We measured the ecosystem-level growing season CO 2 fluxes for a 6-year-old vegetated sub-Boreal clearcut from 24 May to 20 September 2000, and compared the results to CO 2 fluxes from the same clearcut in 1999 (27 June–3 September). Two independent approaches were used to measure ecosystem CO 2 flux for both years. A Bowen ratio energy balance (BREB) method was contrasted with a second approach using component fluxes. The Component model approach was based on scaling up from regressions relating in situ CO 2 flux measurements for conifer seedlings ( Picea glauca × engelmannii), as well as representative herbaceous ( Chamerion angustifolium), woody ( Lonicera involucrata) plant species and soil surface CO 2 efflux to microclimate conditions. The BREB method and Component model estimated the clearcut to be a source of CO 2 6 years post-harvest (24 May–20 September 2000) in amounts of 142 g C m −2 (1.4 t ha −1) and 103 g C m −2 (1.0 t ha −1), respectively. The positive net ecosystem CO 2 fluxes over the growing season resulted from a large soil surface CO 2 efflux (686 g C m −2) that surmounted the photosynthetic CO 2 uptake for the clearcut. The photosynthetic CO 2 uptake partially compensated for the soil surface losses: the conifer seedlings, herbaceous plants and woody shrubs were estimated to uptake −96, −315, −172 g C m −2, respectively. The results of 2000 contrasted with those of 1999. Over a comparable period of measurement (27 June–3 September), the clearcut was a sink for carbon in 1999 (−22.4 g C m −2 using the BREB method and −85 g C m −2 using the Component model) and a source in 2000 (65 g C m −2 using the BREB method and 44 g C m −2 using the Component model). The growing seasons of 1999 and 2000 experienced similar photosynthetic uptake over this same interval (−423 and −422 g C m −2, respectively). The main difference between the two field seasons was an increase in the soil surface CO 2 efflux from 1999 to 2000. In 1999, the soil surface CO 2 efflux was 338 g C m −2 and in 2000 the flux was 38% higher (466 g C m −2) for the same period. The results indicate that while there was notable inter-annual variation in CO 2 fluxes, particularly the soil surface CO 2 effluxes, this young regenerating sub-Boreal forest (≤6 years after harvesting) is a net source of CO 2 when the entire growing season is considered.