To compare the flexibility of accuracy versus speed orientation, 38 reflective and 38 impulsive fifth graders, selected on the basis of latency and errors on Matching Familiar Figures Test, were given three passages for proofreading under neutral, speed-stressing, and accuracy-stressing instructions in that order (Study I). Their performances were described in terms of the number of scanned errata (to be corrected) and the ratio of omissions, which were transformed into comparable T scores, using means and standard deviations of the corresponding measures for another 40 fifth graders who had been given the same three materials all under neutral instructions. When given speed-emphasizing instructions, both reflective and impulsive children showed significant within-style increases in the number of scanned errata. When given accuracy-stressing instructions, only the impulsives showed significant decrease in the omission ratio. Analyses of variance of the differences in T scores indicated that impulsive subjects showed greater variability in the omission ratio than reflective subjects. In a replication study (Study II) with easier passages, both reflective and impulsive fifth graders, who had not participated in Study I, showed significant increases in the number of scanned errata when the instructions stressed speed, but insignificant, nearly equal decreases in the omission ratio when accuracy was stressed. The older impulsive subjects were at least as flexible as their reflective counterparts in modifying their orientation to meet the “situational demands.”