Neuromuscular Blockade Research Articles

Comparative Efficacy of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Levobupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With Fentanyl in Elective Cesarean Section.

Background In parturient posted for elective cesarean sections, a widely used local anesthetic in the subarachnoid blockade is racemic hyperbaric bupivacaine. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine, the pure S (-) isomer of bupivacaine, was introduced and has since become more widely used in India because of its short duration of motor blockade and reduced risks of neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of sensory and motor blockade and side effects of equivalent doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with opioid additive fentanyl in order to extend the duration of analgesia during elective cesarean births. Methodology A total of 130 women classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II who are undergoing elective cesarean sections were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, double-blind comparative study after providing written informed consent. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group LF, which included 65 women, obtained 25 mcg (0.5 ml) of fentanyl and 10 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric levobupivacaine, or Group BF, which included 65 women, received 25 mcg (0.5 ml) of fentanyl and 10 mg (2 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine. Pinprick, cold swab, and the Bromage scale are used to assess the characteristics of sensory and motor blockade; hemodynamic alterations and adverse effects are also observed. Results The levobupivacaine group, consisting of 65 participants aged between 21 and 29 years, exhibited fewer side effects and significantly shorter durations of sensory and motor block compared to the bupivacaine group. In both groups, hemodynamic stability is comparable. Levobupivacaine provides analgesia for a significantly shorter period compared to bupivacaine. Conclusions In cesarean procedures, intrathecal hyperbaric levobupivacaine and fentanyl can be effective alternatives to hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl due to their ability to maintain hemodynamic stability while providing adequate sensory and motor blockade.

Effect of low-volume ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided superior trunk block on diaphragmatic movement in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectivesThe incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis (HDP) in superior trunk block (STB) usually depends on the dose of local anesthetic. This study aimed to further evaluate the impact of a lower volume (10 mL) of the same low concentration (0.25%) ropivacaine compared to a conventional volume (15 mL), on diaphragmatic function and analgesic efficacy under a multimodal analgesia regimen for shoulder arthroscopy.MethodsPatients scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroscopy were randomized allocated to receive either 10 mL or 15 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine in the STB under ultrasound guidance prior to general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in diaphragm excursion (ΔDE) between baseline and 30 min after block. Secondary outcomes included DE and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) before and after block, incidence of HDP, onset of sensory/motor block, duration of analgesia/motor block, dermatomal coverage area of the block, postoperative pain severity, pre- and post-block respiratory function and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, the use of other anesthetic and analgesic drugs, post-block complications, and adverse events post-surgery.ResultsCompared with 15 mL volume, 10 mL ropivacaine significantly reduced the incidence of post-block HDP (as measured by ΔDE: 39.47% vs. 64.10%; and by post-block DTF: 13.16% vs. 33.33%). There was no significant difference in onset of sensory block, duration of analgesia/motor block, dermatomal coverage area of the block, postoperative pain severity between the two groups, except that the onset of motor block was significantly slower in the 10 mL group than in the 15 mL group. Pre- and post-block respiratory function and intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, the use of other anesthetic and analgesic drugs, post-block complications, or postoperative adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionIn shoulder arthroscopy, STB with 10 mL of ropivacaine can reduce the incidence of HDP with no significant difference in analgesic effects under a multimodal analgesia regimen compared with 15 mL.Trial registration: We registered the study at chictr.org (ChiCTR2200057543 , 14/03/2022.https://www.chictr.ogr.cn

Structure-Activity Relationship Studies Leading to the Discovery of Highly Water-Soluble and Biocompatible Acyclic Cucurbit[n]uril FY-3451 as a Universal Antagonist That Rapidly Reverses Neuromuscular Blocking Agents In Vivo.

