Neuromuscular Blockade Research Articles

Effects of neuromuscular block reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate versus sugammadex on bowel motility recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveTo compare the effects of neostigmine/glycopyrrolate (a traditional agent) and sugammadex on bowel motility recovery and the occurrence of digestive system complications after colorectal surgery. DesignProspective, randomized controlled trial. SettingA single tertiary center. Patients111 patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. InterventionsPatients were randomized into two groups based on the block reversal agent: 1) a mixture of 50 μg.kg−1 of neostigmine and 10 μg.kg-1 of glycopyrrolate (neostigmine group) and 2) 2 mg.kg−1 of sugammadex (sugammadex group). MeasurementsThe primary outcome was the time from the surgery's completion to the first flatus.The time to the first postoperative defecation, incidences of postoperative nausea or vomiting, ileus, and dry mouth, as well as postoperative length of stay, were also assessed. Main resultsThe time to the first flatus was significantly shorter in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group (59 [42–79] h vs 69 [53–90] h, P = 0.027). The time to the first defecation and the incidences of postoperative nausea or vomiting and ileus did not differ between the groups, nor did the postoperative length of stay. However, the incidence of postoperative dry mouth was significantly lower in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group (7 patients [13%] vs 39 patients [71%], P < 0.001). ConclusionsThe time to the first flatus was shorter using 2 mg.kg−1 sugammadex to reverse the neuromuscular block for laparoscopic colorectal surgery compared to reversal with conventional neostigmine/glycopyrrolate.

A Comparative Study of Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Major Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries.

Background Neuraxial blockade includes epidural and spinal anesthesia (SA) that have gained wide acceptance for major lower limb orthopedic surgery. Both techniques are competent in rendering surgical anesthesia and pain relief, with specific advantages and disadvantages. SA has the merits of rapid onset and adequate anesthesia with a small volume of the drug but has significant hypotension and unpredictable duration. Epidural anesthesia allows for finer control over analgesia and the duration of anesthesia but requires more substantial volumes of drugs and is slower in onset. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) combines the rapid commencement of action of SA with flexibility in epidural anesthesia, thus optimizing the management of the intraoperative and postoperative phases. This study aims to evaluate hemodynamic changes, compare the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, and track any problems related to CSEA and SA in major lower limb orthopedic procedures. Additionally, this study contrasts the hemodynamic, motor, and sensory changes in the two groups. Methodology A total of 30 individuals were randomized to one of two groups in this prospective comparative trial, which included 60 patients receiving major lower limb orthopedic surgery and meeting the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II criteria. Group A received CSEA, and Group B received SA. The degree and duration of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, and complications were all recorded. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to evaluate statistical significance using Student's t-test and chi-square test. Results The onset of sensory block in our study was earlier in Group B compared to Group A. In both groups, hemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the study. We recorded the onset/duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic changes and took mean values to find any significant difference. Postoperative complications and rescue analgesic requirements were monitored and managed and were a part of our study. Conclusions This study compared CSEA and SA regarding the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, and associated complications in major lower limb orthopedic surgeries. The results shed light on the advantages and shortcomings of each anesthesia technique and, therefore, will help choose the correct method of anesthesia in a given surgery.

Nociception level index variations in ICU: curarized vs non-curarized patients — a pilot study

PurposePain is a major physiological stressor that can worsen critical medical conditions in many ways. Currently, there is no reliable monitoring tool which is available for pain monitoring in the deeply sedated ± curarized critically ill patients. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the multiparameter nociception index (NOL®) in the critical care setting. We compared NOL with traditionally used neurovegetative signs and examined its correlation with sedation depth measured by bispectral index (BIS®) electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring.MethodsThis retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted in a general intensive care unit, including patients who required moderate-to-deep levels of sedation with or without continuous neuromuscular blockade. The performance of NOL was evaluated both in the entire studied population, as well as in two subgroups: curarized and non-curarized patients.ResultsNOL demonstrated greater accuracy than all other indicators in pain detection in the overall population. In the non-curare subgroup, all indices correctly recognized painful stimulation, while in the patients subjected to neuromuscular blocking agent’s infusion, only NOL properly identified nociception. In the former group, EEG’s relation to nociception was on the border of statistical significance, whereas in the latter BIS showed no correlation with NOL.ConclusionNOL emerges as a promising device for pain assessment in the critical care setting and exhibits its best performance precisely in the clinical context where reliable pain assessment methods are most lacking. Furthermore, our research confirms the distinction between sedation and analgesia, highlighting the necessity for distinct monitoring instruments to accurately assess them.

