Nerve Isografts Research Articles

Multiple costimulatory blockade in the peripheral nerve allograft

Background: In the nerve allograft model, costimulation blockade has permitted good regeneration but is still inferior to the nerve isograft. We hypothesize that a short course of multiple costimulatory pathway blockade will be more effective in inhibiting the redundancy of the immune response and improve nerve regeneration through the nerve allograft.Methods: The murine sciatic nerve allograft model was used to reconstruct a 1 cm sciatic nerve gap. Treatment consisted of the inhibition of the CD40, CD28/B7 and ICOS pathways and was compared with only single or double costimulation blockade. Assessment methods included quantitative histomorphometry and ELISPOT assay to quantify the host immune response after 3 weeks post-operatively.Results: Triple costimulation blockade permitted regeneration through the nerve allograft that was equivalent to the nerve isograft. A short course of three doses was more effective than a single dose for all combinations tested. ELISPOT assay demonstrated minimal in vitro immune response with a short course of double or triple pathway-blocking agents.Conclusion: Costimulation blockade, especially with the simultaneous inhibition of multiple pathways, remains a promising strategy to promote regeneration through the peripheral nerve allograft, and may be uniquely suited to the temporary immunosuppressive requirements of the peripheral nerve allograft.

Matching of motor-sensory modality in the rodent femoral nerve model shows no enhanced effect on peripheral nerve regeneration

The treatment of peripheral nerve injuries with nerve gaps largely consists of autologous nerve grafting utilizing sensory nerve donors. Underlying this clinical practice is the assumption that sensory autografts provide a suitable substrate for motoneuron regeneration, thereby facilitating motor endplate reinnervation and functional recovery. This study examined the role of nerve graft modality on axonal regeneration, comparing motor nerve regeneration through motor, sensory, and mixed nerve isografts in the Lewis rat. A total of 100 rats underwent grafting of the motor or sensory branch of the femoral nerve with histomorphometric analysis performed after 5, 6, or 7 weeks. Analysis demonstrated similar nerve regeneration in motor, sensory, and mixed nerve grafts at all three time points. These data indicate that matching of motor-sensory modality in the rat femoral nerve does not confer improved axonal regeneration through nerve isografts.

The role of T helper cell differentiation in promoting nerve allograft survival with costimulation blockade

Peripheral nerve allografts provide a temporary scaffold for host nerve regeneration and allow for the repair of significant segmental nerve injuries. Despite this potential, nerve allograft transplantation requires temporary systemic immunosuppression. Characterization of the immunological mechanisms involved in the induction of immune hyporesponsiveness to prevent nerve allograft rejection will help provide a basis for optimizing immunomodulation regimens or manipulating donor nerve allografts to minimize or eliminate the need for global immunosuppression. The authors used C57Bl/6 mice and STAT4 and STAT6 gene BALB/c knockout mice. A nonvascularized nerve allograft was used to reconstruct a 1-cm sciatic nerve gap in the murine model. A triple costimulatory blockade of the CD40, CD28/B7, and inducible costimulatory (ICOS) pathways was used. Quantitative assessment was performed at 3 weeks with nerve histomorphometry, walking track analysis, and the enzyme-linked immunospot assay. The STAT6 -/- mice received 3 doses of costimulation-blocking antibodies and had axonal regeneration equivalent to nerve isografts, while treated STAT4 -/- mice demonstrated moderate axonal regeneration but inferior to the T helper cell Type 2-deficient animals. Enzyme-linked immunospot assay analysis demonstrated a minimal immune response in both STAT4 -/- and STAT6 -/- mice treated with a costimulatory blockade. The authors' findings suggest that Type 1 T helper cells may play a more significant role in costimulatory blockade-induced immune hyporesponsiveness in the nerve allograft model, and that Type 2 T helper differentation may represent a potential target for directed immunosuppression.