The development of a reversal agent that can rapidly reverse clinically used nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) has long been a challenge. Here, we report the synthesis of a series of highly water-soluble acyclic cucurbit[n]urils (acCBs). Systematic structure-activity relationship studies reveal that introducing two propylidene units on the peripheral benzene rings not only remarkably improves the activity of the corresponding derivative acCB6 (FY 3451) in reversing the neuromuscular block of rocuronium, cisatracurium, vecuronium, and pancuronium, the four clinically used NMBAs, through stable inclusion, but also allows for high water-solubility as well as a maximum tolerated dose (2000 mg/kg on rats). In vivo experiments with rats show that, at the identical dose of 25 mg/kg, for rocuronium, vecuronium, and pancuronium, acCB6 can achieve a recovery time shorter than that of sugammadex for rocuronium and, at the dose of 100 mg/kg, realize comparably rapid reversal for cisatracurium.

Study To Assess The Onset And Duration Of Sensory And Motor Block In Both Groups (IV Dexamethasone Compared To Normal Saline) In Patients Undergoing Below Umbilical Surgeries

Study To Assess The Onset And Duration Of Sensory And Motor Block In Both Groups (IV Dexamethasone Compared To Normal Saline) In Patients Undergoing Below Umbilical Surgeries

Effectiveness of Two Models of Telerehabilitation in Improving Recovery from Subacute Upper Limb Disability after Stroke: Robotic vs. Non-Robotic.

Finding innovative digital solutions is fundamental to ensure prompt and continuous care for patients with chronic neurological disorders, whose demand for rehabilitation also in home-based settings is steadily increasing. The aim is to verify the safety and the effectiveness of two telerehabilitation (TR) models in improving recovery from subacute upper limb (UL) disability after stroke, with and without a robotic device. One hundred nineteen subjects with subacute post-stroke UL disability were assessed for eligibility. Of them, 30 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to either the Robotic Group (RG), undergoing a 20-session TR program, using a robotic device, or the Non-Robotic Group (NRG), undergoing a 20-session TR program without robotics. Clinical evaluations were measured at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, 5 weeks after baseline), and included assessments of quality of life, motor skills, and clinical/functional status. The primary outcome measure was the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, evaluating the change in perceived disability. Statistical analysis shows that patients of both groups improved significantly over time in all domains analyzed (mean decrease from baseline in the WHODAS 2.0 of 6.09 ± 2.62% for the NRG, and of 0.76 ± 2.21% for the RG), with a greater improvement of patients in the NRG in motor (Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity-motor function, Box and Block Test) and cognitive skills (Trail Making Test-A). This study highlights the potential of TR programs to transform stroke rehabilitation by enhancing accessibility and patient-centered care, promoting autonomy, improving adherence, and leading to better outcomes and quality of life for stroke survivors.

Suspected intracranial hypertension in COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory failure.

COVID-19 patients may exhibit neurological symptoms due to direct viral damage, systemic inflammatory syndrome, or treatment side effects. Mechanical ventilation in patients with severe respiratory failure often requires sedation and neuromuscular blockade, hindering thorough clinical examinations. This study aimed to investigate neurological involvement through clinical and noninvasive techniques and to detect signs of intracranial hypertension in these patients. We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated COVID-19 adult patients admitted to our ICU, following standard of care protocols for ventilation and permissive hypercapnia. Data were collected at three time points: admission day (T1), day seven (T7), and day fourteen (T14). At each time point, patients underwent multimodal noninvasive neurological monitoring, including clinical examination, pupillary reactivity, transcranial color doppler of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) assessed via ultrasound (US). Head computer tomography (CT) was performed at T1 and T14. A limited subset of patients had a follow-up examination six months after ICU discharge. Seventy-nine patients were recruited; most were under deep sedation and neuromuscular blockade at T1. Pupillary size, symmetry, and reactivity were normal, as was the MCA mean velocity. However, ONSD, assessed by both US and CT, appeared enlarged, suggesting raised intracranial pressure (ICP). In a subgroup of 12 patients, increased minute ventilation was associated with a significant decrease in US-ONSD, corresponding to a drop in paCO2. At follow-up, twelve patients showed no long-term neurological sequelae, and US-ONSD was decreased in all of them. In this cohort, enlarged ONSD was detected during non-invasive neurological monitoring, suggesting a raised ICP, with hypercapnia playing a prominent role. Further studies are needed to explore ONSD behavior in other samples of mechanically ventilated, hypercapnic patients.

