Abstract Background Plasma cell-free DNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel diagnostic tool for infectious diseases [1]. Data suggests that plasma mNGS may be useful in immunocompromised adults, changing management in up to 60% of the patients [2]. A prospective study evaluating utility of plasma mNGS for pneumonia in immunocompromised adults concluded that mNGS provided an additive diagnostic value of 12.1% [3]. A similar study in adults with febrile neutropenia reported a sensitivity and specificity of 85 and 100%, respectively [4]. However, there is limited data evaluating the utility of mNGS in immunocompromised children. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all pediatric immunocompromised patients who had plasma mNGS testing performed from December 2018 to July 2023 at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract relevant clinical data and microbiologic data including results of mNGS, contemporaneous cultures, and related antimicrobial treatment. Descriptive statistics are presented as frequencies and medians (interquartile range, IQR). Comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate, using R version 3.6.3. Results A total of 18 immunocompromised children underwent plasma mNGS testing. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia was the most common malignancy (33.3%), followed by acute myeloid leukemia (22.2%). Two patients (11.1%) had undergone hematopoietic cell transplant, both allogeneic. At the time of testing, 16 patients (88.9%) had fever and 10 (55.6%) had an absolute neutrophil count of <500/mm3. All except one were on antimicrobial therapy at the time of testing, with a median duration of 8 days (IQR=12.25). Only 9 (50%) patients had a positive mNGS result. A positive mNGS resulted in broadening or extending antibiotics course in 4 patients (22.2%); negative mNGS results did not lead to changes in management in any of the cases. There were no significant differences in age, sex, days of fever, neutropenia, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, and days of fever before testing between those with positive versus negative results. However, a higher frequency of GI symptoms at the time of testing among those with positive results was observed. Clinical characteristics and impact on management in patients with positive and negative results are summarized in Table 1. Conclusion Plasma mNGS had a limited impact on the management of immunocompromised children at our institution. Negative results did not lead to de-escalation of therapy, and positive results led to additional exposure to antibiotics. Further research is needed to determine the role of mNGS in this population, and the interpretation of positive testing in the setting of gastrointestinal disease.