Neurosensory Status Research Articles

Cognitive and neurosensory status as determinants of frailty in the elderly

Cognitive disorders represent an important public health problem due to the high incidence against the background of the aging process and the frailty syndrome, in addition to physical decline, there is a cognitive and neurosensory decline, which causes a decrease of autonomy, limitation of physical performance with impairment of functionality in this group of elderly people. The aim of this study was to evaluate the provisional results of cognitive and neurosensory disorders against the background of the frailty syndrome and to establish some correlations between the determining factors in the elderly. The study, of an epidemiological, descriptive, transversal type, was carried out between November and August 2020 - 2022, on a study group of 400 elderly, average age 72.70±0.30 years, divided into three age groups depending on the Fried frailty screening criteria: group I (frail) – 179 (44,75%) cases, group II (pre-frail) – 115 (28,75%) cases and group III (robust) – 106 (26,5%) cases. Subsequently, all participants were examined according to the complex geriatric assessment (Katz score, Lawton, Tinetti, MMSE, Hamilton), the frailty syndrome was established according to the Fried frailty screening criteria, Gröningen score(GFI), physical performance - The Short Physical Performance Battery(SPPB), sarcopenia - SARC-F, nutritional status - MNA and depression - Geriatric Depression Scale(GDS). The obtained data revealed a high frequency of the frailty syndrome in the elderly, including positive and negative correlations with various geriatric scores, which suggests the type of physical, cognitive and sensory frailty with decreasing autonomy and establishing dependence in the elderly included in the study. This category of population presents a group with increased vulnerability, associated with a physical and cognitive decline.

Efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy on neurosensory recovery in patients with inferior alveolar nerve injury following oral surgical procedures: a systematic review.

The present systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on neurosensory recovery of patients with inferior alveolar nerve injury following third molar surgery or dental implant placement. An electronic search was carried out in Scopus, Embase, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Among 1,122 identified papers, seven articles (three RCTs, one observational study, and three case series) met the inclusion criteria. <br />Results: Time lapse from nerve injury to the onset of PBM therapy varied widely from 2days to 4years. The number of patients in each study ranged between 4 and 74. In the majority of the studies, PBM was done using a diode laser at wavelengths ?in the range of 808 to 830nm with power of 5 to 500mW and radiation dose of 3 to 244 J/cm2. Two out of three RCTs found significant neurosensory recovery in the patients who received PBM therapy compared to the controls. The observational study and all case series reported significant improvement in the neurosensory status following PBM therapy. The degree of neurosensory recovery was found to be greater in younger patients and those who received the treatment within 6months following the injury. <br />Conclusions: Due to the limited number of well-designed RCTs and small number of patients in each study, it is not possible to make a clear conclusion about the efficacy of PBM therapy on neurosensory recovery in patients with inferior alveolar nerve injury following third molar or implant procedures. Considering the possibility of spontaneous inferior alveolar nerve recovery during this period, the conclusion based on the studies with no control group should be interpreted with caution. (Quintessence Int 2021;52:140-153; doi:10.3290/j.qi.a45430).

Clinical Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Implant-Prosthetic Treatment: A Pilot Study.

Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of missing teeth in the anterior maxilla is often challenging due to ongoing bone resorption and remodeling events and may require regeneration procedures involving the nasopalatine canal (NPC). We describe a surgical approach with a block graft in relation to the NPC and evaluate clinical performance, sensory perception, and aesthetic result of the implant-prosthetic treatment over a two- to nine-year (mean: 3.5 years) follow-up. Ten implants (six in the right central incisor and four in the left central incisor) were, respectively, placed in 10 consecutive patients with bone defects affecting the NPC and unfavorable widening of the incisive foramen. Treatment stages included: (1) Diagnosis: evaluation of clinical-aesthetic parameters using Cone Beam Computed Tomography; (2) Surgery: block graft placement by palatine and incisal with simultaneous guided bone regeneration, and late (6–10 months) implant placement; (3) Prosthetics: placement of a screw-retained crown (torque of 32 N/cm). At treatment initiation, all the NPCs evaluated in our study were free of pathologies. Treatment evaluation included bone crest thickness, neurosensory status, patients’ treatment perception, and pink and white aesthetic scores (PES/WES). Pre-surgery, anterior ridge thickness at the level of the incisive foramen was (mean ± SD) 3.5 ± 2 mm, 5.4 ± 1.5 mm, and 6.1 ± 1.9 mm at heights of 4, 8, and 14 mm apical to the marginal bone crest, respectively. Post-treatment values were, respectively, 10.1 ± 2.0 mm, 10.5 ± 1.0 mm, and 13.4 ± 3.0 mm. The perception of treatment with the aesthetic pink and white indices (PES/WES) was an average of 7.5 and 7 points, respectively, out of a total of 10 each index, with a recovery of 100% of the neurosensory perception of the area. We propose that bone augmentation using block and particulate graft material can compensate for anatomical variations in the NPC, optimize implant’s three-dimensional positioning and improve facial contour, providing tissue and implant stability and good aesthetic outcomes.