Low-Dose Opioid Spinal Analgesia during Cesarean Section at the Commune 1 Reference Health Center of Bamako

The need to provide maternal comfort and facilitate rapid recovery during caesarean section requires pain management. The aim of our study of low-dose morphine spinal analgesia during caesarean section was to evaluate its effectiveness during and after the operation. Methodology: We conducted a prospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study lasting 6 months from 1 July to 31 December 2023. It involved 101 Caesarean women undergoing spinal analgesia, selected by random sampling at the reference health centre in Commune I of the Bamako district. Results: The mean age of the patients was 27 ±1.51 years, with ASA I classification in 63.4%. The combination of bupivacaine 10 mg and morphine 0.1 mg was used in 68.3% of cases. The mean duration of motor block release was 2.78 ± 0.7 hours. The manifestation of pain (VAS=0) was 100% at H1 (first hour), with peaks of VAS [1,3] in 42.57% and VAS [4,6] in 6.97% at H4 (fourth hour). Arterial hypotension was found in 57% of cases. From H12 onwards, all the women were very satisfied. Conclusion: The efficacy of morphine spinal analgesia during caesarean section has been proven in all our parturients from H12 (twelfth hour). However, pain management in the first few hours must be started with a well-adapted protocol.

Comparison of Duration of Action in Spinal Anesthesia of 0.5% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a common technique for surgeries below the navel, utilizing bupivacaine, a local anesthetic. Adding adjuncts like dexmedetomidine may enhance the efficacy and duration of the block.Objective: To compare the duration of action of 0.5% bupivacaine versus 0.5% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia.Methods: This quasi-experimental trial included 60 patients aged 20-60 years, ASA grade 1 or 2, undergoing general, plastic, orthopedic, or urological surgery at CMH Karachi. Patients were non-randomly assigned to Group B (0.5% bupivacaine, n=30) or Group BD (0.5% bupivacaine plus 5 mcg dexmedetomidine, n=30). Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, duration of analgesia, and adverse effects were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 considered significant.Results: Group BD showed faster onset of sensory block (7.08 ± 0.54 mins vs. 13.48 ± 0.73 mins, p < 0.001) and motor block (10.32 ± 0.91 mins vs. 17.55 ± 0.69 mins, p < 0.001). Duration of motor block was longer in Group BD (284.06 ± 5.64 mins vs. 133.93 ± 5.72 mins, p < 0.001), as was duration of analgesia (218.07 ± 4.86 mins vs. 125.36 ± 5.42 mins, p < 0.001).Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to 0.5% bupivacaine significantly enhances the onset and duration of spinal anesthesia with a comparable safety profile.

Safety and efficacy of the Tao facemask for positive pressure ventilation in morbidly obese patients

Purpose: Positive-pressure mask ventilation is an essential skill for individuals providing basic and advanced airway interventions in a variety of clinical settings. The C-E grip technique is most commonly used with standard facemasks to provide an effective seal that allows for positive pressure ventilation. The Tao mask is a novel facemask that utilises an ergonomic grip by using downwards pressure of the palm of the hand accompanied by midline jaw lift. Specifically, the technique to create a seal involves downwards pressure of the palm centred on the mask accompanied by a jaw lift with four fingers centred under the mandible. A previous comparison between the Tao and standard masks revealed superior performance across a cross-section of average patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Tao mask compared to the standard mask in a subset of patients with morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2. Methods: This prospective crossover trial included 156 patients aged ⩾18 years at the Medical University of South Carolina who were scheduled for elective surgery under general endotracheal anaesthesia with a BMI of ⩾40 kg/m2 at the time of surgery. After the induction of general anaesthesia, but prior to the administration of a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD), each patient was ventilated with both the standard and Tao masks, and effectiveness was measured using both the Han and Warters scales. The process was repeated after the administration of an NMBD. Results: Data were collected and analysed from 153 individuals. The mean BMI was 50.7 ± 9.3 kg/m2. The Tao mask ventilation scores were significantly lower (more effective) than the standard mask scores on both the Han and Warters Scales before pre-NMBD ( p = 0.0002 and p < 0.001, respectively) and after post-NMBD ( p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). On the Warters Scale, it was significantly easier to ventilate with the Tao Mask pre-NMBD ( p = 0.0001). On the Han Scale, the Tao mask was significantly easier than the standard mask post-NMBD ( p = 0.03). With regard to mask sequence, the mean Warters scores were lower for the Tao mask pre-NMBD only when the standard mask was used first ( p = 0.002). Similarly, the difference in the mean Warters scores post-NBMD was significant only when the standard mask was used first ( p = 0.02). Conclusion: The Tao mask demonstrated equivalent safety and superior effectiveness in ventilating morbidly obese surgical patients despite a trial design that favoured the standard mask owing to anaesthetist experience. The use of the Tao mask may be particularly beneficial in clinical situations involving inexperienced operators or in patients for whom mask ventilation is likely to be difficult. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03473366