Ultrasound guided supraclavicular block versus combined infraclavicular and Suprascapular block: A randomized controlled trial

The infraclavicular block (ICB) can avoid some of the side effects of the supraclavicular block (SCB) like hemi-diaphragmatic palsy. This study aimed to analyze the comparative efficacy of supraclavicular block versus combined infraclavicular block and suprascapular block.Patients undergoing upper limb surgery under general anaesthesia were randomized into group S (to receive supraclavicular brachial plexus block) and group I (to receive infraclavicular brachial plexus block and suprascapular nerve block). Onset times and the duration of both sensory and motor block was noted in both the groups. Postoperative pain as assessed by NRS score and total fentanyl requirement was noted for 24 hours. : The group S showed a significantly faster onset of both sensory (8.47±3.12) vs. 13.75±4.69; p&amp;#60;0.001) and motor blocks (15.56±5.32 vs. 24.17±5.67; p&amp;#60;0.001). The duration of sensory block was significantly greater in the group I, with no significant difference in the duration of motor block.We also noted hemi diaphragmatic paresis (27.8%) and paralysis (8.3%) only in the SCB group.For the patients undergoing upper limb surgeries, the use of ICB+SSB block as compared to the SCB block resulted in increased duration of sensory block; however, the fentanyl consumption was not significantly reduced.

Comparative study of different doses of intrathecal clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for lower limb surgeries: A prospective observational study

Clinical studies suggested that intrathecal clonidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine prolongs sensory as well as the motor block of spinal anesthesia, decreases local anesthetic drug requirement, and provides postoperative analgesia.In the present study, we have examined the effects of two distinct clonidine dosages administered intrathecally as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in individuals undergoing elective lower limb operations, to find out the optimal dose among them. Two groups of thirty patients each posted for lower limb surgery were included in this study. Patients in Group A Received inj. bupivacaine (hyperbaric) 0.5% 3ml (15 mg) + inj. clonidine 0.2 ml (30 µg) + normal saline 0.1 ml intrathecally, in Group B patients received inj. bupivacaine (hyperbaric) 0.5% 3ml (15 mg) + inj.clonidine 0.3 ml (45 µg) intrathecally.Throughout spinal anesthesia; both groups were prospectively observed for various parameters.Compared to patients in group A, patients in group B experienced sensory and motor block for longer durations of time. As compared to group A patients, group B patients experienced increased hypotension, bradycardia, and dry mouth; however, overall adverse effects are mild and easily treated. In addition, we observed that group B patients experienced analgesia for a longer duration of time than did Group A patients. Addition of intrathecal clonidine to bupivacaine significantly hastens the onset of sensory and motor block, provides excellent surgical analgesia, prolongs the duration of superior quality postoperative analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements with relative hemodynamic stability.

