New-onset Left Bundle Branch Block Research Articles

Ventricular pacing burden in patients with left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement therapy.

Electrophysiological testing has been proposed in the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for cardiac pacing to identify left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients with infrahisian conduction delay (IHCD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). While in general IHCD is defined by a His-ventricular (HV) interval of >55 ms, a cut-off of ≥70 ms to trigger pacemaker (PM) implantation has been proposed in the latest ESC guidelines. The ventricular pacing (VP) burden during follow-up in such patients is largely unknown. As such, we aimed to assess the VP burden during follow-up of patients receiving PM therapy for LBBB after TAVR based on an HV interval > 55 ms and ≥70 ms. All patients with new-onset or pre-existing LBBB after undergoing TAVR at a tertiary referral center underwent EP testing the day after TAVR. In patients with a prolonged HV interval (>55 ms), PM implantation was performed by a trained electrophysiologist in a standardized fashion. All devices were programmed to avoid unnecessary VP by specific algorithms (e.g., AAI-DDD). 701 patients underwent TAVR at the University Hospital of Basel. One hundred seventy-seven patients presented with new-onset or pre-existing LBBB the day following TAVR and underwent EP testing. An HV interval > 55 ms was found in 58 patients (33%) and an HV interval ≥ 70 ms in 21 patients (12%). 51 patients (mean age 84 ± 6.2 years, 45% women) agreed to receive a PM, out of which 20 (39%) patients had an HV Interval over 70 ms. Atrial fibrillation was present in 53% of the patients. A dual chamber PM was implanted in 39 (77%), and a single chamber PC in 12 (23%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 21 months. The median VP burden overall was 3%. The median VP burden was not significantly different between patients with an HV ≥ 70 ms (6.5 [0.8-52]) and those with an HV between 55 and 69 ms (2 [0-17], p = .23). 31% of patients demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 27% 1%-5% and 41% > 5%. The median HV intervals in patients with VP burdens < 1%, 1%-5% and >5% were 66 (IQR 62-70) ms, 66 (IQR 63-74) ms and 68 (IQR 60-72) ms, respectively, p = .52. When only assessing patients with an HV interval 55-69 ms, 36% demonstrated a VP burden of <1%, 29% of 1%-5% and 35% of >5%. In patients with an HV Interval ≥ 70 ms, 25% demonstrated a VP burden < 1%, 25% of 1%-5% and 50% of >5% %, p = .64 (Figure). In patients with LBBB after TAVR and IHCD defined by an HV interval > 55 ms, VP burden is relevant in a non-negligible amount of patients during follow-up. Further studies are warranted to define the optimal cut-off value for the HV interval or to develop risk models incorporating HV measurements and other risk factors to trigger PM implantation in patients with LBBB after TAVR.

New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block With ST Elevation After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Differential Diagnosis

New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block With ST Elevation After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Differential Diagnosis

PO-04-017 'LEFT' BROKEN AFTER EXERCISE: A CASE OF PAINFUL LBBB SYNDROME SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH AREA PACING

The leading causes of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) include coronary artery disease, hypertension, and cardiomyopathies. However, when the LBBB occurs in the absence of ischemia, in a rate-dependent manner, usually with exertion, it constitutes a painful left bundle branch block. Although there are multiple case reports of this entity, the mechanism, pathophysiology, and treatment are not well defined. We intend to raise awareness of this syndrome and highlight our unique treatment approach. NA A 57-year-old male presented to the cardiology clinic with exertional chest pain and palpitations. He underwent an exercise ECG test, surprisingly on stage 2 of Bruce protocol, at around a heart rate of 116 bpm; he started developing LBBB on every other beat. At a heart rate of 125 bpm, he developed persistent LBBB associated with similar symptoms, both of which persisted in the recovery phase (Figure 1). His Echocardiogram was normal. Invasive coronary angiography revealed normal coronaries. Previous case reports have shown that cardiac rehabilitation helps to delay the onset of LBBB to a higher heart rate; however, he opted for pacemaker implantation as he had severe exercise limitations. He underwent a biventricular-implantable pacemaker with right atrial, left bundle branch area, and coronary sinus (CS) left ventricular (LV) leads. The pacemaker was programmed DDD60 with a rate adaptive AV interval with a start rate of 80 bpm. This would enable the LBB area pacing above a heart rate of 80 bpm. Within one week of implantation, the patient had a complete resolution of his symptoms. A cardiopulmonary exercise test to assess VO2 with pacing programmed off and then on is scheduled as part of the follow-up. The symptoms of the painful LBBB syndrome can be quite severe, resulting in physical and psychological debilitation. Treatment with a physical exercise regimen has been successful as it delays the LBBB onset to a higher heart rate. However, the patient loses the benefit once they stop exercising. A definitive solution is a pacemaker; there are multiple case reports of His bundle and right ventricular pacing, which successfully treated this syndrome. In this case, we used a unique approach of pacing just the LBBB area; in addition, a CS LV lead was placed, which could be used for an earlier activation of the LV if the patient needs that in the future.