Respiratory effects of prone position in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome differ according to the recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a prospective observational study

BackgroundImprovements in oxygenation and lung mechanics with prone position (PP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are inconstant. The objectives of the study were (i) to identify baseline variables, including the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I), associated with a positive response to PP in terms of oxygenation (improvement of the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure over the inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≥ 20 mmHg) and lung mechanics; (ii) to evaluate whether the response to the previous PP session is associated with the response to the next session.MethodsIn this prospective, observational, single-center study in patients who underwent PP for ARDS due to COVID-19, respiratory variables were assessed just before PP and at the end of the session. Respiratory variables included mechanical ventilation settings and respiratory mechanics variables, including R/I, an estimate of the potential for lung recruitment compared to lung overinflation.ResultsIn 50 patients, 201 PP sessions lasting 19 ± 3 h were evaluated. Neuromuscular blockades were used in 116 (58%) sessions. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased from 109 ± 31 mmHg to 165 ± 65 mmHg, with an increase ≥ 20 mmHg in 142 (71%) sessions. In a mixed effect logistic regression, only pre-PP PaO2/FiO2 (OR 1.12 (95% CI [1.01–1.24])/every decrease of 10 mmHg, p = 0.034) in a first model and improvement in oxygenation at the previous PP session (OR 3.69 (95% CI [1.27–10.72]), p = 0.017) in a second model were associated with an improvement in oxygenation with PP. The R/I ratio (n = 156 sessions) was 0.53 (0.30–0.76), separating lower- and higher-recruiters. Whereas PaO2/FiO2 improved to the same level in both subgroups, driving pressure and respiratory system compliance improved only in higher-recruiters (from 14 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 cmH2O, p = 0.027, and from 34 ± 11 to 38 ± 13 mL/cmH2O, respectively, p = 0.014).ConclusionsA lower PaO2/FiO2 at baseline and a positive O2-response at the previous PP session are associated with a PP-induced improvement in oxygenation. In higher-recruiters, lung mechanics improved along with oxygenation. Benefits of PP could thus be greater in these patients.

Buprenorphine with Bupivacaine 0.5% Heavy Versus Clonidine with Bupivacaine 0.5% Heavy Versus Bupivacaine 0.5% Heavy Alone in Patients Undergoing Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Comparative Study