Clinical Notes on Herbert Screw Fixation for Fracture of Anterior Mandible.

This article aims to present the outcomes of treating anterior mandibular fractures using Herbert's screw. A total of 10 patients were treated for fractures of anterior mandible by open reduction and internal fixation using the Herbert screw. The patients were collected starting from June 2016 to November 2017, at the Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, and Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. The follow-up plan was done to evaluate the postoperative clinical outcomes for malocclusion, neurosensory status, hardware failure, malunion/ nonunion, pain, and edema. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications, except for one case where the Herbert screw was insufficient and needed additional 2.0-mm miniplate at the superior border. The postoperative orthopantomograms revealed satisfactory reduction and fixation of the fractures of all cases. The Herbert screw fixation of anterior mandibular fracture is a reliable technique but sensitive and surgeon dependent and needs further clinical investigation.

The Face – A Neurosensory Perspective

The face is a unique part of the body with its individual anatomical characteristics. While the dental clinician is usually focused on the oral cavity, the physical examination should involve close attention to the neurosensory status of the facial skin. Furthermore, skin sensitivity should be assessed pre- and postoperatively in conjunction with dental interventions. The face can be divided into several functional units, such as the eyes, nose, mouth/lips, and cheeks. With regard to the neurosensory supply of the skin, various innervation territories of the face can be distinguished representing the three divisions of the trigeminal nerve. In addition, cutaneous branches of the cervical plexus provide sensitivity to the lower and lateral portions of the face. The objective of the present article is to provide the dental clinician with a literature update of the neurosensory innervation of the face.

The Face – A Neurosensory Perspective

The face is a unique part of the body with its individual anatomical characteristics. While the dental clinician is usually focused on the oral cavity, the physical examination should involve close attention to the neurosensory status of the facial skin. Furthermore, skin sensitivity should be assessed pre- and postoperatively in conjunction with dental interventions. The face can be divided into several functional units, such as the eyes, nose, mouth/lips, and cheeks. With regard to the neurosensory supply of the skin, various innervation territories of the face can be distinguished representing the three divisions of the trigeminal nerve. In addition, cutaneous branches of the cervical plexus provide sensitivity to the lower and lateral portions of the face. The objective of the present article is to provide the dental clinician with a literature update of the neurosensory innervation of the face.

Surgical treatment of painful inferior alveolar nerve injuries following endodontic treatment: a consecutive case series of seven patients.

Injuries of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related to endodontic treatment are being increasingly reported. However, consensus on the preferred intervention and the timing of and indications for surgical treatment is lacking. Here, we describe our experience with painful IAN injuries arising from endodontic treatment and requiring prompt microsurgical treatment. Seven consecutive patients with painful IAN injuries were referred to the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of San Paolo Hospital in Milan. All patients had undergone root canals endodontic treatment in the mandibular molar or premolar between 2007 and 2014. The time elapsed between injury and referral for surgical treatment ranged from 10days to 20months. Each patient was treated by one of several different microsurgical procedures, described herein. Overall, neurosensory status and IAN-related pain improved in all seven patients. The best results were obtained by IAN replacement with a sural nerve graft. However, complete sensory recovery was not achieved in any of the patients. Although our sample includes only seven patients, early surgical treatment with an interpositional sural nerve graft seems to allow neurosensory recovery. Less satisfactory results are achieved in patients with IAN injuries of >12months duration.

Early surgery and neurodevelopmental outcomes of children born extremely preterm

ObjectivesTo (1) compare the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 8 years of age of children born extremely preterm (EP) who underwent surgical procedures during the course of their initial hospital admission with...

