HUEBNER Stefan – Pan-Asian Sports and the Emergence of Modern Asia, 1913-1974. Singapore: Nus Press, 2016. Pp. 397. Pan-Asian Sports and the Emergence of Modern Asia, 1913-1974 is organized chronologically from the first Asian Games in the wake of the First World War to the Seventh Asian Games in 1974. Each chapter is some 30 pages in length, and the structure of the chapters is equally consistent, each one consisting of a short introduction, a single example of contextualization, the history of the Games in question, and an assessment. This book is concise, clear, and written in a style that is elegant, easily readable, and accessible to all, yet with a richness of information and accuracy of synthesis that will surprise many specialists. In addition, the broad range of references and substantial critical apparatus supply clear evidence of a real commitment to historical truth. The main documents are Western sources studying the first games from 1913 to the 1920s; the author has used either administrative documents—such as reports and letters of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), various colonial administrations, and the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA)—or local newspapers. Stefan Huebner focuses on the seven countries (Philippines, China, Japan, India, Indonesia, Thailand, and Iran) that hosted the Asian Games during this period. The scope is limited by a lack of information about the participation of French colonies during this period, and Dutch Indonesia appears only during Games in which it participated. It is not surprising, given that several Asian countries were colonies at the time, that the author devotes some time to the role of the YMCA in spreading sporting activities among both white colonists and the local elite. However, the author has missed an opportunity to contribute to recent debates about what constitutes “sport.” Similarly, Huebner does not define what he means by “modernity” or modernization, terms used frequently in his book. Perhaps the author thought that hosting this kind of event was sufficient evidence of each country’s modernization. It seemed that each Asian Games had only one aim: to show the modernization of the country. The Thailand Games in 1966 and 1970 here are a notable exception; those Games used sport as a tool to foster economic and infrastructure for the benefit of the country’s rural inhabitants as well as to attract tourism. Thailand’s organization of the Games was so efficient that a German contingent came to study its organization before the Olympic Games in Munich in 1972. It proved that one Asian country could become a model for the West. Next, Huebner emphasizes the strategies adopted by American, British, and Dutch elites to develop sport among certain segments of the local elite as a leisure activity or as a genuine political program for the whole population that would prevent the development of local nationalism. From among the local elites, Huebner quotes politicians and journalists, but absent or rarely heard from are the voices of spectators, athletes, and teams. As a result, we do not always know what other local elites thought about these Games. In this way Huebner has failed to analyze the social role athletes and teams play as models for other sections of society that observe them and would like to have the same quality of life. The modernization process could be measured with the help of statistics detailing the number of athletes or spectators for each activity or each event, the number of sport newspapers, or even sales of sports equipment. What have been the positive benefits of these Games for society as a whole? Is it possible to detect a “domino effect” of local sporting activities after these massive events? This excellent study would benefit from analysis of the audience or the daily lives of athletes to confirm or reverse his conclusions. The author’s main purpose was to study the extent to which it can be said that PanAsian sport played a part in the emergence of modern Asia. In addition, he is particularly interested in defining a single common Asian identity. He has therefore deliberated over the means used and the steps required to fulfill this objective. Who was really involved in this...