Background and Aims: This research aimed to determine which of three spinal anaesthetic medication combinations—clonidine–bupivacaine, buprenorphine–bupivacaine and bupivacaine alone—is the most effective for total abdominal hysterectomy. Material and Methods: In this prospective study, approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, 120 patients aged 35–60 years scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anaesthesia were included, following informed consent. Comprehensive pre-anaesthetic assessments, including detailed medical histories, clinical examinations and routine surgical investigations, were conducted. The study, spanning 24 months, utilised purposive sampling and a cross-sectional design. The inclusion criteria encompassed ASA I and II patients aged 35–60 years, undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy with a weight exceeding 45 kg, height over 150 cm, and valid informed consent. Exclusion criteria involved ASA Class III or higher, patient unwillingness for spinal anaesthesia, gross spinal deformities, bleeding diathesis, known allergy to the test drug, history of cardiac, respiratory, or central nervous system disease, hepatic or renal dysfunction and elevated intracranial pressure. Results: The onset time of sensory blockade was faster in the Bupivacaine + Buprenorphine group than in the Clonidine + Bupivacaine group, with the Bupivacaine group exhibiting the slowest onset. The Bupivacaine + Buprenorphine group had a significantly faster onset of motor block than the Clonidine + Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine groups. The total duration of motor block was shorter in both the Bupivacaine + Buprenorphine and Bupivacaine groups than in the Clonidine + Bupivacaine group. The Clonidine + Bupivacaine group showed higher incidences of bradycardia and hypotension than the other groups. The Bupivacaine + Buprenorphine group reported more side effects, including chest pain, cough, nausea and vomiting, than the other groups. Conclusion: This study found that spinal clonidine, in comparison to bupivacaine alone, gives better post-operative analgesia and sensory and motor blockage over a longer period of time.

Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Plexus-Sciatic Nerve Blocks Versus Epidurals for Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Study to Compare the Competency of Novice Anaesthesiology Residents in a High-Volume Level 1 Trauma Centre.

The relative merits of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) over central neuraxial anaesthesia and the advantages of the above two techniques over general anaesthesia for surgical interventions of the lower limb are well established. The competency of anaesthetic trainees in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre in administering dual ultrasound and nerve stimulator-guided lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block(DUNLuPS) vs. epidural anaesthesia (EA) was compared by reporting the adequacy of anaesthesia with the two techniques, time taken for the performance of block, time of onset of sensoryblock (TOSB), and time of onset of motor block (TOMB). This prospective, randomized, study enrolled 92 patients aged 18-80 years with lower limb fractures admitted in trauma triage and scheduled for surgery. Thepatients were randomly allocated equally into the EA group and the DUNLuPS group. A total of 20 anaesthesia trainees in the third year of residencywith clinical experience of more than 15 independent lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks were included in the study.A volume of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered in the lumbar plexus (Shamrock technique) but the volume used for sciatic nerve (subgluteal approach) was varied so that the cumulative dose did not exceed 3 mg/kg. For each block, the onset of nerve blockade was assessed every five minutes, and the assessments continued for an additional 30 minutes after the nerve blocks were finished. Clinical characteristics and adequacy of anaesthesia were comparable, i.e., 95.65% and93.47% success in the EA (n = 46) and DUNLuPS (n = 46) groups, respectively. Performance time was significantly more in the DUNLuPS group but followed by significantly less TOSB and TOMB. The time for the first analgesic request was 351.63 ± 148.70 minutes in the DUNLuPS group and 147.60 ± 52.65 minutes in the EAgroup (p < 0.0001). Both EA and DUNLuPS provide effective and comparable intra-operative anaesthesia for orthopaedic lower limb surgeries (OLLS) when administered by residents with more than two years of experience (third year of residency)in ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre. Statistically significant differences in the block performance characteristicshad no clinical advantage as it was compensated by the faster onset time in the DUNLuPS group. Post-operative pain management was better in the DUNLuPS group, sothe practice and conduct of anaesthesia for trauma patients should focus on the establishment of "block rooms" and timely training of residents in the former so that the advantages can be extended to the patient population.

Variability in temperature control practices amongst the Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP) trial