Relationship Between the Quantity of Nerve Exposure During Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Surgery and Sensitive Recovery.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how different exposures of the V3 nerves during orthognathic surgery impact neurosensory disturbances. The study included 127 patients who underwent either bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or BSSO with maxillary le Fort 1. They were divided into 6 groups, identified by the quantity of V3 nerve exposure. All patients were examined in a pre-op period and again after 1, 3, 6 months post-op. The standardized tests used were to clarify the objective and subjective neurosensory status of the exposed nerve. Neurosensory evaluation included; a pin prick test, the 2 points discriminator, light touch, warm and cold tests, and blunt discrimination. They were all done bilaterally on the lower lip area. In only 2 patients the nerve was damaged during surgery and thus they were not included in this study. In 10.2% of patients there was no nerve exposure, 25.2% had longitudinal vestibular segment nerve exposed, 22.8% had the longitudinal upper-vestibular segment exposed, 20.5% had the longitudinal lower-vestibular segment exposed, 14.2% had the longitudinal upper-lower-vestibular segment exposed, and in 7.1% of patients the nerve was totally exposed. Given the estimated time of 1 month there was 100% recovery in patients whose nerve was unexposed. Considering the other patients, the authors had a variable number of patients who did not recover completely. The authors estimate a correlation between the recovery time and the quantity of the exposed nerve. There is a high incidence of neurosensory disturbance in the lower lip and chin after BSSO and intraoperative quantity of nerve exposure.

Changing Neurodevelopment at 8 Years in Children Born Extremely Preterm Since the 1990s.

Survival of extremely preterm (EP; <28 weeks' gestation) infants has increased over the last 2 decades. Equivalent reductions in developmental morbidity in early childhood have not been consistently reported. The aim of this study was to determine trends in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 8 years of age of children born EP (22-27 completed weeks' gestation) over the past 2 decades. Population-based cohorts of all EP survivors born in the state of Victoria, Australia in 1991-1992, 1997, and 2005 were recruited at birth. At 8 years of age, general intelligence (IQ), academic achievement, and neurosensory status were assessed. Major neurosensory disability was defined as any of moderate or severe cerebral palsy, IQ <-2 SD relative to term controls, blindness, or deafness. Rates of major neurosensory disability were similar in all eras (1991-1992, 18%; 1997, 15%; 2005, 18%), as were rates of IQ <-2 SD, cerebral palsy, blindness, and deafness. Mean z scores for IQ were similar across eras, but there was some evidence that scores for academic achievement were lower in 2005 than in 1997, and the odds of having academic problems were higher in 2005 than in both earlier eras. These outcomes were not explained by differences in known perinatal care or sociodemographic variables between eras. Contrary to expectations, rates of major neurosensory disability have not improved, and academic performance is poorer at early school age in 2005 than in earlier eras for EP children born in the state of Victoria, Australia.

Lingual Nerve Repair: To Graft or Not to Graft?

Since no studies have compared direct and graft repair of the lingual nerve, we examined the subjective and objective outcomes of lingual nerve repair by direct epineurial repair and indirect graft repair, assessed the effect of other confounding variables, and compared the outcomes of autograft and allograft repairs. All patients who had undergone microneurosurgical repair of the lingual nerve from 2000 to 2012 by 1 surgeon (M.M.) were asked to complete an online questionnaire regarding their current neurosensory status at least 2 years after nerve repair. A direct comparison was made between patients who had undergone direct epineurial repair and those who had undergone interpositional nerve graft repair. Student's t test and χ(2) test were used to determine whether a significant difference existed in the success between the 2 techniques and whether age, gender, race, delay from injury to repair, or degree of initial nerve deficit influenced the success of nerve repair. Of the 72 patients identified, 43, who had undergone 47 nerve repairs (18 direct, 29 indirect graft repairs [4 bilateral]; 28 female and 19 male patients; mean age 28.3 years), were interviewed. The objective results of functional sensory recovery, defined by a Medical Research Council Scale grade of S3, S3+, or S4, was 89% for the graft repairs and 85% for the direct repairs (P = .01). The subjective patient satisfaction score (0 to 10 scale) was 8.9 for the graft repairs and 8.1 for the direct repairs (P = .02). The autograft and allograft repairs performed comparably, and the other variables (ie, age, gender, race, delay from injury to nerve repair, gap length, and initial Sunderland grade injury) were not found to be significant (P > .05). Graft repair of the lingual nerve provides superior long-term (>2 years) objective and subjective outcomes compared with direct repair. This might be because of the lack of tension at the repair site, more freedom with nerve stump preparation, and the addition of neurotropic and neurotrophic factors from the donor nerve graft at the site of injury to augment neurosensory recovery.

