AbstractGeometric morphometrics is used in the biological sciences to quantify morphological traits. However, the need for manual landmark placement hampers scalability, which is both time‐consuming, labor‐intensive, and open to human error. The selected landmarks embody a specific hypothesis regarding the critical geometry relevant to the biological question. Any adjustment to this hypothesis necessitates acquiring a new set of landmarks or revising them significantly, which can be impractical for large datasets. There is a pressing need for more efficient and flexible methods for landmark placement that can adapt to different hypotheses without requiring extensive human effort. This study investigates the precision and accuracy of landmarks derived from functional correspondences obtained through the functional map framework of geometry processing. We utilize a deep functional map network to learn shape descriptors, which enable us to achieve functional map‐based and point‐to‐point correspondences between specimens in our dataset. Our methodology involves automating the landmarking process by interrogating these maps to identify corresponding landmarks, using manually placed landmarks from the entire dataset as a reference. We apply our method to a dataset of rodent mandibles and compare its performance to MALPACA's, a standard tool for automatic landmark placement. Our model demonstrates a speed improvement compared to MALPACA while maintaining a competitive level of accuracy. Although MALPACA typically shows the lowest RMSE, our models perform comparably well, particularly with smaller training datasets, indicating strong generalizability. Visual assessments confirm the precision of our automated landmark placements, with deviations consistently falling within an acceptable range for MALPACA estimates. Our results underscore the potential of unsupervised learning models in anatomical landmark placement, presenting a practical and efficient alternative to traditional methods. Our approach saves significant time and effort and provides the flexibility to adapt to different hypotheses about critical geometrical features without the need for manual re‐acquisition of landmarks. This advancement can significantly enhance the scalability and applicability of geometric morphometrics, making it more feasible for large datasets and diverse biological studies.
Read full abstract