Técnica de superposición de cúspides en TAVI con el sistema autoexpandible Portico FlexNav

Introduction and objectivesThe cusp overlap technique (COT) has been proposed to reduce conduction disturbances (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with self-expanding supra-annular devices, but there are scarce data on COT with intra-annular valves. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of the COT during Portico implantation results in higher valve implantation and lower rates of CD. MethodsWe included 85 patients undergoing TAVI with the Portico FlexNav system: 43 retrospective patients using the standard 3-cusp view and 42 prospective patients with the COT. Primary endpoints were implantation depth and new-onset CD (composite outcome of new-onset left bundle branch block and new permanent pacemaker implantation). ResultsCOT resulted in a higher implantation depth (noncoronary cusp: 4.9±3.9 vs 7.4±3.0; P=.005) and lower new-onset CD (31.0% vs 58.1%; P=.012), with a tendency toward a lower need for permanent pacemaker implantation (14.3% vs 30.2%, P=.078; 7.7% vs 31.0%; P=.011 in patients without pre-existing right bundle branch block). Transvalvular aortic gradients were slightly lower with COT (8.7±3.7 vs 11.0±6.1; P=.044). There were no differences in technical success or major procedure-related complications. On multivariate analysis, COT use was associated with a lower risk of new-onset CD. ConclusionsUse of the COT during Portico implantation is feasible and facilitates a higher valve implant, which in turn may help to reduce rates of new-onset CD.

Vulnerability of the ventricular conduction axis during transcatheter aortic valvar implantation: A translational pathologic study.

The ventricular components of the conduction axis remain vulnerable following transcatheter aortic valvar replacement. We aimed to describe features which may be used accurately by interventionalists to predict the precise location of the conduction axis, hoping better to avoid conduction disturbances. We scanned eight normal adult heart specimens by 3T magnetic resonance, using the images to simulate histological sections in order accurately to place the conduction axis back within the heart. We then used histology, tested in two pediatric hearts, to prepare sections, validated by the magnetic resonance images, to reveal the key relationships between the conduction axis and the aortic root. The axis was shown to have a close relationship to the nadir of the right coronary leaflet, in particular when the aortic root was rotated in counterclockwise fashion. The axis was more vulnerable in the setting of a narrow inferoseptal recess, when the inferior margin of the membranous septum was above the plane of the virtual basal ring, and when minimal myocardium was supporting the right coronary sinus. The features identified in our study are in keeping with the original description provided by Tawara, but at variance with more recent accounts. They suggest that the vulnerability of the axis during transcatheter valvar replacement can potentially be inferred on the basis of knowledge of the position of the aortic root within the ventricular base. If validated by clinical studies, our findings may better permit avoidance of new-onset left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valvar replacement.

Cusp-overlap technique during TAVI using the self-expanding Portico FlexNav system

Introduction and objectivesThe cusp overlap technique (COT) has been proposed to reduce conduction disturbances (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with self-expanding supra-annular devices, but there are scarce data on COT with intra-annular valves. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of the COT during Portico implantation results in higher valve implantation and lower rates of CD. MethodsWe included 85 patients undergoing TAVI with the Portico FlexNav system: 43 retrospective patients using the standard 3-cusp view and 42 prospective patients with the COT. Primary endpoints were implantation depth and new-onset CD (composite outcome of new-onset left bundle branch block and new permanent pacemaker implantation). ResultsCOT resulted in a higher implantation depth (noncoronary cusp: 4.9±3.9 vs 7.4±3.0; P=.005) and lower new-onset CD (31.0% vs 58.1%; P=.012), with a tendency toward a lower need for permanent pacemaker implantation (14.3% vs 30.2%, P=.078; 7.7% vs 31.0%; P=.011 in patients without pre-existing right bundle branch block). Transvalvular aortic gradients were slightly lower with COT (8.7±3.7 vs 11.0±6.1; P=.044). There were no differences in technical success or major procedure-related complications. On multivariate analysis, COT use was associated with a lower risk of new-onset CD. ConclusionsUse of the COT during Portico implantation is feasible and facilitates a higher valve implant, which in turn may help to reduce rates of new-onset CD.

Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AimTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), particularly left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB). The aim of this study was to investigate clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological parameters predicting ICA after TAVR.MethodsPatients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 203) without pacing devices undergoing TAVR with a self-expanding (n = 103) or balloon-expanding (n = 100) valve were enrolled. Clinical and anatomical parameters, such as length of the membranous septum (MS) and implantation depth, were assessed. His-ventricular interval (HVi) before and after implantation was determined. 12-lead-electrocardiograms (ECG) before, during and after 3 and 30 days after TAVR were analyzed for detection of any ICA.ResultsAmong 203 consecutive patients (aortic valve area 0.78 ± 0.18 cm2, age 80 ± 6 years, 54% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 52 ± 10%), TAVR led to a significant prolongation of infranodal conduction in all patients from 49 ± 10 ms to 59 ± 16 ms (p = 0.01). The HVi prolongation was independent of valve types, occurrence of HAVB or ICA. Fifteen patients (7%) developed HAVB requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and 63 patients (31%) developed ICA within 30 days. Pre-existing BBB (OR 11.64; 95% CI 2.87–47.20; p = 0.001), new-onset left BBB (OR 15.72; 95% CI 3.05–81.03; p = 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.30–15.99; p = 0.02) independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM. Neither pre-existing right BBB, a prolonged postHVi, increases in PR duration, any of the TAVR implantation procedural and anatomic nor echocardiographic characteristics were predictive for later HAVB.ConclusionsNew-onset left BBB and diabetes mellitus independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM after TAVR and helped to identify patients at risk. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) of atrioventricular conduction was neither specific nor predictive of HAVB and can be skipped.Trial registration numberNCT04128384 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).Graphical abstract

Reduction of permanent pacemaker implantation by using the cusp overlap technique in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis

BackgroundThe need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a common complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Deep implantation position is a risk factor for PPM implantation. Thus, in the field of self-expandable (SE) transcatheter heart valves (THV) cusp overlap projection (COP) technique was implemented to reduce parallax, allowing a more precise guidance of implantation depth.AimsThis meta-analysis aims to report the outcome of patients undergoing TAVR with SE THV using COP versus conventional implantation technique (CIT).MethodsSystematical search in MEDLINE and EMBASE yielded five observational controlled studies comparing both implantation techniques for the SE Evolut prosthesis (Medtronic Intern. Ltd., CA, USA) and fulfilling the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis.ResultsTotally, 1227 patients were included, comprising 641 who underwent COP and 586 CIT TAVR. Incidence of post-procedural need for PPM implantation was significantly lower in COP group (9.8% vs 20.6%; OR = 0.43; p < 0.00001). This was accompanied by significantly higher implantation position in COP group (mean difference distance from distal end of the intraventricular portion of the THV to the non-coronary cusp (NCC): − 1.03 mm; p = 0.00001). Incidence of new-onset left bundle branch block did not differ. Regarding procedural and 30-day mortality, technical success, post-procedural aortic regurgitation, and rates of multiple device implantation, no difference between COP and CIT was found.ConclusionCOP is an effective and safe implantation technique to reduce the need for a permanent pacemaker implantation during TAVR with SE Evolut prosthesis.Graphical abstract

Incidence and management of atrioventricular conduction disorders in new-onset left bundle branch block after TAVI: A prospective multicenter study