Implants Placed in the Nasopalatine Canal to Rehabilitate Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study With Long Follow-up

To assess the survival rate of implants placed in the nasopalatine canal for the rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxillae and the level of satisfaction of these patients. A retrospective study was performed between 2000 and 2009 of patients with severe atrophy of edentulous maxillae (Cawood and Howell's class V) rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses with 1 implant placed in the nasopalatine canal. A preoperative computed tomography scan was obtained of all patients and all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The following parameters were assessed: neurosensory status of the anterior palate (using the pointed/blunt discrimination method); implant success rate according to criteria described by Albrektsson et al; patient satisfaction with the prosthetic treatment (using visual analogue scales). Thirteen patients with a mean age of 54.8 years were treated, 5 men and 8 women. Seventy-eight implants were placed: 13 in the nasopalatine canal, 6 in the zygomatic bone, 12 in the pterygomaxillary region, 2 in the frontomaxillary buttress and 45 in other locations. Six patients reported a slight decrease in sensitivity in the anterior palate after surgery, which disappeared in all cases within a few weeks. Two early failures (before prosthetic loading) and no late failures (after prosthetic loading) of nasopalatine implants were recorded, yielding a success rate for these implants of 84.6% after a mean follow-up of 70 months (range 24 to 132 months. High patient satisfaction with the prosthetic restoration was generally achieved in terms of comfort, stability, function, esthetics, and ease of cleaning. Residual bone is associated with the nasopalatine canal, even in patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This canal may be considered a possible location for an anterior implant when rehabilitating atrophic patients using implant-supported prostheses.

Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO)

We investigated changes in the sensitivity of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and assessed the differences between SSRO and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). The subjects included in this study were 46 patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent IVRO (88 rami) and 30 patients who underwent SSRO (59 rami). An objective evaluation of the neurosensory status of each patient was completed preoperatively and at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Other variables studied for each patient included sex, age, magnitude of mandibular setback, and amount of blood loss during surgery. We found that a neurosensory recovery occurred earlier in the oral mucosa than at cutaneous points. The number of oral mucosa points showing reduced neurosensory function and neurosensory disturbance after SSRO was significantly higher than after IVRO at 1, 4, and 8 weeks (P<0.05). The nerve recovery observed after SSRO was delayed for a longer period than that noted in our previous study of IVRO. In conclusion, we found changes in sensitivity at cutaneous points and the oral mucosa after SSRO and assessed the differences between SSRO and IVRO.

Inferior alveolar and mental nerve injuries associated with open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures: A Seven Year retrospective study

PurposeTo document adverse neurosensory changes in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and mental nerve (MN) after surgical mandibular fracture treatment and to identify risk factors associated with these changes. Materials and methodsA retrospective study of patients surgically treated for mandibular fractures. The primary study variable was the postoperative change in IAN/MN neurosensory examination after fracture fixation. Risk factors were categorized as demographic, anatomic, experience of the operator, fracture displacement and number of miniplates placed at each fracture site. Appropriate statistics were computed. Results209 patients with 293 fractures were analysed. One hundred twenty fractures (41%) were located between the lingula and mental foramen, and 173 fractures (59%) were located distal to the mental foramen. Two hundred seventeen (41%) were displaced by 5 mm or more. In 38 fractures (13%), the IAN/MN neurosensory status worsened after treatment. In a multivariate model, fracture displacement, operator inexperience and two plate fixation were associated with a statistically significant risk (P ≤ 0.05) for postoperative deterioration of IAN/MN sensation. ConclusionFixation with two miniplates, fracture displacement of 5 mm or more and operator inexperience were associated with an increased risk for deterioration of the IAN/MN neurosensory status after treatment of mandibular fractures.

Evaluation of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery: a prospective study.

