AbstractTwo dioxotetraza macrocycles 9,12,16,19‐tetraazatricyclo[19.4.0.02,7]pentacosa‐1(21),2,4,6,22,24‐hexaene‐8,20‐dione(L1) and 9,13,16,20‐tetraazatricyclo[20.4.0.02,7]hexacosa‐1(22),2,4,6,23,25‐hexaene‐8,21‐dione (L2) and two bis(dioxotetraaza) macrocycles 7,10,14,17,25,28,32,35‐octaazatetracyclo[17.17.2.05,37.023,38]octatriaconta‐1,3,5(37),19,21,23(38)‐hexaene‐6,18,24,36‐tetrone (L3) and 7,11,14,18,26,30,33,37‐octaazatetracyclo[18.18.2.05,39.024,40]tetraconta‐1,3,5(39),20,22,24(40)‐hexaene‐6,19,25,38‐tetrone (L4) were prepared. Their protonation constants and the overall complexation constants of their copper(II) complexes were determined by potentiometry at 25 °C (I = 1, KNO3). In aqueous solution, the complexation sequence was elucidated for each ligand by means of UV/Vis and EPR spectroscopy. According to the ligand structure, two complexation mechanisms can be characterized. For ligand L1, a neutral complex [CuL1H–2] is readily obtained in one step at pH ≈ 5, and it is the sole species above pH 7. Its structure was confirmed by X‐ray analysis. For ligands L2 and L4, the neutral complexes [CuL2H–2] and [Cu2L4H–4] were formed by successive deprotonation of [CuL2]2+ and [Cu2L4]4+, respectively.(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)
Read full abstract