Neurosurgical Service Research Articles

Demands for Essential Neurosurgical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTIONThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented social, geopolitical, and health systems factors that may affect types of patients presenting for essential, non-ambulatory care. Social distancing and lockdowns may reduce the incidence of trauma; however, a significant decline in presentations of acute medical conditions such as stroke and ACS have been reported. Furthermore, health system capacities are substantially altered, with elective surgeries postponed to devote resources to COVID-related illness and high acuity non-COVID illness.METHODSWe reviewed all emergency department and inpatient consultations to the neurosurgical service at a Level 1 Trauma Center during an 8-week post-lockdown period (3/15-5/4), quantifying overall volume, as well the distribution of problem types and management endpoints.RESULTSPandemic period consult volumes were significantly lower than those of parallel periods in 2016–2019 (388 vs. a 4-year average of 576, P < .001, Pearson's chi-squared test). Compared to 2016–2019, 2020 consult volume was decreased by 37% during the first four weeks following lockdown (204 vs. 280, P = .01), and by 48% during the latter four weeks (184 vs. 296, P < .001). Pandemic period consults required acute surgery in 21% of cases, non-acute or non-surgical management in 75%, and palliative management (CMO, hospice, death) in 4%. During the prior year (2019), these proportions were 15%, 80% and 5%, respectively (P = .06). The distribution of consult problem types was not statistically different between periods. Among cranial consults, trauma comprised 45% during the pandemic compared to 41% in the analogous 2019 period; tumor 20% vs 18%; vascular 16%; and ICH/stroke 8%. Among spinal consults, trauma comprised 47% vs 43%, tumor 6% vs 3%, and degenerative disc disease 29% vs 36%.CONCLUSIONNeurosurgical consult volume increasingly declined throughout the post-lockdown COVID-19 pandemic period, which was unprecedented over the 5 years studied. A higher proportion of consults resulted in acute care surgery, approaching statistical significance. Surprisingly, problem types did not differ in the pandemic period despite vastly different social circumstances. Further study will employ time series analysis to contextualize these changes within local COVID-19 surge data.

Medical Ethics and Pandemics in a Low- and Middle-Income Country-what is the Fate of the Health Worker who Render Neurosurgical Services? - The Nigeria Example?

Medical Ethics and Pandemics in a Low- and Middle-Income Country-what is the Fate of the Health Worker who Render Neurosurgical Services? - The Nigeria Example?

COVID-19 and Neurosurgery Consultation Call Volume at a Single Large Tertiary Center With a Propensity-Adjusted Analysis

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected patient care across specialties. Ramifications for neurosurgery include substantial disruptions to surgical training and changes in nonurgent patient presentations to the emergency department. This study quantifies the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of emergency department patients who were referred to the neurosurgery department for further consultation and treatment and identifies and describes trends in the characteristics of these visits.MethodsA retrospective review was performed of neurosurgical consultations at a single high-volume institution for 28 call-day periods before and after the official announcement of the pandemic. Primary outcomes included consultations per call-day, patient presentation category, and patient admission.ResultsThe neurosurgical service was consulted regarding 629 patients (367 male patients) during the study period, with 471 (75%) and 158 (25%) patients presenting before and after the announcement of the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively. The mean number of neurosurgical consultations per call-day was significantly lower in the COVID-19 period (5.6 consultations) compared with the pre–COVID-19 period (16.8 consultations) (P < 0.001). After adjusting for patient demographics, the rate of presentation for general nonurgent concerns, such as back pain, headaches, and other general weaknesses, significantly decreased (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.60 [0.47–0.77], P < 0.001).ConclusionsNeurosurgical consultations significantly decreased after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a substantially lower overall number of consultations necessitating operative interventions. Furthermore, the relative number of patients with nonemergent neurological conditions significantly decreased during the pandemic.

