneuver for each test. Our own normative data is presented alongside published comparisons. Diagnostic test cohort study. Tertiary referral center. Seventy-five healthy ears from 42 volunteers. Six tests of ET function, each performed using multiple different patient maneuvers. Detected ET opening rate for each test-maneuver combination. The highest detected opening rates were: Sonotubometry 94%; nine-step test inflation/deflation 93/94%; continuous impedance 88%, patient-reported opening 79%; observed tympanic membrane movement 78%; and Tubo-tympano-aerodynamic-graphy 76%. Valsalva maneuvers were most effective at opening the ET. Toynbee and swallow maneuvers were more effective when performed without water, when compared to with water. For Valsalva and sniff maneuvers, there was significant correlation between the peak nasopharyngeal pressure generated and the ET opening rate. Based on ET opening detection rates, we recommend the use of dry swallows with sonotubometry and the nine-step test. When testing patient-reported opening and observed membrane movement, and when performing Tubo-tympano-aerodynamic-graphy and impedance tests, we recommend the use of Valsalva maneuvers. Further studies are required to explore the association between the test technique and results in ears with ET dysfunction.

The repeatability of tests of eustachian tube function in healthy ears

Many objective tests of eustachian tube (ET) function have been devised for clinical and research use but they have not been directly compared or characterized. As a first step to identifying tests to incorporate into an outcome set for ET dysfunction, we assessed repeatability of a panel of eight of these tests in healthy ears. Comparison of eight tests of ET function. The following tests were investigated in combination with Valsalva, Toynbee, swallow, or sniff maneuvers: 1) patient-reported ET opening, 2) observed tympanic membrane movement, 3) continuous impedance, 4) canal manometry, 5) sonotubometry, 6) nine-step test, 7) tubomanometry, and 8) tympanometry at rest. Forty-two healthy volunteers were recruited. Each test was performed in 20 different ears and repeated immediately three times in each cycle, with four cycles performed at 20-minute intervals. Repeatability of detected ET opening was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean ET opening rate with each test ranged from 30% to 95%. Variation in detection of ET opening was less when tests were repeated immediately (ICC = 0.61) when compared to between cycles (ICC = 0.49), suggesting there may be significant changes in ET function in the short term. Tubomanometry was the only test to combine a detected ET opening rate of >85% and substantial agreement of results (ICC >0.61) between test cycles. Tubomanometry was the most reliable test at detecting ET opening. When tests of ET function are used in clinical practice, they should be performed more than once to gain a more reliable result. 3b. Laryngoscope, 127:2619-2626, 2017.

Comparison of effects of dry versus wet swallowing on Eustachian tube function via a nine-step inflation/deflation test

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of swallowing type (dry versus wet) on the outcome of a nine-step inflation/deflation tympanometric Eustachian tube function (ETF) test in healthy adults. Fourteen normal healthy volunteers, between 19 and 28 years of age, were included in the study. The nine-step test was performed in two different test procedures: (1) test with dry swallows (dry test procedure) and (2) test with liquid swallows (wet test procedure). If the equilibration of middle-ear (ME) pressure was successful in all the steps of the nine-step test, ETF was considered 'Good'. Otherwise, the test was considered 'Poor', and the test was repeated at a second session. In the dry test procedure, ETF was 'Good' in 21 ears at the first session and in 24 ears after the second session (p > 0.05). However, in the wet test procedure, ETF was 'Good' in 13 ears at the first session and in 21 ears after the second session (p < 0.05). At the first session, ETF was 'Good' in 21 and 13 ears in the dry and wet test procedures, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, after the second session, the overall number of ears with 'Good' tubal function was almost the same in both test procedures (24 ears at dry test procedures versus 21 ears at wet test procedures;p > 0.05). Dry swallowing seems to be more effective for the equilibration of ME pressure. Thus, a single-session dependent evaluation of ETF may be efficient for the dry test procedure of the nine-step test. Swallowing with water may be easier for subjects, but a repetition of the test at a second session may be necessary when the test result is 'Poor'.