Heparin-Binding-Affinity-Based Delivery Systems Releasing Nerve Growth Factor Enhance Sciatic Nerve Regeneration

The controlled delivery of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the peripheral nervous system has been shown to enhance nerve regeneration following injury, although the effect of release rate has not been previously studied with an affinity-based delivery system (DS). The goal of this research was to determine if the binding site affinity of the DS affected nerve regeneration in vivo using nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) in a 13-mm rat sciatic nerve defect. These DSs consisted of bi-domain peptides that varied in heparin-binding affinity, heparin and NGF, which binds to heparin with moderate affinity. Eight experimental groups were evaluated consisting of NGF with DS, control groups excluding one or more components of the DS within silicone conduits and nerve isografts. Nerves were harvested 6 weeks after treatment for analysis by histomorphometry. These DSs with NGF resulted in a higher frequency of nerve regeneration compared to control groups and were similar to the nerve isograft group in measures of nerve fiber density and percent neural tissue, but not in total nerve fiber count. In addition, these DSs with NGF contained a significantly greater percentage of larger diameter nerve fibers, suggesting more mature regenerating nerve content. While there were no differences in nerve regeneration due to varying peptide affinity with these DSs, their use with NGF enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration through a NGC across a critical nerve gap.

Nerve grafts with various sensory and motor fiber compositions are equally effective for the repair of a mixed nerve defect

Autologous, cellular nerve grafts are commonly used to bridge nerve gaps in the clinical setting. Sensory nerves are most often selected for autografting because of their relative ease of procurement and low donor site morbidity. A series of recent reports conclude that sensory isografts are inferior to motor and mixed nerve isografts for the repair of a mixed nerve defect in rat. The aim of the present study was to determine if the disparity reported with cellular graft subtypes exists for detergent decellularized, chondroitinase ABC processed nerve grafts. We hypothesized that processing removes or neutralizes the inferior properties attributed to sensory nerve grafts. Saphenous (cutaneous branch), femoral quadriceps (muscle branch) and tibial (mixed trunk) nerve grafts 5 mm in length were used in tensionless reconstruction of syngenic rat tibial nerves. Nerve regeneration through the grafts and into the recipient distal nerve was evaluated 21 days after grafting by two methods, toluidine blue staining of semi-thin sections (myelinated axons) and neurofilament-immunolabeling (total axons). Contrary to previous reports using this grafting scheme, we found no significant difference in the myelinated axon counts for the three cellular graft subtypes. Moreover, total axon counts indicated cellular saphenous nerve grafts were more effective than the quadriceps and tibial nerve grafts. A similar though less pronounced trend was found for the decellularized processed grafts. These findings indicate that nerve graft composition (sensory and motor) has no substantial impact on the short-term outcome of nerve regeneration in a mixed nerve repair model.

Affinity-based release of glial-derived neurotrophic factor from fibrin matrices enhances sciatic nerve regeneration

Glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) promotes both sensory and motor neuron survival. The delivery of GDNF to the peripheral nervous system has been shown to enhance regeneration following injury. In this study, we evaluated the effect of affinity-based delivery of GDNF from a fibrin matrix in a nerve guidance conduit on nerve regeneration in a 13 mm rat sciatic nerve defect. Seven experimental groups were evaluated which received GDNF or nerve growth factor (NGF) with the delivery system within the conduit, control groups excluding one or more components of the delivery system, and nerve isografts. Nerves were harvested 6 weeks after treatment for analysis by histomorphometry and electron microscopy. The use of the delivery system (DS) with either GDNF or NGF resulted in a higher frequency of nerve regeneration vs. control groups, as evidenced by a neural structure spanning the 13 mm gap. The GDNF DS and NGF DS groups were also similar to the nerve isograft group in measures of nerve fiber density, percent neural tissue and myelinated area measurements, but not in terms of total fiber counts. In addition, both groups contained a significantly greater percentage of larger diameter fibers, with GDNF DS having the largest in comparison to all groups, suggesting more mature neural content. The delivery of GDNF via the affinity-based delivery system can enhance peripheral nerve regeneration through a silicone conduit across a critical nerve gap and offers insight into potential future alternatives to the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries.