A sensitive tobramycin electrochemical aptasensor based on multiple signal amplification cascades

The residue of tobramycin, a broad spectrum antibiotic commonly used in animal husbandry, has evitable impact on human health, which may cause kidney damage, respiratory paralysis, neuromuscular blockade and cross-allergy in humans. Sensitive monitoring of tobramycin in animal-derived food products is therefore of great importance. Herein, a new aptamer electrochemical biosensor for sensing tobramycin with high sensitivity is demonstrated via exonuclease III (Exo III) and metal ion-dependent DNAzyme recycling and hybridization chain reaction (HCR) signal amplification cascades. Tobramycin analyte binds aptamer-containing hairpin probe to switch its conformation to expose the toehold sequence, which triggers Exo III-based catalytic digestion of the secondary hairpin to release many DNAzyme strands. The substrate hairpins immobilized on the Au electrode (AuE) are then cyclically cleaved by the DNAzymes to form ssDNAs, which further initiate HCR formation of lots of long methylene blue (MB)-tagged dsDNA polymers on the AuE. Subsequently electro-oxidation of these MB labels thus exhibit highly enhanced currents for sensing tobramycin within the 5–1000 nM concentration range with an impressive detection limit of 3.51 nM. Furthermore, this strategy has high selectivity for detecting tobramycin in milk and shows promising potential for detect other antibiotics for food safety monitoring.

Parasacral ischial plane block for lower limb surgeries: A case series

The para-sacral ischial plane block (PIP block) is a novel fascial plane approach targeting the sacral plexus. This technique simplifies the process as direct visualization of the sacral plexus or sciatic nerve is unnecessary. This retrospective case series includes ten patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II-IV, aged over 18 years, undergoing elective or emergency lower limb surgeries such as debridement and below-knee amputation between May 2023 and November 2023. The block was performed in ≤ 6 minutes for all patients. Onset of subjective analgesia was almost immediate in those presenting with pain. Sensory loss occurred within 9 to 12 minutes. Motor block in the sciatic nerve distribution did not reach Grade 2 in any patient. Hemodynamic stability was notably maintained in all high-risk cases. Intraoperative supplementation with ketamine was required for one patient. The PIP block is a quick, easy-to-perform technique that offers satisfactory surgical conditions and hemodynamic stability in high-risk patients undergoing lower limb surgeries. It also provides prolonged postoperative analgesia and early resumption of oral intake with minimal procedural discomfort.

Utilizing calcium gluconate with low dose neostigmine to enhance neuromuscular recovery from non-depolarizing blockade: A prospective randomized control study

Ionized calcium has a pivotal role to play in neuromuscular transmission. Co-administration of calcium gluconate may allow for tapering the dose of neostigmine used for neuromuscular reversal, thus minimizing adverse effects associated with it while also reducing the chances of residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of calcium gluconate upon co-administration with neostigmine in enhancing rate of neuromuscular recovery and reducing the incidence of postoperative residual curarization.: This parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing surgery at a tertiary care center. Patients in Group CN received 5 mg kg of 10% calcium gluconate with neostigmine while Group N received 5 ml 0.9% saline with neostigmine for reversal of NMB. Time from neostigmine administration to achieving a TOF ratio of ≥0.9 was taken as the primary outcome. Additional neostigmine requirement and symptoms of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) were considered as secondary outcomes.A significant difference was found in the meantime taken to achieve TOF ratio ≥0.9 after giving reversal, taking 5.43 ±2.12 mins in Group CN and 8.49 ±4.72 mins in Group N (p = 0.001). Although in Group N, 13.33% patients showed signs of RNMB in PACU versus 3.33% patients in Group CN. This difference was not found to be clinically significant (p=0.081). The findings of our study suggest that the administration of exogenous calcium may improve neuromuscular transmission even in normocalcemic patients. In conclusion, co-administration of calcium gluconate with low dose neostigmine helps in reducing neuromuscular recovery time in the early period of NMB reversal without incurring any significant disadvantages of administering higher doses of neostigmine.

Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block as a sole analgesic in fess surgeries and reconstructive nasal surgeries

: Severe postoperative pain is the most common complaint following Functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) and reconstructive nasal surgeries. Sensory, autonomic nerves supplying paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity, and palate relay in sphenopalatine ganglion. Bilateral Sphenopalatine ganglion block can be an effective regional anaesthetic technique for post-operative analgesia. We conducted a study with ultrasound-guided bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block as the sole analgesic compared to Fentanyl in patients undergoing FESS &amp; reconstructive nasal surgeries performed under general anaesthesia. The primary objective of our study was to assess the analgesic effect, quality, and duration of analgesia of ultrasound guided bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block as a sole analgesic. In addition, the secondary aim was to further evaluate the adverse effects.With Institutional ethical committee approval and written informed consent, we conducted this study with two groups of 30 patients each. The surgical procedure was performed under general anaesthesia. At the end of the surgery and before the reversal of neuromuscular blockade, bilateral sphenopalatine plexus block was performed under ultrasound guidance in interventional Group (A) with a mixture of 0.25% Ropivacaine, Dexamethasone 4mg 7.5ml each side, whereas the control Group (B) received fentanyl 2ug/kg intraoperatively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were evaluated soon after extubating (0hrs) and up to 48 hrs postoperatively in all patients.There was no significant difference in VAS scores at 0hrs, 2hrs between both groups. Interventional group(A) had statistically significant lower scores (P &amp;#60;0.00) 4hrs onwards till 48hrs than in control group(B). No adverse events were noted with minimal postoperative analgesic requirement in group(A) (P &amp;#60;0.000).: We conclude, that ultrasound-guided bilateral sphenopalatine block is a safe and effective procedure that provides sustained and superior quality of analgesia when compared to fentanyl

Efficacy of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia compared to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine: A randomized controlled study

In 1980s, nine cases of neurotoxicity were reported following the use of 2-chloroprocaine (2-CP). But, Taniguchi et al found that it was due to low pH and antioxidant sodium bisulfite. Further studies confirmed that it was safe to use the drug. It provides spinal anesthesia adequately.To study efficacy of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia compared to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaineThis was a randomized controlled study. We used prospective double blind method. The study was done in 100 patients. Random allocation software was used to randomize patients in two groups. Group 1 patients (N=50) received 4 ml 1% 2-chloroprocaine while Group 2 patients (N=50) were given 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Baseline parameters were similar in two groups (p&amp;#62;0.05). Parameters like Sensory onset, Height of Sensory blockade, Time for two segment regression, Duration of motor block, Time to void urine were significantly more patients belonging to Group-II (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine) compared to patients belonging to group-I (2-chloroprocaine) (p&amp;#60;0.05). 4 ml 1% 2-chloroprocaine for intrathecal injection of lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries is more effective than 2.5 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Intensive Care Unit-acquired Weakness in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) is a common neuromuscular complication of critical illness, impacting patients' recovery and long-term outcomes. However, limited evidence is available on pooled prevalence and risk factors of ICUAW specifically in the COVID-19-infected population. We searched on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PEDro, and EBSCOhost/CINAHL up to January 31, 2024. Data synthesis was conducted using the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation model for the pooled prevalence rate and odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals was used to identify risk factors. The pooled prevalence of ICUAW in COVID-19 patients was 55% in eight studies on 868 patients. Risk factors for developing ICUAW in these patients were: old age (WMD 4.78, 95% CI, 1.06-8.49), pre-existing hypertension (OR = 1.63, 95% CI, 1.02-2.61), medical intervention of prone position (OR = 5.21, 95% CI, 2.72-9.98), use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) (OR = 12.04, 95% CI, 6.20-23.39), needed tracheostomy (OR = 18.07, 95% CI, 5.64-57.92) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) (OR = 5.24, 95% CI = 2.36-11.63). The prevalence of ICUAW in patients with COVID-19 was considered relatively high. Older age, pre-existing hypertension, medical intervention of prone position, NMBA use, needed tracheostomy and RRT were likely risk factors. In the future, interdisciplinary medical team should pay attention to high-risk groups for ICUAW prevention and early treatments.

Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided supra-clavicular block in children

BackgroundUltrasound-guided supra-clavicular nerve block (SCNB) has regained interest in adults but remains underutilized in pediatrics. This case series aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided SCNB in children undergoing upper-extremity surgery. MethodsProspective observational case series, the inclusion criteria were children over one year old who were scheduled for elective upper-extremity surgery. After induction of general anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided SCNB was performed. A dose of 0.2–0.5 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25 % or ropivacaine 0.2 % was administered all around the brachial plexus. In case of postoperative pain, 15 mg kg-1 of paracetamol + 10 mg kg-1 of ibuprofen were administered. The primary outcome measure was the success and safety of the block. Secondary outcomes were time to first analgesia administration and duration of motor blockade. ResultsThirty-three patients were included. Median age and weight were 6 [2.75,9.75] years and 24 [16,35] kg, respectively with a sex ratio of 3.1. Bupivacaine 0.25 % was used in the majority of cases (N = 24). The overall duration to complete block performance was 170 [120,300] seconds. A single attempt was sufficient for the majority of children, with a block success rate of 100 %. No incidents were reported during block performance. Postoperatively, time to the first analgesic request was 10 [8,12.5] hours. Twenty-five patients developed a motor block, with a duration of 4 [0.5,5] hours. Bupivacaine 0.25 % was associated with higher incidence of motor blockade (p = 0.002). ConclusionsUltrasound-guided SCNB appears to be an effective and safe technique in children. Further studies using lower doses of bupivacaine could help reduce the incidence of motor block.

Comparison of analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block with liposomal bupivacaine after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Objective: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A total of 40 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October to November 2023 were prospectively included, whose American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅱ. They were divided into modified superior trunk block group (group S) and interscalene brachial plexus block group (group I) by random number table according to different nerve block methods, with 20 cases in each group. Local anesthetics was a mixture of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride injection in equal volume. Patients in group S were injected 5 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided modified superior trunk block, and patients in group I were injected with 15 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided traditional interscalene block respectively. Both groups underwent superficial cervical plexus block (5 ml mixture). Standardized general anesthesia and standardized postoperative analgesia were followed. The primary outcome measures included 48 h resting numerical rating scale (NRS) scores after surgery and the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) at 30 min after block. The secondary outcome measures included resting NRS scores during the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), 12, 24, and 36 h after surgery, postoperative opioid consumption and satisfaction with analgesia, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration, and the incidence of perioperative adverse reactions. The non-inferiority cut-off value of resting NRS scores for patients in group S was set as"1 point"at each observation time point after surgery. Results: In group S, one patient was excluded because the target nerve was blocked by the subclavian vein and could not be blocked, nineteen patients [11 males and 8 females, aged (52.2±9.0) years] were eventually included. In group I, there were 7 males and 13 females, aged (55.0±5.1) years. Resting NRS scores of group S and Group I at 48 h after surgery were 0 (0, 0) and 0 (0, 0.8) point, respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The median difference was 0 (95%CI:0-0) point and the upper 95%CI was 0 point, which was lower than the preset non-inferiority cut-off value"1 point"(non-inferiority P<0.001). The incidence of HDP in group S and group I were 5% (1/19) and 75% (15/20), respectively, with statistically significant (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in resting NRS scores at PACU and 12, 24, 36 h after surgery, opioid dosage, satisfaction with analgesia, SpO2 at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration between two groups (all P>0.05). No respiratory adverse events such as hypoxemia and airway spasm occurred in two groups after extubation. One patient in group I showed symptoms of breath shortness when entering PACU, and 3 patients felt uncomfortable due to prolonged numbness and weakness of the blockade limb (>2 days). No nerve block procedures and opioid drugs relative adverse reactions and no neurological complications happened in both groups. Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine usage for modified superior trunk block can provide long-term postoperative analgesic effects which is noninferior to traditional interscalene brachial plexus block and causes less HDP in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Perioperative efficiency of sugammadex following minimally invasive gastric sleeve surgery: A superiority trial.