Impact of the updated NICE referral pathway for patients with suspected brain cancer on a neuroscience service

Introduction The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) publish guidelines to facilitate the referral of patients with suspected malignancies, including CNS tumours, from primary care to the appropriate hospital services. We aimed to assess the impact and utility of the most recently revised guidelines, published in 2015, on our neurosurgical service. Materials & methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2-week wait (2WW) referrals received by the neurosurgery department at our institution over a 3 and a half year period between 2015 and 2019. Details pertaining to the patient’s clinical condition and ultimate diagnosis were collected from their medical records and assessed to determine whether the referral criteria were fulfilled. Results Referrals for 101 patients were received over the study period (mean 29/year). Of these, 82 patients (81.2%) were referred based on symptoms, whilst 19 patients (18.8%) were referred with an abnormal brain scan. Seventy-five referrals (74%) were deemed compliant with the guideline criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of the updated guidelines was 90% (73–98%, 95% CI) and 32.4% (22–45%, 95% CI) respectively. The commonest reason for a non-compliant referral, in 21 cases (81%), was headache disorder without neurological deficit. Overall, 30 patients (30%) referred via the 2WW rule were found to have a brain tumour. With guideline adherence, the brain tumour detection rate was 3-fold higher (36.0% vs 11.5%, p = 0.02). Conclusions An update to the NICE guidelines has coincided with an increase in the number of 2WW referrals received by our department, an increase in guideline compliant referrals and an improved rate of tumour detection, though a significant proportion of patients referred via this route ultimately do not require the services of a neurosurgeon. Greater provision of urgent imaging for general practitioners, in accordance with the current NICE guidelines, may reduce unnecessary neurosurgery consultations.

COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Neurosurgery Practice in Malaysia: Academic Insights, Clinical Experience and Protocols from March till August 2020.

The newly discovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease introduced to humans for the first time. Following the pandemic of COVID-19, there is a major shift of practices among surgical departments in response to an unprecedented surge in reducing the transmission of disease. With pooling and outsourcing of more health care workers to emergency rooms, public health care services and medical services, further in-hospital resources are prioritised to those in need. It is imperative to balance the requirements of caring for COVID-19 patients with imminent risk of delay to others who need care. As Malaysia now approaches the recovery phase following the pandemic, the crisis impacted significantly on neurosurgical services throughout the country. Various emergency measures taken at the height of the crisis may remain as the new normal in the provision of neurosurgical services and practices in Malaysia. The crisis has certainly put a strain on the effective delivery of services and as we approach the recovery era, what may have been a strain may prove to be a silver lining in neurosurgical services in Malaysia. The following details are various measures put in place as the new operational protocols for neurosurgical services in Malaysia.

Letter: Neurosurgeons and Curves: The Need for Critical Appraisal of Modeling in the Post-COVID Era

Letter: Neurosurgeons and Curves: The Need for Critical Appraisal of Modeling in the Post-COVID Era

Investigation of Surgical Site Infection Outbreak Among Neurosurgical Patients

Background: The infection control service of a private hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, performs continuous surveillance of surgical patients according to the CDC NHSN protocols. In a routine analysis of the neurosurgical service, we identified a subtle increase in the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI): in 5 months (June–October 2018), 6 patients developed an SSI. From January 2017 until May 2018, there were no cases of infection in neurosurgery, which led us to suspect an outbreak. Methods: A cohort study was used to investigate the factors associated with risk of SSI. We investigated the following variables: ASA score, number of hospital admissions, age, preoperative hospital length of stay, duration of surgery, wound class, general anesthesia, emergency, trauma, prosthesis, surgical procedures, surgeon. Furthermore, 9 key steps were followed to investigate the outbreak: case definition (step 1), search for new SSI cases (step 2); confirmation of the outbreak (step 3); analysis of SSI cases by London Protocol (step 4); analysis of the cohort data (step 5); inspections in the surgical ward (step 6); qualitative and quantitative reports sent to the neurosurgical departments (step 7); continuing with active surveillance (stage 8); announcement of research findings (step 9). Results: The outbreak was confirmed: SSI incidence in the pre-epidemic period (January–May 2018) was 0 of 218 (0%); in the epidemic period (June–October 2018), SSI incidence was 6 of 94 (6.4%) (P &lt; .001). We identified 3 SSI etiologic agents: 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2 S. aureus, and 1 Serratia marcescens. It was unlikely that there was a common source for the outbreak. We identified the following risk factors: second or third hospital admissions (RR, 3.7; P = .041), and preoperative hospital length of stay: SSI patients (4.3±5.7 days) versus control patients (0.7 ± 2.1 days) (P = .048). None of the surgeons presented an SSI rate significantly different from each other. We used the London protocol to identify antibiotic prophylaxis failures in most cases. Conclusions: New cases of infections can be prevented if the length of preoperative hospital stay becomes as short as possible and, most importantly, if antibiotic prophylaxis does not fail.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Andrei Petrovich Romodanov (for the 100th anniversary of birth)