The impact of motor and sensory nerve architecture on nerve regeneration

Sensory nerve autografting is the standard of care for injuries resulting in a nerve gap. Recent work demonstrates superior regeneration with motor nerve grafts. Improved regeneration with motor grafting may be a result of the nerve's Schwann cell basal lamina tube size. Motor nerves have larger SC basal lamina tubes, which may allow more nerve fibers to cross a nerve graft repair. Architecture may partially explain the suboptimal clinical results seen with sensory nerve grafting techniques. To define the role of nerve architecture, we evaluated regeneration through acellular motor and sensory nerve grafts. Thirty-six Lewis rats underwent tibial nerve repairs with 5 mm double-cable motor or triple-cable sensory nerve isografts. Grafts were harvested and acellularized in University of Wisconsin solution. Control animals received fresh motor or sensory cable isografts. Nerves were harvested after 4 weeks and histomorphometry was performed. In 6 animals per group from the fresh motor and sensory cable graft groups, weekly walking tracks and wet muscle mass ratios were performed at 7 weeks. Histomorphometry revealed more robust nerve regeneration in both acellular and cellular motor grafts. Sensory groups showed poor regeneration with significantly decreased percent nerve, fiber count, and density ( p < 0.05). Walking tracks revealed a trend toward improved functional recovery in the motor group. Gastrocnemius wet muscle mass ratios show a significantly greater muscle mass recovery in the motor group ( p < 0.05). Nerve architecture (size of SC basal lamina tubes) plays an important role in nerve regeneration in a mixed nerve gap model.

Anti-CD40L Monoclonal Antibody Treatment Induces Long-Term, Tissue-Specific, Immunologic Hyporesponsiveness to Peripheral Nerve Allografts

The CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway plays a crucial role in allograft rejection. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment as a method to induce long-term, tissue-specific, immunologic hyporesponsiveness to peripheral nerve allografts. Sciatic nerve allografts were performed from BALB/c donor mice into C57BL/6 recipients. Anti-CD40L mAb (1 mg) was administered intraperitoneally to recipient mice on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. After a 14-, 28-, or 60-day recovery period, the mice were rechallenged with either a BALB/c cardiac or peripheral nerve allograft. Rejection was assessed by measuring the production of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin (IL)-2, -4, and -5, and alloantibodies immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG. IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IgM, and IgG responses were much lower in the anti-CD40L mAb group compared with controls. Nerve allograft and nerve isograft rechallenge 60 days following the original nerve allotransplantation produced low cytokine responses, whereas cardiac allograft rechallenge produced high cytokine production, indicative of acute rejection. Short-term anti-CD40L treatment may cause long-term, tissue-specific, immunologic hyporesponsiveness. This may allow time for native axons to traverse the transplanted nerve allograft and replace the graft with autogenous peripheral nerve tissue.

Assessment of Nerve Regeneration Across Nerve Allografts Treated with Tacrolimus

Although regeneration of nerve allotransplant is a major concern in the clinic, there have been few papers quantitatively assessing functional recovery of animals' nerve allografts in the long term. In this study, functional recovery, histopathological study, and immunohistochemistry changes of rat nerve allograft with FK506 were investigated up to 12 weeks without slaughtering. C57 and SD rats were used for transplantation. The donor's nerve was sliced and transplanted into the recipient. The sciatic nerve was epineurally sutured with 10-0 nylon. In total, 30 models of transplantation were performed and divided into 3 groups that were either treated with FK506 or not. Functional recovery of the grafted nerve was serially assessed by the pin click test, walking track analysis and electrophysiological evaluations. A histopathological study and immunohistochemistry study were done in the all of the models. Nerve allografts treated with FK506 have no immune rejection through 12 weeks. Sensibility had similarly improved in both isografts and allografts. There has been no difference in each graft. Walk track analysis demonstrates significant recovery of motor function of the nerve graft. No histological results of difference were found up to 12 weeks in each graft. In the rodent nerve graft model, FK506 prevented nerve allograft rejection across a major histocompatibility barrier. Sensory recovery seems to be superior to motor function. Nerve isograft and allograft treated with FK506 have no significant difference in function recovery, histopathological result, and immunohistochemistry changes.

Immunomodulation by costimulation blockade inhibits rejection of nerve allografts

The aim of this study was to investigate if costimulation blockade could be used to modulate the immune response, to prevent rejection, and to stimulate regeneration into nerve allografts. Nerve allografts from Balb/C mice, and isogenic nerve grafts (isografts) from C57/BL6 mice, were used to bridge a 7-mm gap of the sciatic nerve in C57/BL6 mice. Allograft recipients were treated with either a triple treatment with anti-lymphocyte function antigen-1 (anti-LFA), anti-CD40 ligand (anti-CD40L), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin (anti-CTLA4Ig) or isotype antibodies (placebo) at postoperative days 0, 2, 4, and 6 (intraperitoneal). After 5 or 9 days, the nerve grafts, together with the proximal and the distal nerve segments, were evaluated by histology and immunocytochemistry for inflammatory cells [CD4-positive (CD4+) and CD8-positive (CD8+) staining cells] and axonal outgrowth (neurofilaments). The immune response was inhibited by costimulation blockade with less extensive inflammation and a lower number of CD4+ staining cells in triple-treated allografts at 9 days. The regeneration rate was significantly faster in isografts (0.75 mm/day) compared with allografts with placebo treatment (0.39 mm/day), but not when compared with triple-treated allografts (0.49 mm/day). At 9 days, the axons were significantly longer in nerve isografts than in nerve allografts, irrespective of treatment. Hence, costimulation blockade neither increased the regeneration rate nor the outgrowth length in triple-treated allografts. We conclude that costimulation blockade inhibits the immune response in nerve allografts without deterring early axonal outgrowth.