Studies have proposed that the routine use of sugammadex could provide perioperative time savings and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of sugammadex on perioperative times and on the incidences of adverse events when compared with the active control, neostigmine, for minimally invasive gastric sleeve surgery. Following institutional review board approval, patient characteristics, type of primary neuromuscular blocking reversal agents, operating room discharge times, post-anaesthesia care unit recovery times, and incidences of and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting and orotracheal reintubation were the measures of interest. Superiority testing determined the between-group means differences of the reversal agents on the two perioperative time periods of interest. Superiority testing demonstrated no improvement of the two perioperative times with sugammadex. There was no clinical difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting or in the number of antiemetic doses received in the post-anaesthesia care unit between the two groups. Finally, the two orotracheal reintubations in the post-anaesthesia care unit were in the sugammadex administered group. These results with sugammadex provide no perioperative time savings or reduce the incidence and treatment for postoperative nausea and vomiting in the post-anaesthesia care unit when compared with neostigmine.

Comparative evaluation of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine alone versus combined with dexmedetomidine for cesarean sections

Background &amp; Objective: This study examined the use of dexmedetomidine 5 μg as an adjuvant to 10 mg of intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine in elective cesarean sections and aimed to assess dexmedetomidine’s impact on block characteristics and post-operative pain management. As spinal anesthesia is commonly employed for cesarean deliveries, the study seeks to determine whether the addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant can prolong the duration and enhance the quality of the block, leading to improved post-operative pain relief. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial included 100 parturients undergoing elective cesarean section over a period of six months. Participants were allocated to either Group B or Group D using a non-random consecutive sampling technique. In Group D, 2 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine mixed with 0.05 mL of dexmedetomidine (5µg) was injected intrathecally, while Group B received 2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine along with an equivalent volume of saline. Sensory and motor block assessments were conducted prior to the start of surgery. Post-operatively, the duration of motor block and post-operative pain relief were assessed. Results: The addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine resulted in significant reductions in the onset time of sensory block (4.22 ± 0.79 min vs 5.66 ± 1.21 min) and motor block (4.20 ± 0.81min vs 6.32 ± 1.20 min) (P &lt; 0.001). Furthermore, the duration of motor block was longer in the dexmedetomidine + bupivacaine group compared to the bupivacaine alone group (7.32 ± 0.95 h vs 4.38 ± 1.27 h). Additionally, patients who received intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine experienced significantly longer durations of post-operative analgesia (7.32 ± 0.95 h) as compared to the bupivacaine alone group (4.38 ± 1.27 h) (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an intrathecal adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine extends the duration of analgesia and motor block, providing prolonged pain relief. Additionally, it exhibits an early onset of sensory and motor block, ensuring prompt pain relief and rapid anesthesia onset. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.clinicaltrials.gov], identifier: ID NCT05469529 Abbreviations: CS - cesarean section; OT - Operation Theater; SA - Spinal anesthesia; VAS - visual analogue scale; Keywords: cesarean section, dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, spinal anesthesia Citation: Qureshi RA, Jadoon H, Shabbir M. Comparative evaluation of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine alone versus combined with dexmedetomidine for cesarean sections. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(5):866−870. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i5.2558 Received: December 03, 2023; Reviewed: December 15, 2023; Accepted: August 16, 2024

The impact of different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine used as adjuvant to hyperbaric prilocaine in short ambulatory procedures under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Objective: This study aimed to determine the most effective dose of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prilocaine in spinal anesthesia. Methods: Sixty-nine adult patients (21 to 65 y) scheduled for elective surgeries under spinal anesthesia were included in the study. Patients received spinal anesthesia with 3 mL of prilocaine and 0.5 mL dexmedetomidine of dose according to randomization of 5,10 and15 µg (D5, D10 and D15 respectively). Time of the first request of analgesia was set as a primary outcome. Results: Time of the first request of rescue opioid was significantly shorter in D5 group (8 ± 6 h) compared to D15group (21 ± 4 h) (P &lt; 0.018). 24 h of postoperative Nalbuphine consumption was higher in D5 group (4.67 ± 0.59 mg) compared to D15 group (2.5 ± 0.71 mg) (P = 0.012). The onset of sensory and motor blocks was significantly earlier in group D15 and D10 compared to group D5. Group D15 showed a significantly prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade than Groups D10 and D5. The duration of sensory and motor blockade was significantly prolonged in group D10 compared with group D5 (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: 10 and 15 μg dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prilocaine in spinal anesthesia shortened the onset of both sensory and motor block, prolonged the duration of sensory block, motor block, and the time to first analgesic. Clinical trial registration: The study was registered on Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (www.pactr.org) (ID: PACTR202204558879194-April 2022). Keywords: Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine; Hyperbaric prilocaine; Ambulatory Surgery; Spinal Anesthesia Citation: Biekhet EG, Elazzazi H, Hussein W, Zedan M, Abdelhamid BM. The impact of different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine used as adjuvant to hyperbaric prilocaine in short ambulatory procedures under spinal anesthesia: a randomized controlled study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):664−672; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2509 Received: February 20, 2024; Reviewed: April 01, 2024; Accepted: April 20, 2024

A comparative study of low-dose intrathecal bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy), levobupivacaine 0.5% (plain), and levobupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) with fentanyl as an adjuvant in transurethral resection of prostate surgery: A prospective randomized study

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgeries. Levobupivacaine, an S-enantiomer of bupivacaine, is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine; therefore, a low dose of local anesthetic with fentanyl as an adjuvant has been used to decrease toxicity and increase efficacy. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5%, and hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl as an adjuvant. Materials and Methods: One hundred and five patients scheduled for elective TURP surgeries were randomly divided into three groups. Group BH (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 μg of fentanyl, Group LH (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine with 25 μg of fentanyl, and Group LP (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with 25 μg of fentanyl intrathecally. Results: The onset of sensory and motor block was earlier and the duration of analgesia and motor block were longer in the BH group (P&lt;0.001) as compared to LH and LP groups. The demographic data, duration of surgery, heart rate, SpO2, pruritus, and shivering were comparable between the groups (P&gt;0.05). The visual analog scale score was higher in the LP group. Hypotension, nausea, and vomiting were seen in the BH group. Conclusion: Hyperbaric is better than isobaric group due to quicker onset and longer duration. Levobupivacaine is better than bupivacaine in terms of the early mobilization and a lesser incidence of side effects, making hyperbaric levobupivacaine a better alternative to isobaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Comparison of the effect of intrathecal fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Background: Subarachnoid blockade is a safe, reliable, and inexpensive technique that provides surgical anesthesia along with prolonged post-operative analgesia. The quality of subarachnoid block is enhanced by the addition of intrathecal adjuvants, such as fentanyl citrate and magnesium sulfate to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fentanyl and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in orthopedic surgeries under subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study included 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing orthopedic surgeries. Group LS received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+0.5 mL normal saline. Group LF received 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+fentanyl 25 μg, and Group LM, 3 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine heavy+magnesium sulphate 50 mg+0.4 mL normal saline. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and intraoperative hemodynamics were recorded. In the post-operative period, duration of analgesia, Visual Analog Scales scores, and side effects were observed. Results: The onset of sensory block was 4.04±0.74 min in Group LM (P&lt;0.001) as compared to Groups LF (2.01±0.23 min) and LS (2±0.24 min). The onset of motor blockade took 5±1.14 min in the control group, 7.01±0.94 in group LF, and 8.11±1.33 min in group LM (P&lt;0.001). The duration of analgesia in group LS was 183.73±12.08 min, 317±18.6 min in group LF, and 219.43±20.89 in group LM (P&lt;0.001). Conclusion: The addition of fentanyl and magnesium as adjuvants enhanced the quality of subarachnoid block when added to hyperbaric levobupivacaine. The duration of analgesia was longest in fentanyl, followed by magnesium and then control. The incidence of side effects was greatest in fentanyl, followed by control and nil in magnesium.

