where f: IR x iR + IR is a Caratheodory function, f( *, x) is 2n-periodic for every x, CI E R and r E IO, 2n[. This problem has been studied by Sadovskii in [ 151, by Hale and Mawhin in [6], in the case Ial 1 to the previous one. Our interest is particularly motivated by the fact that (*) represents a simple and meaningful model for a general phenomenon which often arises in the study of functional differential equations. In fact, as is well known, in some cases a delayed differential equation can be seen as a perturbation of an ordinary differential equation. In particular this occurs when the delayed term in the equation can be considered smaller than the ordinary one, or dominated by it. When such domination is available many good properties can be proved, and several results (such as those of [6] and [16]) take advantage of this fact. On the contrary, when no domination is present, the situation is much more complicated and in general very little is known. In problem (*), the delayed term can be considered dominated by the ordinary one whenever Ial < 1. As a matter of fact, in this case, one can prove the invertibility of the differential operator L,x = x’ + a~‘(. r) + ,ux, the compactness of its inverse and even some a priori estimates for the solutions. Consequently, one can reduce (*) to a fixed point problem and solve it by means of some topological degree argument. However, when ((11 = 1, so that the weight of the two terms x’(t) and x’(t T) is the same, the above properties fail, and moreover (for some delays) the kernel of the differential operator Lx = x’ + a~‘(* r) is infinite dimensional. Therefore one must look for different methods. Problem (*) is thus a simple but nevertheless significant example of the considerations illustrated by Hale in [5] about the difficulty of undertaking a unified approach in the study of functional differential equations. At the same time, it provides an analogy between neutral equations and the wave equation, in the line suggested by Hale in [5].
Read full abstract