New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) is one of the most frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is associated with delayed high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of AV block in such a population and to assess the performance and safety of a risk stratification algorithm on the basis of electrophysiology study (EPS) followed by implantation of a pacemaker or implantable loop recorder (ILR). This was a prospective open-label study with 12-month follow-up. From June 8, 2015, to November 8, 2018, 183 TAVI recipients (mean age 82.3 ± 5.9 years) were included at 10 centers. New-onset LBBB after TAVI persisting for >24 hours was assessed by electrophysiology study during initial hospitalization. High-risk patients (His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms) were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker recording AV conduction disturbance episodes. Patients at lower risk were implanted with an ILR with automatic remote monitoring. A high-grade AV conduction disorder was identified in 56 patients (30.6%) at 12 months. Four subjects were symptomatic, all in the ILR group. No complications were associated with the stratification procedure. Patients with His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms displayed more high-grade AV conduction disorders (53.2% [25 of 47] vs 22.8% [31 of 136]; P < .001). In a multivariate analysis, His-ventricle interval ≥70 ms was independently associated with the occurrence of a high-grade conduction disorder (subdistribution hazard ratio 2.4; 95% confidence interval 1.2-4.8; P = .010). New-onset LBBB after TAVI was associated with high rates of high-grade AV conduction disturbances. The stratification algorithm provided safe and valuable aid to management decisions and reliable guidance on pacemaker implantation.

Ambulatory Smartwatch ECG Monitoring among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Early after Discharge: An Observational Study.

As an emerging arrhythmia monitor, ambulatory smartwatch electrocardiogram (ECG) provides an option for home-based monitoring of delayed new-onset arrhythmic events after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to validate the diagnostic efficacy of a consumer smartwatch ECG in TAVR recipients, while further explore the occurrence rate of both tachy- and brady-arrhythmia for 30 days after discharge to support risk management. Consecutive TAVR recipients from February 26th, 2021 to December 13th, 2021 were enrolled prospectively, receiving simultaneous 24-hour Holter and 12-lead ECG compared with smartwatch ECG during hospitalization and daily smartwatch ECG collection for 30 days after discharge. Among 110 patients, the efficacy of smartwatch ECG presented sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF) as 1.00 and 0.97, left bundle branch block (LBBB) as 0.61 and 0.88, and right bundle branch block (RBBB) as 0.60 and 0.97, respectively, compared with 24-hour Holter; presented sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing AF as 0.88 and 1.00, LBBB as 0.90 and 0.96, and RBBB as 0.83 and 0.94, respectively, compared with 12-lead ECG. At 30-day follow-up, new-onset arrhythmia included new-onset severe conduction disturbance (SCD) (23.6%), new-onset AF (21.8%), new-onset permanent LBBB (14.5%) and new-onset permanent RBBB (0.9%); 69.2% (36/52) of early new-onset LBBB recovered at 30-day follow-up. The diagnostic efficacy of consumer smartwatch ECG in arrhythmic events among TAVR population was acceptable, which provided a recommendable option for home-based management. "Continuously ambulatory rhythm monitoring and predictors of electrocardio-related adverse events in 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve replacement"; Identifier: ChiCTR2000041244; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=66324.

A new trend to reduce adverse events in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: cusp overlap technique: a cross sectional study.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently the treatment of choice for the majority of patients at moderate or high surgical risk. However, some complications occur frequently with this procedure. In this study, we aimed to assess whether the cusp-overlap view (COP) technique may be associated with a reduced incidence of some of these complications compared with the classical three-cusp view (TCV) technique. In this single-center, retrospective study we investigated; technical success, postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI), new-onset stroke, pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia development, acute renal failure, major bleeding, major vascular complications, procedure-related coronary obstruction, new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB), paravalvular leak, peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI), day of hospitalization, death, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were determined as the clinical endpoints. A total of 281 consecutive patients who met the study criteria and underwent elective or emergency transfemoral TAVI using the self-expandable CoreValve Evolut valve were included. 176 consecutive patients implanted with the classical TCV technique and 105 consecutive patients implanted with the COP technique were compared. Compared with the TCV group, patients in the COP group had lower PPMI (3.8% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.039), in-hospital mortality (1.9% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.018), and 1-year death (4.8% versus 18.8%, p = 0.001), and MACCE rates (12.4% vs 31.3%, p < 0.001). The COP technique may help to reduce the conduction disturbances, PPMI requirement and complication rates that may develop following TAVI. In addition, it is an interesting result that it reduces mortality and MACCE rates in long-term follow-ups.

Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with new-onset left bundle branch block after SAPIEN-3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

New-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) can develop after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) resulting in worse outcomes. Describe clinical and echocardiographic outcomes with new-onset LBBB after TAVR. We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) valve between April 2015 and December 2018. Exclusion criteria included pre-existing LBBB, right BBB, left anterior hemiblock, left posterior hemiblock, wide QRS ≥ 120ms, prior permanent pacemaker (PPM), and nontransfemoral access. Among 612 patients, 11.4% developed new-onset LBBB upon discharge. The length of stay was longer with new-onset LBBB compared with no LBBB [3 (2-5) days versus 2 (1-3) days; p < 0.001]. New-onset LBBB was associated with higher rates of 30-day PPM requirement (18.6% vs. 5.4%; p < 0.001) and 1-year heart failure hospitalizations (10.7% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.033). There was no difference in 3-year mortality between both groups (30.9% vs. 30.6%; p = 0.829). Further, new-onset LBBB was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at both 30 days (55.9 ± 11.4% vs. 59.3 ± 9%; p = 0.026) and 1 year (55 ± 12% vs. 60.1 ± 8.9%; p = 0.002). These changes were still present when we stratified patients according to baseline LVEF (≥50% or <50%). New-onset LBBBs were associated with a higher 1-year LV end-diastolic volume index (51.4 ± 18.6 vs. 46.4 ± 15.1 ml/m2 ; p = 0.036), and LV end-systolic volume index (23.2 ± 14.1 vs. 18.9 ± 9.7 ml/m2 ; p = 0.009). Compared with resolved new-onset LBBB, persistent new-onset LBBB was associated with worse LVEF and higher PPM at 1 year. New-onset LBBB after S3 TAVR was associated with higher PPM requirement, worse LVEF, higher LV volumes, and increased heart failure hospitalizations, with no difference in mortality.

Abstract 12486: Impact of New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block on Reverse Cardiac Remodeling and Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background: The clinical implication of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial. We investigated the impact of new-onset persistent LBBB on reverse cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes after TAVR. Methods: Among 478 patients who had undergone TAVR for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis from 2011 to 2021, we analyzed 364 patients after excluding patients with pre-existing intraventricular conduction disturbance or a pacing rhythm before or during the indexed hospitalization for TAVR. Echocardiographic variables of cardiac remodeling at baseline and 1 year after TAVR were comprehensively analyzed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes were all-cause death and individual components of the primary outcome. Result: New-onset persistent LBBB occurred in 41 (11.3%) patients after TAVR. The no LBBB group showed a significant increase in the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and decreases in LV dimensions, the left atrial volume index, and LV mass index 1 year after TAVR (all p&lt;0.001). However, the new LBBB group showed no significant changes in these parameters. During a median follow-up of 18.1 months, the new LBBB group experienced a higher incidence of primary outcomes (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.60-9.73; p &lt; 0.001) and all-cause death (HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.38-5.69; p = 0.003). The data were similar after multivariable regression analysis. Conclusion: New-onset persistent LBBB after TAVR is associated with insufficient reverse cardiac remodeling and increased adverse clinical events.

Abstract 15768: Relative Longitudinal Strain Apical Sparing Pattern as a Detrimental Factor of Cardiovascular Outcome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Introduction: Several risk scores have been developed for outcome after heart surgery. However, risk factors associated with clinical outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are still not well defined. This study aimed to determine laboratory and echocardiography determinants of short- and long-term outcome after TAVR. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 598 consecutive patients with sole aortic stenoseis (AS) who received balloon-expandable TAVR in our hospital (mean age 81.7±5.7 years, 48.7% male, median EuroSCORE II 5.0%). Pre-operative laboratory and imaging data including speckle-tracking echocardiography were analyzed. Clinical outcomes included cardiovascular (CV) death, CV hospitalization, and procedure related complications at 30 days, 1 year, and at 2 years after TAVR. Results: Semi-quantitative assessment defined as ≥3 LV wall segments with the apico-basal LS ratio &gt;3.0 was used to define relative apical sparing pattern (RASP). The prevalence of RASP was 19.2%. RASP patients had higher prevalence of acute kidney injury (AKI, 10.4% vs. 3.3%, P=0.001) and new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) after TAVR (17.4% vs. 6.8%, P&lt;0.001). CV mortality at 30 days (7.0% vs. 3.1%, P=0.062), 1 year (15.7% vs. 7.9%, P=0.010), and 2 years (22.6% vs. 9.9%, P&lt;0.001) was also higher after TAVR. RASP remained the strongest determinant for AKI (OR=3.11, P=0.007), new-onset LBBB (OR=2.89, P&lt;0.001), increased 30-day CV related hospitalization or death risk (OR=2.20, P=0.033). Lower albumin level and RASP were identified as independent determinants of increased 1-year and 2-year CV mortality risk (RASP: HR=1.83 and 2.18, P=0.039 and 0.002; albumin&lt;4.0g/dl: HR=3.18 and 2.55, both P&lt;0.001), regardless of TAVR approach and EuroSCORE II. After adjustment, the addition of RASP significantly improved prognostic power of a model including clinical variables and low albumin level for predicting CV death at 2-year follow-up ( χ 2 from 28.18 to 40.70, P=0.001). Conclusions: RASP represents a novel clinically relevant determinant of outcome after TAVR. Low albumin and RASP were identified as the strongest laboratory and echocardiography determinants for increased short- and long-term outcome after TAVR.

