Fans of The Lord of the Rings may disagree, but when it comes to exquisite excavation, the dwarves of Moria have nothing on the mighty fire ants of Georgia Tech. But Dan Goldman and Michael Goodisman aren't fascinated by the aesthetics of fire ant architecture alone. ‘I have an interest in animals interacting with complex materials’, explains Goldman, who has studied creatures such as sidewinder snakes and sandfish lizards moving through and across sand. With the ants on their doorstep, Goldman and Goodisman were intrigued to learn more about how the insects work together and the mechanical factors that affect ant nest construction in soils ranging from wet clay to coarse sand.However, producing consistent simulated soil conditions for the ants to excavate was not as simple as stirring soil into water – ‘Different people got different conditions’, Goldman recalls – until Nick Gravish came up with the idea of sieving mixtures of sand and water to create uniform distributions of water through the soil. Then, everything was ready for Daria Monaenkova to take 14.5 cm long plugs of the uniform soil samples – ranging from minute clay-like particles to ant head-sized grains of sand with a moisture content ranging from complete saturation to perfectly dry – drop mini-colonies consisting of 100 ants on the top and leave them to their excavations for 20 h. The challenge then was to visualise the nests without destroying them, so Monaenkova meticulously scanned the plugs with X-rays – taking 400 shots per nest – and laboriously reconstructed the 3D structures with Greggory Rodriguez and Rachel Kutner to see what the industrious insects had achieved.Analysing the structures, Monaenkova could see that no matter how large or small the grains of soil, the ants were able to excavate tunnels. However, the wetness of the soil dramatically affected their productivity. In completely dry soils, the ants couldn't dig at all, and Goldman says that they were only able to dig pitiful looking tunnels in slightly damp soils. But, when Monaenkova attempted to repeat the ants' efforts by driving a small steel rod into the relatively dry soils, they appreciated how impressive even these puny efforts were. ‘Daria couldn't do it’, says Goldman, adding that he suspects that the microengineers are building networks like Jenga puzzles to stabilise their structures. However, once the hydration reached an intermediate level, the ants were able to produce lengthy tunnels of a consistent diameter down through the soil. And, when the soil was completely saturated, the tiny engineers failed again: ‘It's like trying to build a sand castle with sloppy sand’, says Goldman. He suspects that the soils at intermediate levels of hydration yielded the most robust tunnels because the granules were bonded by strong capillary forces provided by minute droplets of water bridging the particles – although the stronger attachment did not impair the ants' excavations.Next, Monaenkova investigated the mechanics of ant excavation by enticing them to burrow against a glass cylinder wall while she filmed their Herculean efforts, revealing that the animals used two tactics. When the soil was coarse, they grasped a single grain and shuffled backward up the tunnel, dragging it with them. However, when the soil was fine and the ants could grasp multiple grains, they gathered a pellet of grains and marched upward. Goldman was most surprised by the ants' inventiveness, moulding bulky pellets like snowballs with their forelimbs, mandibles and even their antennae.Reflecting on the ants' engineering, Goldman says that he is impressed by their ability to work in a completely dark and confined environment while continually colliding with their nest mates. ‘It is just mind blowing how they can dig so well’, he says.
Read full abstract