The article traces the life of famous Soviet neurosurgeon Andrei Petrovich Romodanov from his school years and participation in the Great Patriotic War to headship of the Kiev Neurosurgery Research Institute. Dr. Romodanov was the full member of the Academy of Medical Sciences, deputy of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, mentor of several generations of neurosurgeons. His contributions to organization of the neurosurgical service, pedagogical work, participation in All-Soviet Union research programs are described.

Neurosurgical Services in the Northern Zone of Sarawak in Malaysia: The Way Forward Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has set a huge challenge to the delivery of neurosurgical services, including the transfer of patients. We aimed to share our strategy in handling neurosurgical emergencies at a remote center in Borneo island. Our objectives included discussing the logistic and geographic challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsMiri General Hospital is a remote center in Sarawak, Malaysia, serving a population with difficult access to neurosurgical services. Two neurosurgeons were stationed here on a rotational basis every fortnight during the pandemic to handle neurosurgical cases. Patients were triaged depending on their urgent needs for surgery or transfer to a neurosurgical center and managed accordingly. All patients were screened for potential risk of contracting COVID-19 prior to the surgery. Based on this, the level of personal protective equipment required for the health care workers involved was determined.ResultsDuring the initial 6 weeks of the Movement Control Order in Malaysia, there were 50 urgent neurosurgical consultations. Twenty patients (40%) required emergency surgery or intervention. There were 9 vascular (45%), 5 trauma (25%), 4 tumor (20%), and 2 hydrocephalus cases (10%). Eighteen patients were operated at Miri General Hospital, among whom 17 (94.4%) survived. Ninety percent of anticipated transfers were avoided. None of the medical staff acquired COVID-19.ConclusionsThis framework allowed timely intervention for neurosurgical emergencies (within a safe limit), minimized transfer, and enabled uninterrupted neurosurgical services at a remote center with difficult access to neurosurgical care during a pandemic.

Determinants of discharge against medical advice from a rural neurosurgical service in a developing country: A prospective observational study

Background: In low-resource regions of the world, discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is one empiric contributory factor to poor in-hospital outcome that is not often mentioned. This study aims to investigate the determinants of DAMA from a rural neurosurgical service in a developing country.Methods: This was a prospective observational study of all patients who discharged against medical advice in our service between November 2018 and October 2019.Results: There were 88 patients, 67 (76.1%) males, in the study, (M:F = 3.2:1), representing 17.4% of our patient population in the study period. The peak incidence was in the 20–29 years age group which accounted for 37.5% of the cases. About 55% of the patients presented directly to our center; 31.8% were referred from other hospitals, while 3.4% came from traditional caregivers and 1.1% from religious homes. Head injury was the most common indication for presentation (76.1% of the cases). The duration of hospital stay ranged from 2 h to 14 days. Majority of the patients (87.5%) left the hospital within 8 h of presentation. The reason for DAMA was financial constraints in 50% of cases, inadequate health literacy in 20.5%, financial constraints and poor health literacy together in 12.5%, religious misgivings in 4.5%, and traditional belief in 2.3%. Neurotrauma was predictive of early DAMA (P = 0.001).Conclusion: The rate of DAMA was high in our study. Financial constraints with other socioeconomic limitations were the most common causes of DAMA in our environment.

