Complex innovative design (CID) trials aim to address multiple clinical questions, including efficacy in biomarker-selected patients, specific cancer cohorts or combination regimens. While CID trials could speed up the traditional route to European Medicines Agency marketing authorisation, they can be more challenging to evaluate through Health Technology Assessments (HTA) versus conventional randomized controlled trials. This research explores whether CID oncology trials can accelerate time to regulatory approval and patient access while maintaining optimised pricing and market access outcomes. Thirty-minute, qualitative, in-depth interviews were conducted with payer advisors from France, Germany and the UK to understand perspectives on HTA outcomes for larotrectinib and expectations for entrectinib, histology-independent cancer drugs studied in CID trials and targeting neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) solid tumours. In England, following the submission of a revised price, larotrectinib was recommended for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF). This allows for data collection to address clinical uncertainties, stemming from the pooled analysis of single-arm trials with limited patient numbers, while providing access. In contrast, larotrectinib has broad access in Germany though its price may have been negatively impacted by its âno additional benefitâ rating based on clinical uncertainties. In France, early access to larotrectinib was provided via a cohort Temporary Use Authorisation (ATU), however payers expect less favourable HTA outcomes given uncertainties in the clinical benefit due to the trial design. Payers expect entrectinib will face similar hurdles to larotrectinib which, coupled with reduced unmet needs, will negatively impact pricing and market access opportunity. CID trials create significant uncertainty on the benefit of oncology drugs assessed using existing HTA frameworks, risking negative reimbursement outcomes. The availability of managed/early access agreements can be leveraged by manufacturers for timely access. Additionally, upcoming changes to the NICE methods review may help address uncertainties for histology-independent oncology products to optimise access.
Read full abstract