The prospective study was to evaluate the incidence, type of neurosensory disturbance (NSD), grade its severity and monitor its recovery occurring in the lower lip and chin due to damage to inferior alveolar nerve following orthognathic surgery involving mandible. The study included 10 patients who have undergone sagittal split osteotomy, genioplasty, and anterior subapical osteotomy (ASO). All the patients examined preoperatively and post operatively 1week, 1 and 6months according to standardized test to clarify the subjective and objective neurosensory status of the injured nerve. Pin prick test, blunt test, two-point discrimator test, brush stoke direction, light touch test, warm and cold test were used bilaterally to lower lip and chin area. Seven patients underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) (70%), one patient had BSSO with genioplasty (10%), two patients had BSSO with ASO (20%). During the operation none of the nerves were transectioned, in 60% of patients nerve was not visible and in 40% of patients nerve was seen in distal segment. 70% of patients underwent setback, 30% of patients underwent advancement. The subjective evaluation of the patients revealed the incidence of 90% at 1week, 30% at 1month, 20% at 6months and 10% at 1year post operatively. The altered sensation reported subjectively was hypoesthesia in 50% of the patients, anaesthesia in 40% of the patients. There was 100% recovery in advancement cases and 93.5% recovery in setback cases. There is a high incidence of NSD of the lower lip and chin after BSSO related to advancement, setback, intraoperative nerve encounter and surgical skill. However, recovery of sensation occurs with increasing frequency during the follow-up period. The clinical neurosensory tests are effective guides to study the neurosensory deficit.

Changes in the sensitivity of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

In this study we investigated the changes in the sensitivity of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa that occur after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO). Additionally, postoperative changes in the sensitivity and the relationships between neurosensory disturbance and factors associated with IVRO operations were evaluated. An objective evaluation of the neurosensory status of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa of each patient was completed preoperatively and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The other variables studied for each patient included sex, age, magnitude of mandibular setback, and the amount of haemorrhage that occurred during surgery. In addition, the relationships between neurosensory disturbance and factors connected with IVRO operations were evaluated. We found that at cutaneous points, contributing factors such as sex, age, the magnitude of mandibular setback, and haemorrhage were associated with an increased risk of neurosensory disturbance after IVRO. However, these factors were not associated with that in the oral mucosa. In conclusion, we demonstrated the changes that occur in the sensitivity of cutaneous points and the oral mucosa after IVRO, the postoperative changes in sensitivity, and the relationships between neurosensory disturbance and factors connected with IVRO operations.

Neurosensory and functional evaluation in distraction osteogenesis of the anterior mandibular alveolar process

Neurosensory status and craniomandibular function of 19 patients (mean age 35.2 years, range 17.8–58.8 years) treated by combined surgical orthodontic treatment with distraction osteogenesis of the mandibular anterior alveolar process (DO group) was compared with that in 41 orthodontically treated patients (mean age 22.9 years, range 15.1–49.0 years; control group). Clinical examination took place on average 5.9 years (DO group) and 5.4 years (control group) after treatment ended. Neurosensory status was determined by two-point discrimination (2-pd) and the pointed and blunt test. Lateral cephalograms evaluated advancement of the mandibular alveolar process and possible relapse. There was no significant difference in craniomandibular function and neurosensory status between the groups. Age was significantly correlated with 2-pd at the lips (DO: p=0.01, R=0.575; control group: p=0.039, R=0.324) and chin (DO: p=0.029, R=0.501; control group: p=0.008, R=0.410). Younger patients had smaller 2-pd values. Gender, age, the amount of advancement, and relapse at point B or incision inferior show no correlation with craniomandibular function and neurosensory impairment. DO of the mandibular anterior alveolar process is a valuable and safe method with minor side effects regarding neurosensory impairment.

Concomitant Removal of Mandibular Third Molars During Sagittal Split Osteotomy Minimizes Neurosensory Dysfunction

Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is 1 of the most important postoperative complications after sagittal split osteotomy (SSO). The purpose of our study was to investigate the effects of the presence or absence of a mandibular third molar on the neurosensory recovery of the IAN after SSO. A prospective cohort study enrolled a sample composed of patients who underwent SSO to correct mandibular deformities. The primary predictor variable was the status of the mandibular third molar at the time of SSO and it was divided into two levels, present at the time of SSO (Group I) or absent at the time of SSO (Group II). The primary outcome variable was neurosensory recovery of the IAN, assessed using the Medical Research Council scale, functional sensory recovery, and subjective evaluation. Neurosensory status was measured 3 times (preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively). Appropriate bivariate and multivariate statistics were computed, and the level of statistical significance was set at P < .05. A total of 120 SSOs were performed in 60 patients. Group I included 64 SSOs (mean patient age ± SD 19.3 ± 8.0 years) and group II, 56 SSOs (mean patient age 24.9 ± 10.0 years). The Medical Research Council scale scores showed that the presence of third molars during SSO was associated with a statistically significant decreased incidence of neurosensory disturbance of the IAN at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (all P < .01). Functional sensory recovery was achieved more frequently in group I, but this difference remained significant only at 3 months after adjusting (P = .01). A "normal sensation" was subjectively reported more frequently in group I at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P ≤ .05). The presence of third molars during SSO minimizes postoperative neurosensory disturbance of the IAN.