AimTemperature control is a complex bundled intervention; the synergistic impact of each individual component is ill defined and underreported. Resultantly, the influence of parameter optimization on temperature control’s overall neuroprotective effect remains poorly understood. To characterize variability in temperature control parameters and barriers to short pre-induction and induction times, we surveyed sites enrolling in an ongoing multicenter clinical trial. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, survey study evaluating temperature control practices within the Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP) trial (NCT04217551). A 23-question web-based survey (Qualtrics) was distributed to the site principal investigators by email. Respondents were asked about site practices pertaining to the use of temperature control, including the request to upload individual institutional protocols. Open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively by categorizing responses into identified themes. To complement survey level data, records pertaining to the quality of temperature control were extracted from the ICECAP trial database. ResultsThe survey response rate was 75% (n = 51) including 23.5% (n = 12) survey respondents who uploaded institutional protocols. Most sites reported having institutional protocols for temperature control (n = 41; 80%), including 62.5% (n = 32) who had separate protocols for initiation of temperature control in the emergency department (ED). Fewer sites had protocols specific to sedation or neuromuscular blockade (NMB) management (n = 35, 68.6%). Use of NMB during temperature control induction was variable; 61.7% (n = 29) of sites induced paralysis less than 20% of the time. While most institutional protocols (n = 11, 83.3%) commented on the importance of early initiation of temperature control, this was incongruent with the largest reported barrier, which was clinical nihilism regarding the importance of early temperature control initiation (n = 30, 62.5%). Within the ICECAP trial database, 1 in 2 patients were treated with NMB however, use of NMB and time to initiation of temperature control device varied widely between sites. ConclusionAmongst ICECAP trial sites, there was significant variability in resources, methods, and barriers for early temperature control initiation. Defining and standardizing high-quality temperature control must be prioritized, as it may impact the interpretation of past and current clinical trial findings.

Effect of sugammadex with neostigmine on postoperative bowel function and on recovery of neuromuscular functions: A randomized controlled trial.

Early recovery of neuromuscular and bowel function after abdominal surgery are important clinical indicators of postoperative recovery. This study aimed to investigate the effects of sugammadex, and neostigmine added to sugammadex, on postoperative bowel function and recovery from neuromuscular blocking agents. Ninety gynecological surgery patients, aged 18 to 65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists of 1 to 2 were randomly assigned to 3 groups: sugammadex 2 mg/kg (Group S), sugammadex 1 m/kg with neostigmine 20 µg/kg + atropine 10 µg/kg (Group S1N), and sugammadex 1.5 mg/kg with neostigmine 20 µg/kg + atropine 10 µg/kg (Group S2N), for reversal at the end of surgery during moderate block (train-of-four [TOF] count 1-2). Propofol, remifentanil, rocuronium, and sevoflurane were used for general anesthesia, and neuromuscular function was assessed using kinemyography. The primary outcomes assessed the effects of sugammadex alone and in combination with neostigmine on the time to first flatus. The secondary outcomes included time to first defecation and recovery time; defined as the administration of reversal agent to TOF ratio 90%. Data from 90 female patients who underwent abdominal gynecological surgery were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the groups in term of the time to first flatus, defecation, or postoperative nausea and vomiting after surgery. However, significant differences were observed in the time to reach a TOF ratio 90% (P < .001) and extubation time (P = .003). The addition of neostigmine to sugammadex did not affect bowel function recovery. However, combining 20 μg/kg neostigmine with 1.5 mg/kg sugammadex or 2 mg/kg sugammadex alone antagonized moderate-depth nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade with similar efficacy.

A systematic review of upper extremity outcome measures assessed in randomized controlled trials of post stroke upper extremity rehabilitation over time

ABSTRACT Background The heterogeneity in outcome measures of post stroke rehabilitation trials suggests the need for consensus approach in stroke recovery measurement. To reach this aim, it is important to understand the past and current use of outcome measures in randomized control trials (RCTs) of stroke rehabilitation. Objective To systematically review RCTs of post stroke UE rehabilitation interventions to understand the use of UE outcome measures in research and their changes over time. Methods CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 1960 to 1 April 2021. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they (1) were RCTs or crossovers published in English (2) ≥50% of participants were affected by stroke, 3) included adults ≥ 18 years old, and (4) applied an intervention to the hemiparetic UE as the primary objective of the study. Results 1,276 RCTs met inclusion criteria, and 112 different outcome measures were identified. Outcome measures were classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Outcome measures most frequently assessed body function and structure (n = 1,692), followed by activities (n = 1,572) and participation (n = 162). The most used outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (n = 619), the modified Ashworth Scale (n = 255), Action Research Arm Test (n = 211), Wolf Motor Function Test (n = 184), and Box and Block Test (n = 178). Conclusions Understanding the breadth of outcome measures that have been used over time emphasizes the need for proposed standardization of outcome measures but also the need to adjust and expand consensus recommendations based on past and ongoing research trends.