Current Practice of Neurosurgical Teleconsultation in Germany.

As neurosurgery is a demanding specialty with services in larger medical centers only, consultation over larger distances plays an important role in health care. In times of digitalization, teleconsultation for medical images and cases plays an increasing role in neurosurgical services. However, no standards and demands have been established for its execution in the subfield of neurosurgery, so far. Therefore, as a first step, we performed a survey about the current state of teleconsultation in neurosurgery in Germany. A standardized questionnaire consisting of 20 items was used to investigate the frequency of use and the operating conditions of teleconsultation in the field of neurosurgery. The survey was performed during the annual national German Society of Neurosurgery conference in 2017. Participation in the written survey was on voluntary and anonymous basis. In total, 296 individuals took part in the survey (140 specialists in neurosurgery, 77 residents). Among them, 71% were male and 121 worked at a university medical center. In total, 87.5% of all participants indicated that teleconsultation was used in their institutions (n = 113 in university medical centers and n = 76 in hospitals), and a vast majority stated to have had personal experience with it (88.6% of specialists, 85.5% of residents). The most frequent initial request for a consultation was done by phone call (80.3%). Images or data were then primarily transmitted via an electronic system (77.3%), followed by transmissions via CD or by post. The reply to a consultation was also mainly done by phone call (91.3%), followed by fax, or by e-mail. No standard protocol was followed by 78.6% of the respondents, and they stated not to know about the statutory and legal rules. However, it was stated that the protection of patient data was not endangered by using teleconsultation. The usefulness of teleconsultation and its future relevance were rated highly by the participants. The risk of misinterpretation of image data, especially without having direct access to other patient data, seemed to be a critical and unequivocal challenge. The results of the survey demonstrate that teleconsultation for medical images and cases is a frequently used and well-accepted tool in neurosurgical health care. However, a standardized neurosurgical procedure is still lacking and the statutory rules for this field of digital medicine are generally not known in our community. Potential misinterpretation and resulting misjudgment seem to be realistic drawbacks. Thus, we see a necessity for elaboration of guidelines for teleconsultation in neurosurgery on national and European basis.

Institutional review of predictors of in-hospital and 30-day discharge mortality in neurosurgical patients

ObjectiveRisk of adverse events from neurosurgical diagnoses is high. It is not well described whether there are any demographic, admission, or discharge factors that are associated with inpatient or post-discharge mortality outcomes in neurosurgical patients. The aim of this study is to identify the differences in predictors of mortality during inpatient stay and within 30 days of discharge. MethodsThis was a single-institution, retrospective cohort analysis of mortality. Our patient cohort of 11,477 was defined as all adult patients who were discharged (dead or alive) from an inpatient stay between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, and were either admitted to a neurosurgical service or underwent a neurosurgical procedure during that admission. ResultsOut of 11,477 patients, 224 (1.95 %) and 290 (2.53 %) died inpatient and within 30 days of discharge, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of inpatient mortality were older age, female gender, diagnostic group, high present on admission severity of illness (POA-SOI) and present on admission risk of mortality (POA-ROM), intensive care unit (ICU) care, and palliative care consult (all p < 0.05). The predictors of mortality within 30-day discharge were older age, admission urgency, admission specialty type, palliative care consult, and discharge disposition (all p < 0.01). ConclusionOlder age and palliative care consult were significant predictors of both inpatient and within 30 days of discharge mortality. Admission SOI (>3) and ROM (>3) and ICU care were significant predictors for inpatient mortality while discharge disposition (home health, skilled nursing facility) was important for 30-day mortality.