A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of cisatracurium and rocuronium for endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized study

Background: Cisatracurium and rocuronium are non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers with an intermediate duration of action and are used safely in short and intermediate-duration surgical procedures in the pediatric population. Aims and Objectives: A prospective randomized study is to assess the efficacy of cisatracurium compared to rocuronium in terms of intubating conditions, clinical duration of action, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects in pediatric patients undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: In this study, 50 patients aged 2–12 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists grades I and II were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I received injection cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg IV and Group II received injection rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg IV for intubation. Intubating conditions by Cooper et al., score, TOF count, hemodynamic parameters, signs of histamine release, and complications if any were noted. Results: According to the Cooper et al., score, intubating conditions were excellent in 100% of patients in Group II and 84% of patients in Group I, which was statistically significant. The time required for the first maintenance dose was shorter in Group II (14.04±2.95 min) compared to Group I (20.08±3.68 min). Hemodynamic parameters and demographic profiles were comparable between the two groups. No associated signs of histamine release or any other complications were noted in either group. Conclusion: We concluded that rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg provides better intubating conditions and a shorter duration of action compared to cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg without any signs of histamine release in pediatric patients.

The median effective concentration of epidural ropivacaine with different doses of dexmedetomidine for motor blockade: an up-down sequential allocation study.

Recent studies have shown that dexmedetomidine can be safely used in peripheral nerve blocks and spinal anesthesia. Epidural administration of dexmedetomidine produces analgesia and sedation, prolongs motor and sensory block time, extends postoperative analgesia, and reduces the need for rescue analgesia. This investigation seeks to identify the median effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine for epidural motor blockade, and assess how incorporating varying doses of dexmedetomidine impacts this EC50 value. Prospective, double-blind, up-down sequential allocation study. Operating room, post-anesthesia care unit, and general ward. One hundred and fifty patients were allocated into five groups in a randomized, double-blinded manner as follows: NR (normal saline combined with ropivacaine) group, RD0.25 (0.25 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine) group, RD0.5 (0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine) group, RD0.75 (0.75 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine) group, RD1.0 (1.0 μg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine) group. The concentration of epidural ropivacaine for the first patient in each group was 0.5%. Following administration, the patients were immediately placed in a supine position for observation, and the lower limb motor block was assessed every 5 min using the modified Bromage score within 30 min after drug administration. According to the sequential method, the concentration of ropivacaine in the next patient was adjusted according to the reaction of the previous patient: effective motor block was defined as the modified Bromage score > 0 within 30 min after epidural administration. If the modified Bromage score of the previous patient was >0 within 30 min after drug administration, the concentration of ropivacaine in the next patient was decreased by 1 gradient. Conversely, if the score did not exceed 0, the concentration of ropivacaine in the next patient was increased by 1 gradient. The up-down sequential allocation method and probit regression were used to calculate the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine. Adverse events, hemodynamic changes, demographic data and clinical characteristics. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine required to achieve motor block was 0.677% (95% CI, 0.622-0.743%) in the NR group, 0.624% (95% CI, 0.550-0.728%) in the RD0.25 group, 0.549% (95% CI, 0.456-0.660%) in the RD0.5 group, 0.463% (95% CI, 0.408-0.527%) in the RD0.75 group, and 0.435% (95% CI, 0.390-0.447%) in the RD1.0 group. The EC50 of the NR group and the RD0.25 group were significantly higher than that of the RD0.75 and the RD1.0 groups, and the EC50 of the RD0.5 group was significantly higher than that of the RD1.0 group. The EC50 of epidural ropivacaine required to achieve motor block was 0.677% in the NR group, 0.624% in the RD0.25 group, 0.549% in the RD0.5 group, 0.463% in the RD0.75 group, and 0.435% in the RD1.0 group. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for ropivacaine dose-dependently reduce the EC50 of epidural ropivacaine for motor block and shorten the onset time of epidural ropivacaine block. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine for epidural anesthesia was 0.5 μg/kg.