You have accessJournal of UrologyInfections/Inflammation of the Genitourinary Tract: Prostate & Genitalia1 Apr 20111430 THE EFFICACY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PROSTATITIS/CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN SYNDROME PATIENTS WHO DO NOT RESPOND TO PHARMACOTHERAPY Woojoong Kim, Jae Seung Lee, Geonseok Lee, Wonjin Cho, Ha Na Lee, Young Suk Lee, DeokHyun Han, and Kyu-Sung Lee Woojoong KimWoojoong Kim Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , Jae Seung LeeJae Seung Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , Geonseok LeeGeonseok Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , Wonjin ChoWonjin Cho Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , Ha Na LeeHa Na Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , Young Suk LeeYoung Suk Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , DeokHyun HanDeokHyun Han Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author , and Kyu-Sung LeeKyu-Sung Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1342AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We investigated the effect of electromagnetic stimulation (EMS) as primary treatment for men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) who did not respond to pharmacotherapy, evaluating the changes in their pain and lower urinary tract symptoms. METHODS The patients with CP/CPPS symptoms for at least 3 months in spite of medication were included. Inclusion criteria were > 18 years, total score of NIH-CPSI > 15, score of item 1 and item 2 in NIH-CPSI > 1. All patients underwent EMS for 6 weeks (total 12 sessions). The primary end-point was the change of total and pain scores of NIH-CPSI 24 weeks after treatment. Patients were evaluated by NIH-CPSI, International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), Benefit Satisfaction and Willingness (BSW) questionnaire, patient perception of symptom improvement (PPSI), voiding diary and complications. RESULTS A total of 46 men were included. 37 patients who completed this study were analyzed. Nine of 46 patients dropped out −7 in withdrawal of consent, 1 in unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, 1 in adverse effect of EMS. Figure 1 shows the changes of total and pain scores of NIH-CPSI. Total and pain scores of NIH-CPSI were significantly decreased immediately after treatment and maintained till 24 weeks after treatment. At 24 weeks, 22 patients (59.5%) shows 6 or greater improve of total NIH-CPSI score. Total and and sub-domain sum of IPSS, 24-hr micturition number were improved significantly after treatments. In BSW, 75.7%, 70.3% and 78.4% patients reported positive answer to the benefit, satisfaction and willingness domain respectively 24 weeks after treatment. PPSI measured by visual analog scale was maintained from immediately after treatment (45.0) till 24 wks (45.9). There were 4 adverse events, including 1 increased postvoid residual, 1 hip joint pain, 1 urethral discharge, and 1 reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSIONS In this study, EMS significantly improved pain and lower urinary tract symptoms in CP/CPPS patients who did not respond medical treatments and more than 70% patients were satisfied with EMS. These data suggest that EMS could be considered as a safe and effective treatment option for CP/CPPS patients who do not respond to pharmacotherapy. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e572-e573 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Woojoong Kim Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Jae Seung Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Geonseok Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Wonjin Cho Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Ha Na Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Young Suk Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author DeokHyun Han Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Kyu-Sung Lee Seoul, Korea, Republic of More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract