Nerve Block Research Articles

Lameness of horses is effectively ameliorated with a low volume of mepivacaine administered as a palmar digital nerve block.

To determine the effect of 1.5 mL 2% mepivacaine, 0.75 mL 2% mepivacaine, and a combination of 0.75 mL 2% mepivacaine with epinephrine (1:200,000 solution) administered over each palmar digital nerve (PDN) to 6 horses with naturally occurring lameness caused by digital pain. In a crossover study design, 6 horses with forefoot-related lameness were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Each group received, on different study days, a PDN block using 1.5 mL of 2% mepivacaine, 0.75 mL 2% mepivacaine, or 0.75 mL of a combination of 2% mepivacaine and epinephrine (1:200,000 solution) injected over each nerve. The horses' gait while trotting was analyzed with an inertial, sensor-based motion-analysis system immediately before treatment. The assigned treatment was then administered to the lame forelimb, after which the gait was reevaluated at 5-minute intervals for 15 minutes. All 3 treatments significantly reduced lameness scores at all gait evaluations, but the effect of treatment on the lameness score did not differ significantly among treatments. 0.75 mL of mepivacaine hydrochloric acid injected over each PDN was as effective as twice that volume in decreasing the lameness score of horses with digital pain. The 0.75-mL solution of mepivacaine/epinephrine injected over each nerve did not significantly improve the anesthetic effect of mepivacaine. For a palmar digital nerve block, a lower-than-commonly-recommended volume of 2% mepivacaine effectively ameliorates digital pain. This finding invites investigation as to whether administering a low volume of local anesthetic will more precisely localize pain.

Excision of Giant Occipital-Lateral Neck Lipoma with Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block Combined with Greater Occipital Nerve Block

Excision of Giant Occipital-Lateral Neck Lipoma with Ultrasound Guided Superficial Cervical Plexus Block Combined with Greater Occipital Nerve Block

Ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block: A bright future on the horizon

Objective: In light of the advancement of modern medicine, anesthesiologists and surgeons are increasingly prioritizing patient comfort in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. A growing body of research revolves around the utilization of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks for surgeries involving the distal upper limb. This review aims to provide an overview of regional anesthesia techniques in forearm, hand, and wrist surgeries, laying a theoretical foundation for the prospects of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks in optimizing comfort during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Methods: A retrospective review of literature sourced from the PubMed database was conducted to comprehensively evaluate and elucidate the advantages and drawbacks of ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks, brachial plexus blocks, Bier blocks, and wrist blocks. Additionally, a summary was provided regarding the selection of local anesthetics for ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve blocks. Results: Overall, ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block techniques exhibit several advantages over Bier’s block, brachial plexus block, and wrist block for the majority of forearm, wrist, and hand surgeries. These advantages include reduced anesthesia-related time, prolonged duration of analgesia, and minimal impairment of upper extremity motor function. Consequently, these techniques enhance surgical safety and facilitate postoperative recovery. Furthermore, the addition of dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to ultrasound-guided selective nerve blocks of the forearm could extend the duration of analgesia. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided forearm selective nerve block is a straightforward and conducive anesthesia method for distal upper limb surgeries, aligning with the principles of fast surgical recovery and enhanced patient comfort during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Given its manifold benefits, widespread promotion and adoption of this technique in clinical practice are warranted.

Can computerized intraosseous anaesthesia replaces the inferior alveolar nerve block in children? A randomized controlled clinical trial

Can computerized intraosseous anaesthesia replaces the inferior alveolar nerve block in children? A randomized controlled clinical trial

Pain and immune function in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery following stellate ganglion block with total intravenous anesthesia.

Stellate ganglion block is a commonly used sympathetic nerve block technique that restores the balance of the sympathetic and vagal nervous systems of the body and inhibits sympathetic nerve activity. To analyze the effect of a stellate ganglion block combined with total diploma intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain and immune function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastric cancer (GC) surgery to provide a reference basis for the formulation of anesthesia protocols for radical GC surgery. This study included 112 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery for GC between January 2022 and March 2024. There was no restriction on sex. The patient grouping method used was a digital random table method, and the number of cases in each group was 56. The control group was administered total intravenous anesthesia, and the observation group compounded the stellate ganglion block according to the total intravenous anesthesia protocol. Postoperative hemodynamics, pain levels, and immune indices were compared between the groups. The heart rate and mean arterial pressure in the observation group after intubation were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Pain levels were compared between the two groups at 2 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours after surgery (P > 0.05). The number of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ cells at the end of surgery was higher in the observation group than in the control group, and the number of CD8+ cells was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of propofol dosage, awakening time, extubation time, or postoperative adverse reactions (P > 0.05). The application of a stellate ganglion block combined with total intravenous anesthesia had no significant effect on postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical GC surgery. However, it can safely reduce the effect of surgery on the immune function of patients and is worth applying in clinical practice.

From pain level to pain experience: redefining acute pain assessment to enhance understanding of chronic postsurgical pain

BackgroundChronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) significantly impairs quality of life and poses a substantial healthcare burden, affecting up to a quarter of patients undergoing surgery. Although acute pain is recognised as a predictor for CPSP development, the role of patient experience remains underexplored. This study examines the predictive value of patient experience alongside traditional risk factors for CPSP after orthopaedic surgery. MethodsAn exploratory analysis was conducted on 294 patients from a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing continuous perineural analgesia and single-injection nerve block in ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries. Patient experience was assessed using the Evaluation du Vecu de l’Anesthésie Générale (EVAN-G) validated questionnaire. Factors associated with CPSP at 90 days after surgery were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses, incorporating patient-reported outcomes and classical variables. ResultsOut of 219 patients with complete data, 63 (29%) developed CPSP at day 90. Multivariate analysis revealed a poor pain experience, as assessed by the pain dimension of EVAN-G on postoperative day 2, as an independent predictor of CPSP (odds ratio 6.45, 95% confidence interval 1.65–25.26, P<0.01). Poor pain experience was associated with an augmented risk of CPSP. ConclusionsThis study underscores the role of patient-reported outcomes, specifically the pain experience dimension captured by the EVAN-G scale, in prediction of CPSP 90 days after surgery. It suggests a shift from conventional assessments of pain intensity to a comprehensive understanding of pain experience, advocating for tailored pain management approaches that could reduce chronic pain, thereby improving patient quality of life and functional recovery.

Automatic Segmentation of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) technology has become a widely used perioperative analgesia method during abdominal and pelvic surgeries. Due to the anatomical complexity and individual variability of the quadratus lumborum muscle (QLM) on ultrasound images, nerve blocks heavily rely on anesthesiologist experience. Therefore, using artificial intelligence (AI) to identify different tissue regions in ultrasound images is crucial. In our study, we retrospectively collected 112 patients (3162 images) and developed a deep learning model named Q-VUM, which is a U-shaped network based on the Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16) network. Q-VUM precisely segments various tissues, including the QLM, the external oblique muscle, the internal oblique muscle, the transversus abdominis muscle (collectively referred to as the EIT), and the bones. Furthermore, we evaluated Q-VUM. Our model demonstrated robust performance, achieving mean intersection over union (mIoU), mean pixel accuracy, dice coefficient, and accuracy values of 0.734, 0.829, 0.841, and 0.944, respectively. The IoU, recall, precision, and dice coefficient achieved for the QLM were 0.711, 0.813, 0.850, and 0.831, respectively. Additionally, the Q-VUM predictions showed that 85% of the pixels in the blocked area fell within the actual blocked area. Finally, our model exhibited stronger segmentation performance than did the common deep learning segmentation networks (0.734 vs. 0.720 and 0.720, respectively). In summary, we proposed a model named Q-VUM that can accurately identify the anatomical structure of the quadratus lumborum in real time. This model aids anesthesiologists in precisely locating the nerve block site, thereby reducing potential complications and enhancing the effectiveness of nerve block procedures.

Continuous Catheter Techniques Versus Single-Injection Nerve Blocks: A Comprehensive Review of Postoperative Pain Management Strategies.

Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and enhancing surgical outcomes. This review compares two prominent regional anesthesia techniques, continuous catheter techniques and single-injection nerve blocks, focusing on their efficacy, safety, and impact on patient outcomes. Single-injection nerve blocks involve administering a one-time anesthetic dose to a specific nerve or plexus, offering immediate but transient pain relief. In contrast, continuous catheter techniques utilize a catheter to deliver a continuous infusion of anesthetic, providing extended analgesia. The review synthesizes current evidence on the effectiveness of each method, highlighting that single-injection blocks are advantageous for their simplicity and rapid onset but may require supplementary pain management for longer procedures. Continuous catheter techniques, while offering prolonged pain relief, carry risks such as infection and catheter displacement. The comparative analysis of these techniques reveals that both have distinct roles in postoperative care, with choice depending on the surgical procedure and patient needs. Patient satisfaction, recovery times, and overall outcomes are critical factors in determining the optimal pain management strategy. Future research should focus on refining these techniques and exploring innovations to improve patient care and pain management outcomes. This review provides insights for clinicians to make informed decisions about postoperative pain management to enhance patient comfort and recovery.

Comparison of Intercostal Nerve Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Perioperative Pain Management and Impact on Chronic Pain in Thoracoscopic Surgery

Objectives: This study compares the analgesic efficacy of Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB) under direct thoracoscopic visualization and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) with ultrasound guidance during thoracoscopic surgery’s perioperative period. Furthermore, it examines their impact on chronic pain and identifies potential risk factors associated with its development. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 74 thoracoscopic surgery patients were randomly assigned to ICNB or SAPB groups. Attending surgeons administered ICNB, while anesthesiologists performed SAPB, both using 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for resting and coughing pain at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively, perioperative opioid and NSAID consumption, and chronic pain incidence at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes aimed to identify independent risk factors for chronic pain. Results: The primary results reveal that SAPB group exhibited significantly lower VAS scores than ICNB group for postoperative coughing at 24 hours (P&lt;0.001, 95% CI=[0.5, 1]) and for resting pain at 48 hours (P=0.001, 95% CI=[0.2, 1]). Conversely, ICNB group demonstrated reduced VAS score for resting pain at 6 hours compared to SAPB group (P=0.014, 95% CI=[−0.5, 0.5]). SAPB group required significantly less intraoperative sulfentanil (P&lt;0.001, 95% CI=[2.5, 5]), remifentanil (P=0.005, 95% CI=[−0.4, −0.1]), and flurbiprofen ester (P=0.003, 95% CI=[0, 50]) than ICNB group. Chronic pain incidence was similar (P=0.572, 95% CI=[0.412, 1.279]), with mild pain in both ICNB and SAPB groups. Secondary findings indicate that resting VAS score at 12 hours (OR=7.59, P=0.048, 95% CI=[1.02, 56.46]), chest tube duration (OR=3.35, P=0.029, 95% CI=[1.13, 9.97]), and surgical duration (OR=1.02, P=0.049, 95% CI=[1.00, 1.03]) were significant predictors of chronic pain occurrence. Discussion: ICNB and SAPB demonstrated comparable analgesic effects, with similar rates of chronic pain occurrence. Chronic pain independent risk factors included resting VAS score at 12 hours, chest tube duration, and surgical duration.

Role of Adjuvants in Enhancing the Efficacy and Duration of Anesthesia Blocks: A Comprehensive Review.

Anesthesia blocks are integral to modern pain management, offering targeted and effective relief for various surgical and procedural interventions. These techniques, including regional and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), involve the administration of local anesthetics to specific body areas, either through epidural, spinal, or direct nerve injections. While effective, incorporating adjuvants, substances added to local anesthetics, can significantly enhance their efficacy and prolong their duration. Adjuvants such as opioids, corticosteroids, alpha-2 agonists, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to amplify analgesic effects, reduce the need for general anesthesia, and improve postoperative outcomes. This review explores the role of adjuvants in optimizing anesthesia blocks, examining their mechanisms of action, clinical benefits, and safety considerations. Adding adjuvants can lead to enhanced pain control, reduced dosage of local anesthetics, and fewer systemic side effects. By integrating adjuvants into anesthesia practice, clinicians can achieve more precise and sustained pain management, tailoring approaches to individual patient needs and specific procedural demands. This comprehensive review highlights current evidence on using adjuvants, their impact on anesthesia block effectiveness, and future research directions. Understanding the role of adjuvants is crucial for improving patient outcomes and advancing pain management techniques in various surgical settings.

Application of hip capsule peripheral nerve block in early analgesia in elderly patients with hip fracture

Application of hip capsule peripheral nerve block in early analgesia in elderly patients with hip fracture

Ultrasound-guided combined intra-articular corticosteroids injection and suprascapular nerve block for pain control in patients with frozen shoulder

BackgroundFrozen shoulder is an incapacitating disease that causes pain and limitation in the shoulder joint functional capacity. This work aimed to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided combined intra-articular corticosteroids (CS) injection and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in pain control in patients with frozen shoulders.ResultsOur prospective study included 40 patients, equally divided into two groups: group A; managed with combined ultrasound (US) guided intra-articular corticosteroids injection (IACSI) and SSNB, and group B patients managed with US-guided SSNB. The visual analog scale score statistically significantly improved after both injections. This success was maintained and showed mild improvement at 8-week intervals (with increased patient capability to do physiotherapy after pain control). Similarly, improvement in the functional capacity of the shoulder joint was identified and assessed by the Oxford shoulder score (OSS) in both groups. Mean OSS was statistically significantly higher at 4-week intervals than before the nerve block for groups A and B. At 8 weeks interval, this favorable result was sustained (p < .001).ConclusionsUS-guided SSNB is an effective, radiation-free method to alleviate frozen shoulder-related pains. However, US-guided combined SSNB and IACSI was more effective than SSNB alone in both pain alleviation and improved shoulder joint function.

Racial disparity in peripheral nerve block usage in breast reconstruction: A nationwide analysis

Peripheral nerve block (PNB) usage in plastic surgery is associated with reduction in post-operative opioid consumption and pain demonstrating benefits in breast reconstruction (BR). This retrospective study explored whether racial-ethnic disparities exist with PNB use for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing BR. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, women who underwent BR from 2012-2021 and received "regional" in addition to general anesthesia were included in the study. Patients without race and ethnicity dataand who received other additional anesthesia were excluded. Unweighted rates of PNB use were compared between racial-ethnic groups and BR modality. Multivariate logistic regression assessed whether race and ethnicity were independently associated with receiving PNBs. A total of 25,188 patients underwent BR and 9429 patients (37.4%) received PNB for postoperative analgesia. Patient demographics reached statistical, but not clinical, significance in age and BMI. Comorbidities were not significantly different between groups. Black patients were less likely to receive PNBs (p<0.001), while Asian and Other patients were more likely to receive PNBs compared to White patients (p<0.001). Black patients were less likely to receive PNB in immediate implant-based and autologous BR, as well as delayed autologous (p<0.05). Asian patients were more likely to receive PNB for all implant-based BR compared to White patients (p<0.001). Ethnicity had no significant impact on receipt of PNB. As a conclusion, racial disparity exists in use of PNBs for postoperative analgesia in BR. Equitable access to PNBs should be championed to not augment baseline racial disparity in BR.

Carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia with or without distal median nerve block: Double-blind randomized clinical trial

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper extremity, and its surgical treatment is carpal tunnel release (CTR). It is mostly performed in local anesthesia. There are no clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing local infiltration anesthesia with or without a distal median nerve block in CTR. The aim of the PERSONNEL trial (carPal tunnEl ReleaSe lOcal iNfiltratioN mEdian bLockade) is to assess whether a distal median nerve block reduces pain during and after the procedure in addition to local anesthesia. Methods: This is a single-center randomized clinical superiority trial comparing local anesthesia alone and local anesthesia with a distal median nerve block for CTR in patients with CTS. Adult patients will be randomized in one university hospital in Finland, and the intended sample size is 118. The primary outcome is the mean pain level after the procedure during 72 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes include expected pain; pain during the injection of the anesthetic solution caused by pressure, burning, needle sting, and total pain; worst pain during the surgery; duration of anesthesia; number of experienced needle stings; Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ); pain killer consumption;, patient satisfaction using Net Promoter Score (NPS); and complications. Discussion: Patient satisfaction is a crucial factor in modern healthcare. A distal median nerve block may reduce pain during and after CTR, potentially increasing patient satisfaction with the given treatment. It can also be hypothesized that better postoperative pain control may prevent complications, for example, complex regional pain syndrome. However, we lack adequate evidence to justify the use of distal median nerve block, which can itself predispose patients to complications, for example, median nerve injury. Therefore, there is a need for adequate RCTs to assess its efficacy. The results of this study can be used to optimize anesthesia for carpal tunnel surgery, improve patient satisfaction, and possibly prevent complications. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05372393.

Comparison of ropivacaine with ropivacaine–dexamethasone combination for postoperative analgesia in the pectoral nerve block for modified radical mastectomy: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background and Aims: The pectoral nerve block types I and II are novel techniques to provide analgesia for modified radical mastectomy (MRM) surgeries performed under general anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare the duration of effective analgesia, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate the total amount of rescue analgesics in 24 h, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative adverse effects. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on a total of 80 women with breast cancer belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologist class I and II scheduled for MRM, which were randomly allocated into two groups – Group R (n = 40) received 0.25% ropivacaine 29 ml + NS 1 ml and Group RD (n = 40) received 0.25% ropivacaine 29 ml + dexamethasone (4 mg) 1 ml. Ten milliliters of the study drug was used in Pecs I and the rest 20 ml in Pecs II block posttumor resection. Results: The duration of analgesia was statistically significantly longer in RD (778.75 ± 55.12 min) compared to Group R (412.63 ± 21.69 min) (P &lt; 0.05). Pain scores were significantly less in Group RD. The mean dose of acetaminophen required was significantly less in Group RD (2362.50 ± 375.32 mg) than in Group R (3525.00 ± 298.50 mg) (P &lt; 0.05). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Conclusion: The addition of dexamethasone with ropivacaine in the Pecs block can be used for prolonging the effective duration of analgesia and decreasing postoperative analgesic consumption with comparable hemodynamic and side effect profiles.

Clinical application of ultrasound in thoracic medial branch block and thoracic cooled-radiofrequency ablation: Case report and literature review

Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation is a procedure used to alleviate pain by destroying nerves with by radiofrequency-generated heat. Traditionally, radiofrequency ablation is preceded by diagnostic medial branch block injections, both guided by fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopic visualization of the superolateral aspect of the thoracic transverse process, where thoracic medial branch nerves occur, can be challenging due to anatomical complexities, especially in obese patients. We present a novel technique in which ultrasound was utilized in conjunction with fluoroscopy to perform medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation of the thoracic medial branch nerves. Case Report: First, two diagnostic thoracic medial branch nerve blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance. For the subsequent radiofrequency ablation, spinal needles were first advanced under ultrasound guidance to the target thoracic medial branch nerves. The position of those spinal needles was then used to guide the placement of cooled radiofrequency ablation probes using fluoroscopy. The patient reported 100% pain relief following the procedures. Discussion: We found that the addition of ultrasound allowed us to overcome the challenge of visualizing the superolateral aspect of thoracic transverse process under fluoroscopy alone. Direct ultrasound visualization allowed us to accurately and safely perform a thoracic medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation in a patient with poor fluoroscopic anatomy, as demonstrated by the patient’s complete pain relief after both medial branch block and radiofrequency ablation. We also theorize that our novel technique allows the provider to directly visualize the pleura, which could reduce the risk of severe pneumothorax associated with thoracic medial branch block and cooled radiofrequency ablation.

Comprehensive Survey on the Performance of Lignocaine in Root Canal Treatment

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lignocaine as a local anesthetic in root canal treatment, particularly focusing on its use in lower teeth, different administration techniques, and its performance in patients with specific challenges such as inflammation or allergy. Methods: A survey-based approach was utilized to gather data from clinicians on their experiences with lignocaine in endodontic procedures. The study assessed the success rates of various techniques, including the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), intraligamentary, and intraosseous injections. The impact of different adrenaline ratios (1:100,000, 1:80,000, and 1:200,000) on anesthesia duration and effectiveness was also analyzed. Results: Lignocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was effective in the majority of cases, with IANB being the primary technique used for lower Lignocaine was identified as the anesthetic of choice by the majority of participants, preferred for its rapid onset and adequate duration of action. Most clinicians reported that lignocaine provided effective anesthesia for routine root canal procedures when inflammation was present or additional duration was required, clinicians recommended using supplemental techniques such as intraligamentary and intraosseous. Alternative anesthetics like articaine and bupivacaine were used successfully in patients with lignocaine allergies. Conclusion: Lignocaine remains a reliable anesthetic for root canal treatments, particularly in the lower jaw, when used with appropriate techniques and adrenaline ratios. However, challenges such as inflamed tissues and patient allergies require alternative strategies, including supplemental injection techniques and the use of different anesthetic agents. Clinicians should be adaptable in their approach to ensure effective anesthesia and patient safety. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lignocaine as a local anesthetic in root canal treatment, particularly focusing on its use in lower teeth, different administration techniques, and its performance in patients with specific challenges such as inflammation or allergy.

Pediatric Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and peripheral nerve blocks:a retrospective cohort study of 25 patients.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is an inherited neurologic disorder characterized by progressive peripheral neuropathies. The use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) in patients with CMT disease has been controversial because of concerns about exacerbating existing neurologic impairments and the "double hit" hypothesis. We aimed to assess the use of PNB in pediatric patients with CMT disease undergoing orthopedic surgery to address the limited data available in the literature on this topic. In this retrospective cohort study, we included all pediatric patients with CMT disease scheduled for orthopedic surgery receiving PNB at our centre. All of the patients had preoperative neurologic exams and received one or more ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques. Data extracted included details of anesthesia technique, surgical procedure, opioid consumption, and pain scores during the first three postoperative days. We also reviewed any complications such as neurologic deficits and local anesthetic toxicity. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the findings. We included 25 patients, 14 of whom (56%) presented with pre-existing neurologic deficits, primarily in the lower extremities. Postoperative assessments revealed no new neurologic impairments in 24/25 (96%) patients, with only one patient experiencing a nerve injury possibly related to the surgical procedure. Opioid consumption was low in the postanesthesia care unit and on the day of surgery. No additional complications were noted in the first 72hr after surgery. Despite concerns, PNB showed favourable outcomes in a pediatric cohort with CMT disease, with low opioid consumption and pain scores and minimal complications during follow-up. These findings match previous reports of adult patients with CMT disease and suggest that the benefits of PNB may outweigh the perceived risks in pediatric patients with CMT disease.

Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Plexus-Sciatic Nerve Blocks Versus Epidurals for Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Study to Compare the Competency of Novice Anaesthesiology Residents in a High-Volume Level 1 Trauma Centre.

The relative merits of peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) over central neuraxial anaesthesia and the advantages of the above two techniques over general anaesthesia for surgical interventions of the lower limb are well established. The competency of anaesthetic trainees in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre in administering dual ultrasound and nerve stimulator-guided lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve block(DUNLuPS) vs. epidural anaesthesia (EA) was compared by reporting the adequacy of anaesthesia with the two techniques, time taken for the performance of block, time of onset of sensoryblock (TOSB), and time of onset of motor block (TOMB). This prospective, randomized, study enrolled 92 patients aged 18-80 years with lower limb fractures admitted in trauma triage and scheduled for surgery. Thepatients were randomly allocated equally into the EA group and the DUNLuPS group. A total of 20 anaesthesia trainees in the third year of residencywith clinical experience of more than 15 independent lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks were included in the study.A volume of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered in the lumbar plexus (Shamrock technique) but the volume used for sciatic nerve (subgluteal approach) was varied so that the cumulative dose did not exceed 3 mg/kg. For each block, the onset of nerve blockade was assessed every five minutes, and the assessments continued for an additional 30 minutes after the nerve blocks were finished. Clinical characteristics and adequacy of anaesthesia were comparable, i.e., 95.65% and93.47% success in the EA (n = 46) and DUNLuPS (n = 46) groups, respectively. Performance time was significantly more in the DUNLuPS group but followed by significantly less TOSB and TOMB. The time for the first analgesic request was 351.63 ± 148.70 minutes in the DUNLuPS group and 147.60 ± 52.65 minutes in the EAgroup (p < 0.0001). Both EA and DUNLuPS provide effective and comparable intra-operative anaesthesia for orthopaedic lower limb surgeries (OLLS) when administered by residents with more than two years of experience (third year of residency)in ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks in a high-volume level 1 trauma centre. Statistically significant differences in the block performance characteristicshad no clinical advantage as it was compensated by the faster onset time in the DUNLuPS group. Post-operative pain management was better in the DUNLuPS group, sothe practice and conduct of anaesthesia for trauma patients should focus on the establishment of "block rooms" and timely training of residents in the former so that the advantages can be extended to the patient population.

A Comparative Study Between Femoral Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Femur Fracture Fixation

Introduction: Femur fractures and their surgical fixations are common. Adequate postoperative pain relief is mandatory as it facilitates rapid recovery by enhancing early ambulation and mitigating stress response. This is barely achievable with conventional pain control methods. Ultrasound-guided regional blocks like femoral nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block are simple yet promising techniques for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures. Aims: To compare post-operative analgesia duration and satisfaction attained between the patients receiving ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with, those receiving ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block, after femur fracture fixation. Methods: Seventy-four patients, aged 16−85 years, of either sex, ASA I−II, who underwent femur fracture surgical fixations under spinal anesthesia, were randomly divided into two equal groups: groups 1 and group 2. Postoperatively, Group 1 (n= 37) received a femoral nerve block with 15 ml 2.5% bupivacaine whereas Group 2 (n = 37) received a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with 30 ml 2.5% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia, patients' level of satisfaction, visual analogue scale scores, and hemodynamic parameters at different time intervals were recorded in the first 24 hours postoperatively and compared. Results: The demographic profiles between the two groups were comparable. Group 2 had a significantly longer duration of analgesia than Group 1, with the means 795.14 vs 538.65 minutes respectively, and a P value of .002. Although group 1 patients had predominantly 3 and 4 levels of satisfaction whereas group 2 had 4 and 5, there was no statistically significant difference in patients’ level of satisfaction between the groups (P=.249). Conclusion: Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block provides a longer duration of analgesia than femoral nerve block in femur fracture fixation. The level of satisfaction in both groups is high and comparable.