Time to treatment following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, rural place of residence and inter-hospital transfers

BackgroundLittle is known about how transfers influence time to treatment for cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We examine the effect of geographical location, socioeconomic status and inter-hospital transfer on time to treatment following an aSAH. MethodsA state-wide retrospective cohort study was established from 2010-2014. Time intervals from ictus to treatment were calculated. Linear regression examined associations between transfer status, place of residence and socioeconomic status and log-transformed times to treatment. ResultsThe median (IQR) time to intervention was 13.78 (6.48-20.63) hours. Socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with a 1.52-fold increase in the time to hospital (p<0.05) and a 1.76-fold increase in time to neurosurgical admission (p<0.05). Residing in an outer regional area was associated with a 2.27-fold increase (p<0.05) in time to neurosurgical admission. Inter-hospital transfers were associated with a 6.26-fold increase in time to neurosurgical admission (p<0.05). ConclusionsThe time to treatment was negatively influenced by socioeconomic disadvantage; geographical location and inter-hospital transfers. The urgent transfer of individuals with suspected aSAH is undeniably necessary when neurosurgical services are unavailable locally. The timeliness and organisation of transfers should be reviewed to overcome the potential vulnerability to poor outcomes for people from rural and disadvantaged areas.

Neurosurgical patients admitted via the emergency department initiating comfort care measures: a prospective cohort analysis.

Given the serious nature of many neurosurgical pathologies, it is common for hospitalized patients to elect comfort care (CC) over aggressive treatment. Few studies have evaluated the incidence and risk factors of CC trends in patients admitted for neurosurgical emergencies. To analyze all neurosurgical patients admitted to a tertiary care academic referral center via the emergency department (ED) to determine incidence and characteristics of those who initiated CC measures during their initial hospital admission. We performed a prospective, cohort analysis of all consecutive adult patients admitted to the neurosurgical service via the ED between October 2018 and May 2019. The primary outcome was the initiation of CC measures during the patient's hospital admission. CC was defined as cessation of life-sustaining measures and a shift in focus to maintaining the comfort and dignity of the patient. Of the 428 patients admitted during the 7-month period, 29 (6.8%) initiated CC measures within 4.0 ± 4.0days of admission. Patients who entered CC were significantly more likely to have a medical history of cerebrovascular disease (58.6% vs. 33.3%, p= 0.006), dementia (17.2% vs. 1.5%, p= 0.0004), or cancer with metastatic disease (24.1% vs. 7.0%, p= 0.001). Patients with a presenting pathology associated with cerebrovascular disease were significantly more likely to initiate CC (62.1% vs. 35.3, p= 0.04). Patients who underwent emergent surgery were significantly more likely to enter CC compared with those who had elective surgery (80.0% vs. 42.7%, p= 0.02). Only 10 of the 29 (34.5%) patients who initiated CC underwent a neurosurgical operation (p= 0.002). Twenty of the 29 (69.0%) patients died within 0.8 ± 0.8days after the initiation of CC measures. CC measures were initiated in 6.8% of patients admitted to the neurosurgical service via the ED, with the majority of patients entering CC before an operation and presenting with a cerebrovascular pathology.

Impact of COVID-19 on Neurosurgical Training in Southeast Asia

ObjectiveNeurosurgery departments worldwide have been forced to restructure their training programs because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In this study, we describe the impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgical training in Southeast Asia.MethodsWe conducted an online survey among neurosurgery residents in Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand from May 22 to 31, 2020 using Google Forms. The 33-item questionnaire collected data on elective and emergency neurosurgical operations, ongoing learning activities, and health worker safety.ResultsA total of 298 of 470 neurosurgery residents completed the survey, equivalent to a 63% response rate. The decrease in elective neurosurgical operations in Indonesia and in the Philippines (median, 100% for both) was significantly greater compared with other countries (P < 0.001). For emergency operations, trainees in Indonesia and Malaysia had a significantly greater reduction in their caseload (median, 80% and 70%, respectively) compared with trainees in Singapore and Thailand (median, 20% and 50%, respectively; P < 0.001). Neurosurgery residents were most concerned about the decrease in their hands-on surgical experience, uncertainty in their career advancement, and occupational safety in the workplace. Most of the residents (n = 221, 74%) believed that the COVID-19 crisis will have a negative impact on their neurosurgical training overall.ConclusionsAn effective national strategy to control COVID-19 is crucial to sustain neurosurgical training and to provide essential neurosurgical services. Training programs in Southeast Asia should consider developing online learning modules and setting up simulation laboratories to allow trainees to systematically acquire knowledge and develop practical skills during these challenging times.

