To analyse the kinematics of the Reciproc Direct® contra-angle reciprocating device with different motor sources. Reciproc Direct contra-angle (VDW GmbH, Munich, Germany) was tested with new micro-motor sources. The micro-motor groups were as follows: a brushless electric micro-motor, a brushed electric micro-motor and an air-driven micro-motor. The electric micro-motor sources were also divided intofour subgroups as 10000, 15000, 20000 and 25000rpm. The maximum air pressure of the air-driven micro-motor was adjusted to 2 and 3kgfcm-2 . A custom target object was attached to the Reciproc Direct, and reciprocating motions were recorded with a high-speed camera at 1200frames per second. The following kinematic parameters were calculated: duration of each reciprocating motion, engaging and disengaging angles, cycle rotational speeds, engaging and disengaging rotational speeds, net cycle angle, total cycle angle and number of cycles to complete full rotation. One-way anova was used where applicable, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests, to compare the kinematic values of reciprocating motion for each micro-motor/Reciproc Direct combination. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test was used for non-normally distributed data. Statistical analysis was performed (α=0.05). For the brushless micro-motor, median engaging angle was 186.5° at 10000rpm and 188.0° at 15000rpm which were significantly different than median engaging angles at 20000 (188.5°) and 25000 (189.3°) rpm (P<0.05). For the brushless micro-motor, median cycle rotational speed was 372.5rpm at 10000 and 459.8rpm at 15000rpm which were significantly different than median cycle rotational speed at 20000 (576.2rpm) and 25000 (677.8rpm) rpm (P<0.05). For the brushed micro-motor, median cycle rotational speed was 293.5rpm at 10000 and 386.3rpm at 15000rpm which were significantly different than median cycle rotational speed at 20000 (508.9rpm) and 25000 (597.6rpm) rpm (P<0.05). Rotational speeds were influenced significantly by motor sources even when the Reciproc Direct was used at speeds recommendedby the manufacturer. This could indicate that thekinematics of the Reciproc Direct are dependent on the power of the rotating motor.