Yield of the electrophysiological study in patients with new-onset left bundle branch block after transcathether aortic valve replacement: The PR interval matters.

BackgroundStudies suggest that performing an electrophysiological study (EPS) may be useful to identify patients with new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) post-TAVR at risk of atrioventricular block. However, tools to optimize the yield of such strategy are needed. We therefore aimed to investigate whether 12-lead ECG changes post-TAVR may help identify patients with abnormal EPS findings.Materials and methodsConsecutive patients with new-onset LBBB post-TAVR who underwent EPS were included. PR and QRS intervals were measured on 12-lead ECG pre-TAVR and during EPS. Abnormal EPS was defined as an HV interval > 55 ms.ResultsAmong 61 patients, 28 (46%) had an HV interval > 55 ms after TAVR. Post-TAVR PR interval and ΔPR (PR-post–pre-TAVR) were significantly longer in patients with prolonged HV (PR: 188 ± 38 vs. 228 ± 34 ms, p < 0.001, ΔPR: 10 ± 30 vs. 34 ± 23 ms, p = 0.001), while no difference was found in QRS duration. PR and ΔPR intervals both effectively discriminated patients with HV > 55 ms (AUC = 0.804 and 0.769, respectively; p < 0.001). A PR > 200 ms identified patients with abnormal EPS results with a sensitivity of 89% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88%. ΔPR ≥ 20 ms alone provided a somewhat lower sensitivity (64%) but combining both criteria (i.e., PR > 200 ms or ΔPR ≥ 20 ms) identified almost every patients with abnormal HV (sensitivity = 96%, NPV = 95%). Selecting EPS candidate based on both criteria would avoid 1/3 of exams.ConclusionPR interval assessment may be useful to select patients with new-onset LBBB after TAVR who may benefit most from an EPS. In patients with PR ≤ 200 ms and ΔPR < 20 ms the likelihood of abnormal EPS is very low independently of QRS changes.

Predictors of high-degree atrioventricular block in patients with new-onset left bundle branch block following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The development of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) is frequently seen post TAVR and is a known risk factor for progression to high degree AV block. The timing and likelihood of progression into complete heart block is variable and can develop after hospital discharge. We sought to determine predictors for the development of high degree AV block in patients who developed LBBB following TAVR. All patients between 2014 and 2019 underwent electrophysiology study after developing LBBB post TAVR. Data on these patients including baseline characteristics, echo parameters, EKG variables, HV interval, and the need for subsequent pacemaker implantation were extracted. A prolonged HV interval was defined as ≥ 65ms. Clinically significant conduction abnormality was defined as development of high-degree AV block or clinically significant complete heart block. Thirty-four patients were included in our study of which 10 (29.4%) developed clinically significant heart block, while 24 (70.6%) did not. The mean HV interval for patients with clinically significant heart block was 70.1ms vs 57.8ms for those who did not (p = 0.022). Pre-existing first-degree heart block prior to TAVR (p = 0.026), history of AFib (p = 0.05) in addition to STS score (p = 0.037) were predictors of development of high-degree AV block in our patient population. In patients who develop LBBB following TAVR, HV interval, pre-existing first-degree heart block, and STS score predict progression to high-degree AV block. Performance of a routine electrophysiology study should be considered for high-risk patients who develop LBBB following TAVR.