Use of motor nerve material in peripheral nerve repair with conduits

We have recently shown in experimental nerve injury models that nerve regeneration is enhanced across a motor nerve graft as compared with a sensory nerve graft. To test the hypothesis that nerve architecture may mediate the beneficial effect of motor nerve grafting, we developed a model of disrupted nerve architecture in which motor and sensory nerve fragments were introduced into silicone conduits. Lewis rats were randomized to 5 experimental groups: nerve repair with motor nerve fragments, sensory nerve fragments, mixed nerve fragments, saline-filled conduit (negative control), or nerve isograft (positive control). At 6, 9, or 12 weeks, animals were sacrificed and nerve tissues were analyzed by quantitative histomorphometry. No significant differences were observed between the motor, sensory, and mixed nerve fragment groups. These findings suggest that intact nerve architecture, regardless of neurotrophic or biochemical factors, is a prerequisite for the beneficial effect of motor nerve grafting.

Short-Term Anti-CD40 Ligand Costimulatory Blockade Induces Tolerance to Peripheral Nerve Allografts, Resulting in Improved Skeletal Muscle Function

Reconstruction of long or multiple peripheral nerve defects with peripheral nerve autografts may not be possible due to insufficient quantities of donor nerve. There are promising preliminary data that nerve allografting has the potential to improve functional outcome and quality of life after devastating nerve injuries or large tumor resections. The authors previously demonstrated that blockade of the CD40/CD40 ligand costimulatory pathway, via anti-CD40 ligand monoclonal antibody (MR1) therapy, induces tolerance to peripheral nerve allografts in mice. In this study, the authors sought to correlate the immunomodulatory effects of MR1 treatment with functional muscle recovery after peripheral nerve allografting in the murine model. In the mouse hindlimb model, peroneal nerve isografts (C57BL/6 into C57BL/6) and allografts (BALB/c into C57BL/6) were utilized to reconstruct 0.8-cm peroneal nerve gaps. MR1 versus vehicle was administered on days 0, 1, and 2. At 60 days after transplantation, splenocyte production of interferon-gamma and interleukins 2, 4, and 5 were quantified using ELISPOT analysis, and in vitro maximum tetanic isometric force of the extensor digitorum longus muscle was measured. At 60 days after transplantation, immunomodulation persisted in MR1-treated, allografted animals, as evidenced by significantly muted interferon-gamma, interleukin 4, and interleukin 2 splenocyte production. Functional extensor digitorum longus muscle recovery after nerve allografting and MR1 administration was improved due to the tolerance induced by MR1 compared with untreated allograft recipients. Three-day inductive therapy with MR1 produces 60-day immunologic tolerance to peripheral nerve allografts, as evidenced by dramatic decreases in interferon-gamma, interleukin 4, and interleukin 2 production, and results in increased muscle force recovery. This work emphasizes the potential promise of CD40-CD40 ligand costimulatory blockade in reducing or eliminating peripheral nerve allograft rejection.

Regeneration through Nerve Isografts is Independent of Nerve Geometry

Investigators have theorized that tortuosity in nerve grafts may adversely affect nerve regeneration. This study investigated the effect of graft configuration and redundancy on regeneration across 2.5-cm rat sciatic nerve isografts. Thirty-two Lewis rats were randomized to four nerve grafting groups defined by gap distance and isograft conformation. In Group 1, grafts were interposed into a 2-cm gap, resulting in mild graft redundancy. In Groups 2 and 3, grafts were tacked in sinusoidal or omega-shaped configurations, respectively, to bridge a 0.5-cm gap. In Group 4, grafts were interposed after 1 cm of native sciatic nerve was resected, resulting in no graft redundancy and an interstump distance of 2.5 cm. At 6 weeks, nerve tissue was harvested; subsequent histomorphometric analysis revealed no significant differences in regeneration between groups. These data suggest that regeneration through isografts is independent of the graft geometry and redundancy.