Rocuronium-specific antibodies drive perioperative anaphylaxis but can also function as reversal agents in preclinical models.

Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) relax skeletal muscles to facilitate surgeries and ease intubation but can lead to adverse reactions, including complications because of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) and, in rare cases, anaphylaxis. Both adverse reactions vary between types of NMBAs, with rocuronium, a widely used nondepolarizing NMBA, inducing one of the longest rNMB durations and highest anaphylaxis incidences. rNMB induced by rocuronium can be reversed by the synthetic γ-cyclodextrin sugammadex. However, in rare cases, sugammadex can provoke anaphylaxis. Thus, additional therapeutic options are needed. Rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis is proposed to rely on preexisting rocuronium-binding antibodies. To understand the pathogenesis of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis and to identify potential therapeutics, we investigated the memory B cell antibody repertoire of patients with suspected hypersensitivity to rocuronium. We identified polyclonal antibody repertoires with a high diversity among V(D)J genes without evidence of clonal groups. When recombinantly expressed, these antibodies demonstrated specificity and low affinity for rocuronium without cross-reactivity for other NMBAs. Moreover, when these antibodies were expressed as human immunoglobulin E (IgE), they triggered human mast cell activation and passive systemic anaphylaxis in transgenic mice, although their affinities were insufficient to serve as reversal agents. Rocuronium-specific, high-affinity antibodies were thus isolated from rocuronium-immunized mice. The highest-affinity antibody was able to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in nonhuman primates with kinetics comparable to that of sugammadex. Together, these data support the hypothesis that antibodies cause anaphylactic reactions to rocuronium and pave the way for improved diagnostics and neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.

Multifocal motor neuropathy in Japan: A nationwide survey on prevalence, clinical profiles, and treatment.

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare disease for which epidemiological and clinical data are limited. We conducted a nationwide survey to determine disease prevalence, incidence, clinical profile, and current treatment status in Japan. A nationwide survey was conducted in 2021 using an established epidemiological method. Questionnaires were sent to all neurology and pediatric neurology departments in Japan. An initial questionnaire was administered to determine the number of patients with and incidence of MMN. A second questionnaire was administered to collect detailed clinical information. The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society 2010 guidelines were used as diagnostic criteria. The estimated number of patients with MMN was 507. The estimated prevalence was 0.40 per 100,000 individuals. Detailed clinical profiles were available for 120 patients. The male-to-female ratio was 2.3:1 and the median onset age was 42 years. The median disease duration at diagnosis was 25 months. Most patients presented with upper limb-dominant muscle weakness. Motor nerve conduction blocks were found in 62% of patients and positive anti-GM1 IgM antibody results in 54%. A total of 117 (98%) patients received immunoglobulin therapy, and 91% of them showed improvement. At the time of the last visit (median, 82 months from treatment initiation), 89 (74%) patients were receiving maintenance immunoglobulin therapy. A slight progression of neurological deficits was observed during follow-up. Most patients with MMN in Japan received induction and maintenance immunoglobulin therapies, which appear to suppress long-term disease progression.

Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff® on the Lower Leg and TOF-Scan® on the Ulnar Nerve During Mivacurium Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND To evaluate neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia with mivacurium, this study assessed the correlation between measurements of TOF-Cuff® placed on the lower leg and stimulating the tibial nerve and TOF-Scan® values from the adductor pollicis muscle. Additionally, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBO) blood pressure measured in both locations were compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-six patients participated in this observational clinical trial. The TOF-Cuff® was placed on the lower leg and the TOF-Scan® was placed on the thumb. Train-of-four (TOF) values were recorded simultaneously by both devices at 30-second intervals before intubation. Measurements continued every 5 minutes until extubation. Bland-Altman analyses compared TOF values obtained from the 2 devices. RESULTS Time to onset and relaxation time did not differ significantly; the number of patients presenting a lack of blockade despite TOF=0 was also concordant. The time from the last dose of mivacurium to TOF ratio >90 was shorter on the leg than on hand (median 20 [5-28, 0-65] min vs 30 [20-35, 0-60] min, p=0.025). The median (range, interquartile range) difference between measurements was: 11.6 (-41 to 45, 2-19) for SBP and -8 (-28 to 26, -15 to -4) for DBP at baseline (p=0.0495); 5 (-53 to 55, -2 to 9) for SBP and -11 (-45 to 29, -19 to -5) (p=0.0017) for DBP during the blockade. CONCLUSIONS Time-to-onset and SBP are comparable between these 2 methods, in contrast to time-to-recovery and diastolic blood pressure, and this should be considered in case of the inability to apply the TOF-Cuff on the leg.

Comparative Analysis of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Fentanyl Versus Intrathecal Bupivacaine With Midazolam in Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries.

Many different adjuvants are added intrathecally along with local anaesthetics to prolong intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Hence, this study aimed to compare intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl and bupivacaine with midazolam in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Following permission from the Hospital Ethical Committee (Research Protocol No.: IESC/PGS/2022/143), the study was conducted on a sample of 60 patients, divided into two groups, Group F and Group M, with 30 patients each, representing the American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grades I and II. The patients were between the ages of 18 and 60 and featured both males and females, scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures on the lower abdomen and lower limbs via spinal anaesthesia. Group "F": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (25 mcg) of fentanyl (preservative-free) intrathecally. Group "M": 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine hydrochloride with 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) of midazolam (preservative-free) intrathecally. The primary aim was to study the onset of motor and sensory block and duration of analgesia with the addition of midazolam or fentanyl to 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in the sub-arachnoid block. A secondary aim was to evaluate the quality of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, determine the haemodynamic stability in the intraoperative and postoperative period in the two study groups, andobserve any adverse effects of study drugs. Group F exhibited a substantially longer duration for both sensory (211.5 vs. 154.4 min) and motor blockade (269.8 vs. 214.6 min) compared to Group M, as well as a rapid onset time for both sensory (2.6 vs. 3.3 min) and motor blockade (3.1 vs. 3.9 min). Also, Group F had a significantly longer duration of effective analgesia compared to Group M (266 ± 15.9 vs. 197.6 ± 13.7 minutes). The addition of 0.5 ml (2.5 mg) Midazolam with 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine intrathecally prolonged the duration of anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia; however, fentanyl 0.5 ml (25 mcg) has a more prolonged duration of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia.

Incidences of Rocuronium Use during Anesthetic Induction in Adult Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery Using Supraglottic Airway Devices: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are not usually necessary during the induction of general anesthesia in patients using supraglottic airway (SGA) devices. In this study, we assessed the incidences of rocuronium use in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia using SGA devices. Methods: From September 2022 to August 2023, the medical records of adult patients (≥19 years) who underwent orthopedic surgery using SGA devices were retrospectively investigated. The incidences of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction were analyzed according to the anesthetic induction drug. The association of rocuronium use during anesthesia was analyzed in terms of demographic (age, sex, height, and weight), surgical (surgical time), and anesthetic factors (premedication, anesthetic agent, anesthetic time). Results: In total, 321 patients were enrolled. The incidence rate of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction was 28.3%. In the subgroup analysis, patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol (PPF) and remifentanil showed a markedly lower incidence (14.4%) than the other anesthetic groups. Premedication or short anesthetic duration was associated with lower incidences of rocuronium use. Demographic and other anesthetic factors did not seem to affect the incidences of rocuronium use during anesthesia. Conclusions: The incidence of rocuronium use during anesthetic induction with SGA devices was significantly lower with the PPF-TIVA compared to that using remimazolam-TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. Premedication with midazolam and shorter operation times were associated with a significantly lower incidence of rocuronium use.