Comparison of Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Versus Without Mitral Annular Calcium

There are limited data regarding the impact of mitral annular calcium (MAC) on the outcomes of patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent TAVI in 2018 and divided them into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of MAC, using a validated MAC computed tomography-based scoring system. Among 468 patients who underwent TAVI in 2018, 271 patients (58%) had MAC present compared with 197 patients (42%) without MAC. Compared with patients without MAC, patients in the MAC group were older (81 vs 79, p=0.012), had a higher body mass index (29.30 vs 28.05, p=0.031), lower left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (4.47 vs 4.80, p &lt;0.001), higher mitral valve mean gradient (4.54 vs 3.01, p=0.031), and a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score (5.69 vs 4.91, p=0.127). There was no significant difference in the with versus without MAC groups in the all-cause mortality (at 1 year: 9% vs 6%, p=0.8; at 2 years: 15% vs 13%, p=0.47), incidence of myocardial infarction (1% vs 2%, p=0.417), stroke (1% vs 3%, p=0.4), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (17% vs 19%, p=0.53) at 1 year. Although the rate of new-onset left bundle branch block was higher in patients with MAC, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rates of complete atrioventricular block (5% vs 3%, p=0.483) or the need for pacemaker implantation (6% vs 3%, p=0.168). The post-TAVI peak aortic valve gradient was comparable between the groups with and without MAC (22.52 vs 22.60, p=0.931). In conclusion, TAVI is a safe alternative for patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant MAC, with comparable outcomes to patients without MAC.

New-onset persistent left bundle branch block following sutureless aortic valve replacement

ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence, predictive factors and prognostic value of new-onset persistent left bundle branch block (NOP-LBBB) in patients undergoing sutureless surgical aortic valve replacement (SU-SAVR).MethodsA total of 329 consecutive...

Effects of Left Bundle Branch Block and Pacemaker Implantation on Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) frequency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and their effect on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain controversial. We evaluated the incidence of PPI and new-onset LBBB after TAVI and their impact on LVEF at 6-month follow-up. Moreover, the impact of right ventricular (RV) pacing burden on changes in LVEF after TAVI was analyzed. The electrocardiograms of 377 patients (age 80 ± 7years, 52% male) treated with TAVI were collected at baseline, after the procedure, at discharge, and at each outpatient follow-up. LVEF was measured at baseline before TAVI and 6months after the procedure. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the occurrence of LBBB, the need for PPI, or the absence of new conduction abnormalities. In patients with PPI, the influence of RV pacing burden on LVEF was analyzed. New-onset LBBB after TAVI occurred in 92 patients (24%), and PPI was required in 55 patients (15%). In patients without new conduction abnormalities, LVEF significantly increased during follow-up (56 ± 14% to 61 ± 12%, p &lt;0.001). Patients with a baseline LVEF ≤50% presented with a significant recovery in LVEF, although the recovery was less pronounced in patients with new-onset LBBB. Moreover, patients with a baseline LVEF ≤50% who received PPI showed an improvement in LVEF at 6months regardless of the RV pacing burden. New-onset LBBB hampers the recovery of LVEF after TAVI. Among patients with an LVEF ≤50%, pressure overload relief counteracts the effects of new-onset LBBB or RV pacing.

Usefulness of Temporary Pacing in Patients With New Left Bundle Branch Block During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

New-onset left bundle branch block (NLBBB) is the most common complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Expert consensus recommends temporary transvenous pacemaker (TTVP) support for 24 hours in these patients. To date, no study has examined TTVP use during the index hospitalization in detail. Therefore, we aimed to assess TTVP use in patients with TAVI who developed NLBBB. In this prospective observational study, we performed a detailed analysis of 24-hour telemetry in patients who developed NLBBB during TAVI. Baseline characteristics and procedural and postprocedural data were recorded. The primary outcome was pacing by the TTVP. We evaluated inappropriate TTVP use, electrophysiology study findings, permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, and NLBBB resolution. A total of 83 patients (74.4 ± 8.7 years, 41% female) developed NLBBB during TAVI. During index hospitalization, 1 patient (1%) required TTVP because of complete heart block and received a PPM. Five of the 83 (6%) patients were inappropriately paced, and 1 patient (1%) had ventricular fibrillation, likely secondary to TTVP. A total of 34 patients (41%) underwent electrophysiology study during hospitalization, with 4 of 83 (5%) subsequently receiving a PPM. One (1%) patient died during hospitalization, and 9 patients were lost to follow-up because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the remaining 73 patients with a 30-day follow-up, NLBBB had resolved in 36 (49%) at 30 days, and 2 (3%) were readmitted with complete heart block and received PPM. In conclusion, in patients with TAVI who develop NLBBB, temporary pacing is rarely necessary, may carry additional risks to the patient, and prolong hospitalization time.