Peripheral Nerve Transplantation: The Role of Chemical Acellularization in Eliminating Allograft Antigenicity

This study tests the hypothesis that a chemically acellularized peripheral nerve allograft is as immunologically inactive as a peripheral nerve isograft. Cellular and acellular sciatic nerves were transplanted from BALB/c into C57BL/6 mice. C57BL/6 sciatic nerves were also transplanted into C57BL/6 recipients as isograft controls. Fourteen days post-transplantation, recipient splenocytes were isolated, stimulated with donor alloantigens, and IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and gamma-IFN production was quantified using the ELISPOT technique. Cellular peripheral nerve allografts stimulated robust Th1 and Th2 systemic immune responses, whereas acellular peripheral nerve allografts elicited a response that is comparable to or lower than that quantified following peripheral nerve isograft transplantation. Chemical acellularization of peripheral nerve allografts dramatically reduces the cellular and humoral immunologic responses. These data indicate that chemically acellularized peripheral nerve constructs are relatively non-antigenic and may be a readily available source of nerve for peripheral nerve reconstruction.

Assessment of the Immune Response to Dose of Nerve Allografts

Nerve allotransplantation provides a limitless source of nerve graft material for the reconstruction of large neural defects. It does require systemic immunosuppression or induction of immune unresponsiveness to prevent allograft rejection. It is unknown whether a greater volume of nerve graft material will increase the risk of rejection or the need for more intensive immunosuppression. This study assessed the relationship between the quantity of nerve tissue transplanted and the magnitude of the resulting immune response. Forty female (BALB/c) mice were randomly assigned to two groups that received either nerve isografts (BALB/c) or nerve allografts (C57BL/6). Each group was then subdivided into two groups that received either one or 10 sciatic nerve graft inlays. Histological and immunological assessments were performed at 10 days after engraftment. Histologic analysis demonstrated greater cellular infiltration in the allograft than the isograft groups but no appreciable difference in infiltration related to quantity of transplanted nerve tissue. In vitro assessments of the immune response using mixed lymphocyte assays and limiting dilution analysis similarly demonstrated a robust immune response to allografts but no effect on quantity of transplanted nerve tissue. These data suggest that larger peripheral nerve allografts may not be subject to increased risk for rejection.

Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on nerve regeneration in acellular nerve grafts.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of human recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-165) on peripheral nerve axonal sprouting and elongation following peripheral nerve injury and repair. Two-centimeter nerve gaps were created in rat peroneal nerves and repaired with either peripheral nerve autografts, acellular peripheral nerve isografts, or VEGF-165-treated acellular peripheral nerve isografts. Four months postoperatively, the peroneal nerves were harvested and histomorphometric analysis was performed. The reinnervated extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles were harvested and weighed. At the proximal nerve gap coaptation site, there was a statistically significant increase in the total number of axons and percent neural tissue in the VEGF-treated acellular nerve graft group, compared with the acellular peripheral nerve isograft and autograft groups. At the distal coaptation site, however, the total number of axons and percent neural tissue was similar in the acellular and VEGF-treated groups, which was significantly less than the autograft group. VEGF-165 treatment of acellular nerve grafts resulted in greater EDL muscle masses than acellular nerve grafts alone. VEGF treatment of acellular peripheral nerve isografts enhances axonal sprouting, resulting in an increased number of axons and percent neural tissue at the proximal nerve graft coaptation site. In the absence of any cellular elements, VEGF-impregnated acellular peripheral nerve grafts do not demonstrate enhanced axonal elongation, as noted by relatively few axons at the distal nerve graft coaptation site.