The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium: Too common and disadvantageous.

The prevalence rates and adversities of delirium have not yet been systematically evaluated and are based on selected populations, limited sample sizes, and pooled studies. Therefore, this study assesses the prevalence rates and outcome of and odds ratios for managing services for delirium. In this prospective cohort study, based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) 5, the Delirium Observation Screening (DOS) scale, and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) construct, 28,118 patients from 35 managing services were included, and the prevalence rates and adverse outcomes were determined by simple logistic regressions and their corresponding odds ratios (ORs). Delirious patients were older, admitted from institutions (OR 3.44-5.2), admitted as emergencies (OR 1.87), hospitalized twice longer, and discharged, transferred to institutions (OR 5.47-6.6) rather than home (OR 0.1), or deceased (OR 43.88). The rate of undiagnosed delirium was 84.2%. The highest prevalence rates were recorded in the intensive care units (47.1-84.2%, pooled 67.9%); in the majority of medical services, rates ranged from 20% to 40% (pooled 26.2%), except, at both ends, palliative care (55.9%), endocrinology (8%), and rheumatology (4.4%). Conversely, in surgery and its related services, prevalence rates were lower (pooled 13.1%), except for cardio- and neurosurgical services (53.3% and 46.4%); the lowest prevalence rate was recorded in obstetrics (2%). Delirium remains underdiagnosed, and novel screening approaches are required. Furthermore, this study identified the impact of delirium on patients, determined the prevalence rates for 32 services, and elucidated the association between individual services and delirium.

Causes of hospital readmissions within 7 days from the neurosurgical service of a quaternary referral hospital.

Background: Evaluation of readmission rates as a proxy metric of health-care quality in neurological surgery has grown to become a prevalent area of investigation in the last several years. Significant attention has been paid to 30-day readmission rates due to the financial incentive to health-care providers following the enforcement of the penalties created by the Affordable Care Act. However, relatively little attention has been paid to patients readmitted within 7 days of discharge to large quaternary neurological surgery services. This study was conducted to examine the causes and unique characteristics of 7-day readmission rates from a neurosurgical service at a large quaternary referral hospital.Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of all 7-day readmissions to the neurosurgical surgery service of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Presbyterian Hospital from August 2017 to June 2019, was performed. Patients were organized into seven categories based on their primary reason for readmission: scheduled surgeries, infection, pain, altered mental status or seizures, general postoperative complications, complications directly resulting from a neurosurgical intervention, and unrelated reasons. Demographic information, the time between initial discharge and subsequent readmission, and discharge disposition were also recorded.Results: Of 5274 discharges, 258 patients (4.9%) were readmitted within 7 days (55.0% male; mean age 60 years of age). Two-thirds of patients readmitted initially underwent care for cranial pathologies (57% of 258 patients) as opposed to a third for spine pathologies (33% of 258 patients). Complications that directly arose from the neurosurgical intervention (e.g., shunt infection or misplacement, and hardware misplacement) represented 18.9% of total readmission, while general postoperative complications (e.g., urinary tract infection) accounted for 15.1% of total readmission, in which all together were slightly greater than a third of readmissions. Seizures or altered mental status led to less than a fifth of readmissions (17.0%), followed by readmissions from unrelated diagnosis or miscellaneous reasons (17.0%) and scheduled surgeries (13.1%). Taken together, surgical site infections (9.7%) and postoperative pain (9.3%) accounted for 9.7% and 9.3 % of readmissions, respectively.Conclusion: Approximately 5% of patients discharged in a single year from our quaternary referral center were readmitted within 7-days. Approximately 90% of all 7-day readmissions were unplanned, with one-third resulting directly from perioperative complications. Further investigation to better understand this acutely vulnerable yet previously overlooked population may guide focused efforts to increase the quality of neurosurgical patient care.