Microsurgical Repair of the Peripheral Trigeminal Nerve After Mandibular Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy

Injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and lingual nerves (LNs) have long been known complications of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). Most postoperative paresthesias resolve without treatment. However, microsurgical exploration of the nerve may be indicated in cases of significant persistent sensory dysfunction associated with observed or suspected localized IAN or LN injury. We report the demographics and outcome of microsurgical exploration and repair of peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve injured because of the SSRO. A retrospective chart review was completed on all patients who had microsurgical repair of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries caused by mandibular SSRO and were operated on by the senior author (R.A.M.) between March 1986 and December 2005. A physical examination, including standardized neurosensory testing (NST) as described by Zuniga et al, was completed on each patient preoperatively. All patients were followed periodically after surgery for at least 1 year with NST repeated at each visit. NST results obtained at the last patient visit were used to determine the final level of recovery of sensory function. Sensory recovery was evaluated using guidelines established by the Medical Research Council scale. The following data were collected and analyzed: age of patient, gender, nerve injured, chief sensory complaint (numbness, pain, or both), duration (months) from injury to surgical intervention, intraoperative findings, surgical procedure, and neurosensory status at final evaluation. Given the retrospective nature of this study, the research was exempt from our institutional review board ethics committee. There were 54 (n = 54) patients (8 males and 46 females) with an average age of 36.9 years (range, 16 to 55 years) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. The most commonly injured/repaired nerve was the IAN (n = 39), followed by the LN (n = 14), and the long buccal nerve (n = 1). In 31 patients (57.4%), the chief sensory complaint was numbness, while 20 patients (37%) complained of pain and numbness, and 3 patients (5.5%) complained of pain without mention of numbness. The average time from nerve injury to repair was 9.4 months (range, 3 to 50 months). The most common intraoperative finding was a discontinuity defect (n = 18, 33.3%), followed by partial nerve severance (n = 15, 27.8%), neuroma-in-continuity (n = 11, 20.3%), and compression injury (n = 10, 18.5%). The most frequent surgical procedure was autogenous nerve graft reconstruction of the IAN using the sural or great auricular nerve (n = 22, 40.7%), followed by excision of a neuroma with or without neurorrhaphy (n = 13, 24.1%). All the LN injuries (n = 14) were partial or complete severances, of which 2 were reconstructed with autogenous nerve grafts and the other 12 underwent neurorrhaphy. The long buccal nerve injury required excision of a proximal stump neuroma without neurorrhaphy. After a minimum of 1-year follow-up, NST showed that 8 nerves (14.8%) showed no sign of recovery; 19 nerves (35.2%) had regained "useful sensory function," and 27 nerves (50%) showed full recovery as described by the Medical Research Council scale. Microsurgical repair of the IAN or LN injured during the SSRO can be considered in patients with persistent, unacceptable sensory dysfunction in the distribution of the involved nerve. Modifications of surgical technique may be helpful in reducing the incidence of such injuries. Based on our experience, an algorithm for evaluation and treatment is presented.

Neurological and developmental disabilities in ELBW and VLBW: follow-up at 2 years of age

To establish the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disabilities among premature infants born in western Poland. From 1999 to 2003, 640 extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and 777 very low birth weight (VLBW) infants were admitted to the tertiary care center in Poland. Discharged home were 302 and 671 of them, respectively. At 2 years corrected age, 165 ELBW and 285 VLBW children were diagnosed with neurosensory abnormality including cerebral palsy (CP) and evaluated with Bayley Scales of Infant Development II. Mental developmental index (MDI) score <70 was recorded in 104 children (23.1%). There were 75 (16.7%) cases of CP, 8 (1.7%) deafness/hearing loss, 22 (4.8%) blindness and 14 (3.1%) of epilepsy. Patients with abnormal neurosensory status had significantly lower MDI compared with those with normal development (83.8±9 vs 54.7±10). Severe intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leucomalacia, ventricular dilatation and hydrocephalus were the most important risk factors for neurologic abnormality. Severe disability is more common among ELBW compared with VLBW infants and remains a major challenge for health-care providers.