Evaluation of Predive Parameters Related to Eustachian Tube Dysfunction for Symptomatic Middle Ear Barotrauma in Divers

Eustachian tube dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis of middle ear barotrauma. This investigation evaluates the predictive value of several parameters related to tubal dysfunction, in relation to symptomatic middle ear barotrauma in divers. Prospective and blinded. Thirty-one sport scuba divers with normal predive audiometry, tympanometry, and general and otorhinolaryngologic examination. After an occurrence of middle ear barotrauma, the individual diver predive data on smoking, mild septal deviation, otitis media history, rhinosinusitis history, Valsalva, Toynbee, and nine-step inflation/deflation tympanometric test, as well as degree of mastoid pneumatization were registered for calculation of predictive value in relation to the barotrauma. All symptomatic ears were examined within 24 hours of diving by the investigator, who was blinded to the predive findings. Barotraumas that occurred during an upper respiratory tract infection were excluded. Divers completed a total of 774 dives (median, 25; range, 3-100). Symptomatic middle ear barotrauma occurred in 19 ears (31%) of 14 divers (45%) at one time or another. The rate of tubal dysfunction measured by the nine-step test and a mastoid pneumatization below average were significantly higher in divers (p <0.05) as well as in ears (p <0.005) with barotrauma. Positive and negative predictive values of both parameters for subsequent barotrauma were between 69% and 76%. Combining the results into a two-test battery in a strict approach (positive on both) increased the positive predictive value to 86%. Eustachian tube dysfunction measured by the nine-step test and a small size of the mastoid cell system seem to be risk factors for symptomatic middle ear barotrauma in otherwise healthy sport scuba divers. Evaluation of these factors in the predive examination of diving candidates may be useful in the determination of fitness to dive.

Use of the nine-step inflation/deflation test as a predictor of middle ear barotrauma in sports scuba divers.

Middle ear (ME) barotrauma, the most common disorder encountered in diving, results from inadequate pressure equilibration between the ME and the ambient environment. Eustachian tube function plays a key role in the pathogenesis of barotrauma. This study was designed to investigate the predictive value and efficiency of tympanometric tests of Eustachian tube function (Valsalva test, Toynbee test and nine-step inflation/deflation test) in predicting ME barotrauma in 44 ears of 22 sports scuba divers who had normal audiometry, tympanometry and otorhinolaryngological examination without previous history of ear disease. The divers were counselled to refer to the investigators if any symptoms occurred during and/or after diving. All symptomatic ears were examined within 24 hours of diving by one investigator who was unaware of the pre-symptomatic test results. Decision matrix analysis was applied to the results of Eustachian tube function tests for predicting ears with barotrauma. Values were also evaluated for a battery of tests by 'Lax' (positive on A, B or C) and 'Strict' (positive on A, B and C) criteria. The nine-step test was found to be the most efficient (93%) test with highest predictive values (PPV 83%; NPV 95%), whereas the Valsalva and Toynbee tests were unreliable in predicting barotrauma, whereas the Valsalva and Toynbee tests were unreliable in predicting barotrauma (PPV of the Valsalva and Toynbee tests were 0% and 25% respectively). Combining the nine-step and Toynbee tests into a two-test battery in a strict approach increased the PPV (100%). It appears that the nine-step inflation/deflation test is a reliable method of predicting ME barotrauma sufferers, especially when applied with the Toynbee test. The nine-step test may have value in the evaluation of Eustachian tube function of sports scuba diving candidates after routine otorhinolaryngological, audiological and tympanometric evaluation.

Alterations of the Eustachian Tube, Middle Ear, and Nose in Rhinovirus Infection

This study measured the changes in 64 ears of 32 adult volunteers in eustachian tube function by the nine-step test, middle ear pressure by tympanometry, and nasal patency by active posterior rhinomanometry for 18 days following type 39 or Hanks rhinovirus infection. Abnormal measures were limited to the 75% of subjects (24) with clinical illness (colds) defined by symptom scores. Two days after infection, tubal function was present in only 50% of ears (48) and 20% of persons (5), middle ear underpressures of less than -50 mm H2O were measured in 50% of volunteers (12), and decreased nasal patency was observed in 54% of those with colds (13). These changes resolved 6 to 10 days after challenge. These results support a causal relationship between viral upper respiratory tract infection eustachian tube obstruction and abnormal middle ear pressure.

Evaluation of noninvasive eustachian tube function tests in normal adults.

A causal association between eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction and otitis media (OM) has been documented. We present normative data for eustachian tube function (ETF) in an otologically normal population of 107 college-age subjects using two noninvasive methods: nine-step tympanometric testing and sonotubometry. The results show a 78% agreement between the two methods when one test session was performed. The nine-step test showed a 52% repeatability rate on three sequential test sessions while the sonotubometry test showed a 34% repeatability rate. The combined tests showed a 34% agreement for the three sequential tests. The findings reveal that the combination of the two tests identify 96% of normal subjects as having at least some tubal function present. Although both tests provide similar information regarding the presence of tubal opening, the sonotubometry method is more physiologic. Additional information shows that the average category of the nine-step test in a normal population was category 2, the mean duration of tubal dilation was 0.40 seconds, and the mean middle-ear pressure was -12 mm H2O.