Exogenous leukaemia inhibitory factor enhances nerve regeneration after late secondary repair using a bioartificial nerve conduit

The clinical outcome of peripheral nerve injuries remains disappointing, even in the ideal situation of a primary repair performed with optimal microsurgical techniques. Primary repair is appropriate for only about 85% of injuries, and outcome is worse following secondary nerve repair, partly owing to the reduced regenerative potential of chronically axotomised neurons. Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a gp-130 neurocytokine that is thought to act as an ‘injury factor’, triggering the early-injury phenotype within neurons and potentially boosting their regenerative potential after secondary nerve repair. At 2–4 months after sciatic nerve axotomy in the rat, 1 cm gaps were repaired using either nerve isografts or poly-3-hydroxybutyrate conduits containing a calcium alginate and fibronectin hydrogel. Regeneration was determined by quantitative immunohistochemistry 6 weeks after repair, and the effect of incorporating recombinant LIF (100 ng/ml) into the conduits was assessed. LIF increased the regeneration distance in repairs performed after both 2 months (69%, P=0.019) and 4 months (123%, P=0.021), and was statistically comparable to nerve graft. The total area of axonal immunostaining increased by 21% ( P>0.05) and 63% ( P>0.05), respectively. Percentage immunostaining area was not increased in the 2 months group, but increased by 93% in the repairs performed 4 months after axotomy. Exogenous LIF, therefore, has a potential role in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration after secondary repair, and can be effectively delivered within poly-3-hydroxybutyrate bioartificial conduits used for nerve repair.

The effects of cold preservation and subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 on axonal regeneration in murine peripheral nerve isografts

FK506 is a frequently used immunosuppressant with neuroregenerative effects. The neuroregenerative and immunosuppressive mechanisms of FK506, however, are distinct, suggesting that FK506 may stimulate nerve regeneration at lower doses than are needed to induce immunosuppression. The effects of cold preservation, a technique known to improve axonal regeneration through nerve allografts, are not well studied in nerve isografts and are also reported here. To determine the effects of subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 and cold preservation on nerve regeneration in isografts. The neuroregenerative properties of immunosuppressive and subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 were compared in a murine model receiving either fresh or cold preserved nerve isografts. Sixty female BALB/cJ mice were randomized into six groups. Animals in groups I, III and V received fresh nerve isografts. Animals in groups II, IV and VI received cold-preserved nerve isografts. Mice in groups I and II received no medical therapy, while those in groups III and IV received subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506, and those in groups V and VI received immunosuppressive doses as confirmed by mixed lymphocyte reactivity assays. Nerve regeneration was evaluated with histomorphometry and functional recovery was evaluated with walking track analysis. Pretreatment with cold preservation did not significantly affect neural regeneration. The potent neuroregenerative effect of immunosuppressive doses of FK506 was confirmed, and the ability of subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 to stimulate axonal regeneration in murine nerve isografts is reported. Less toxic subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 retaining some neuroregenerative properties may have a clinical role in treating extensive nerve injuries.

The effects of cold preservation and subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 on axonal regeneration in murine peripheral nerve isografts

The effects of cold preservation and subimmunosuppressive doses of FK506 on axonal regeneration in murine peripheral nerve isografts

The effects of rapamycin in murine peripheral nerve isografts and allografts.

The FKBP-12-binding ligand FK506 has been successfully used to stimulate nerve regeneration and prevent the rejection of peripheral nerve allografts. The immunosuppressant rapamycin, another FKBP-12-binding ligand, stimulates axonal regeneration in vitro, but its influence on nerve regeneration in peripheral nerve isografts or allografts has not been studied. Sixty female inbred BALB/cJ mice were randomized into six tibial nerve transplant groups, including three isograft and three allograft (C57BL/6J) groups. Grafts were left untreated (groups I and II), treated with FK506 (groups III and IV), or treated with rapamycin (groups V and VI). Nerve regeneration was quantified in terms of histomorphometry and functional recovery, and immunosuppression was confirmed with mixed lymphocyte reactivity assays. Animals treated with FK506 and rapamycin were immunosuppressed and demonstrated significantly less immune cell proliferation relative to untreated recipient animals. Although every animal demonstrated some functional recovery during the study, animals receiving an untreated peripheral nerve allograft were slowest to recover. Isografts treated with FK506 but not rapamycin demonstrated significantly increased nerve regeneration. Nerve allografts in animals treated with FK506, and to a lesser extent rapamycin, however, both demonstrated significantly more nerve regeneration and increased nerve fiber widths relative to untreated controls. The authors suggest that rapamycin can facilitate regeneration through peripheral nerve allografts, but it is not a neuroregenerative agent in this in vivo model. Nerve regeneration in FK506-treated peripheral nerve isografts and allografts was superior to that found in rapamycin-treated animals. Rapamycin may have a role in the treatment of peripheral nerve allografts when used in combination with other medications, or in the setting of renal failure that often precludes the use of calcineurin inhibitors such as FK506.