Letter: Maintaining Neurosurgical Resident Education and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Letter: Maintaining Neurosurgical Resident Education and Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Letter: Neurosurgery Residency in the COVID-19 Era: Experiences and Insights From Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

To the Editor: At Thomas Jefferson University, a 1000-bed quaternary care hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, our neurosurgical service has cared for numerous patients testing positive for the novel coronavirus and also presenting with neurosurgical conditions. The institution has created a university-wide tiered system of classifying cases based on urgency and implemented strict policies governing visitation to the hospital, and has taken decisions on the management of risk of exposure and utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE). NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT ROLE IN THE HOSPITAL Neurosurgery residents have a ubiquitous role in the hospital and are often first responders. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that neurosurgery residents have 24/7 access to adequate PPE. Since neurosurgeons are often near the head, it would be prudent to follow the same precautions as our anesthesia colleagues. Based on the current recommendations, the Department of Neurosurgery at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital has been given access to powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs). NEUROSURGERY RESIDENT EDUCATION AND TEAM MORALE While in-person conferences have been formally canceled in order to comply with social distancing criteria, we have found a way to come together, despite being separated, using the many internet-based resources that facilitate virtual group interactions. Residents are not immune to the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The suspension of all elective surgeries has drastically changed the daily schedule of many residents, who now find themselves with more free and unstructured time. Furthermore, the health and safety of the neurosurgery residents is the top priority of our department at Jefferson. The program leadership has fought for the residents to secure adequate PPE to allow residents to respond safely and promptly to any COVID + neurosurgical emergencies. To ensure coverage, the Chief Residents have devised a new call schedule with 2 teams to minimize exposures and mandated that residents who are not working stay home. This pandemic offers a tremendous opportunity for residents to grow and discover a professional voice and identity, which is most influenced during residency training. REDISTRIBUTION OF RESIDENTS IN A PANDEMIC SURGE Neurosurgery residents are inherently facile in stressful situations, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Therefore, neurosurgery residents are working alongside those of general surgery to be part of a “Line Service” to place central and arterial lines in all COVID patients throughout the ICUs in the hospital. While planning for the critical care and acute inpatient needs of patients, we realize that we cannot make our plans in a vacuum—every department and clinical unit is interdependent in some way and has to unite in the fight against COVID-19. Disclosures The authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Palliative Care Consultation and Effect on Length of Stay in a Tertiary-Level Neurological Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Patients admitted to an acute care setting with a devastating brain injury are at high risk for morbidity and mortality. These patients and their families can benefit from the psychosocial and decision-making support of a palliative care consultation.Objective: We aim to investigate the characteristics and impact of palliative care consultation for patients under the management of neurosurgical and critical care services with a devastating brain injury in a neurological intensive care unit (ICU) at a large tertiary-care hospital.Design: Data were collected by retrospective review of the electronic medical record and metrics collected by the palliative care service. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess effect of timing of palliative care consultation.Results: Fifty-five patients admitted to the neurological ICU under the management of the neurosurgical service received a palliative care consultation for the following: hemorrhagic stroke (49%), metastatic cancer (22%), and traumatic brain injury (18%). Of these, 73% had at least one neurosurgical intervention. Palliative care was most frequently consulted for assistance in defining a patient's goals of care (88%). When compared with late consultation, early palliative care consultation was significantly associated with shorter mean length of stay (LOS) and positively correlated in linear regression analysis without an effect on mortality.Conclusions: When compared with a late consultation, early palliative care consultation corresponded to shorter LOS without increasing mortality. One reason for this effect may be that palliative care can help to clarify and document goals of care earlier and more concretely.